✅ Features of AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum

The vacuum boasts impressive suction power, reaching up to 35,000Pa in its maximum mode. It offers a runtime of up to 50 minutes in normal mode, which decreases to around 20 minutes when using the max suction setting. Charging is straightforward, taking approximately 4 hours to reach a full charge.

The 2-in-1 roller brush is a welcome feature, designed to effectively clean all floor types. The brush head also incorporates a V-Shape anti-tangle design, a flexible swivel (0-180° side-to-side, 0-90° up and down), and an LED headlight to illuminate dark areas.

Filtration is handled by a 5-layer HEPA system, claiming to capture 99.99% of particles as small as 0.1 micron. The dust cup has a generous 1.5L capacity and is easily emptied with a one-button release.

The design is cordless and lightweight, offering versatility as it can be used as a handheld vacuum.

✅ What we like about AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum

One of the things I really like about this vacuum is its long battery life. It lasts for multiple uses, with some people even reporting a week on a single charge. Plus, the suction is incredibly powerful, making it really effective for cleaning up messes.

The vacuum is also very easy to use and to clean. The filters are reusable, which is a bonus, and cleaning them is a breeze. It's lightweight, making it easy to carry around.

Being cordless makes cleaning so much more convenient. I appreciate the handheld capability, too. That really helps with getting into those hard-to-reach spots.

The wall-mountable charging dock is a nice touch. It provides a designated spot to store the vacuum and keep it charged. One of the best things is that it's a good value for the money.

The light on the vacuum is a great feature for spotting dirt. And the small size makes it perfect for cleaning workspaces and cars.

✅ Key specs of AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum

The AUQQ H01-CVC is a stick vacuum designed for home use on various surfaces like hard floors, tile, hardwood, rugs, and bare floors. It boasts a strong suction power alongside an anti-hair tangle design. It features a 1.5L dust cup capacity, two adjustable suction modes, and an adjustable telescopic pole. It's cordless for convenient use.

The vacuum comes equipped with a HEPA filter and an accessory kit, making it a multi-functional cleaning tool. A flexible LED motorized floor brush helps with visibility and cleaning in dark areas. Customer service is available 24/7.

It has a runtime of 50 minutes and requires a 4-hour charging time. The maximum suction is 5.18 inches. The device is white and controlled via push button with a touch control method.

The vacuum is lightweight at 5 pounds with dimensions of 11"L x 7"W x 16.8"H. It utilizes a lithium-ion battery, and one is included. It was manufactured in 2023 and requires batteries to operate.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Dreame R10 Pro Cordless Vacuum

The AUQQ H01-CVC appears to have a potentially stronger suction based on its 35,000Pa rating, although this measurement isn't directly comparable to the Dreame R10 Pro's 150 AW. However, the Dreame offers a longer runtime of up to 65 minutes compared to the AUQQ's 50 minutes.

For filtration, the AUQQ boasts a slightly more effective system, capturing particles down to 0.1 microns with 99.99% efficiency, versus the Dreame's 0.3 microns at 99.9%. The AUQQ also has a significantly larger dust cup capacity at 1.5 Liters, making the Dreame's 0.6 Liters look quite small. The Dreame, however, charges faster, at 3.5 hours compared to the AUQQ's 4 hours.

The AUQQ is considerably lighter at 5 pounds, a significant advantage over the Dreame's 9.25 pounds. Both vacuums share anti-tangle brush features and LED headlights, though the Dreame provides a broader selection of brush heads.

The Dreame wins when it comes to included accessories. It has specific attachments like a Multi-Surface Brush, Soft Roller Brush, and Motorized Mini-Brush. The AUQQ only specifies an "Accessory Kit" without details. Customer ratings give the AUQQ a higher score of 4.4 out of 5 stars, while the Dreame gets a 3.8. Finally, the AUQQ seems to be the more affordable option, as indicated by its lower best seller rank.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. FABULETTA FSV006 Pro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The Fabuletta FSV006 Pro edges out the AUQQ H01-CVC in several key performance areas. Its maximum suction power reaches 38,000Pa, surpassing the AUQQ's 35,000Pa. The Fabuletta also provides a slightly longer maximum runtime of 55 minutes compared to the AUQQ's 50 minutes. The Fabuletta's significantly lighter weight, at 1.2 pounds versus the AUQQ's 5 pounds, makes it a more user-friendly option for extended cleaning sessions.

The Fabuletta offers a more comprehensive accessory package, with specifically listed items like a long crevice tool, dusting brush, and adjustable telescopic alloy tube, unlike the AUQQ's generic "Accessory Kit." The Fabuletta also offers three power levels, providing greater cleaning flexibility. Furthermore, the Fabuletta lists more attractive special features, including a 500W Brushless Motor, a Self-Standing Design, and is app controlled.

However, the AUQQ H01-CVC holds its own with a larger 1.5-liter dust cup, reducing the frequency of emptying. It also features a 5-layer HEPA filtration system, which may offer superior dust particle capture compared to the Fabuletta's standard HEPA filter. The AUQQ has slightly higher customer reviews at 4.4 out of 5 stars, but with a smaller sample size than Fabuletta.

Both vacuums share desirable brush head features, including a V-Shape Anti-Tangle design, LED Headlight, and flexibility, resulting in a tie in that category. Charging time is also identical at 4 hours, and both use a simple push-button controller type. Price information is absent, making a definitive comparison difficult.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. allseywell CP01A Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The allseywell CP01A edges out the AUQQ H01-CVC in suction power, boasting 36,000Pa compared to 35,000Pa. Both vacuums offer comparable runtime, with a maximum of 20 minutes and an Eco mode providing a similar range (50 mins for AUQQ H01-CVC and 45-55 mins for allseywell CP01A). The filter systems are also on par, both employing HEPA filters with similar levels of efficiency. Both vacuums also share the same dust cup capacity of 1.5L and have LED lights on the floor brush.

However, the allseywell CP01A shines with its lighter weight of 2.75 lbs versus the AUQQ H01-CVC's 5 lbs, promising easier maneuverability. The allseywell CP01A also features a detachable battery, offering the potential for extended use with a spare and simplified battery replacement. Noise is another area where the allseywell CP01A excels, operating at a measured 62 dB while the noise level of the AUQQ H01-CVC isn't specified.

The AUQQ H01-CVC wins on storage compactness with dimensions of 11"L x 7"W x 16.8"H, while allseywell CP01A is 6.28"L x 9.84"W x 42"H. The allseywell CP01A also features an all-in-one LED display, a potentially more user-friendly feature than the AUQQ H01-CVC's V-Shape Anti-tangle Brush.

The allseywell CP01A also stands out with a 2-year warranty and 1-year free returns, compared to AUQQ's 7*24 hours customer service. Customer ratings also favor the allseywell CP01A, with 4.5 stars compared to the AUQQ H01-CVC's 4.4 stars. Finally, the allseywell CP01A is a newer model manufactured in 2024, whereas the AUQQ H01-CVC was manufactured in 2023.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. ZCAISH Z01-US2 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The ZCAISH Z01-US2 edges out the AUQQ H01-CVC in a head-to-head comparison, primarily due to superior specifications. The ZCAISH boasts a higher suction power of 45,000 Pa compared to AUQQ's 35,000 Pa, suggesting better cleaning effectiveness. Furthermore, the ZCAISH lists a 550W motor, which is a key specification absent from the AUQQ's details.

While the ZCAISH offers a longer maximum runtime of 60 minutes, it's important to note this is at its minimum suction setting. Without knowing the AUQQ's runtime at max suction, it's difficult to do a like-for-like comparison. However, the ZCAISH does provide more specific battery information (7 x 2500mAh) implying potentially better battery performance and lifespan.

Both vacuums share a 4-hour charging time, feature a V-shaped anti-tangle floor brush with flexible design and LED headlights, and have a 1.5L dust cup capacity, resulting in a tie in these categories. However, the ZCAISH pulls ahead with its 5-layer HEPA filtration system that includes a fragrance component, offering an additional, albeit subjective, benefit. The inclusion of a touch screen on the ZCAISH also provides enhanced control and information display, a feature lacking in the AUQQ model.

The ZCAISH also claims to have more overall features. The AUQQ has a lighter weight at 5 lbs compared to the ZCAISH at 9 lbs, potentially making it easier to maneuver for some users. However, the ZCAISH has more customer ratings (384 ratings versus 52 ratings), giving us higher confidence in the ratings. The ZCAISH also has a better Best Seller Rank at #141 versus #332 for AUQQ. Finally, we are unable to compare price.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. SunSare US-X9 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

The SunSare US-X9 edges out the AUQQ H01-CVC in several key performance areas. It boasts a higher suction power (45,000 Pa implied from its 550W motor) compared to the AUQQ, suggesting superior cleaning capabilities. The US-X9 also offers a slightly longer runtime in Eco mode (60 minutes versus 50 minutes in normal mode for the AUQQ), providing more cleaning flexibility. Furthermore, the 7-Level Filtration of the SunSare is preferable to the 5-layer HEPA filtration of the AUQQ, particularly for allergy sufferers. The self-cleaning brush roller is a welcome convenience, not present in the AUQQ's V-Shape anti-tangle design.

Both vacuums share the same 1.5L dust cup capacity, resulting in a tie for this feature.

However, the AUQQ H01-CVC has some advantages. Its charging time is slightly faster (4 hours versus 4-5 hours for the SunSare) and it is significantly lighter (5 pounds versus 8 pounds), making it easier to maneuver.

The SunSare US-X9 has self-standing design, a feature not present in the AUQQ H01-CVC.

Customer ratings also favor the SunSare US-X9, with a higher average rating of 4.6 out of 5 based on a much larger sample size (188 ratings) compared to the AUQQ's 4.4 out of 5 with 52 ratings. Finally, SunSare has many Special Features to love such as self-standing, removable battery, and height adjustable

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Trucozie T352 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The Trucozie T352 edges out the AUQQ H01-CVC in suction power, boasting 45,000Pa compared to 35,000Pa. Both vacuums offer a runtime of up to 50 minutes, resulting in a tie in this category. However, the AUQQ H01-CVC wins in dust cup capacity with 1.5 Liters, offering less frequent emptying than the Trucozie T352's 0.7 Liters.

The Trucozie T352 features a 6-Stages E12-Level High-Efficiency Filtration system, giving it an advantage over the AUQQ H01-CVC's 5-layer HEPA. Its anti-tangle technology is specifically designed for pet homes, further surpassing the AUQQ's V-Shape Brush. The detachable battery of the Trucozie T352 also provides more flexibility for charging and extending runtime compared to the AUQQ's integrated battery.

The Trucozie T352 comes with a more comprehensive accessory set, including a charger, wall hanger, adjustable extension tube, battery pack, crevice tool, and LED big brush. However, the AUQQ H01-CVC is lighter, weighing 5 pounds compared to the Trucozie T352's 8.27 pounds, offering easier maneuverability.

The Trucozie T352 includes additional features such as self-standing capability, LED display, more suction settings, and one-click dust removal, giving it an advantage in convenience. The AUQQ H01-CVC is more popular. The Trucozie T352's customer reviews demonstrate a more reliable indication of satisfaction. Finally, the Trucozie T352 appears to be slightly more well-known.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. MUTGOF Sparkle 1 Cordless Vacuum

The MUTGOF Sparkle 1 demonstrably outperforms the AUQQ H01-CVC in several key areas. With a suction power of 45Kpa compared to the AUQQ's 35Kpa, it promises a more effective cleaning experience. The MUTGOF's 550W motor is also likely more powerful, given the AUQQ's unspecified wattage. Furthermore, the Sparkle 1 provides a longer runtime of up to 60 minutes versus the AUQQ's 50 minutes, allowing for extended cleaning sessions. Its 8-level cyclone multi-cone filtration system, including HEPA, surpasses the AUQQ's 5-layer HEPA system in trapping finer particles.

The MUTGOF also excels in brush design, incorporating a built-in comb in addition to the V-shape anti-tangle design for superior hair tangle prevention. In terms of Ergonomics, the double handle design offers a more comfortable and versatile cleaning experience, and the Aromatherapy Tablets provide a nice additional benefit.

However, the AUQQ edges out the MUTGOF in terms of noise level, where it is not specified. Furthermore, at 5 lbs, it is significantly lighter than the MUTGOF's 5.89 lbs, enhancing maneuverability.

While both vacuums share a 1.5L dust cup capacity, the MUTGOF Sparkle 1 takes the lead in customer satisfaction. It boasts a higher rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars with a significantly larger pool of 258 ratings, compared to the AUQQ's 4.4 stars with 52 ratings. The Sparkle 1 also has a far better best-seller rank, indicating greater popularity. Finally, all other things equal, more customers prefer the AUQQ, which is assumed to be the more economical of the two.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The dsorupa V10 Ultra clearly outperforms the AUQQ H01-CVC in several key areas. Its suction power of 45,000Pa is significantly higher than the AUQQ's 35,000Pa. The V10 Ultra also boasts a 550W motor. It wins out here, because the AUQQ motor wattage is not even stated.

Runtime on the dsorupa is up to 70 minutes on minimum. Its dust cup capacity is 1.8 Liters and filtration system has 8-layer HEPA. This beats the AUQQ H01-CVC's 50 minutes, 1.5 liters, and 5-layer HEPA. The V10 Ultra has a V-Shaped Anti-Tangle Soft & Hard Combination brush head, while the AUQQ is just V-Shape Anti-Tangle.

Furthermore, the dsorupa V10 Ultra includes an integrated LED display, a wall-mounted charging dock, and even aromatherapy. These features are missing in the AUQQ model. The V10 ultra also has an Ultra-Quiet Mode at 64dB. AUQQ does not state their noise level.

The AUQQ H01-CVC does have an edge in weight. At 5 pounds, its lighter than the dsorupa V10 Ultra at 8 pounds. This could be significant for users who prioritize maneuverability. Also, the price of the AUQQ is assumed to be cheaper, based on best seller ranking.

However, the dsorupa V10 Ultra boasts significantly higher customer review scores, with 4.9 out of 5 stars from 455 ratings, compared to the AUQQ's 4.4 out of 5 stars from only 52 ratings. The best seller rank is far better too, so the dsorupa seems to be preferred among customers.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Ciogu P2 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The AUQQ H01-CVC edges out the Ciogu P2 in suction power, boasting 35,000Pa compared to the Ciogu P2's 33,000Pa. However, the Ciogu P2 counters with a 400W Brushless motor, a type generally known for superior efficiency, durability, and quieter operation compared to standard motors. The AUQQ H01-CVC comes with additional suction level.

Runtime also favors the AUQQ H01-CVC on normal mode, offering 50 minutes versus the Ciogu P2's 45 minutes on Eco mode, although both have 20 minutes on Max mode. The AUQQ H01-CVC has a larger dust cup capacity at 1.5 Liters compared to the Ciogu P2's 1 Liter.

Both vacuums feature a 5-layer HEPA filtration system, making it a tie in this category. The AUQQ H01-CVC floor brush has a V-shape anti-tangle design, a specific advantage for hair pickup, and features both flexible brush and LED.

The Ciogu P2 includes a touch screen LED for easier control and feedback. The Ciogu P2 includes Adapter, Multiple Brush Heads & Telescopic Links.

The Ciogu P2 is lighter, weighing 4.5 pounds compared to the AUQQ H01-CVC's 5 pounds. The Ciogu P2 also boasts a higher customer review rating of 4.8 stars with significantly more reviews (269) compared to the AUQQ H01-CVC's 4.4 stars with 52 ratings.

The Ciogu P2 ranks much better as a best seller, at #18,621 in Home & Kitchen and #68 in Stick Vacuums, compared to the AUQQ H01-CVC's #206,618 in Home & Kitchen and #332 in Stick Vacuums. The AUQQ H01-CVC list additional features such as Strong suction power,Anti hair tangle design and large capacity dust cup.

Pricing remains unknown for both models, making a final value determination impossible. And finally, The charging time is better for the Ciogu P2, where as, the AUQQ H01-CVC remains unknown.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Ciogu P6-C17K-H08A Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

In a head-to-head comparison of the AUQQ H01-CVC and the Ciogu P6-C17K-H08A stick vacuums, several key differences emerge. The AUQQ boasts a slightly stronger suction power at 35,000Pa compared to the Ciogu's 33,000Pa, and a larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 liters versus 1 liter, reducing the frequency of emptying. The AUQQ also provides a V-Shape Anti-Tangle floor brush. Its dimensions are also more compact. Its marketing also boasts of more special features.

However, the Ciogu holds its own in several important categories. It specifies a 400W Brushless motor which is generally more efficient and durable. It features a touch screen control panel which is more modern than a push button. It is also lighter at 4.5 pounds, potentially making it easier to maneuver. The Ciogu also has a lower noise level which is an advantage for the end user.

Both vacuums offer comparable features such as HEPA filtration and runtime. Customer reviews suggest that the Ciogu has higher satisfaction with a higher average star rating. Furthermore, the Ciogu has a lower rank in stick vacuums & electric brooms suggesting a higher popularity with consumers.

✔ AUQQ H01-CVC Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

When comparing the AUQQ H01-CVC and the dsorupa SmartVac Pro, several factors come into play. Brand preference is subjective and results in a tie, but dsorupa takes the lead in suction power with 45KPa compared to AUQQ's 35KPa. The dsorupa also boasts a more powerful 550W brushless motor. The runtime is also better on the dsorupa with up to 60 minutes of cleaning versus AUQQ's up to 50 minutes, but both share a 1.5L dust cup capacity. Both models have a HEPA filter system, anti-tangle brush design, and LED lights.

The dsorupa SmartVac Pro stands out with its upgraded 550W motor, double handle design, intelligent display, and low noise operation. However, the AUQQ is lighter at 5 lbs compared to dsorupa's 8 lbs, and offers a slightly faster charging time.

dsorupa leads with higher customer ratings (4.9 out of 5 stars) based on 52 reviews. The dsorupa also provides more concrete special features like it's upgraded 550W brushless motor, double handle design, adjustable extension tube, low noise ≤ 63 dB and intelligent display.

Warranty and support favors dsorupa with a 2-year protection plan versus the AUQQ's 24/7 customer service. Lastly, The dsorupa is also the newer model, manufactured in 2025 compared to 2023 for the AUQQ.

✅ Conclusion

In conclusion, the AUQQ H01-CVC stick vacuum offers a compelling blend of power, convenience, and value. Its strong suction, long battery life, and versatile design make it a capable tool for tackling various cleaning tasks around the home. The inclusion of features like the anti-tangle brush, HEPA filtration, and LED headlight further enhance its usability. While the charging time is a bit lengthy, the overall performance and thoughtful design elements make it a worthwhile investment for those seeking a cordless and lightweight cleaning solution. The handheld functionality and included accessories further solidify its position as a multi-functional cleaning device suitable for a range of surfaces and spaces.