The LG cordless stick vacuum boasts a powerful LG Smart Inverter Motor, which is definitely a highlight considering its 10-year limited warranty. The removable and rechargeable battery offers up to 50 minutes of cleaning in normal mode without power nozzles, but keep in mind that this is only with one battery.
The portable charging stand is a practical addition, offering both freestanding and wall-mountable options. It also conveniently stores accessories, and has the option of charging a second battery, though it's important to note that this second battery is not included.
Controlling the vacuum is simple thanks to the one-touch control, allowing for easy power on/off and power level selection.
Maintaining the vacuum should be fairly straightforward with its washable cyclone and filters, allowing for easy cleaning. The 5-step filtration system is another positive, claiming to filter 99.9% of common allergens.
The vacuum is designed to clean both carpets and hard floors, employing a direct drive motor in the nozzle cleaning head. For more targeted cleaning, the vacuum easily transforms into a hand vacuum, making it quite versatile for use on floors, furniture, and even in the car.
The quality is definitely a highlight, making it a solid choice as a first stick vacuum. Many find themselves using it almost every day.
Ease of use is another major plus. It's lightweight and easy to maneuver, which makes it perfect for those quick clean-up jobs. Emptying the dustbin is also a breeze.
The lightweight design contributes to its appeal, making it easy to handle and visually appealing due to its slim profile.
Don't let the light weight fool you – the suction power is surprisingly strong.
The aesthetic design is also a win. Its slim and attractive appearance means it doesn't look out of place, and some people really appreciate the included stand and replaceable battery.
For those looking to replace a Dyson, this vacuum offers a nice middle ground – a step up from entry-level but without all the extra features of the high-end models.
The inclusion of a stand seems to be a popular feature, as is the replaceable battery.
The LG CordZero A913 is a lightweight and portable cordless stick vacuum, boasting a 5-Step Filtration System. It comes with a Universal Power Nozzle, Portable Charging Stand, Crevice Tool, Telescoping Wand, Battery, Combination Tool, and Filters.
This vacuum has a 13.5-ounce capacity and operates at 160 watts. It offers a runtime of 50 minutes with a charging time of 3.5 hours. It is recommended for both carpet and hard floor surfaces.
The product dimensions are 10.2"L x 10.6"W x 44.1"H and comes in black/silver. The battery is Lithium-Ion and the noise level reaches 84 dB.
The vacuum has a One Touch controller and uses a touch control method. It has two speeds and power levels. The vacuum falls under the CordZero A9 style and uses cordless connectivity technology.
This vacuum is designed for indoor use. It weighs 5.95 pounds and has a UPC of 048231029124 and ASIN of B09SSWL697. The model number is A913BM.
The package includes 1 Lithium Ion battery. The product has received an average customer rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars based on 168 ratings. It ranks #299 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms in the Home & Kitchen category.
It has a 1-year warranty and a 10-year motor warranty.
Both the LG A913BM and Electrolux EHVS75S1AO are from reputable brands, resulting in a tie. The Electrolux edges out the LG in weight, being lighter at 4.8 lbs compared to the LG's 5.95 lbs, making it easier to handle. However, LG offers a more appealing set of special features, including a portable charging stand for convenient storage. LG's 5-Step Filtration System is superior to Electrolux's foam filter, likely providing better particle capture.
The LG also wins in included components, offering a more comprehensive set of attachments for versatile cleaning. Both vacuums are cordless, resulting in a tie. The LG boasts a larger dustbin capacity at 13.5 ounces (0.4 Liters), reducing the frequency of emptying, while the Electrolux has a capacity of 0.3 Liters. The Electrolux has a higher wattage at 250 watts compared to the LG's 160 watts, suggesting potentially stronger suction. Both models provide a runtime of 50 minutes.
LG has a shorter charging time of 3.5 hours compared to Electrolux's 4.5 hours. Both are recommended for indoor use and are therefore tied in that respect. The Electrolux operates at a lower noise level of 80 dB compared to the LG's 84 dB. Battery life is equal on both models at 50 minutes.
LG features one-touch controls, which some may find more user-friendly, while Electrolux uses push buttons. Electrolux has 4 speeds compared to LGs 2 which offers greater control over cleaning power. Electrolux is more environmentally conscious, using at least 43% recycled plastic. Electrolux has marginally better customer reviews, with 3.9 out of 5 stars compared to LG's 3.8. LG provides a 1 year warranty and 10 year motor warranty whereas Electrolux does not list a warranty.
Gtech edges out LG in brand recognition, backed by higher customer ratings and a much larger volume of reviews. However, LG pulls ahead with its special features, including a portable charging stand, washable filters, and a long-lasting battery, offering greater user convenience.
LG's 5-step filtration system is likely more effective at capturing dust and allergens compared to Gtech's auto-cleaning filter. The LG also comes with a more extensive set of included components, such as a universal power nozzle, crevice tool, and telescoping wand.
While both models are cordless, Gtech boasts a larger dustbin capacity at 0.7 liters, but LG counters with higher wattage (160 watts) for potentially stronger suction and a longer runtime of 50 minutes.
Gtech's versatility extends to a wider range of floor types, making it suitable for hard floors, carpets, rugs, tile floors, hardwood, and bare floors. LG has more flexible form factor
The color and battery type are tied. LG has a longer battery life. The controller and control method is tied. Both models are portable. LG is lighter at 5.95 pounds.
However, Gtech has significantly better customer ratings and a much larger sample size. Gtech is a best seller. LG has a 10 year motor warranty.
LG's A913BM edges out ZCAISH in brand recognition, leveraging its well-established history and trusted reputation in the electronics and appliance market. When it comes to charging time, LG wins due to it being slightly faster. LG also offers a stronger warranty, with a 1-year warranty and an impressive 10-year motor warranty. The LG is also lighter, weighing in at 5.95 pounds compared to the ZCAISH's 9 pounds. Finally, where Noise Level is concerned, we don't have this stat for ZCAISH.
However, the ZCAISH Z01-US2 outperforms the LG in several key performance areas. The ZCAISH boasts a suction power of 45Kpa, while the LG's suction power is not explicitly stated. The ZCAISH also has a more powerful motor, rated at 550 watts compared to the LG's 160 watts.
In terms of runtime, the ZCAISH offers 60 minutes on minimum suction, whereas the LG manages 50 minutes on normal mode without power nozzles. The ZCAISH also features a larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 liters, significantly surpassing the LG's 0.4 liters. The filtration system of the ZCAISH also provides a slightly higher filtration efficiency of 99.99% dust filtration versus the LG's 99.9%.
Furthermore, the ZCAISH incorporates more advanced features, including an intelligent touch screen, V-shape floor brush, aromatherapy, and high-efficiency filtration system. Customer reviews also favor the ZCAISH, with a higher average rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars based on 384 ratings. Price comparison is not possible because the price information is not available.
The Iirios Q5 Pro edges out the LG A913BM in several key performance categories. The Iirios boasts a suction power of 45KPa with a 550W motor, providing a more powerful and quantifiable performance compared to the LG's Smart Inverter Motor, whose specifications are not clearly defined. Furthermore, the Iirios Q5 Pro provides longer runtime, offering up to 70 minutes of use compared to the LG's 50 minutes.
While the LG A913BM wins in Battery and Charging & Storage categories, the Iirios takes the lead in other categories. LG's removable battery allows for potential extended use with a spare and the flexible charging & storage with portable charging stand helps to place it in more than one place. The Iirios Q5 Pro's larger dustbin capacity (1.6 Liters vs 0.4L) minimizes the need for frequent emptying, adding to user convenience. Its 8-stage filtration system, capturing 99.99% of dust, surpasses the LG's 5-step filtration system with 99.9% dust capture, offering superior air purification.
The Iirios operates at a significantly quieter noise level (<60 dB) compared to the LG's 84 dB. The LG A913BM, at 5.95 pounds, is lighter than the Iirios (8.7 pounds), providing better maneuverability for some users. However, the Iirios Q5 Pro features an interactive OLED display and an anti-tangle brush, offering more practical benefits than the LG's features.
The LG has a defined 1-year warranty (10-year on the motor), and appears to offer greater value with a lower estimated price tag. The higher average customer rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars (with a significantly larger sample size of 859 ratings) for the Iirios Q5 Pro, compared to the LG's 3.8 out of 5 stars (with 168 ratings), suggests greater overall customer satisfaction.
Alright, let's break down the LG A913BM versus the SunSare US-X9 stick vacuums. Price is unknown for both, rendering a cost comparison impossible. However, the SunSare US-X9 immediately takes the lead in several performance-related categories. Its specified 550W motor with 45kPa suction surpasses the LG's unspecified power, and its potentially longer runtime (up to 60 minutes in Eco mode versus LG's 50 minutes) is a point in its favor. Both vacuums feature removable batteries, resulting in a tie for that attribute.
The SunSare US-X9 continues to impress with its superior charging/storage setup. The self-standing feature, in addition to wall mounting, offers more convenience than the LG's wall-mountable portable charging stand. Control preference is subjective, resulting in a tie, but the SunSare pulls ahead again with its 7-level filtration system.
Dust cup capacity is another clear win for the SunSare US-X9 (1.5 Liters versus 0.4 Liters), meaning less frequent emptying. The self-cleaning brush roller and 2-in-1 soft/hard design of the SunSare US-X9 are superior to the LG's universal power nozzle. The significantly quieter noise level (62 dB versus 84 dB) is a major advantage as well.
The LG A913BM claws back some ground due to its lighter weight, making it potentially easier to maneuver (5.95 pounds versus 8 pounds). Also, the LG's warranty, especially the 10-year motor warranty, is a significant advantage given that the SunSare's warranty wasn't listed. However, the SunSare US-X9 boasts a higher customer rating.
Special features are overwhelmingly in favor of the SunSare US-X9, with its adjustable height, 270° swivel, front light, and anti-tangling brushes. The SunSare US-X9's 550 watts is higher than the LG A913BM's 160 watts. The devices are both stick vacuums, resulting in a tie for the form factor. The SunSare US-X9 ships with a wider array of accessories.
Let's break down the LG A913BM versus the Eureka NEC490BL. In terms of brand reputation, LG typically holds a stronger position in the appliance and electronics market. However, when it comes to raw suction power, the Eureka clearly specifies a 350W BLDC motor, giving it the edge. LG does offer a 10-year limited motor warranty, which is a significant advantage for peace of mind as the Eureka doesn't state a warranty.
Runtime is key, and the Eureka boasts a longer maximum battery life of 60 minutes compared to LG's 50 minutes. Dustbin capacity is a massive difference, with the Eureka's 2.5 Liters dwarfing the LG's 0.4 Liters, meaning less frequent emptying. That's compounded by the Eureka including a self-emptying station, a major convenience feature that the LG lacks, which relies on manual emptying.
Both vacuums claim excellent filtration systems with 99.9% dust filtration, resulting in a tie. Regarding included accessories, both have good options. On weight, the LG is considerably lighter at 5.95 pounds compared to the Eureka's 17.64 pounds, a crucial factor for maneuverability. Noise level is unknown for the Eureka, so a comparison is impossible.
Customer reviews favor the Eureka, with a higher average rating based on a much larger sample size. Price is unavailable for both models in the given information, but it's always a crucial purchasing factor. Finally, in terms of special features, the Eureka wins again, largely due to its self-emptying capability.
LG edges out dsorupa in the Brand category due to its established reputation for quality. However, when it comes to suction, the dsorupa SmartVac Pro takes the lead, boasting a quantifiable 45KPA and a 550W motor. This is further supported by the dsorupa's use of a brushless motor, known for its efficiency and long life. While LG provides a more generous 10-year limited motor warranty, the dsorupa counters with a longer battery runtime of up to 60 minutes. Both vacuums utilize Lithium-Ion batteries.
LG gains an advantage with a faster battery charging time of 3.5 hours. But the dsorupa more than compensates with a much larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 Liters. Both vacuums have similar filtration systems, capturing 99.9% of dust.
The LG A913BM is lighter at 5.95 pounds, making it easier to maneuver. The dsorupa is quieter with a noise level of 68 dB and includes a double handle for enhanced ergonomics, reducing strain. Feature sets are comparable; the dsorupa provides a Smart LED Display, while the LG offers a Portable Charging Stand. Both have comprehensive accessory kits, but the dsorupa includes an extra HEPA filter and hair cleaning tool. Finally, customer reviews favor the dsorupa, showing an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars.
The LG CordZero A913 presents a compelling option for those seeking a lightweight, versatile cordless vacuum. Its strong suction and ease of use make it ideal for everyday cleaning, while the included accessories and portable charging stand enhance its practicality. The long motor warranty inspires confidence in its durability, though the 50-minute runtime with a single battery (without power nozzles) might be a limitation for larger homes. While perhaps not a top-of-the-line model, it strikes a nice balance between performance, features, and price, positioning itself as a solid upgrade for those looking beyond basic stick vacuums.
Hi, I'm Hannah! Welcome to my corner of the internet dedicated to helping you find the perfect vacuum cleaner for your home. As a passionate blogger and vacuum enthusiast, I've spent countless hours researching, testing, and reviewing a wide range of models. Whether you're tackling pet hair, deep cleaning carpets, or maintaining hardwood floors, I'm here to provide you with unbiased information, expert advice, and comprehensive buying guides. Let's find the vacuum that effortlessly transforms your cleaning routine!
Explore these additional resources for more information.
© 2025 Flow. All rights reserved.