The Axial Cyclone Technology employed appears effective at separating dirt and dust, contributing to sustained cleaning power. The 5-Step Filtration System, incorporating a 2-layer foam filter and a sealed E10 emission filter, suggests a thorough approach to trapping fine particles.
The Motorized Bristle Nozzle’s versatility across various floor types—carpets, hardwood, and others—is a definite plus. The Integrated Hand Unit offers added convenience, enabling cleaning of surfaces beyond just floors.
A runtime of up to 50 minutes on a single charge is quite acceptable.
The Brushroll Clean Technology, which automatically removes hair and fibers with the push of a button, is a very welcome feature.
The ease of use is a major selling point, with features like a lightweight design, comfortable handle, cordless operation, easy setup, and simple dirt cup emptying. Instructional videos are also available, making it user-friendly.
The lightweight design is beneficial, making the vacuum easy to maneuver and preventing user strain.
The vacuum boasts strong suction power, with two settings available. It performs well on hard floors and effectively picks up cat hair and litter.
The vacuum quality is evident in its ability to clean apartments thoroughly. It picks up dust, outdoor debris, and effectively cleans crevices, baseboards, and even Berber carpet.
Several features and functionalities enhance its appeal, including a handheld attachment, washable filter assembly, telescoping crevice wand with dusting brush, and a brush roll detangler.
The design and build are well-considered, featuring a stand-up charging design, bright light for visibility, HEPA filter, good dirt containment in the canister, and an overall solid and premium feel.
It is particularly suitable for hardwood and tile floors, performing effectively on these surfaces.
For some, the value is excellent, with a price lower than comparable vacuums. It's also sturdy and easy to assemble.
Battery life is satisfactory for some users, delivering the advertised duration and proving sufficient for small apartments.
The Electrolux WellQ7 is a lightweight stick vacuum designed for indoor use on both carpets and hard floors. It weighs in at 6 pounds and boasts a cordless design powered by a Lithium-Ion battery. The vacuum has a runtime of 50 minutes.
This model has a capacity of 0.3 liters and operates at 1200 watts. It includes an adaptor and utilizes a foam filter. Its dimensions are 10.04"L x 5.5"W x 43.3"H, featuring a single handle and a push button control. It's styled in a standard form factor with a granite grey finish.
The WellQ7 features touch controls and offers two power levels. The noise level is rated at 70 dB. This Electrolux model number is EHVS35S2AU.
The vacuum requires Lithium-Ion batteries, which are included. Electrolux provides a 2-year manufacturer warranty. The UPC is 012505284700 and the ASIN is B0BFJ93NPY.
Electrolux wins on brand reputation, being generally considered higher-end. It also triumphs in the cordless versus corded debate, offering greater freedom. Electrolux also has some more advanced features such as Axial Cyclone Technology and Brushroll Clean, compared to Eureka's Swivel Steering and 3-in-1 design. The Eureka vacuum cleaner features a HEPA filter, outperforming Electrolux's Foam & E10 Emission Filter in terms of filtration effectiveness.
Eureka offers double the capacity at 0.6 Liters, requiring less frequent emptying. Electrolux comes out on top with 1200 watts. While Eureka is significantly lower at 240 watts. Electrolux has a runtime of 50 minutes due to being cordless. The Electrolux vacuum works on carpets and hard floors, whereas the Eureka specializes on bare floors, hardwood, and tile floors.
Eureka wins in terms of versatility with its 3-in-1 form factor (Handheld, Stick, Upright). It's also lighter, weighing only 3.97 pounds compared to Electrolux's 6 pounds. Electrolux, with a noise level of 70 dB, is quieter than Eureka's 84 dB.
Eureka edges out Electrolux in customer satisfaction, boasting a 4.1-star rating from a massive 110,015 reviews. Eureka generally is a lot more affordable than the Electrolux. Eureka has Swivel Steering to increase the vacuum's maneuverability.
Axial Cyclone Technology beats the 180-degree EasySteer Technology due to its efficient dirt and dust separation, leading to consistent performance. The Electrolux EHVS35S2AU also features a superior 5-step filtration system, complete with an E10 emission filter, ensuring better particle capture than the EHVS2510AW's Cartridge Filter. A slightly longer runtime of up to 50 minutes further tips the scales in favor of the first product. The power is significantly more in the first product with 1200 watts. The weight of the first product is only 6 pounds.
However, the Electrolux EHVS2510AW gains ground with its larger 0.5-liter capacity, requiring less frequent emptying. It also boasts a quieter operation at 60 dB, compared to the EHVS35S2AU's 70 dB. Customer satisfaction seems to be higher for the second product, reflected in its 4.4-star rating from a substantial 1,742 reviews. The second product features more accessories.
Moreover, its higher best-seller rank suggests greater popularity and sales. Lastly, the Electrolux EHVS2510AW is faster to charge.
The Electrolux Ultimate700 (EHVS75S1AO) edges out the WellQ7 (EHVS35S2AU) by providing more model information. However, the WellQ7's Axial Cyclone technology could provide more consistent cleaning.
The Ultimate700 is lighter at 4.8 pounds compared to the WellQ7's 6 pounds, and it incorporates 43% recycled plastic in its construction, making it the better eco-conscious choice. Its PowerPro nozzle with LED lights enhances visibility. It also filters particles down to 0.3 microns for cleaner air and includes a more comprehensive set of attachments.
While the WellQ7 boasts a higher wattage of 1200 compared to the Ultimate700's 250, both offer a runtime of up to 50 minutes. The Ultimate700 clearly states its 4.5-hour charging time.
Noise is a factor, the WellQ7 operates at a quieter 70 dB compared to the Ultimate700's 80 dB. The Ultimate700 has 4 power levels compared to the WellQ7, which only has 2.
The WellQ7 has a slight edge in customer satisfaction with a rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars from 336 reviews. It also has a slimmer width, making it easier to store. The price comparison, however, remains undetermined without current pricing data.
Electrolux edges out SunSare in brand recognition, being a more established player in the appliance market. However, SunSare appears to be more competitively priced based on BSR data, indicating a stronger position in the stick vacuum market.
SunSare boasts a significantly higher suction power at 40,000 Pa, a much larger dustbin capacity of 1.5 Liters, and a more effective multi-stage filtration system including a HEPA filter.
The SunSare also provides a slightly longer runtime of up to 55 minutes and operates at a quieter 62 dB, while weighing in at a lighter 5.5 pounds.
Electrolux has a higher wattage at 1200, which could mean more motor power, but the suction power is more of an indicator. The special features are a tie, though the Electrolux prioritizes cleaning convenience with its Axial Cyclone and Brushroll Clean Technology, while the SunSare focuses on user information and visibility with its smart screen, edge clean design, and LED light.
Customer reviews heavily favor SunSare, with a higher average rating of 4.5 stars from a larger pool of 740 ratings. Electrolux offers a 2-year manufacturer warranty, while SunSare does not specify the warranty. Lastly, only SunSare has smart screen.
Electrolux edges out OXVAC in brand recognition, being a more established name in the appliance market. However, OXVAC boasts a specifically stated suction power of 45kpa, while Electrolux lacks a quantified suction rating, giving OXVAC the win in this category.
Electrolux counters with a more powerful 1200W motor compared to OXVAC's 550W. But OXVAC recovers ground with a significantly larger 1.5-liter dust cup, reducing the need for frequent emptying, compared to Electrolux's smaller 0.3-liter capacity.
Both vacuums offer a runtime of up to 50 minutes, resulting in a tie. OXVAC takes the lead again with a faster charging time and a more effective 5-stage HEPA filtration system, ideal for trapping finer particles.
Weight is a factor and OXVAC is slightly lighter at 5.79 pounds compared to Electrolux's 6 pounds. Electrolux gets back a point for lower noise level at 70 dB versus OXVAC's 75 dB.
The OXVAC has more accessories – dusting brush, and crevice tool – than the Electrolux which only includes the adaptor. Both are pretty well equipped with special features depending on user preference.
Customer reviews give OXVAC a slight edge with a 4.4-star rating compared to Electrolux's 4.0, although OXVAC's rating is based on fewer reviews. Pricing is unknown at this point, so they are neck and neck. The Electrolux comes out on top here because the physical size could be useful for storing it away when not in use.
The Dsorupa V10 Ultra clearly outperforms the Electrolux EHVS35S2AU in several key areas. For suction power, the Dsorupa takes the lead with its specified 45 KPa and 550W motor, as Electrolux provides no such details. Runtime is also significantly better with the Dsorupa offering 70 minutes compared to Electrolux's 50 minutes. The Dsorupa's larger 1.8-liter dustbin capacity necessitates less frequent emptying compared to Electrolux's smaller 0.3-liter capacity.
Filtration is another area where Dsorupa excels. Its 8-stage HEPA filtration system surpasses the Electrolux's 5-step E10 system. The Dsorupa's soft & hard combination brush with anti-tangle technology is a better offering compared to the motorized bristle brush of Electrolux. Dsorupa is also quieter and offers a better cleaning experience.
Electrolux wins in the weight category, being lighter at 6 pounds versus Dsorupa's 8 pounds, potentially offering better maneuverability.
The Dsorupa also includes an integrated LED display, which is a useful feature. Dsorupa is also preferred for the aromatherapy tablets.
The Dsorupa's customer rating is considerably higher at 4.9 out of 5 stars, suggesting greater user satisfaction than the Electrolux's 4.0 out of 5 stars. Electrolux, has higher wattage.
Let's break down the Electrolux EHVS35S2AU versus the Honeywell VC10 Aeromax. Both brands have their strengths, making a direct comparison somewhat subjective.
Weight-wise, the Honeywell edges out the Electrolux, being slightly lighter at 5.5 pounds compared to 6 pounds. Both are cordless, but the Honeywell boasts a larger capacity at 0.49 liters versus the Electrolux's 0.3 liters. The Electrolux counters with a higher wattage of 1200 watts, potentially indicating more powerful suction, although suction power is not always directly correlated with wattage and can depend on the motor and design of the vacuum.
The Honeywell offers a slightly longer runtime of 55 minutes compared to Electrolux's 50 minutes. While the charging time is not specified for the Electrolux, we know the Honeywell takes a full 5 hours to charge. The Honeywell also includes a disk filter in addition to foam for potentially better filtration.
The Honeywell truly shines when it comes to included components, boasting a wide array of accessories, versus the Electrolux's single adaptor. The Honeywell is described to be used on a wider variety of surfaces. On the other hand, the Electrolux operates at a quieter noise level of 70 dB compared to Honeywell's 80 dB.
Customer reviews favor the Honeywell, with a rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars, although based on significantly fewer reviews (26) than the Electrolux (336 ratings) which received 4.0 out of 5 stars. Both models boast special features that may appeal differently to individual users. Finally, price seems to favor the Electrolux, being potentially less expensive based on Best Seller rankings.
The Electrolux WellQ7 presents a compelling package for those seeking a lightweight, cordless stick vacuum. Its features, such as the Axial Cyclone Technology, 5-Step Filtration System, and Brushroll Clean Technology, contribute to effective cleaning and ease of maintenance. The long runtime and versatility across various floor types, coupled with user-friendly design elements, make it a practical choice for apartment dwellers and homes with primarily hard floors. While battery life may be a limiting factor for larger spaces, its strong suction, array of attachments, and premium build quality, especially at a competitive price point, position it as a strong contender in the stick vacuum market.
Hi, I'm Nancy! Welcome to my blog, your go-to destination for all things vacuum cleaner! As a dedicated blogger, I'm passionate about helping you find the perfect vacuum cleaner to suit your lifestyle and cleaning needs. Whether you're tackling pet hair, deep cleaning carpets, or maintaining hardwood floors, I'll provide you with in-depth reviews, expert buying guides, and helpful tips to make your cleaning experience a breeze. Let's dive in and discover the best vacuum cleaner for you!
Explore these additional resources for more information.
© 2025 Flow. All rights reserved.