✅ Features of BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The cordless vacuum boasts dual power settings, 11KPa (high - 15 mins) and 7KPa (low - 25 mins), making it suitable for various cleaning tasks. It can handle cat litter, coffee beans, hair, and fine dust effectively.

Weighing only 3.5 lbs, the vacuum is lightweight. The handle design aims to reduce arm fatigue. Its compact size makes storage convenient, especially in smaller living spaces.

The filtration system includes a steel mesh filter for larger particles and a washable HEPA filter for fine dust. The inclusion of an extra HEPA filter is a plus for maintaining filtration efficiency over time.

The direct-suction brush is designed to prevent hair tangling, making it suitable for wood floors and both long and short carpets.

A specialized brush is provided for cleaning sofas and cars, enhancing its versatility. The vacuum can be used as a car vacuum for on-the-go cleaning.

A 12-Month Worry-Free After-Sales Service is offered. A dedicated after-sales team is available to address product-related issues, and direct contact is facilitated for prompt resolution.

✅ What we like about BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The lightweight design is a huge plus. I can easily maneuver it with one hand. It makes quick cleanups a breeze, especially on hardwood floors and low shag carpets.

Ease of use is another strong point. Assembly is simple, and the cordless design adds to the overall convenience, particularly when cleaning hard floors.

The vacuum's appearance is also well-received. Many customers find it cute and appreciate the color options.

I've noticed that some are surprised by the suction power. For light cleaning and pet hair removal, it seems to be sufficient.

Value for money is another benefit mentioned, especially considering the price point. Some consider it a good deal.

Functionality is also a key advantage. It works well for picking up pet fur and quick tidying up during the week on various floor types like carpets and hardwood.

✅ Key specs of BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The BUTY BULU LK-W05 stick vacuum boasts a HEPA filter and an extra filter for enhanced air purification, complemented by a steel mesh filter for larger debris. The package includes the main motor, dust cup, HEPA filter, tube, three brush attachments, and an extra filter.

This is a cordless vacuum with an 800-milliliter capacity, powered by 120 watts. It offers a runtime of 20 minutes with a charging time of also 20 minutes. Recommended surfaces include carpet and hard floors.

The vacuum is a stick form factor, colored in "Cordless-w05," and is designated as model LK-W05. Its dimensions are 2.5 inches in length, 2.5 inches in width, and 41 inches in height. It runs on a Lithium-Ion battery, with a noise level of 75 dB. Battery life is also rated at 20 minutes.

Operation is via a push-button controller and touch control method, with two power levels to choose from. The product has seven total USB ports (not sure what that's for, honestly). It's designed for indoor use, weighs 3.2 pounds, and originates from China.

The vacuum requires one Lithium-Ion battery, which is included. Customer reviews average 3.6 out of 5 stars from 245 ratings. It holds a Best Sellers Rank of #94,426 in Home & Kitchen and #203 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NES100 Stick Vacuum

The BUTY BULU LK-W05 boasts the advantage of being cordless, offering greater flexibility than the corded Eureka NES100. However, the Eureka is lighter at 2.8 lbs compared to the BUTY BULU's 3.2 lbs, making it easier to maneuver.

When it comes to power, the Eureka NES100 takes the lead with its 240W, as the BUTY BULU's 120W and KPa rating do not provide a clear comparison. Furthermore, the corded Eureka has continuous runtime, a major benefit over the BUTY BULU's limited 15-25 minute battery life.

The BUTY BULU redeems itself with a superior HEPA filter system compared to the Eureka's foam filter, and a larger dust cup capacity of 0.8 Liters versus the Eureka's 0.7 Liters, which translates to less frequent emptying.

The special features category is a tie, depending on individual needs. The BUTY BULU includes an extra HEPA filter, while the Eureka offers a lightweight design and converts to a handheld vacuum. The BUTY BULU also wins out on noise level, operating at a quieter 75 dB compared to the Eureka's 84 dB.

Both vacuums are versatile. The BUTY BULU specifically mentions being suitable for sofas and cars, while the Eureka highlights its handheld conversion for these tasks. However, the Eureka NES100 significantly outperforms the BUTY BULU in customer ratings and bestseller rank. The Eureka has a much higher rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars based on a massive 110,015 ratings, compared to the BUTY BULU's 3.6 out of 5 stars from only 245 ratings. The Eureka also holds a much higher bestseller rank at #2 in stick vacuums, versus the BUTY BULU's #203.

✔ BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Kenmore DS1020 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Kenmore emerges as the preferred brand due to its established reputation and trustworthiness in the home appliance market. While both vacuums are cordless, the BUTY BULU boasts a significantly lighter weight, enhancing maneuverability and ease of carrying. However, Kenmore offers a longer runtime on its Eco Mode.

A notable advantage for the BUTY BULU is its rapid charging time, dwarfing Kenmore's. Furthermore, the BUTY BULU features a larger dustbin capacity, allowing for extended cleaning sessions before needing to be emptied.

The BUTY BULU also appears to have the upper hand in suction power, likely translating to superior cleaning performance. Its filtration system, utilizing a steel mesh and HEPA filter (with an extra HEPA filter included), is more effective at trapping fine dust and allergens than Kenmore's cloth filter. The inclusion of an extra HEPA filter adds further value. The BUTY BULU also has more brush attachments for cleaning a variety of surfaces.

However, Kenmore generates slightly less noise during operation. More significantly, customer reviews reveal a strong preference for Kenmore, with a higher rating and a significantly larger number of ratings, indicating greater customer satisfaction and reliability.

The BUTY BULU offers a unique feature with its 7 total USB ports, adding a charging functionality that Kenmore lacks.

✔ BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. FABULETTA FSV006 Pro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

When comparing the BUTY BULU LK-W05 and the FABULETTA FSV006 Pro cordless stick vacuums, several factors contribute to an overall assessment. Brand recognition is subjective. FABULETTA wins in the "Special Features" category due to a broader range, including a longer runtime, self-standing design, various suction modes, and a powerful brushless motor. However, the BUTY BULU edges out FABULETTA regarding filter type, as it offers both a HEPA and a steel mesh filter.

Regarding included components, FABULETTA pulls ahead with a more comprehensive set of tools and accessories suited for diverse cleaning scenarios. The capacity is also larger at 1 Liter for FABULETTA, compared to BUTY BULU's 800 Milliliters.

FABULETTA boasts a significantly higher wattage (500W vs 120W), suggesting stronger motor performance. The runtime is much longer on FABULETTA (55 minutes vs 20 minutes). BUTY BULU has a much faster charging time, taking only 20 minutes compared to FABULETTA's 4 hours. The "Recommended Uses" category is won by FABULETTA with more explicit details on suitable surfaces and specific attachments.

FABULETTA provides a more detailed description of the battery, explicitly mentioning its voltage. FABULETTA takes the lead on battery life, with 55 minutes compared to 20 minutes. Regarding control method, FABULETTA wins because it has App control. FABULETTA wins as it has more power level options, providing more flexibility. BUTY BULU has total USB ports of 7.

FABULETTA is significantly lighter at 1.2 pounds, offering better maneuverability compared to BUTY BULU's 3.2 pounds. Customer reviews favor FABULETTA with a higher rating of 4.3 stars and lower "Best Sellers Rank". Finally, FABULETTA also offers more detail in battery description.

✔ BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Trucozie T350 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Trucozie wins for better brand recognition, although the price difference is undetermined without actual figures. Both vacuums are cordless, resulting in a tie.

The BUTY BULU is significantly lighter at 3.2 lbs compared to Trucozie's 6 lbs. However, Trucozie boasts a longer runtime of 45 minutes versus BUTY BULU's 25 minutes. BUTY BULU has a faster charging time of only 20 minutes compared to Trucozie's lengthy 5 hours.

The BUTY BULU also edges out in capacity with an 800ml dustbin against Trucozie's 600ml. Trucozie pulls ahead in wattage with 150 watts compared to BUTY BULU's 120 watts, suggesting potentially better suction power.

Trucozie demonstrates a more advanced filtration system with metal and HEPA filters compared to BUTY BULU's steel mesh and HEPA. Trucozie also includes more filters – 3 (2 HEPA, 1 standard) versus BUTY BULU's 2 (both HEPA).

Trucozie excels with its special features, including an LED display, a de-tangle brush, 3 suction modes, and an 8-in-1 lightweight design. The Trucozie also has 3 power levels against BUTY BULU's 2. The Trucozie's V-shape de-tangle brush is designed to prevent hair tangling.

Trucozie includes more and better accessories: an adjustable extension tube, a 2-in-1 crevice tool, a sofa brush, and a wall hanger, versus BUTY BULU's tube, 3 brushes, and an extra filter. Both vacuums have a noise level of 75 dB, resulting in a tie.

Customer reviews heavily favor Trucozie, with a 4.4 out of 5 stars from 1,055 ratings, compared to BUTY BULU's 3.6 out of 5 stars from 245 ratings. The best seller rank shows Trucozie at #7 in stick vacuums, while BUTY BULU is at #203, highlighting much stronger sales.

BUTY BULU includes 7 USB ports, where as Trucozie has none. Trucozie uses 7 lithium ion batteries compared to BUTY BULU's 1, which gives Trucozie a more powerful battery. BUTY BULU is more compact in dimensions (2.5"L x 2.5"W x 41"H) compared to Trucozie's (16.9"L x 11.2"W x 7.2"H).

Overall, Trucozie emerges as the superior choice based on better customer reviews, higher wattage, more features, more accessories and battery.

✔ BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VCS-90B1 Stick Vacuum

The BUTY BULU LK-W05 edges out the FARBERWARE VCS-90B1 in cordless convenience, offering more freedom than its corded counterpart. However, the FARBERWARE strikes back with a superior 18 KPa suction power, potentially offering more effective cleaning. The BUTY BULU offers HEPA and Steel Mesh filter while the FARBERWARE utilizes a cloth filter. The FARBERWARE is also significantly lighter at 1 lb compared to the BUTY BULU's 3.2 lbs. Both share a dustbin capacity of 0.8 liters.

The BUTY BULU has a runtime of 15-25 minutes on battery, however, a corded model such as FARBERWARE has the convenience of constant operation by removing the need to charge. Speaking of charging, the FARBERWARE is always ready to use, providing immediate cleaning capability. The BUTY BULU offers a greater array of attachments, including three brushes versus FARBERWARE's dust brush and crevice tool. However, the FARBERWARE counters with useful features like a headlight, washable filter, and wall mount for easy storage.

Customer reviews favor the FARBERWARE, sporting a 4.3-star rating compared to the BUTY BULU's 3.6 stars. The BUTY BULU has lower price, but offers better versatility. In addition, the FARBERWARE operates at lower noise levels, which is better. The BUTY BULU features 7 USB ports.

✔ BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. TITIPOY A27B Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The TITIPOY A27B generally outperforms the BUTY BULU LK-W05 in key performance areas. The TITIPOY boasts a significantly stronger suction power of 30KPa compared to BUTY BULU's 11KPa/7KPa, and its 300W power rating dwarfs the BUTY BULU's 120W.

Runtime is also a clear advantage for the TITIPOY, offering 45 minutes in Eco mode versus BUTY BULU's 15-25 minutes. The TITIPOY's larger 1.5-liter dust cup means less frequent emptying than the BUTY BULU's 0.8-liter capacity. Furthermore, the TITIPOY features a superior 6-stage high-efficiency (HEPA) filtration system, while the BUTY BULU uses a steel mesh and HEPA filter. Finally, the TITIPOY adds value with its LED display and detachable battery.

However, the BUTY BULU LK-W05 has some advantages. It's considerably lighter at 3.2 pounds compared to the TITIPOY's 7.05 pounds, making it easier to maneuver.

The BUTY BULU also has a more compact design with dimensions of 2.5"L x 2.5"W x 41"H, whereas the TITIPOY measures 10"L x 7.09"W x 17"H. Also, only BUTY BULU has 7 USB ports, and while the noise level is not specified for the TITIPOY, the BUTY BULU operates at 75 dB.

The TITIPOY scores higher in customer reviews, with a rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars compared to BUTY BULU's 3.6 out of 5 stars. The TITIPOY also has a higher Best Seller Rank at #145 in Stick Vacuums, versus the BUTY BULU's #203. Without pricing information for either product, it's impossible to determine which offers better value.

✔ BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. BSNAW X8-Pro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

When comparing the BUTY BULU LK-W05 and the BSNAW X8-Pro cordless vacuums, several factors stand out. Both are cordless, making them convenient for use anywhere. However, brand preference is subjective.

The BSNAW X8-Pro boasts significantly higher suction power at 35KPa compared to the BUTY BULU's 11KPa (High) and 7KPa (Low). The BSNAW also has a higher wattage of 250W, indicating a stronger motor, and offers a longer runtime of 40 minutes on standard mode, whereas the BUTY BULU provides 15 minutes on high and 25 minutes on low. On the flip side, the BUTY BULU charges in a mere 20 minutes, while the BSNAW takes a considerable 4 hours.

The BSNAW also features a more advanced filtration system with HEPA, stainless steel, and cyclonic separation, along with a slightly larger dustbin capacity of 1 kilogram compared to the BUTY BULU's 800 ml. However, the BUTY BULU is considerably lighter at 3.2 lbs, making it easier to maneuver compared to the BSNAW's 6.93 lbs.

Both vacuums include three attachments. However, the BSNAW X8-Pro includes more convenient special features like a bendable head, LED lights, and a self-standing design, while the BUTY BULU only offers an extra filter. Customer reviews also favor the BSNAW, with a rating of 4.4 out of 5 from 56 ratings, compared to the BUTY BULU's 3.6 out of 5 from 245 ratings.

The BSNAW X8-Pro comes with a 3-year return & exchange policy and 24/7 after-sales service, offering greater peace of mind compared to the BUTY BULU's 12-month warranty. The BUTY BULU has a noise level of 75 dB. Finally, the BUTY BULU has 7 USB ports.

✔ BUTY BULU LK-W05 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Ciogu P6-C17K-H08A Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The Ciogu P6-C17K-H08A edges out the BUTY BULU LK-W05 overall. Ciogu has a more established brand presence, indicated by slightly higher customer ratings. While BUTY BULU is lighter at 3.2 lbs compared to Ciogu's 4.5 lbs, and more compact in dimensions, Ciogu compensates with superior performance in other areas.

Ciogu boasts a significantly higher suction power of 33KPa versus BUTY BULU's maximum of 11KPa. Runtime is also in Ciogu's favor, offering 20 minutes on Max and 45 minutes on Eco mode, exceeding BUTY BULU's 15 minutes (High) and 25 minutes (Low). Ciogu’s larger 1-liter dustbin capacity also reduces the frequency of emptying compared to the 800 Milliliters of the BUTY BULU.

BUTY BULU includes a steel mesh filter alongside the HEPA filter, while Ciogu uses only a HEPA filter. However, the Ciogu boasts a higher wattage of 400 watts, suggesting a more powerful motor, and operates at a quieter 65 dB compared to the BUTY BULU's 75 dB.

The Ciogu P6-C17K-H08A offers a broader range of special features, including LED headlights, a touch screen & LED display, and a 5-stage filtration system, against BUTY BULU's simple inclusion of an extra filter. Ciogu comes with multiple brush heads and telescopic links offering more versatility than BUTY BULU’s provided brush heads.

The BUTY BULU has a customer review rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars from 245 ratings. Ciogu, has a higher average rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars, derived from 173 ratings. The BUTY BULU includes USB ports, functionality unclear. The Ciogu model does not have any USB ports.

✅ Conclusion

The BUTY BULU LK-W05 presents a compelling option for those seeking a lightweight and convenient cordless vacuum. Its dual power settings and assortment of attachments cater to a range of cleaning tasks, from pet hair removal to quick tidying on both hard floors and carpets. While the suction power may be best suited for lighter cleaning, the inclusion of a HEPA filter and an extra filter contribute to effective air purification. The vacuum's lightweight design, ease of use, and appreciated aesthetics further enhance its appeal, especially at its given price point. However, the 20-minute runtime and discrepancies regarding the USB ports warrant consideration, potentially impacting user experience and perceived value. Overall, the LK-W05 offers a practical solution for smaller living spaces and quick cleanups, backed by a worry-free after-sales service, but potential buyers should weigh its limitations against their specific cleaning needs.