The vacuum boasts a robust 48KPa / 190AW suction power, making it effective for cleaning various debris like crumbs, pet hair, and dust. It's powered by a 4000mAh battery, delivering up to 60 minutes of runtime in Eco mode, 40 minutes in Mid, and 20 minutes in Max mode. This larger battery capacity translates to extended usage and improved suction compared to models with 2200mAh or 2500mAh batteries.
The inclusion of anti-hair wrap technology is a notable feature, particularly beneficial for pet owners. The motorized brush head with its comb-tooth design and independent motor minimizes hair tangling, reducing maintenance hassles.
Its filtration system utilizes a genuine multi-cone design to maximize suction and prevent clogs. Notably, it operates without a HEPA filter, which some may find appealing from an eco-conscious perspective.
The 1.5L dustbin capacity is generous, and emptying is facilitated by a one-button release with a spring mechanism for effortless debris ejection. An LED display provides real-time monitoring of suction levels and vacuum status.
The lightweight design allows for easy conversion to a handheld vacuum, and the self-standing design provides convenient pausing during cleaning. The product is backed by a 24-month guarantee and dedicated customer service.
This vacuum cleaner boasts a lightweight design, making it easy to maneuver around the house. Assembly, cleaning, and operation are all straightforward, thanks to the clear instructions provided.
The suction power is commendable, performing well on both hard floors and area rugs. Multiple suction settings offer versatility for different surfaces. The battery charges rapidly and provides a satisfactory run time.
Considering its price point, the vacuum offers excellent value. It's well-suited for cleaning small areas, including area rugs and hardwood floors, operating quietly and efficiently. The power is sufficient for picking up small particles.
The design is both sleek and modern, and it conveniently stands upright on its own. It swivels with ease around corners and furniture. Furthermore, the low-profile head allows it to reach under furniture.
Additional features, such as the spring-loaded container for easy emptying and the brushless motor for extended lifespan, add to the overall appeal.
The MIUZZY M245 cordless stick vacuum boasts impressive specifications, starting with its powerful 48KPa suction pressure and a 350W brushless motor delivering 190AW of suction. It's powered by 6 large 4000mAh batteries offering up to 60 minutes of runtime. Its designed with anti-hair wrap technology and offers 3 suction power modes.
This vacuum features a 1.5L large dustbin and a self-standing design, along with genuine multi-cone filtration. It's fairly quiet at 68dB. The M245 has received 4.4 out of 5 stars from 369 ratings.
The package includes the main vacuum cleaner, a rechargeable battery, fast-charging adapter, anti-tangle motorized brush, dust brush, long crevice tool, wall mount, cleaning tool, and user manual. The filter type is a metal mesh.
Additional details include its dimensions of 17"L x 7"W x 48"H and a weight of 8 pounds. The battery is Lithium-Ion, and the vacuum utilizes a push-button controller with a touch control method. It has 3 speeds and power levels. It is designed for indoor use and was manufactured in 2024. The vacuum requires one C battery, which is included.
Recommended uses include daily cleaning of floors, carpets, and furniture, as well as effective pet hair removal. Regular maintenance requires cleaning the filters and brush roll and checking for blockages.
In this comparison of the MIUZZY M245 and the Eureka NEC370GR, Eureka takes the lead in brand recognition, being a well-established player in the vacuum cleaner market. However, the MIUZZY boasts a substantially more powerful suction with 48KPa/190AW compared to the unspecified, but likely lower, power of the Eureka. This difference in suction is a major advantage for the MIUZZY.
The MIUZZY also demonstrates superior battery performance, offering up to 60 minutes of runtime with a 4000mAh battery, outperforming the Eureka's 40-minute runtime and unspecified battery capacity. A larger dustbin capacity of 1.5 liters on the MIUZZY also means less frequent emptying.
While the Eureka features a HEPA filter, which is excellent for allergy sufferers, the MIUZZY wins out in several other key areas. It is slightly lighter at 8 pounds compared to the Eureka's 8.16 pounds and operates at a significantly quieter 68 dB versus the Eureka's 80 dB.
The MIUZZY also presents a compelling array of special features, including an Anti-Hair Wrap, Self-Standing Design, LED Display, and Multi-Cone Filtration. While the Eureka offers a headlight and smooth speed control, the Anti-Hair Wrap of the MIUZZY is a significant benefit, especially for pet owners. Additionally, the MIUZZY includes more accessories than the Eureka.
The MIUZZY has a higher average customer rating of 4.4 stars from 369 ratings, compared to the Eureka's 4.0 stars from a much larger pool of 8,120 ratings. Despite the large number of reviews for the Eureka, the MIUZZY's higher rating is noteworthy. The maneuverability goes to the Eureka for being able to get under furniture.
Without knowing the prices of the two vacuums at the same time, a tie is given.
Let's analyze these two vacuum cleaners, the MIUZZY M245 and the NADALY CVC-ME02, feature by feature. Starting with suction, the MIUZZY M245 clearly wins with 48KPa / 190AW compared to the NADALY's 28KPa. This suggests the MIUZZY is more powerful in picking up dirt and debris.
Battery life also favors the MIUZZY M245, boasting a 4000mAh battery and up to 60 minutes runtime in Eco mode, compared to the NADALY's 2200mAh battery and 45-minute standard mode runtime. The MIUZZY also offers more versatility with different power modes.
However, the NADALY CVC-ME02 takes the lead in filtration, employing a HEPA filter which is generally more effective at capturing fine particles and allergens than the MIUZZY's metal mesh multi-cone system. Dustbin capacity is equal between the two, at 1.5 Liters.
Looking at power, the MIUZZY M245 has a 380-watt motor, considerably higher than the NADALY's 150 watts, which suggests greater power output. Both vacuums have anti-hair wrap technology, but the effectiveness would depend on real-world testing.
The NADALY CVC-ME02 shines in weight, being significantly lighter at 6 pounds compared to the MIUZZY M245's 8 pounds, making it easier to maneuver. The MIUZZY M245 is slightly quieter at 68 dB versus the NADALY's 70 dB.
When it comes to special features, the MIUZZY M245 edges out the NADALY with its self-standing design, LED display, and multi-cone filtration system, with the LED display appearing more useful than the NADALY's LED headlights.
The NADALY CVC-ME02 is the clear winner in terms of price, estimated at around $70 compared to the MIUZZY M245's estimated $180, based on Best Seller Rank. Customer ratings are similar for both, at 4.4/5 stars.
When comparing the MIUZZY M245 and the ZCAISH Z01-US2 cordless vacuums, the brands are a matter of personal preference. The MIUZZY takes the lead in suction power with 48KPa and 190AW, surpassing the ZCAISH's 45KPa. Although the ZCAISH boasts a higher motor wattage at 550 Watts compared to the MIUZZY's 380 Watts, suction power is the ultimate deciding factor. The MIUZZY also has a higher total battery capacity, with 4000mAh x 6 versus the ZCAISH's 2500mAh x 7, promising longer runtime. Both vacuums claim a maximum runtime of 60 minutes on their respective eco/minimum suction modes, resulting in a tie.
The MIUZZY has fast charging implying that it charges faster than ZCAISH's 4 hour claim. However, the ZCAISH excels in filtration, featuring a 5-Layer HEPA system, whereas the MIUZZY uses a multi-cone system without HEPA, impacting its suitability for allergy sufferers. Both vacuums share an identical 1.5-liter dustbin capacity. Both offer anti-hair wrap brush heads.
Looking at special features, the MIUZZY's self-standing design is a clear advantage, while the ZCAISH offers an aromatherapy tablet, a less practical but potentially desirable feature. The MIUZZY wins in weight at 8 pounds, being lighter than the ZCAISH's 9 pounds, alongside a lower noise level of 68 dB. MIUZZY has a 24 month guarantee.
Assuming a similar price point, the value proposition is tightly contested. Customer reviews are nearly identical, with both scoring 4.4 out of 5 stars. The MIUZZY includes more accessories. HEPA filtration is a strong selling point for ZCAISH, however.
Let's break down the MIUZZY M245 versus the Iirios Q5 Pro stick vacuum comparison. The M245 boasts a slightly stronger suction power at 48KPa, compared to the Q5 Pro's 45KPa. More importantly, the M245 specifies an air watt (AW) rating of 190AW, which provides a more accurate measure of cleaning power and is higher than the Iirios Q5 Pro which does not specify. However, the Iirios Q5 Pro has a more powerful motor at 550W, although AW matters more in vacuum comparisons.
The Iirios Q5 Pro edges out the M245 in runtime, offering 70 minutes versus the M245's 60 minutes. While both have significant battery capacity, with the MIUZZY using 4000mAh x 6 batteries and the Iirios having 2800mAh x 8 batteries. The Iirios Q5 Pro features a HEPA filter and an 8-stage filtration system, generally more effective at trapping small particles than the MIUZZY's metal mesh/multi-cone filter. Furthermore, the Iirios' larger 1.6L dustbin, against the M245's 1.5L, means less frequent emptying.
Both vacuums incorporate anti-tangle technology. The Iirios Q5 Pro sports a V-shaped brush with a comb, while the MIUZZY M245 uses a comb-tooth brush. The display also favors the Iirios Q5 Pro with its OLED display, offering better clarity and information than the MIUZZY M245's LED. Moreover, the Iirios operates at a lower noise level, less than 60dB, making it quieter than the MIUZZY M245's 68dB.
The MIUZZY M245 is lighter at 8 pounds, potentially easier to maneuver than the Iirios Q5 Pro's 8.7 pounds. Customer ratings slightly favor the MIUZZY M245 with 4.4 out of 5 stars (from 369 ratings), edging out the Iirios Q5 Pro's 4.3 (from 859 ratings). However, the Iirios Q5 Pro enjoys a significantly higher bestseller rank, suggesting greater sales volume.
The Iirios Q5 Pro has a smart OLED interactive display. The MIUZZY M245 stands out with a 24-month guarantee, while the Iirios Q5 Pro's warranty is not specified.
The MiuZZY M245 edges out the AFNOP Pure 16 in suction power, boasting 48KPa/190AW compared to AFNOP's 45KPa. MiuZZY also has the advantage in battery capacity with a 4000mAh x 6 configuration versus AFNOP's 2500mAh x 7 setup. However, both vacuums claim a runtime of up to 60 minutes.
In filtration, the AFNOP Pure 16 takes the lead with its HEPA filter, generally considered superior for capturing fine particles compared to MiuZZY's multi-cone system without HEPA. Both vacuums share a 1.5L dustbin capacity and offer features to prevent hair tangling in their brush heads, resulting in a tie. The self-standing design and weight (8 lbs) are also identical for both models.
The AFNOP Pure 16 stands out with its dual-screen LED display, offering more detailed information than MiuZZY's standard LED display. The wattage is also higher for AFNOP with 550W, while MiuZZY has 380W. MiuZZY is quieter at 68 dB with noise level.
Based on bestseller rank (BSR), the AFNOP Pure 16 is more popular, holding a much lower BSR. Customer reviews also lean slightly in favor of the AFNOP Pure 16, with a slightly better rating based on a larger sample. MiuZZY offers a 24-month guarantee. AFNOP comes with ergonomically dual-screen design, One-click dust removal, Cyan stylish appearance enjoys the beauty of life.
The MIUZZY M245 edges out the JELLYPIG Pure 01 in suction power, boasting 48KPa and 190AW compared to the JELLYPIG's 45KPa. However, the JELLYPIG strikes back with a more powerful 550W motor versus the MIUZZY's 350W. Runtime is a tie at 60 minutes in Eco Mode. The MIUZZY has a larger battery capacity at 4000mAh, though the JELLYPIG doesn't specify its battery size.
For filtration, the JELLYPIG takes the lead with a HEPA filter and aromatherapy, a step above MIUZZY's multi-cone filtration system that does not use HEPA. Anti-hair wrap technology is a tie as both have anti-tangle features, though the comb-tooth and V-shaped brush designs are difficult to compare. Both share the same 1.5L dustbin capacity.
The MIUZZY includes an LED display, a feature absent on the JELLYPIG. Conversely, the JELLYPIG is lighter at 6 pounds compared to the MIUZZY's 8 pounds, and operates at a quieter 65 dB compared to the MIUZZY's 68 dB. Customer reviews favor the JELLYPIG, with 4.6 stars from 476 ratings compared to the MIUZZY's 4.4 stars from 369 ratings.
MIUZZY comes with a 24-month guarantee, while the JELLYPIG's warranty is unspecified. The MIUZZY's special features, like its self-standing design and focus on airflow and suction with its definition of Air Watts, offer more tangible benefits than JELLYPIG's aromatherapy tablets. Without pricing information, a complete comparison is not possible.
When comparing the MIUZZY M245 and the OXVAC SV008, both brands show similar brand preference, but the MIUZZY boasts a higher suction power at 48KPa / 190AW compared to the OXVAC's 45KPa. However, the OXVAC has a higher motor wattage of 550W versus the MIUZZY's 380W.
Runtime favors the MIUZZY, offering 60 minutes on Eco mode, while the OXVAC provides 50 minutes on Low. Battery capacity also leans towards the MIUZZY with 4000mAh x 6, significantly larger than the OXVAC's 2200mAh x 7. Conversely, the OXVAC employs a HEPA filter, generally superior to the MIUZZY's metal mesh multi-cone system.
Dustbin capacity is equal at 1.5L for both models. The OXVAC is lighter at 5.79 lbs compared to the MIUZZY's 8 lbs, but the MIUZZY operates at a quieter noise level of 68 dB versus the OXVAC's 75 dB. Warranty coverage is longer for the MIUZZY at 24 months, double the OXVAC's 12 months.
Customer reviews slightly favor the MIUZZY with a higher number of ratings (369) compared to the OXVAC (55), both holding 4.4 out of 5 stars. The MIUZZY has special features like Anti-Hair Wrap and Self-Standing Design. The OXVAC features an LED Display and 5-Stage Filtration. The OXVAC has more compact dimensions.
The MIUZZY M245 edges out the Nexahome BVC-V11 in suction power with 48KPa / 190AW versus 45KPa. However, the Nexahome boasts a stronger motor at 550W compared to the MIUZZY's 350W.
Runtime favors the MIUZZY, offering 60 minutes on Eco mode against the Nexahome's 50 minutes. This is further supported by the MIUZZY's specified 4000mAh battery capacity.
A key difference lies in filtration. The Nexahome BVC-V11 comes equipped with a HEPA filter, making it a better choice for allergy sufferers, while the MIUZZY M245 uses multi-cone filtration. Both models feature anti-hair wrap technology, but the effectiveness will vary from user to user.
The MIUZZY M245 offers a larger dustbin at 1.5 Liters compared to the Nexahome's 1.2 Liters. In terms of display, the Nexahome features an LED touch display versus the MIUZZY's standard LED display. Both models are self-standing, offering convenient storage.
The MIUZZY M245 is lighter at 8 pounds, compared to the Nexahome's 9 pounds, potentially making it easier to maneuver. Also, the MIUZZY M245 has a lower noise level at 68 dB.
The Nexahome has telescopic tube adjustable length, while the MIUZZY has multi-cones filtration, it really just depends on the person and their needs.
Customer reviews show the Nexahome BVC-V11 receiving a slightly higher rating (4.8 out of 5) compared to the MIUZZY (4.4 out of 5). However, the MIUZZY has significantly more ratings (369) compared to the Nexahome (48).
Finally, the MIUZZY M245 provides a longer warranty of 24-months.
The MIUZZY M245 boasts a stronger suction power at 48KPa/190AW compared to the KCLASO V10's 45Kpa. However, the KCLASO V10 packs a more powerful motor at 550W, outperforming the MIUZZY M245's 350W. Battery life favors the MIUZZY M245, offering a maximum runtime of 60 minutes against the KCLASO V10's 45 minutes. The MIUZZY M245 also has a larger battery capacity, featuring 4000mAh x 6 versus the KCLASO V10's 2500mAh x 6.
The KCLASO V10 distinguishes itself with a 5-layer filter system including HEPA filtration, a significant advantage over the MIUZZY M245's multi-cone system which lacks HEPA. The MIUZZY M245 compensates with a much larger 1.5-liter dustbin, tripling the KCLASO V10's 500ml capacity.
The KCLASO V10 is the lighter of the two, weighing in at 6.64 pounds compared to the MIUZZY M245's 8 pounds. The MIUZZY M245 operates at a quieter 68 dB, while the KCLASO V10 registers at 75 dB. User interface is where the KCLASO V10 shines with a touchscreen display, while MIUZZY offers an LED.
Both models feature anti-hair wrap technology in their brush head designs, resulting in a tie. They both offer self-standing capabilities. However the MIUZZY offers multi-cone filtration and the KCLASO V10 boasts a 180° bendable brush head, creating another tie in special features.
Considering market value, the KCLASO V10 ranks higher in the Home and Kitchen section. Customer ratings are also slightly in favor of the KCLASO V10, with a 4.7-star average compared to the MIUZZY M245's 4.4 stars. Finally, the KCLASO V10 presents a more compact design, offering easier storage due to its smaller dimensions.
Let's break down the MIUZZY M245 and Ciogu P2 cordless vacuum cleaners to see how they stack up.
The MIUZZY M245 clearly wins in suction power, boasting 48KPa and 190AW compared to the Ciogu P2's 33KPa. While the Ciogu P2 has a slightly more powerful 400W motor versus the MIUZZY's 350W, the suction performance of the MIUZZY is notable. Battery life is another advantage for the MIUZZY, offering a 4000mAh battery and up to 60 minutes of runtime in Eco mode, while the Ciogu P2 has a 2200mAh battery and 45 minutes runtime. The MIUZZY also has a larger dustbin capacity at 1.5 Liters compared to the Ciogu P2's 1 Liter. Additionally, the MIUZZY M245 offers a more comprehensive suite of features, including anti-hair wrap technology, a self-standing design, an LED display and more components for cleaning. It also has a specific warranty compared to the other one.
However, the Ciogu P2 has some significant advantages. Its HEPA filter is a plus for allergy sufferers. The weight difference is substantial, with the Ciogu P2 weighing only 4.5 pounds compared to the MIUZZY's 8 pounds, making it easier to handle. The Ciogu P2 also operates at a slightly quieter 65 dB versus the MIUZZY's 68 dB. Customers seem to favor the Ciogu P2 slightly, with an average rating of 4.8 out of 5 stars compared to the MIUZZY M245's 4.4. The Ciogu P2 is also equipped with LED Headlights and touch screen.
Ultimately, determining an outright winner depends on individual needs and preferences. If powerful suction, long runtime, and a larger dustbin are priorities, the MIUZZY M245 is the better choice. If a lightweight design, HEPA filtration, and ease of use are more important, the Ciogu P2 is a good consideration. Without price information, the overall value is difficult to judge definitively.
Let's break down the Miuzy M245 versus the dsorupa SmartVac Pro. In terms of brand preference, it's a tie, coming down to individual taste. When it comes to pure suction power, the Miuzy M245 edges out the dsorupa with 48KPa and an AW measurement. However, the dsorupa retaliates with a more powerful 550W motor compared to the Miuzy's 350W. Battery life is in Miuzy’s favor, with a higher total mAh due to its 4000mAh x 6 configuration. Both models have the same maximum runtime of 60 minutes and identical dustbin capacity of 1.5L and are similarly weighted at 8 lbs.
The filter type, however, is a key difference. The dsorupa's HEPA filter surpasses the Miuzy's metal mesh, offering superior filtration of allergens and fine particles. Noise levels are identical at 68 dB. Both vacuums feature effective anti-hair wrap technology.
The dsorupa SmartVac Pro pulls ahead with its more informative LED display, including dust cup fullness and fault alarm indicators. It also features a double handle design, which offers a more ergonomic experience and reduced pushing resistance. The warranty period is the same for both: 24 months. The Special Features also have a tie, though both have unique features and come down to preference.
Customer feedback and sales rankings lean towards the dsorupa SmartVac Pro, boasting a 4.9-star rating with 52 ratings and a higher Best Seller Rank of #89 in the Stick Vacuums category, as the Miuzy has 4.4 out of 5 stars and is ranked #207. While the Miuzy M245 comes out on top by not specifying its charging time, the dsorupa SmartVac Pro charges in 4.5 hours.
The MIUZZY M245 cordless stick vacuum presents a compelling option for those seeking a versatile and powerful cleaning solution. Its strong suction, extended runtime, and anti-hair wrap technology make it particularly appealing for pet owners and households with diverse cleaning needs. While the absence of a HEPA filter may be a consideration for some, the multi-cone filtration system appears effective. Coupled with its user-friendly design, convenient features, and a generous warranty, the M245 delivers excellent value within its price range, making it a worthy contender in the cordless vacuum market.
Hi, I'm Nancy! Welcome to my blog, your go-to destination for all things vacuum cleaner! As a dedicated blogger, I'm passionate about helping you find the perfect vacuum cleaner to suit your lifestyle and cleaning needs. Whether you're tackling pet hair, deep cleaning carpets, or maintaining hardwood floors, I'll provide you with in-depth reviews, expert buying guides, and helpful tips to make your cleaning experience a breeze. Let's dive in and discover the best vacuum cleaner for you!
Explore these additional resources for more information.
© 2025 Flow. All rights reserved.