✅ Features of BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 Wet Dry Vacuum

The product boasts a 3-in-1 cleaning function: vacuuming, mopping, and self-cleaning. It claims powerful suction and hydro mopping capabilities, tackling dirt, debris, wet messes, stains, and grime, with a promise of streak-free surfaces.

Surface compatibility is another key feature, with the device being suitable for all sealed hard floors like hardwood, tile, marble, and laminate. The inclusion of cleaning tablets aims to improve cleaning performance, eliminate odors, and prevent their return.

The water tank capacity is generous, featuring a 650ML clean water tank and a 550ML waste water tank. This should allow for cleaning larger areas without constant refills. The tanks are designed for easy disassembly and cleaning, which is a plus.

The self-cleaning mode is activated with a single button when the mop is on its base. This function cleans and decontaminates the brush, reducing the need for manual intervention.

Finally, the product includes a 24-hour after-sales service. The package contains the cordless hard floor vacuum mop cleaner, a roller brush, three cleaning tablets, a base, and a HEPA filter assembly.

✅ What we like about BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 Wet Dry Vacuum

This product boasts several appealing features. Many users praise its lightweight design and maneuverability, highlighting how easy it is to move around, even when filled with water. The smooth rolling action further contributes to the user-friendly experience. It is able to clean right to the edge and get to the hard to reach places.

Another advantage is the low noise level during operation, making it less disruptive than other cleaning appliances. The simple bin removal and replacement process is appreciated, streamlining the emptying and reassembly tasks. Furthermore, users found the hard floor mopping to be effective, reducing the amount of scrubbing required compared to traditional mopping methods, and complimented its ability to remove dirty water.

The self-cleaning mode is also a welcomed feature, offering convenience in maintaining the mop head. The machine is very easy to use and makes the mopping job very easy. It does not stress the back when in use.

The charging station makes it easy to keep the vacuum charged and ready. Some users have also found it effective for cleaning area rugs, making it a good maintenance tool. Its overall ease of setup and the ability to quickly switch between modes is an advantage.

✅ Key specs of BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 Wet Dry Vacuum

The BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 is a cordless stick vacuum designed for indoor use, particularly on hard floors. It has a HEPA filter for trapping allergens and comes with a light kit for improved visibility. The vacuum is primarily black in color and has a handheld form factor for versatile cleaning.

The specifications reveal it operates on battery power, requiring one Lithium Ion battery which is included. The runtime is approximately 5 hours with a wattage of 180 Watt-hours. The motor operates at 100 Watts. The unit is designed with push button and touch controls for user-friendly operation.

Dimensions are 11.46 inches in length, 10.2 inches in width, and 42.56 inches in height. The unit has a single handle and weighs 9.92 pounds. The vacuum has a capacity of 0.9 pounds and a maximum recommended load of 16.2 pounds.

This vacuum is listed as number 560 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms, and number 438,159 in Home & Kitchen.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 Wet Dry Vacuum vs. Shark AW261 Wet Dry Vacuum

Shark emerges as the overall winner in this head-to-head comparison with the BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01, primarily due to its more established brand reputation in floor cleaning and significantly higher customer ratings. Both units offer essential 3-in-1 cleaning functionality, acting as vacuums, mops, and self-cleaning devices.

A key difference lies in surface compatibility. While the BLACK+DECKER is limited to sealed hard floors, the Shark extends its reach to area rugs, adding versatility. However, BLACK+DECKER boasts a substantially larger water tank capacity (650ML clean/550ML dirty) compared to Shark's smaller 0.38 quarts (approximately 360ML) combined tank. This means less frequent refills/emptying during cleaning sessions.

Regarding self-cleaning, Shark's continuous self-cleaning feature combined with a rinse cycle on the dock seems more thorough. Shark also gains an advantage with its cleaning solution, offering a multi-surface concentrate with odor neutralizers. Both are cordless, but BLACK+DECKER uses HEPA filtration which is generally considered superior for capturing fine particles and allergens.

Shark compensates by including more components in the package, such as extra brushrolls, cleaning solution, and a charging dock. It also incorporates an LED display, providing helpful information about battery life and tank levels. While the BLACK+DECKER claims an impressive 5-hour runtime, the Shark is lighter at 8.46 lbs, which is easier to maneuver. A final point, the Shark shows a more popular rating and list price.

✔ BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 Wet Dry Vacuum vs. Ultenic U12 Cordless Vacuum

Let's break down the BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 versus the ULtenic U12. The BLACK+DECKER is a 3-in-1 wet dry vacuum mop, giving it an edge if you need mopping functionality, while the ULtenic is a more traditional stick vacuum. Both are cordless, offering flexibility in cleaning.

The ULtenic pulls ahead in special features. Its powerful 450W motor, impressive 40,000Pa suction, LED headlights, and digital display make it a feature-rich choice. Both vacuums use HEPA filters.

The BLACK+DECKER has a slightly larger tank capacity for both clean and waste water, but the ULtenic boasts a much higher wattage, suggesting greater suction power. Runtime is a significant win for the BLACK+DECKER with 5 hours, while the ULtenic offers 45 minutes in ECO mode. The ULtenic charges faster, around 4 hours.

In terms of raw power, the ULtenic delivers with 40,000Pa of suction. The ULtenic is also much lighter and more compact, enhancing maneuverability.

Customer ratings favor the ULtenic, with a significantly higher average rating and a larger number of reviews. Both come with attachments, catering to different cleaning needs. The ULtenic is versatile and suitable for a wider range of cleaning tasks.

✔ BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 Wet Dry Vacuum vs. JONR ED12 Cordless Wet Dry Vacuum

Black+Decker edges out JONR primarily due to its brand reputation. Both offer similar core cleaning functionalities of vacuuming, mopping, and self-cleaning, leading to a tie in this regard. However, Black+Decker's water tank capacity, boasting 650ml for clean water and 550ml for dirty water, proves superior in its balance, allowing for longer cleaning sessions and better waste management compared to JONR's 850ml/450ml split. Both are cordless, ensuring hassle-free movement.

JONR wins in terms of weight, being a more maneuverable 7.89 lbs compared to Black+Decker's 9.92 lbs. However, Black+Decker retaliates with a vastly superior runtime of 5 hours, overshadowing JONR's 25 minutes. JONR compensates with a quicker 4-hour charging time. JONR's 200W wattage suggests potentially stronger suction power than Black+Decker's 180W.

Black+Decker redeems itself with a HEPA filter, generally providing better filtration than JONR's sponge filter. However, JONR boasts more diverse and well-defined special features, including wet/dry capabilities, lightweight design, edge-cleaning, cordless operation, and self-propelled movement. Self-cleaning is equally convenient on both, with one-button or one-step activation.

JONR's inclusion of edge-cleaning is a significant advantage. Customer reviews heavily favor JONR, with a 4.4-star rating from 172 ratings, vastly outperforming Black+Decker's 3.6-star rating from 28 ratings. Similarly, JONR's Best Seller Rank in Home & Kitchen is significantly better at #103,457 compared to Black+Decker's #438,159.

JONR includes cleaning solution within its accessories. I was also able to find out from JONR the Noise Level (75db).

✔ BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 Wet Dry Vacuum vs. Farberware VC-D11B Stick Vacuum Cleaner

The Black+Decker BXUVXA01 edges out the Farberware VC-D11B in cleaning type, offering both wet/dry vacuuming and mopping capabilities, while the Farberware is only a dry vacuum. The Black+Decker also boasts a larger water tank capacity and self-cleaning function, adding to its convenience. A significantly longer cordless runtime of 5 hours further favors the Black+Decker.

However, the Farberware VC-D11B offers greater surface compatibility, capable of cleaning hard floors and carpets. It also features a larger dustbin capacity, reducing the frequency of emptying.

While both feature filters, they each have their merits. The HEPA filter in the Black+Decker generally provides superior allergen filtration, but the washable cloth filter in the Farberware is more economical in the long run.

A major advantage of the Farberware is its lighter weight, making it easier to maneuver. The Farberware also includes a wider range of special features like a bendable design, smart sensor technology, a smart LED display, and a lighted motor brush, along with accessories like a dusting brush, crevice tool and charging dock.

In terms of performance, the Farberware's higher suction power rating suggests better cleaning capabilities. Finally, the Farberware enjoys a higher customer rating, reflecting greater satisfaction. Without pricing information, it's impossible to definitively declare an overall winner as both have strengths and potential areas for improvement.

✔ BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 Wet Dry Vacuum vs. Shark WW201 Cordless Hard Floor Cleaning System

The Shark WW201 edges out the Black+Decker BXUVXA01 due to its more comprehensive cleaning functionalities. The Shark offers vacuuming, mopping, scrubbing, on-demand spray, and even dry-only cleaning, surpassing the Black+Decker's basic vacuuming, mopping, and self-cleaning features. However, both devices are suitable for a range of sealed hard floor surfaces including hardwood, tile, marble, and laminate.

A key difference lies in water tank capacity. The Black+Decker holds a substantial 650ML of clean water and 550ML for waste, while the Shark has a smaller 420ML total capacity. This suggests the Black+Decker can handle longer cleaning sessions before needing a refill or emptying. Both models feature self-cleaning brushrolls.

The Shark's significantly lighter weight (5 pounds compared to Black+Decker's 9.92 pounds) makes it easier to maneuver and carry around the house. Both are cordless for convenience.

The Shark WW201 provides extra value with its included antimicrobial brushroll and Shark Hydro Multi-Surface Concentrate, whereas the Black+Decker comes with a roller brush, cleaning tablets, a base, and a HEPA filter assembly.

Customer reviews also slightly favor the Shark, with a rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars compared to the Black+Decker's 3.6. Furthermore, the Shark holds a much higher bestseller rank, indicating greater popularity. The Black+Decker, however, boasts a 5 hour runtime, whereas the Shark does not specify this information. Both include odor control.

✅ Conclusion

The BLACK+DECKER BXUVXA01 presents a compelling package for those seeking an all-in-one hard floor cleaning solution. Its 3-in-1 functionality, coupled with the convenience of self-cleaning and ease of use, makes it a strong contender for simplifying floor maintenance. The lightweight design and maneuverability are significant advantages, especially for users who find traditional mopping cumbersome. While primarily designed for hard floors, some users have found success using it on area rugs, adding to its versatility. Ultimately, the BXUVXA01 appears to be a well-rounded appliance that delivers on its promise of efficient and convenient hard floor cleaning.