✅ Features of Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum

The vacuum boasts powerful suction, designed for comprehensive cleaning of dirt, debris, pet hair, and stubborn messes throughout the entire home. Its runtime extends up to 50 minutes, supported by a removable battery that can be charged both inside and outside the vacuum unit. A handheld power mode is also available for spot cleaning.

The cleaning modes are versatile. Powered Lift-Away technology facilitates seamless transitions between Upright Vacuum mode for carpets and floors, Stick Vacuum mode for reaching under furniture, and Handheld Vacuum mode for tackling hard-to-reach areas, including car interiors.

Floor cleaning is handled by DuoClean Technology. This technology combines two brush rolls within a single powerhead to effectively clean both fine dust and larger debris from carpets and hard floors.

The dust cup offers 2X the capacity compared to the Shark ION F80, minimizing emptying frequency.

Filtration is robust, featuring Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology and a HEPA filter. This combination captures and traps up to 99.99% of dust and allergens, based on ASTM F1977 standards for particles 0.3 microns and larger. Finally, the vacuum offers freestanding upright storage for convenience.

✅ What we like about Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum

Customers consistently praise the vacuum's strong suction power, noting its effectiveness on both hardwood and carpet for picking up dust and debris. This is a key factor in overall satisfaction.

The lightweight design is another highlight, making it easy to carry and maneuver without causing discomfort. Users appreciate how well-designed and versatile the vacuum is, particularly for quick cleanups.

Ease of use is a recurring theme. Customers find it simple to assemble, disconnect/reconnect parts, empty the canister, and convert to handheld mode, making it convenient for daily cleaning tasks.

Maneuverability is also excellent. The vacuum is easy to maneuver around tight spaces and under furniture, gliding smoothly on hardwood floors and transitioning seamlessly to handheld mode. The cordless design adds to this convenience, allowing users to vacuum anywhere without being restricted by a cord.

The detachable roller is a smart cleaning feature, simplifying maintenance by eliminating the need for scissors to remove hair or string. The vacuum's ability to stand on its own is a plus, enabling users to pause cleaning easily.

Additionally, the bright headlights are well-received for improving visibility of dust and debris on the floor. Finally, the velvet-like material on the front roller is appreciated for allowing a smoother glide on hardwood without grating sounds and effectively attracting pet hair.

✅ Key specs of Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum

The Shark ION P50 Lightweight Cordless Upright Vacuum is designed with several key features, including being alcohol-free and utilizing a cartridge filter. It comes with a HEPA filter and brush attachments. It's a cordless model, allowing for flexible movement, and has a capacity of 1 liter. It boasts a runtime of 50 minutes.

The vacuum is designed for hard floors, carpets, and general home use. Its form factor is versatile, functioning as a stick, upright, and handheld vacuum. The color is limestone. The model name is Shark ION P50 Lightweight Cordless Upright Vacuum with HEPA Filter, Handheld Vacuum Mode, and Shark DuoClean for Carpet and Hardfloor Cleaning (IC162).

It runs on a battery that lasts 50 minutes. It is manufactured by SharkNinja, and comes as a single item. Control is managed by hand using touch. It features both handheld, upright, and stick styling, and is portable. The design includes one handle.

The vacuum is intended for indoor usage and has a matte finish. The Global Trade Identification Number is 00622356555340, and the UPC is 622356555340. Its dimensions are 10.24 x 12.45 x 44.8 inches, and it weighs 12 pounds. The ASIN is B07FX3Y4TB, and the item model number is IC162.

The vacuum requires one included Lithium Ion battery. It has received customer reviews averaging 4.3 out of 5 stars from 2,025 ratings. It holds a Best Sellers Rank of #1,183,638 in Home & Kitchen, specifically #414 in Upright Vacuum Cleaners. It is not discontinued by the manufacturer.

Specific instructions indicate that it is a dual-action vacuum suitable for both hard floors and carpet. The volume capacity is 60.6 fluid ounces and it also features a matte finish. The vacuum includes a 5-year limited warranty. Batteries are required with 50 minute battery life.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum vs. Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Shark IC162 appears to be a more feature-rich model, suggested by its longer, more descriptive name: "Shark ION P50 Lightweight Cordless Upright Vacuum with HEPA Filter, Handheld Vacuum Mode, and Shark DuoClean for Carpet and Hardfloor Cleaning." This already hints at greater versatility. Indeed, when comparing the two, the IC162 wins out in form factor, offering stick, upright, and handheld options versus the SV1106's upright-only design.

While the SV1106 is the lighter option at 7.5 lbs compared to the IC162's 12 lbs, the IC162 boasts a significantly longer runtime of 50 minutes versus 17 minutes. The IC162 also features a larger dust cup capacity at 1 Liter (1.06 Quarts) compared to the SV1106's 0.64 Quarts.

The IC162 incorporates a HEPA cartridge filter, which is superior for allergen control compared to the SV1106's washable foam filters. Furthermore, the IC162 integrates more advanced technologies like DuoClean and Anti-Allergen Complete Seal.

However, the SV1106 offers a faster charging time of 4 hours. Its special features, "Portable" and "Lightweight," are valuable benefits for easy use.

Customer ratings are slightly better for the IC162, at 4.3 out of 5 stars versus 4.2 for the SV1106, despite the SV1106 having a much higher number of ratings. The SV1106 holds a much better Best Seller Rank in the upright category (#14) compared to the IC162 (#414). Additionally, only SV1106 provide information about noise level and Voltage.

The IC162 comes with a 5-year limited warranty, a clear advantage over the SV1106's one-year limited warranty.

✔ Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum vs. AFNOP Pure 16 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Let's break down this comparison between the Shark IC162 and the AFNOP Pure 16 vacuum cleaners. Starting with brand recognition, Shark clearly wins due to its established presence in the vacuum market. However, when we look at suction power, the AFNOP claims a significant 45000Pa, while the Shark's "powerful" suction lacks a specific measurement, giving the edge to AFNOP.

The AFNOP also comes out ahead in runtime and battery life, offering up to 60 minutes compared to the Shark's 50. Furthermore, its dust cup capacity is larger at 1.5 liters versus the Shark's 1 liter, meaning less frequent emptying. The AFNOP vacuum has a weight of 8 pounds compared to Shark at 12 pounds giving AFNOP the lead in that aspect.

On the other hand, the Shark shines in its form factor, offering a versatile 3-in-1 design (stick, upright, and handheld). The AFNOP, being only a stick vacuum, is less flexible. The Shark also boasts DuoClean Technology and an Anti-Allergen Complete Seal, which are strong selling points. The warranty on the Shark is also 5 years which is great to protect you from defect or malfunction, while the AFNOP warranty is unstated. Finally, the Shark's dimensions are smaller allowing for easier storage.

The AFNOP, however, presents a dual-screen display, providing real-time information. The AFNOP also has a strong showing in customer reviews with 4.5 stars versus the Shark's 4.3 stars, and its best seller rank is significantly better. The AFNOP also include self-standing design and one-click dust removal which is a very attractive feature for cleaning and storage.

✔ Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC490BL Cordless Stick Vacuum

Shark IC162 edges out Eureka NEC490BL due to its brand recognition. Shark generally earns higher ratings for vacuums. However, the Eureka NEC490BL excels in special features with its cordless design, bag, headlight, HEPA filter, and self-emptying station, which the Shark IC162 lacks. Both vacuum cleaners share HEPA filters, ensuring effective allergen removal, but the Eureka package includes more useful accessories like a vacuum bag, accessory kit, charging dock, and crevice tool. Both models are cordless, a convenience factor.

Eureka boasts a larger dustbin capacity at 2.5 liters compared to Shark's 1 liter, requiring less frequent emptying. Its wattage is 350, suggesting potentially stronger suction, though other factors influence this as well. Eureka also demonstrates a longer runtime, especially in optimal modes, outperforming Shark's fixed 50-minute runtime. The Eureka vacuum is suitable for more floor types, from bare floors and hard floors to carpets, rugs, and tile floors.

The Shark IC162 offers more versatile form factors with stick, upright, and handheld options. Shark is also more compact and lighter, weighing 12 pounds compared to Eureka's 17.64 pounds, enhancing maneuverability. Both models feature hand controls and touch control methods, indicating similar ease of operation. While Shark offers more form factor options, Eureka's self-emptying base enhances overall convenience. The Eureka model is a newer release from 2024.

Shark IC162 has slightly better customer reviews, with 4.3 out of 5 stars, compared to Eureka's 4.2. However, Eureka holds a far superior Best Sellers Rank in Home & Kitchen, showing a higher popularity overall. Both models require batteries.

✔ Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum vs. JELLYPIG Pure 01 Cordless Vacuum

In terms of brand recognition and reputation, Shark takes the lead. It's a well-established brand in the vacuum cleaner market.

However, the JELLYPIG Pure 01 boasts a more powerful suction at 45Kpa compared to the Shark IC162's unspecified suction power. The JELLYPIG also offers a slightly longer runtime, up to 60 minutes, versus Shark's 50 minutes, and a larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 liters versus the Shark's 1 liter.

Both vacuums employ HEPA filter systems. The JELLYPIG includes aromatherapy tablets, which may appeal to some users. The Shark has greater versatility thanks to its 3-in-1 form factor (Stick, Upright, and Handheld).

The JELLYPIG is considerably lighter at 6 pounds compared to the Shark's 12 pounds. Furthermore, the JELLYPIG receives slightly higher customer reviews, averaging 4.6 out of 5 stars, while the Shark has 4.3 stars. JELLYPIG also has a lower price, indicating a more competitive price in the market.

The Shark boasts DuoClean Technology and Powered Lift-Away, while the JELLYPIG has an anti-tangle V-Brush and Aromatherapy Tablet. Ultimately, these are preference based features.

Shark has a 5-year limited warranty, but JELLYPIG's warranty information is not provided.

✔ Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The dsorupa V10 Ultra edges out the Shark IC162 in suction power, boasting 45 KPa and a 550W motor compared to the Shark's unspecified "Powerful" description. Runtime is also a win for the dsorupa, offering up to 70 minutes in Min Mode, exceeding the Shark's 50-minute maximum. The dsorupa also holds more dust with its 1.8-liter capacity, versus the Shark's 1 liter.

For those concerned about air quality, the dsorupa's 8-stage filtration, capturing particles down to 0.1 micron, provides a better clean compared to the Shark's HEPA filter capturing particles 0.3 microns and larger. The dsorupa's brush type provides for a more versatile clean. Its combination of soft and hard bristles, plus the anti-tangle feature, will be helpful for cleaning. The dsorupa model also gives information at a glance with its OLED screen. At only 8 pounds, the dsorupa is also the lighter option, making it easier to maneuver and use as a handheld.

The Shark IC162 gains a point in form factor, offering the flexibility of stick, upright, and handheld configurations, while the dsorupa is strictly a stick vacuum. However, the dsorupa wins in special features thanks to aromatherapy tablets, an ultra-quiet mode, and a convenient wall-mounted charging dock.

Customer reviews favor the dsorupa with a 4.9 out of 5 stars, while the Shark holds a 4.3. Price is too dependent on current listings to call a winner, but the dsorupa is generally known as the cheaper option. The Shark wins in brand recognition because it is a household name.

✔ Shark IC162 Cordless Vacuum vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Shark edges out KCLASO in brand recognition, benefiting from its established reputation in the vacuum cleaner market. However, when it comes to raw power, KCLASO takes the lead, explicitly stating a "Hurricane-Force" suction of 45Kpa and boasting a 550W motor. Shark offers a slightly longer runtime of up to 50 minutes compared to KCLASO's 45 minutes.

The filtration systems present another point of difference. Shark utilizes Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology with a HEPA filter, while KCLASO employs a 5-layer filtration system incorporating HEPA, stainless steel, and sponge filters. The KCLASO system appears to offer more comprehensive filtration. Shark comes back with a larger dust cup capacity of 1 liter, doubling KCLASO's 500ml. KCLASO compensates with a stated noise level of under 75dB, a feature not specified for the Shark.

KCLASO gains ground with its inclusion of a touchscreen for monitoring battery life and suction power. Innovative brush designs give KCLASO the upper hand with its V-shaped roller brush and comb design. Coupled with its 0° to 180° sideways and 0° to 90° up and down head swivel. Furthermore, KCLASO provides a greater range of attachments, including a crevice tool, furniture brush, and telescopic tube, among others.

A significant advantage for KCLASO lies in its weight, at 6.64 pounds, versus Shark's 12 pounds. Shark's offering is more versatile in form factor, functioning as a stick, upright, and handheld vacuum. Both vacuum's are self-standing and share the same battery type (Lithium Ion). KCLASO pulls ahead with a higher customer review rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars, though based on a smaller sample size.

Considering the prices are within a similar range, the other features become more important. Lastly, Shark offers a 5-year limited warranty while KCLASO's warranty details were not specified.

✅ Conclusion

In conclusion, the Shark ION P50 proves to be a highly versatile and effective cordless vacuum. Its strong suction, lightweight design, and ease of use make it a standout for tackling various cleaning tasks throughout the home. The DuoClean technology excels on both carpets and hard floors, while the multiple cleaning modes provide adaptability for different areas and needs. Coupled with a lengthy runtime, robust filtration, and convenient features like the detachable roller and self-standing design, the Shark ION P50 offers a compelling cleaning solution that's well worth considering.