✅ Features of SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum

This vacuum cleaner offers excellent floor surface compatibility, effectively cleaning hardwood, tile, and rugs. The intense suction power, reaching up to 150 AW, ensures thorough dirt removal.

The Jet Cyclone technology is a significant advantage, optimizing airflow and preventing clogs. This contributes to consistent suction performance and reduces maintenance. Complementing this is a clog reduction feature that helps maintain consistent suction.

The HEPA air filtration system instantly traps dust particles. The 5-Layer Filtration System captures large clumps of dust, fine dust, and traps 99.999% of micro dust (including pet dander, pollen, and other allergens).

The runtime of up to 40 minutes per battery is adequate for most cleaning tasks. The removable battery design adds flexibility, allowing for convenient charging and the option to swap in a spare for extended use.

Its ultra-light design, weighing only 6 lbs, makes it easy to maneuver. The 180-degree swivel head further enhances maneuverability, simplifying navigation around furniture and obstacles.

The included combination tool is versatile for cleaning furniture, window frames, tabletops, and car interiors. The long reach crevice tool is ideal for accessing tight corners and hard-to-reach areas. The 0.8-liter dustbin capacity is reasonable, and the fact that it's hand washable is a definite plus.

The energy-efficient motor is designed for high performance and maximized battery power, indicating a focus on both effectiveness and energy conservation.

✅ What we like about SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum

The suction power is a major selling point. It's effective on various surfaces and often rivals that of larger, corded vacuums. The multiple suction settings are also a plus, allowing for more versatile cleaning.

Functionality is another key strength. The product is easy to maneuver and gets the job done efficiently.

Cleaning the canister and filter is simple, and it's particularly effective for cleaning stairs.

The lightweight design makes it easy to carry and use, reducing strain during cleaning sessions.

Ease of use is another highlight. It's simple to operate, convenient for quick cleanups, and easy to grab and go.

Finally, it boasts a sleek and modern design. And the attachments easily click on and off.

✅ Key specs of SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum

The Samsung Jet 60 Flex Cordless Stick Vacuum, finished in a glossy gold, is designed for indoor use. Its lightweight and portable form factor makes it easy to maneuver around the home. The vacuum weighs 5.7 pounds and has dimensions of 8"L x 9.8"W x 44.1"H. It was manufactured in 2022.

This stick vacuum features a disk filter and comes with a battery and crevice tool. It's cordless for convenience. It has a 0.2-gallon capacity and operates at 40 watts, powered by a lithium-ion battery. The runtime is approximately 40 minutes, with a matching 40-minute charging time.

The Jet 60 is recommended for various floor types, including carp, hardwood, and tile. It has a 9.8-inch cleaning path width. It has a single speed and power level, controlled via a push button or touch. The motor delivers 0.201 horsepower at 3.6 Amps.

The vacuum requires one lithium-ion battery, which is included. It's part of the 60 series. The UPC is 887276595153, and the ASIN is B09GRJJD1K. The item model number is VS15A6031R7/AA. Customers have rated it 4.2 out of 5 stars based on 2,018 ratings.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum vs. Shark IZ163H Cordless Stick Vacuum

When comparing the Samsung VS15A6031R7/AA and the Shark IZ163H, several factors come into play. Brand preference is subjective, resulting in a tie there. However, the Samsung boasts a specified suction power of up to 150 AW, giving it an edge over the Shark whose suction power is only described as "powerful" without any specifics.

The Shark IZ163H shines in terms of weight, being significantly lighter at 3.4 lbs compared to the Samsung's 5.7 lbs, making it easier to maneuver. On the other hand, the Samsung has a larger dustbin capacity of 0.8 Liters (0.2 Gallons) compared to the Shark's 0.34 Quarts (0.39 Liters), meaning less frequent emptying. Both vacuums offer a runtime and charging time of 40 minutes, resulting in a tie. They also both have highly effective filtration systems.

In terms of features, the Shark offers a self-cleaning brushroll and a flexible wand, which are desirable for many users. This gives it a slight edge over the Samsung's offering of being lightweight and portable. The accessories are a tie, as it depends on specific user needs. For pet owners, the Shark's Pet Multi-Tool is a plus. Both offer features to enhance maneuverability.

The Shark has a higher wattage at 181 watts compared to the Samsung's 40 watts. Note that this is not a direct measure of suction. Noise level information is only available for the Shark (80 dB). Both have similar customer ratings of 4.2 Stars. Price and form factor are ties since they are variable, or dependent on personal preference.

✔ SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum vs. SunSare KCV02 Cordless Stick Vacuum

SAMSUNG wins on brand recognition due to its well-established reputation in electronics and home appliances. However, SunSare appears to take the lead in suction power, with a significant 40,000 Pa, surpassing the inferred 150 AW of the SAMSUNG.

SunSare also edges out SAMSUNG in runtime, offering 55 minutes compared to SAMSUNG's 40 minutes, along with a larger 1.5 Liter dustbin, minimizing the need for frequent emptying. The slight weight advantage also goes to SunSare at 5.5 pounds versus 5.7 pounds.

SAMSUNG strikes back with a faster charging time of 40 minutes, while SunSare requires 4 hours. SAMSUNG's 5-Layer HEPA filter system is preferred because HEPA is a standardized high-efficiency standard.

SunSare's special features are more comprehensive, including a smart screen and headlight. Furthermore, the included accessories are more extensive for the SunSare model. The SunSare also operates at a lower noise level of 62 dB.

Customer ratings favor SunSare with 4.5 stars from 740 ratings, compared to SAMSUNG's 4.2 stars from 2,018 ratings. SunSare incorporates more smart features, providing a smart screen for real-time feedback and status updates.

✔ SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum vs. SMOTURE VAC01 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

SAMSUNG edges out SMOTURE in brand recognition, boasting a well-established reputation and a long history in electronics. A significant advantage for SAMSUNG is its suction power, measured at 150 AW, far surpassing SMOTURE's estimated 40 AW (based on 45 KPA). SAMSUNG also wins on charging time, completing a full charge much faster at 40 minutes compared to SMOTURE's 4 hours. SAMSUNG's lighter weight of 5.7 pounds also makes it easier to maneuver and carry, especially during extended cleaning sessions.

However, SMOTURE wins by motor power. 550w is very powerful for a cordless vacuum cleaner, and should translate to better performance than the implied lower wattage of the Samsung based on its overall wattage SMOTURE's runtime stretches up to 60 minutes, outlasting SAMSUNG's 40 minutes. The dustbin capacity of 1.5 Liters is also significantly larger than SAMSUNG's 0.8 Liters, reducing the frequency of emptying.

SMOTURE clearly takes the lead in special features, including automatic suction adjustment, an LED touch screen, and a fragrant filter layer design. SMOTURE comes with a wider array of accessories, providing greater versatility for various cleaning tasks. In terms of operation, SMOTURE offers 4 speeds/modes (ECO, STANDARD, BOOST, AUTO) compared to SAMSUNG's single speed. The inclusion of a rechargeable wall mount in SMOTURE's design offers convenient storage and charging.

Customer ratings also lean towards SMOTURE, with an average of 4.7 out of 5 stars (from 2,315 ratings), indicating higher customer satisfaction compared to SAMSUNG's 4.2 out of 5 stars (from 2,018 ratings). The lower noise level of 64 dB is also an advantage of SMOTURE. Finally, The self-standing feature on the SMOTURE is a convenience that SAMSUNG lacks.

The price is not listed, but if the products were for sale, this would determine which product would be superior to the other.

✔ SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum vs. AFNOP AceVac 11 Cordless Vacuum

The AFNOP AceVac 11 appears to outperform the Samsung VS15A6031R7/AA in several key areas. While the Samsung boasts 150 AW of suction power, the AFNOP claims 45000Pa, which likely translates to a higher Air Watt figure, despite requiring conversion for a precise comparison. Additionally, the AFNOP offers a longer runtime of 60 minutes compared to Samsung's 40 minutes.

The AFNOP also holds advantages in dustbin capacity (1.6L vs. 0.8L), filtration (8-stage vs. 5-layer HEPA), motor wattage (550W vs. 40W), and overall feature set, including an LED touch screen and a V-shaped anti-tangle brush. The AFNOP includes more accessories, making it more versatile.

While the Samsung is lighter at 5.7 lbs versus the AFNOP's 8.3 lbs, and offers a much faster charging time of 40 minutes compared to AFNOP's 4.5 hours, the AFNOP scores better in customer reviews (4.6 vs. 4.2 out of 5 stars) and comes with a more comprehensive array of special features, including a touchscreen display.

Samsung has a higher motor horsepower than AFNOP. Brand recognition is a significant advantage for Samsung, while AFNOP is less well-known. Finally, the AFNOP is assumed to be less expensive, offering greater value.

✔ SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum vs. JELLYPIG Pure 01 Cordless Vacuum

In a head-to-head comparison between the SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA and the JELLYPIG Pure 01 cordless stick vacuums, several key differences emerge. While SAMSUNG benefits from its established brand reputation, the JELLYPIG generally outperforms in terms of features and performance.

Regarding suction power, JELLYPIG boasts a significantly higher 45 KPa compared to the SAMSUNG's 150 AW, a measurement that indicates airflow, and doesn't specify the KPa. JELLYPIG also offers a longer runtime of 60 minutes compared to SAMSUNG's 40 minutes, providing extended cleaning sessions.

Furthermore, the JELLYPIG's HEPA filter surpasses the SAMSUNG's disk filter in trapping fine particles and allergens. The JELLYPIG also has a larger dustbin capacity of 1.5 liters compared to the SAMSUNG's 0.8 liters, reducing the frequency of emptying. On the other hand, SAMSUNG is slightly lighter at 5.7 pounds versus the JELLYPIG's 6 pounds.

In terms of included accessories, JELLYPIG offers a more comprehensive set of tools, providing greater cleaning versatility. SAMSUNG, however, features a much faster charging time of 40 minutes compared to JELLYPIG's 4 hours. The JELLYPIG has a more powerful motor at 450 Watts compared to the SAMSUNG's 40 Watts.

As no dB level is specified it is likely the Samsung is Quieter. The JELLYPIG also integrates special features, including an anti-tangle V-Brush, a 7-layer filtration system, and aromatherapy tablet compatibility. JELLYPIG also has newer year of manufacture.

Customer reviews indicate a higher average rating for the JELLYPIG, while the price comparison remains to be seen.

✔ SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum vs. Ciogu P2 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Let's compare the Samsung VS15A6031R7/AA and the Ciogu P2 stick vacuums. The Samsung wins in brand recognition, offering the reassurance of a well-established name in electronics.

Suction power is tricky to compare directly. The Samsung lists 150 AW (Air Watts), while the Ciogu lists 33 kPa (Kilopascals). Without a proper conversion, it's difficult to say definitively which is stronger, but the Ciogu could potentially have higher suction. This is something to investigate further. However, the Ciogu has a much higher motor wattage, 400W compared to Samsung's 40W, suggesting a potentially more powerful motor.

The Ciogu edges out the Samsung in runtime, offering 45 minutes in Eco mode (though only 20 in Max mode) versus Samsung's 40 minutes. The Ciogu is also lighter, weighing in at 4.5 pounds compared to Samsung's 5.7 pounds. It also boasts a larger dustbin capacity (1 liter versus 0.8 liters).

Both vacuums offer a 5-layer/stage filtration system with HEPA filters, resulting in a tie for filtration quality. However, the Ciogu comes with more versatile accessories, including multiple brush heads and telescopic links, compared to the Samsung's combination and crevice tools. The Ciogu also features a touch screen LED display, which the Samsung apparently lacks.

Both are lightweight and portable so are the same in those features. The Ciogu P2 has a noise level specified as 65 dB, which is important information that is lacking on the Samsung.

Customer reviews favor the Ciogu P2, with a 4.8-star average versus the Samsung's 4.2 stars. However, the Samsung has significantly more reviews (2,018 versus 269), giving its rating more statistical weight.

Finally, price is a major factor, but I don't have that information to consider in this comparison.

✔ SAMSUNG VS15A6031R7/AA Stick Vacuum vs. Ciogu P6-C17K-H08A Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Samsung wins in brand recognition due to its established reputation and consumer confidence in electronics and appliances. Ciogu likely offers stronger suction with its 33 kPa rating. Note that Samsung reports AW (Air Watts) rather than kPa, and a direct comparison is not possible without knowing AW for the Ciogu and confirming the kPa rating is accurate.

Ciogu edges out Samsung in battery runtime with 45 minutes compared to Samsung's 40 minutes and its lighter weight of 4.5 lbs versus 5.7 lbs makes the Ciogu easier to maneuver. The Ciogu also has a larger dustbin capacity at 1 Liter, compared to Samsung's 0.8 Liters.

However, Samsung's 5-Layer Filtration System captures a slightly higher percentage of micro dust (99.999%) than the Ciogu's 5-stage system (99.99%). Both vacuums share similar special features like lightweight and HEPA filters, resulting in a tie.

Ciogu offers more accessory versatility with multiple brush heads and telescopic links, while Samsung comes with a Combination Tool and Long Reach Crevice Tool. Ciogu also boasts a touch screen and LED display for more convenient control, versus Samsung's push button controls.

Ciogu operates at a lower noise level of 65 dB. Samsung's dimensions are slightly more compact at 8"L x 9.8"W x 44.1"H compared to the Ciogu's 11"L x 8"W x 46"H. Customer ratings favor Ciogu with 4.5 out of 5 stars, while Samsung has 4.2, although the Ciogu rating is based on fewer reviews. Finally, price is not factored into this comparison.

✅ Conclusion

The Samsung Jet 60 Flex presents a compelling cordless cleaning solution. Its standout feature is undeniably the strong suction, proving effective across various floor types. Combined with its lightweight design and ease of use, it's a practical option for quick, efficient cleanups. While the 40-minute runtime might not suit extensive cleaning sessions, the removable battery offers a degree of flexibility. The inclusion of useful attachments and a washable dustbin further enhances its appeal. Ultimately, the Jet 60 strikes a good balance between power, convenience, and maneuverability, making it a worthwhile consideration for those seeking a versatile stick vacuum.