✅ Features of Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum

The Shark vacuum boasts impressive technology with its DUOCLEAN DETECT system, utilizing two brushrolls and Intelli-Sense sensors that automatically adjust brushroll speed for optimal cleaning. FLOOR DETECT, also powered by Intelli-Sense, uses an ultrasonic sensor to identify floor type, enabling Shark POWERDETECT to automatically adjust brushroll speed. DIRECTION DETECT, utilizing an Intelli-Sense directional sensor, recognizes the vacuuming direction, allowing POWERDETECT to direct suction forward or in reverse for maximum cleaning.

From a convenience standpoint, the self-standing design allows for easy storage, preventing the vacuum from falling over. The ultra-lightweight construction, weighing less than 10 pounds, contributes to ease of lifting and maneuverability. A self-cleaning brushroll eliminates hair wrap issues, making it ideal for pet owners. Finally, Odor Neutralizer Technology helps freshen the home while vacuuming.

Filtration is handled by an ANTI-ALLERGEN COMPLETE SEAL combined with a HEPA filter, trapping 99.99% of dust and allergens (non-living matter).

The included accessories enhance its versatility with a Pet Power Brush, Upholstery Tool, Crevice Tool, Odor Neutralizer Technology Cartridge, and Onboard Storage Clip.

Performance metrics indicate strong large particle cleaning, based on ASTM F558, measured at the hose and benchmarked against ASTM F2607 and IEC62885-2 (5.5) in the upright market.

✅ What we like about Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum

One of the most impressive aspects of this product is its powerful suction. It effectively removes dirt, dust, and both human and pet hair from various surfaces, including carpets, rugs, and hard floors. The suction is strong enough to even lift debris from deep within carpets, ensuring a thorough clean.

The lightweight design significantly enhances the user experience. Its portability makes it easy to carry and maneuver, particularly on stairs. This feature also reduces strain on the back, making cleaning less physically demanding.

The product is also very easy to use. Assembly is simple, and the start/stop buttons make operation straightforward. It transitions smoothly between different floor types, and the maintenance is hassle-free.

Cleaning the vacuum itself is also a breeze. The dust cup is easy to empty, and the filters are washable. The self-cleaning brushroll is a great addition, preventing hair from tangling and reducing maintenance time.

This vacuum offers excellent versatility. It can be used as a stick vacuum or a hand vacuum, making it suitable for various cleaning tasks. Its effectiveness extends to hardwood, carpets, and rugs, and it's also great for cleaning furniture and stairs.

Finally, the long cord provides excellent reach, eliminating the need to constantly recharge. This corded design ensures consistent power throughout the cleaning process. Many users have reported surprise at how much dirt the vacuum picks up, highlighting its overall effectiveness.

✅ Key specs of Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum

The Shark HZ4002 stick vacuum is a corded model boasting several notable features. It's designed to be portable and lightweight, enhancing maneuverability during cleaning tasks. A headlight is incorporated to illuminate dark areas, and its compact form factor aids in storage. The inclusion of a HEPA filter suggests a focus on allergen removal.

The package comes with useful attachments such as an Odor Neutralizer Technology Cartridge, an Upholstery Tool, a Pet Power Brush, and a Crevice Tool, making it versatile for various cleaning needs. It has a dustbin capacity of 0.87 quarts and operates at 600 watts, drawing 5 amps of current.

This vacuum is recommended for use on a variety of surfaces including carpet, hard floors, tile floors, hardwood, and rugs. The "DuoClean+Self-Clean+PowerDetect" style implies advanced cleaning capabilities and user-friendly maintenance.

The Eggplant-colored vacuum has dimensions of 9.8"L x 10.23"W x 46.15"H, with a matte finish. It weighs 9.3 pounds and features a push button control type with a touch control method. The vacuum has one handle and is intended for indoor use.

Manufactured by SharkNinja in China, this 2024 model has received an average customer rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars based on 1,155 ratings. It's ranked #24 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms within the Home & Kitchen category. Batteries are not required for operation.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. Shark IZ163H Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Shark IZ163H cordless vacuum gains an initial advantage over the corded Shark HZ4002 with its cordless design, offering greater freedom of movement. However, when it comes to suction, the HZ4002’s POWERDETECT technology, with its adaptable suction, edges out the IZ163H's generalized "powerful suction," suggesting a more intelligent approach to varied surfaces. The IZ163H claws back a win with its 40-minute runtime.

The brushroll technology is a close call. Both models boast self-cleaning capabilities to prevent hair wrap, earning them a tie. The HZ4002 features Floor Detect with Intelli-Sense and Direction Detect with Intelli-Sense, so, it automatically adjusts to the floor type and optimizes cleaning performance in both forward and reverse motions. The IZ163H counters with its impressively light weight of just 3.4 pounds, making it much easier to maneuver for above-floor cleaning, thus winning the weight category.

The HZ4002 takes the lead again with a larger dust cup capacity (0.87 Quarts vs 0.34 Quarts). Both models boast HEPA filtration and Anti-Allergen Complete Seal technology. The HZ4002 then wins the Special Features category, it features unique Odor Neutralizer Technology. Also, HZ4002 wins Accessory category since it includes one more accessory than IZ163H. Both models offer compact maneuverability.

While the noise level of HZ4002 model is unknown, but, IZ163H model is at 80 dB, which gives HZ4002 one more point. HZ4002 wins wattage rating too, 600 Watts vs 181 Watts which means possibly stronger suction. Finally, The HZ4002 clinches the Customer Rating category with a slightly better rating of 4.3/5 stars.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. Shark HV343AMZ Stick Vacuum

The Shark HZ4002 edges out the HV343AMZ in technology, boasting DuoClean Detect, Floor Detect, Direction Detect, and an Odor Neutralizer compared to the HV343AMZ's Self-Cleaning Brushroll and hand vacuum conversion. Both vacuums feature a self-cleaning brushroll for hair wrap prevention, resulting in a tie.

The HV343AMZ is slightly lighter at 9.2 pounds compared to the HZ4002's 9.3 pounds. However, the HZ4002 wins in dust cup capacity, offering 0.87 quarts versus the HV343AMZ's 0.68 quarts. The HZ4002 also packs more power with 600 watts compared to the HV343AMZ's 500 watts, potentially leading to stronger suction. The HZ4002 also uses a HEPA filter, which is generally better for allergen filtration than the HV343AMZ's foam and felt filter.

In terms of accessories, the HZ4002 comes with a Pet Power Brush and odor cartridge in addition to the Upholstery Tool and Crevice Tool that both models share. Maneuverability is a tie, with the HZ4002 being ultra-lightweight and self-standing, while the HV343AMZ has advanced swivel steering.

The HV343AMZ scores higher in customer ratings, with 4.4 stars from a substantial 23,983 ratings, compared to the HZ4002's 4.3 stars from 1,155 ratings. The HV343AMZ also holds a higher bestseller rank at #7 in the stick vacuum category, compared to the HZ4002's #24. At least we know the HV343AMZ produces 80 db.

Finally, The HZ4002 wins the dimensions aspect.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum

Shark takes the lead in brand recognition, being a more established and well-known name in the vacuum industry. Both vacuums are corded, resulting in a tie.

Eureka edges out in weight, being lighter at 7.4 pounds compared to Shark's 9.3 pounds, making it potentially easier to maneuver. Eureka also offers a slightly larger capacity at 1 liter versus Shark's 0.87 quarts, reducing the frequency of emptying.

Shark counters with a higher wattage of 600 Watts compared to Eureka's 500 Watts, suggesting more powerful suction. It also boasts a superior HEPA filter compared to Eureka's foam filter, which is more effective at trapping allergens.

Shark's special features, including "DuoClean Detect" and "Self-Cleaning Brushroll," are more advanced. Shark also wins regarding included accessories, offering specific items like an odor neutralizer cartridge, upholstery tool, and pet power brush, unlike Eureka's generic accessory kit. The Shark vacuum is also more versatile, recommended for a wider range of floor types, including carpet, hard floor, tile, hardwood, and rug.

Eureka has a more compact design with a smaller width and height. Eureka also received a slightly higher customer rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars compared to Shark's 4.3, although based on fewer ratings. However, Shark holds a better bestseller rank at #24 compared to Eureka's #73, indicating greater popularity.

Shark has a significant technology advantage with features like DuoClean Detect, Floor Detect, Direction Detect, Self-Cleaning Brushroll, and Odor Neutralizer.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. SMOTURE VAC01 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

The SMOTURE VAC01 emerges as the superior choice primarily due to its cordless design, offering greater convenience and freedom compared to the corded Shark HZ4002. Furthermore, the SMOTURE's impressive 45KPA suction, clearly specified, outweighs the Shark's unspecified suction power, despite the Shark's slightly higher wattage.

A significant advantage for the SMOTURE is its runtime of up to 60 minutes, enabled by its cordless nature. While both vacuums are self-standing, the SMOTURE's lighter weight of 6 pounds makes it easier to maneuver and carry compared to the Shark's 9.3 pounds. The SMOTURE also boasts a larger 1.5-liter dustbin, requiring less frequent emptying than the Shark's 0.87-quart capacity.

The Shark HZ4002 takes the lead in floor detection and adaptation with its "Intelli-Sense" technology, which appears more advanced than the SMOTURE's "Auto Mode". Both vacuums offer hair wrap prevention, a valuable feature for pet owners, leveling the playing field.

While both have HEPA filters, Shark's Anti-Allergen Complete Seal filtration is appealing. However, washable filter for SMOTURE is a great plus.

The SMOTURE wins out with more accessories offered. It also presents special features such as a rechargeable wall mount, LED touch screen, and fragrant filter layer design.

Customer satisfaction leans towards the SMOTURE, evidenced by its higher rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars from a larger pool of 2,315 ratings, compared to the Shark's 4.3 out of 5 stars from 1,155 ratings. Finally, the SMOTURE provides a longer warranty of 24 months, offering enhanced peace of mind.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. Iirios Q5 Pro Cordless Vacuum

In the realm of corded versus cordless vacuums, the Iirios Q5 Pro takes the lead with its cordless design, offering greater freedom of movement. When it comes to suction power, the Iirios Q5 Pro boasts a formidable 45KPa, surpassing the unstated suction of the Shark HZ4002 (600W). The Iirios Q5 Pro also shines with a runtime of up to 70 minutes, providing substantial cleaning time on a single charge.

The Iirios Q5 Pro further distinguishes itself with a larger dust cup capacity of 1.6 liters, reducing the frequency of emptying. Its lighter weight of 8.7 pounds also contributes to enhanced maneuverability. In terms of filtration, the Iirios Q5 Pro's 8-stage filtration system, coupled with HEPA, edges out the Shark HZ4002's Anti-Allergen Complete Seal + HEPA. Moreover, the Iirios Q5 Pro operates at a quieter noise level, clocking in at under 60dB.

The Shark HZ4002 claws back some ground with its DuoClean Detect brushroll tech, which includes floor detect capabilities and self cleaning. The array of special features is somewhat subjective, but the Shark HZ4002 offers direction detect and an odor neutralizer. The Shark HZ4002 emerges as the winner in the accessories category, packing a pet power brush, upholstery tool, crevice tool, and odor neutralizer cartridge. It also earns points for maneuverability with its integrated headlight.

Determining the price/value proposition is impossible without pricing information. The Iirios Q5 Pro offers the smart OLED display and Wall-Mounted Charging system.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VC-D11B Stick Vacuum Cleaner

The Farberware VC-D11B edges out the Shark HZ4002 in several key areas. Its cordless design offers superior freedom compared to the corded Shark. The Farberware's significantly lighter weight, at only 2 lbs versus the Shark's 9.3 lbs, makes it much easier to carry and maneuver. While the Shark boasts a slightly larger dustbin capacity (0.92 Liters vs 0.8 Liters), the Farberware provides a runtime of 36 minutes.

The Shark counters with a HEPA filter, generally more effective at capturing smaller particles than the Farberware's cloth filter. While both come with a good accessory set, the Shark stands out with more advanced "detect" features. However, the Farberware specifies a suction power of 27,000 PA, while the Shark does not.

The Farberware's more narrow width (3.94" vs 10.23") contributes to better maneuverability. It also boasts a slightly higher customer rating (4.4 vs 4.3), and its Smart Sensor Technology with LED Display provides useful information and suction control. Conversely, the Shark's self-cleaning brushroll is a valuable feature absent in the Farberware. The Shark also seems to be the more affordable option.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. AZVKEA S17 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

The AZVKEA S17 emerges as a strong contender against the Shark HZ4002, primarily due to its cordless design offering superior freedom. The AZVKEA's specified suction power of 45KPa significantly outshines the Shark, which lacks a specific suction power rating. The AZVKEA S17 also benefits from a runtime of up to 60 minutes.

The AZVKEA S17 further excels with a larger dustbin capacity of 1.6 liters compared to the Shark's 0.87 quarts and lighter weight of 6.99 pounds for greater maneuverability. Its filtration system, an 8-Stage Cyclonic Multi-Cone + HEPA + Outlet Filter, appears more comprehensive than the Shark's Anti-Allergen Complete Seal with HEPA. The AZVKEA comes with a more generous package of attachments and accessories. Its dual-handheld and upright design also gives it the edge in maneuverability.

However, the Shark HZ4002 gains ground with its unique special features like DuoClean Detect, Floor Detect, and Direction Detect. Its higher wattage of 600 watts might translate to stronger performance. Additionally, since the Shark's noise level isn't specified, its noise level is assumed to be better.

Customer ratings also favor the AZVKEA S17, with a 4.6 out of 5 stars compared to the Shark's 4.3. Portability is a tie, as both are designed with portability in mind. Price, being unknown for both, remains a crucial factor for any customer.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Let's break down this vacuum cleaner comparison.

The Shark HZ4002 has the advantage of brand recognition, a testament to Shark's established presence and perceived reliability in the vacuum market. However, the dsorupa V10 Ultra pulls ahead with its cordless design, offering superior maneuverability.

Diving into power, the dsorupa's explicitly stated 45KPa suction power edges out the Shark, which lacks a clear specification, suggesting a stronger cleaning performance for the dsorupa. The dsorupa also boasts a runtime of up to 70 minutes, a benefit inherent to cordless vacuums.

The dsorupa's dustbin capacity is nearly double that of the Shark (1.8 Liters vs. 0.87 Quarts), reducing the frequency of emptying. Furthermore, the dsorupa utilizes an 8-stage filtration system, potentially offering slightly better allergen control compared to the Shark's anti-allergen complete seal with HEPA filter.

The brushroll comparison ends in a tie, with each offering unique advantages. The Shark features DuoClean Detect, focusing on intelligent adaption and self-cleaning, while the dsorupa utilizes a V-shaped anti-tangle brush designed for both soft and hard surfaces. The choice depends on specific cleaning needs. Special features are also a tie. The dsorupa brings modern elements like an LED display and aromatherapy, while the Shark features Intellisense technology.

The dsorupa is lighter (8 pounds vs. 9.3 pounds), contributing to easier handling. The dsorupa also comes with a more comprehensive set of accessories, including a telescopic tube. The dsorupa also has a higher user rating 4.9 out of 5 stars with 455 ratings. The Shark has 4.3 out of 5 stars with 1,155 ratings.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. IRIS 540017 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The second product, the IRIS cordless vacuum, wins in the corded/cordless category due to the freedom and convenience offered by its cordless design. Similarly, its lighter weight of 5.07 lbs compared to the Shark's 9.3 lbs gives it the advantage in weight, resulting in better maneuverability and reduced strain.

While the IRIS boasts appealing special features, the Shark HZ4002 takes the win here thanks to its compact design for easy storage, a feature not matched by the IRIS. Both vacuums feature HEPA filters, creating a tie in filter type. However, the Shark edges ahead in dust capacity, offering a marginally higher 0.87 quarts compared to the IRIS's estimated 0.75 quarts. The Shark also comes out on top in wattage, with 600 watts suggesting stronger suction power compared to the IRIS's 230 watts.

The IRIS triumphs in runtime, offering up to 50 minutes of cordless operation, a clear advantage over the corded Shark. However, the Shark regains its lead in floor detection and adaptation with its more comprehensive DuoClean Detect, Floor Detect, and Direction Detect technology compared to the IRIS's Dust Sensor with Auto Mode. The Shark also wins in included accessories, providing a more comprehensive set for furniture, pet clean-up, and storage. Additionally, the Shark's Odor Neutralizer Technology gives it a win in odor control, a feature absent in the IRIS. Both vacuums offer self-standing storage, resulting in a tie.

Customer reviews favor the Shark, with a higher rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars based on a substantial 1,155 ratings, suggesting greater overall satisfaction compared to the IRIS's 3.9 out of 5 stars with only 28 ratings. However, considering the likely lower price point of the IRIS, it wins in price/value, providing good value for basic cordless cleaning.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. Intercleaner S660 Stick Vacuum

Let's break down these two stick vacuums, the Shark HZ4002 and the Intercleaner S660. Brand recognition goes to Shark; they're a more established name in the vacuum cleaner world. Both are corded models, resulting in a tie in that category.

However, the Intercleaner S660 edges out the Shark in suction power with a specified 20KPa, whereas the Shark only implies high suction through its "POWERDETECT" feature. The Intercleaner is also lighter, weighing in at 5.95 pounds versus the Shark's 9.3 pounds, and it boasts a larger dust cup capacity (1.2 Liters compared to Shark's 0.92 Liters). Regarding dimensions, the Intercleaner's more compact width gives it the advantage for storage. And with a 23ft cord it wins out over the Shark because there's no specified reach.

The Shark HZ4002 counters with a richer set of special features, including DUOCLEAN DETECT, FLOOR DETECT, DIRECTION DETECT, SELF-STANDING, ULTRA-LIGHTWEIGHT, NO HAIR WRAP, ODOR NEUTRALIZER, ANTI-ALLERGEN COMPLETE SEAL, Headlight, Portable, Compact, HEPA, beating the Intercleaner S660's Corded and LED lights on the powerhead. The Shark also has a superior filtration system with its HEPA Filter and Anti-Allergen Complete Seal, suggesting better allergen removal than the Intercleaner's 3-Stage HEPA Filter.

The Shark wins out in the accessories department with a Pet Power Brush, Upholstery Tool, Crevice Tool, Odor Neutralizer Technology Cartridge, and Onboard Storage Clip compared to the Intercleaner's Dusting Brush, Crevice Tool, 2-in-1 combination tool, flexible tube. Customer reviews also favor the Shark, with significantly more ratings and a slightly higher average. Finally, the Shark's Best Seller Rank is much higher, indicating greater sales and popularity. The noise level and price cannot be determined.

✔ Shark HZ4002 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

The DSORUPA SmartVac Pro edges out the SHARK HZ4002 due to its cordless design, offering greater freedom of movement. It also boasts a stronger suction power, implied by its 45KPa rating compared to the Shark. The cordless nature of the DSORUPA grants it a runtime of up to 60 minutes.

Furthermore, the DSORUPA features a larger 1.5-liter dust cup, reducing the frequency of emptying. It's also lighter, weighing in at 8 lbs, making it easier to maneuver. While both vacuums utilize HEPA filters, the DSORUPA comes with more accessories.

The SHARK HZ4002 distinguishes itself with a unique set of special features like DuoClean Detect, Floor Detect, Direction Detect, self-standing capability, odor neutralizer, and an anti-allergen seal. The DSORUPA is quieter at 68 dB.

The wattage favors the SHARK at 600W. Customer ratings, however, lean towards the DSORUPA. The Dsorupa also features an extra handle.

✅ Conclusion

The Shark HZ4002 stands out as a compelling corded stick vacuum, offering a powerful and versatile cleaning solution. Its intelligent features, such as DuoClean Detect and PowerDetect, adapt to various floor types and cleaning directions for optimal results. The lightweight design and user-friendly features, like the self-cleaning brushroll and easy-to-empty dust cup, enhance the overall cleaning experience. Paired with a comprehensive set of attachments and effective filtration, the Shark HZ4002 delivers a thorough and convenient cleaning solution for a variety of homes.