✅ Features of Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The cordless stick vacuum features a 500W brushless motor, offering impressive suction power with up to 170 Air Watts across its three power modes.

Its 24V, high-capacity 4Ah 21700 battery provides a run time of up to 45 minutes on a full charge. The included deluxe wall charger simplifies the charging process.

A washable and reusable HEPA filter contributes to air purification. The inclusion of 5 LED lights enhances visibility in dimly lit areas. A digital display screen conveniently shows run time, selected power mode, and any error messages.

Notably, this vacuum includes USB-C charging capabilities, allowing for charging portable electronics like phones and tablets.

The vacuum comes with a comprehensive set of accessories: a deep cleaning fur brush, a 2-in-1 dusting brush, a crevice tool, a soft bristle brush, and two accessory clips for convenient storage.

✅ What we like about Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum

One of the standout features of this vacuum is its ease of cleaning. It's suitable for both indoor and outdoor use, and the dust collection system is designed for mess-free emptying. The included attachments expand its cleaning capabilities, making it effective for car interiors and baseboards, even handling tougher cleaning tasks.

The suction power is impressive, offering three levels adjustable via a touch screen. Combined with the attachments, this makes it a versatile vacuum suitable for various cleaning needs around the house.

Aesthetically, the vacuum boasts a nice design and a convenient battery removal system. Many users find it to be a good value for the price, with some even considering it the best and most affordable vacuum they've owned.

Battery life is reported to be around 45 minutes on the lowest suction setting, with quick recharge times. Users have noted that the suction is strong, resulting in excellent cleaning results.

Beyond floors, the vacuum's versatility shines through in its ability to clean car interiors, blinds, and other surfaces. The docking station provides a convenient solution for both charging and storage.

The lightweight design makes it easy to maneuver and handle. Furthermore, the vacuum appears to be constructed with durable materials, suggesting a long lifespan.

✅ Key specs of Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Greenworks SVW24L410 is a cordless stick vacuum designed for indoor use. Its features include a disk filter, multiple attachments (Deep Cleaning Fur Brush, 2-in-1 Dusting Brush, Crevice Tool, and Soft Bristle Brush), and accessory clips for storage. It operates on a 24V Lithium-Ion battery.

The vacuum has a runtime of 45 minutes and a charging time specified as "3E+1 minutes", which I believe means 31 minutes. Its recommended uses cover carpet, home cleaning, and bare floors. The form factor is a combination of stick and handheld, and the color is white, specifically for the power station.

Performance-wise, the vacuum has a wattage of 65 watts and an amperage of 5.33 Amps. The motor horsepower is listed as 500 watts. The noise level is 78 dB. It offers 3 speeds/power levels, controlled via push button and touch methods.

Physically, the vacuum measures 7.1"L x 11"W x 30.8"H and weighs 15.1 pounds. It includes one handle and two wheels. It comes with two USB ports for connectivity. The finish type is glossy.

Additional details: It is part of the 24 series, has a UPC of 195526007784, and an ASIN of B098JY7KK8. The item model number is SVW24L410. Customer ratings are 4.1 out of 5 stars based on 277 ratings.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Dreame R10 Pro Cordless Vacuum

The Greenworks SVW24L410 edges out the dreame R10 Pro in suction power with up to 170 Air Watts compared to dreame's 150 Air Watts. It also provides its exact battery capacity of 4Ah 21700, while dreame does not specify its battery details. The Greenworks battery's added utility as a 40,000mAh power bank with USB-C charging for electronics further solidifies its advantage in battery features. A digital display provides helpful information on runtime, power mode, and error messages. Greenworks also shines in charging time, completing a full charge in 30 minutes versus the dreame's 3.5 hours. Greenworks gets a slightly better customer rating with 4.1 out of 5 stars with 277 ratings compared to dreame's 3.8 with 34 ratings.

However, the dreame R10 Pro takes the lead in runtime, offering up to 65 minutes on a single charge, significantly more than the Greenworks' 45 minutes. The dreame's brush head design appears more comprehensive, including a V-shaped brush head, soft roller brush, multi-surface brush, motorized mini-brush, and crevice nozzle. Its 5-layer filtration system captures 99.9% of 0.3 micron particles, surpassing Greenworks' washable/reusable HEPA filter in specificity. Dreame includes more accessories like an extension rod, wall mount, and detachable filter, while the Greenworks only includes accessory clips.

The dreame boasts a significantly lighter weight of 9.25 pounds, making it easier to maneuver compared to the Greenworks' 15.1 pounds. Noise level is also a win for dreame at 65 dB versus Greenworks' 78 dB. While Greenworks lists 65W wattage with 500W motor horsepower, dreame lists wattage clearly at 150W.

✔ Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC370GR Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Greenworks SVW24L410 edges out the Eureka NEC370GR in several key areas. The Greenworks boasts a more powerful 500W brushless motor compared to Eureka's 300W, which translates to superior suction. This is further substantiated by Greenworks' air watt rating of up to 170, a spec not provided for the Eureka, implying stronger cleaning performance. The Greenworks also offers a slightly longer runtime of up to 45 minutes versus Eureka's 40 minutes, as well as higher capacity 4Ah battery.

Furthermore, Greenworks provides a more comprehensive digital display, including run time, power mode, and notably, error messages for troubleshooting. The inclusion of more attachments with the Greenworks, such as the deep cleaning fur brush and soft bristle brush, gives it an edge in versatility for different cleaning tasks. The Greenworks operates at a slightly lower noise level of 78 dB compared to Eureka's 80 dB. Customer ratings also favor the Greenworks, albeit slightly, with a 4.1 out of 5 stars against Eureka's 4.0.

However, the Eureka NEC370GR shines in its significantly lighter weight of 8.16 pounds compared to Greenworks' 15.1 pounds, making it easier to maneuver. Also, Eureka utilizes a 5-stage cyclone filtration system with HEPA, which I would consider a more robust approach to dust separation than Greenworks' washable/reusable HEPA filter. Finally, the Eureka includes headlights, a very useful feature missing from the Greenworks, for illuminating dark areas during cleaning.

✔ Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Iirios Q5 Pro Cordless Vacuum

The Iirios Q5 Pro takes an early lead with its superior suction power, boasting 45KPa, which outstrips the Greenworks SVW24L410's implied 170 Air Watts. The Iirios also has a more powerful motor (550W versus 500W) and a longer run time (70 minutes versus 45 minutes).

However, the Greenworks SVW24L410 strikes back with a higher battery capacity of 40,000mAh, trumping the Iirios Q5 Pro's 22,400mAh. Additionally, the Greenworks stands out with its portable electronics charging capability via USB-C.

The Iirios Q5 Pro regains its momentum with an 8-stage filtration system, a clear upgrade over the Greenworks' standard HEPA filter. Its dust cup capacity is also superior at 1.6 Liters, unlike the Greenworks which does not specify the dust cup capacity. Furthermore, the Iirios Q5 Pro operates at a quieter noise level of <60 dB compared to the Greenworks' 78 dB, and weighs considerably less (8.7 pounds vs. 15.1 pounds). The V-shaped anti-tangle roller brush on the Iirios is another significant advantage over the Greenworks' deep cleaning fur brush.

The Iirios Q5 Pro continues to shine with its Smart OLED Interactive Display. It also boasts four wheels for improved maneuverability, compared to the Greenworks' two. Customer satisfaction seems to favor the Iirios Q5 Pro, with a higher rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars (from 859 ratings) compared to the Greenworks' 4.1 stars (from 277 ratings). The Iirios also holds a far superior ranking within the Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms category (#36 vs #957). The Iirios Q5 Pro's higher wattage of 550 watts beats the Greenworks' 65 watts.

✔ Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. AFNOP Pure 16 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

When comparing the Greenworks SVW24L410 and the AFNOP Pure 16 cordless stick vacuums, AFNOP appears to offer more compelling features with actual cleaning benefits. While the Greenworks boasts a cordless design, USB charging, LED lights, and a HEPA filter, the AFNOP counters with a potent 45Kpa suction, a generous 60-minute runtime, self-standing capability, a dual screen, one-click dust removal, multi-cone filtration, and a tangle-free brush. Both incorporate HEPA filters, the AFNOP specifies multiple filtration stages.

Regarding included components, Greenworks provides a fur brush, a 2-in-1 dusting brush, a crevice tool, a soft bristle brush, and accessory clips, while AFNOP offers a long crevice nozzle, a hair cleaning brush, replaceable HEPA filters, a brush holder, and a crevice brush. Greenworks offers more unique accessory clips. The AFNOP has a listed dust cup capacity of 1.5 liters.

The AFNOP's 550 watts outstrips the Greenworks' 65 watts, potentially indicating stronger performance. The AFNOP also wins in runtime (60 minutes versus 45 minutes). Greenworks has a quicker charging time (30 minutes compared to 4 hours for AFNOP). AFNOP specifies maximum suction in quantitative value of 12 inches.

Both are recommended for home use and are primarily stick vacuums. The AFNOP has dimensions of 11"L x 7"W x 48"H versus the Greenworks' 7.1"L x 11"W x 30.8"H. The AFNOP's taller height might lend itself to more ergonomic handling. Both vacuums use Lithium-Ion batteries, but AFNOP specifies battery life of 60 minutes.

Greenworks specifies a noise level of 78 dB. Greenworks also specifies amperage of 5.33 Amps. AFNOP specifies a motor power of 550 watts to the Greenworks' 500 watts. Greenworks has 3 speeds and power levels, whereas AFNOP only offers 1. Greenworks also offers a vacuum with wheels and USB ports.

In terms of weight, the AFNOP is the lighter choice at 8 pounds, versus 15.1 pounds for the Greenworks. Customer reviews favor the AFNOP, with a higher rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars (406 ratings) compared to the Greenworks' 4.1 out of 5 stars (277 ratings). AFNOP also has a Best Sellers Rank of #80 in Stick Vacuums and Greenworks has a rank of #957.

✔ Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VCS-90B1 Stick Vacuum

The Greenworks SVW24L410 wins out with its cordless design, offering greater freedom compared to the corded Farberware VCS-90B1. The Greenworks also provides a specified run time, an advantage that the Farberware lacks. Additionally, the integrated power bank feature of the Greenworks battery is a practical bonus. The Greenworks vacuum also edges out the Farberware with its attachments, offering a deeper cleaning fur brush and more attachments, giving more versatile cleaning options. Regarding features, the Greenworks has a HEPA filter, important for allergy sufferers. The Greenworks is also quieter, and more compact.

However, the Farberware VCS-90B1 is likely to have better suction power, as a 700W motor often indicates stronger suction than a 500W motor, despite the measurements listed for each. The Farberware also has a larger dustbin capacity, requiring less frequent emptying. Also, the Farberware is significantly lighter, which would lead to greater ease of use.

The Farberware also has a slightly higher overall rating, though based on considerably fewer reviews. Without the price point, it's impossible to make a true comparison.

✔ Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Greenworks edges out KCLASO in brand recognition due to its established presence in outdoor power equipment and home cleaning. However, KCLASO takes the lead in motor power with 550W compared to Greenworks' 500W, suggesting a potentially stronger suction capability.

Suction power is a clear win for KCLASO, boasting 45KPa compared to Greenworks' 170 Air Watts. Similarly, KCLASO's 5-Layer Filtration system offers superior protection against particles compared to Greenworks' Disk HEPA filter. KCLASO also specifies a dust cup capacity of 500 ml, a detail missing from Greenworks' specifications. KCLASO further extends its advantage with a slightly longer runtime of up to 50 minutes.

However, Greenworks retaliates with a significantly faster charging time of only 30 minutes, contrasting sharply with KCLASO's 5-hour charging period. KCLASO compensates with a more comprehensive set of included accessories, including a telescopic tube, floor brush, clean hook, and storage mount, alongside the standard 2-in-1 brush and crevice tool.

KCLASO also features a user-friendly LED touchscreen with alerts and operates at a slightly quieter 75 dB compared to Greenworks' 78 dB. A major advantage for KCLASO is its significantly lighter weight of 6.64 pounds versus Greenworks' 15.1 pounds, greatly improving maneuverability.

Greenworks counters with a higher battery capacity of 24V 4Ah (40,000mAh) compared to KCLASO's 6*2500mAh (15,000mAh), and it offers a USB charging power bank feature, which KCLASO lacks. KCLASO includes a self-standing design, allowing it to stand upright independently. Finally, KCLASO edges out Greenworks in customer satisfaction, with a higher rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars from a larger pool of 331 ratings, compared to Greenworks' 4.1 out of 5 stars from 277 ratings.

✔ Greenworks SVW24L410 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

Greenworks wins out on brand recognition, being a more established player in the power tool and outdoor equipment market. However, dsorupa edges ahead in motor power with 550W compared to Greenworks' 500W, suggesting potentially stronger suction.

The dsorupa SmartVac Pro shows a much stronger suction with 45 KPA, which is a better measurement compared to Greenworks with 170 Air Watts. Dsorupa also provides longer runtime, offering up to 60 minutes of cleaning versus Greenworks' 45 minutes.

Battery capacity also favors dsorupa, with 7 * 2500mAh offering a more powerful setup than Greenworks. However, Greenworks significantly cuts down charging time with only 30 minutes compared to dsorupa's 4.5 hours.

Both vacuums use HEPA filters, but Greenworks scores a slight advantage with its washable and reusable filter. dsorupa comes with a broader set of included components. Both are cordless.

dsorupa has the better Wattage with 550W, along with a dustbin capacity of 1.5L. While Greenworks is recommended for general use such as carpet and bare floors, dsorupa specifically targets pet hair.

Greenworks takes the lead in form factor with its stick and handheld design, offering more versatility, but dsorupa is significantly lighter at 8 lbs compared to Greenworks' 15.1 lbs. Dsorupa operates at a quieter noise level of 68 dB versus Greenworks' 78 dB.

The dsorupa also incorporates a double handle design for user comfort and offers higher customer satisfaction with a 4.9 out of 5 stars rating, based on 52 reviews. Dsorupa demonstrates higher popularity with a Best Sellers Rank of #89, compared to Greenworks' #957.

While Greenworks has more compact dimensions (7.1"L x 11"W x 30.8"H compared to dsorupa's 8.6"L x 4.7"W x 45.6"H), the price comparison is a tie without actual prices.

✅ Conclusion

The Greenworks SVW24L410 cordless stick vacuum presents a compelling package of power, versatility, and user-friendly features. Its strong suction, long runtime, and assortment of attachments make it a capable tool for tackling a wide range of cleaning tasks, both indoors and out. The inclusion of USB-C charging and a digital display adds modern convenience, while the lightweight design and durable construction enhance usability and longevity. Despite a few inconsistencies in the specified charging time and wattage, the positive customer feedback and overall feature set suggest that this vacuum offers excellent value and performance for the price.