✅ Features of Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum

This cordless vacuum boasts impressive cleaning power, promising powerful suction capable of tackling dirt, debris, pet hair, and tough messes throughout the entire home.

A key feature is the self-cleaning brushroll, enhanced with Dirt Engage technology. This combination aims to provide nonstop hair removal, a significant advantage for pet owners.

The Dirt Engage technology elevates cleaning performance, claiming unbeatable results on both carpets and bare floors when compared to other Shark cordless vacuums. It targets deeply embedded debris in carpets and ensures direct engagement with bare floor surfaces.

The runtime offers up to 40 minutes in Standard mode, though it's important to note that this measurement is taken at the hand vacuum level.

Finally, the MultiFLEX wand offers versatility with its bending capability for reaching under furniture. It also folds for compact, self-standing storage.

✅ What we like about Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum

The product shines in its ease of cleaning. It allows for quick mess cleanup, made even more convenient by its cordless design. The attachments are effective, and many find it superior to using a broom, capable of picking up unseen dirt.

Functionality is another strong point. It's affordable and effective on hardwood and tile floors. The back-saving handle and swivel steering are appreciated, and the included attachments are useful. The powered brush is also mentioned as working well.

Ease of use is also noted, customers have said that its lightweight nature makes cleaning easier and faster, adapting well to various tasks. The quick and easy setup is another bonus. The lightweight design further enhances portability, making it suitable for spaces like RVs.

The cordless nature of the product is greatly appreciated for its convenience and freedom of movement.

Many users are satisfied with the suction power, finding it effective at picking up cat hair and dirt. The strong motor is also a key factor.

The design is considered smart, particularly the roller bar, which is ingeniously designed to prevent hair and threads from winding around it. The detachable hand vacuum is a clever addition, praised for its effectiveness and ease of use. The product effectively reaches under furniture, such as beds, thanks to its stick handle's mid-way bending capability.

✅ Key specs of Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum

The Shark IZ140 Rocket Pro is a lightweight and compact stick vacuum designed for indoor use. It features self-cleaning technology and a foam filter. The vacuum comes equipped with a light kit.

It is cordless, powered by a Lithium-Ion battery, and offers a runtime of up to 40 minutes. It's designed to tackle pet hair and general home cleaning, with a capacity of 1 pound.

The vacuum cleaner has a push-button controller. It's available in blue. Its dimensions are 10.24"L x 7.09"W x 46.1"H and weighs 11.38 pounds.

The Shark IZ140 Rocket Pro operates at a noise level of 80 dB and has one speed and power level. It features one handle and two wheels. The control method utilizes an app.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum vs. Shark HV343AMZ Stick Vacuum

The Shark IZ140 wins out in the cordless versus corded category, offering greater freedom and convenience. While the HV343AMZ doesn't have a runtime limit due to being corded, the IZ140 provides a decent 40-minute runtime. However, the HV343AMZ takes the lead in weight, being lighter at 9.2 lbs compared to the IZ140's 11.38 lbs, making it easier to maneuver. The IZ140 compensates with a larger dust cup capacity of 1 pound versus the HV343AMZ's 0.68 quarts.

Both vacuums feature self-cleaning brushrolls, resulting in a tie. However, the IZ140 includes Dirt Engage technology. Similarly, they tie in special features due to their lightweight design, and for having LED headlights.

The IZ140 excels in under-furniture reach thanks to its MultiFLEX wand, while the HV343AMZ relies on advanced swivel steering and a low-profile design. The HV343AMZ pulls ahead with its filter type, using foam and felt for better fine dust filtration than the IZ140's foam filter. The control method is a tie, as it comes down to personal preference, and both vacuums are portable.

Customer ratings slightly favor the HV343AMZ, with 4.4 out of 5 stars compared to the IZ140's 4.3. Price comparison is impossible without the data. Finally, the HV343AMZ wins in warranty since a 5 year warranty is stated and no information is provided for the IZ140.

✔ Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VC-D02C Stick Vacuum Cleaner

Shark's IZ140 edges out Farberware's VC-D02C due to its established brand reputation. While both vacuums boast useful features, resulting in a tie in this category, Shark's self-cleaning brush roll is a notable advantage. However, Farberware counters with its headlight, bagless design, and washable filter.

Farberware takes the lead in filter type with its preferred washable filter and also wins in included components with essential attachments like a dusting brush, charging dock, and crevice tool. Cordless convenience is a tie, offered by both models. The Shark IZ140 has a bigger capacity than Farberware to hold more dirt.

Shark's longer runtime of 40 minutes versus Farberware's 26 minutes provides more cleaning time. Recommended use is similar for both, resulting in a tie. Form factor also results in a tie.

Farberware's VC-D02C is more compact for easier storage and also has 2 speed, versus 1 from Shark. Farberware's lighter weight makes it easier to maneuver. However, Shark wins on customer reviews with higher ratings and significantly more reviews indicating greater satisfaction. I couldn't compare price as the cost for both are unavailable.

✔ Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VCS-90B1 Stick Vacuum

The Shark IZ140 stands out with its cordless design, offering superior freedom compared to the corded Farberware VCS-90B1. However, the Farberware boasts a stated suction power of 18,000 PA, suggesting potentially stronger cleaning performance, but only if measurement is accurate. The Shark offers 40 minutes of runtime, while the Farberware is limited by its cord.

Conversely, the Farberware nearly doubles the Shark's dustbin capacity, leading to less frequent emptying. While the Shark's special features, like the self-cleaning brushroll and Dirt Engage technology, appear advantageous, the Farberware's incredibly lightweight design at 1 pounds makes it much easier to maneuver.

The Farberware also wins in terms of attachments with its included dust brush and crevice tool. Storage is a tie, with the Shark's folding MultiFLEX wand and the Farberware's hanging wall mount. Customer reviews favor the Shark, with a high rating based on a significantly larger number of reviews, but Farberware had attachments. Considering the assumption that Farberware has a lower price point, the Farberware presents a better value for money.

✔ Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VC-D11E1 Stick Vacuum

Shark's IZ140 edges out Farberware's VC-D11E1 in brand recognition. While both are cordless stick vacuums suitable for home use and boast portability, Farberware pulls ahead with its superior special features, including a headlight and washable filter. Farberware also uses a cloth filter, generally preferred for its washability and potential longevity, whereas the Shark uses a foam filter. Farberware also includes a better variety of attachments with the dusting brush, charging dock, and crevice tool.

The two vacuums are closely matched for their cordless functionality. On capacity, the Shark vacuum cleaner does have a higher capacity. But Farberware has a slight edge on runtime, offering 43 minutes compared to Shark's 40. Farberware also has narrower dimensions than the Shark vacuum. In terms of noise, Shark is shown to have a lower noise level than the Farberware vacuum.

Farberware also has more speed options, providing greater control over cleaning and power and battery life than Shark. Also, the Farberware vacuum is the more lightweight and easier to use vacuum. Although the Shark vacuum cleaner is well regarded among many users, Farberware has slightly better customer reviews as well as more power levels, providing even more control than the Shark vacuum. However, there are significantly more reviews of the Shark that still give it a high rating. Shark is manufactured by a better-known vacuum manufacturer than the Farberware vacuum cleaner.

✔ Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Shark, a well-known brand, faces a formidable competitor in the dsorupa V10 Ultra. While Shark's brand recognition is a definite advantage, the dsorupa quickly gains ground with its superior suction power, boasting 45KPa compared to Shark's unspecified figure.

Runtime is another key area where the dsorupa excels, offering up to 70 minutes compared to Shark's 40. The dsorupa also features a more advanced brush type, with combination soft & hard bristles in a V-shape design.

Filtration is clearly superior in the dsorupa, featuring an 8-stage HEPA system with 99.99% efficiency, a stark contrast to Shark's basic foam filtration. The dsorupa continues to impress with a significantly larger dust cup capacity of 1.8 Liters, dwarfing Shark's small 1-pound capacity. Noise level is also a win for the dsorupa, operating at a quieter 64 dB compared to Shark's 80 dB.

The dsorupa also incorporates an integrated LED display, which the Shark lacks. While both offer additional features like a MultiFLEX wand (Shark) and Aromatherapy Tablet (dsorupa), the dsorupa's additions of aromatherapy and wall-mounted charging give it the edge. The dsorupa is also significantly lighter, weighing 8 pounds compared to Shark's 11.38 pounds.

Customer reviews favor the dsorupa, with a rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars (455 ratings) compared to Shark's 4.3 out of 5 stars (919 ratings). Finally, although the specific price is not provided, the dsorupa is generally less expensive than the Shark model.

✔ Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Alright, let's break down this vacuum comparison.

In terms of suction, the KCLASO V10 takes the lead. It boasts a 45Kpa Hurricane Suction with a 550W motor, whereas the SHARK IZ140's suction is only described as "powerful" without any specific metrics. The KCLASO V10 also edges out the SHARK IZ140 in runtime, offering up to 45 minutes compared to the SHARK's 40.

For filtration, the KCLASO V10's multi-stage system with HEPA, stainless steel, and sponge filters is superior to the SHARK's foam filter. HEPA filtration is crucial for trapping fine particles and allergens. The KCLASO also operates at a quieter 75 dB compared to the SHARK's 80 dB.

The KCLASO V10 is significantly lighter, weighing only 6.64 pounds, making it far easier to maneuver than the SHARK IZ140 at 11.38 pounds. Dust cup capacities are pretty similar, with the SHARK holding approximately 1 pound and the KCLASO holding around 1.1 pounds.

When considering special features, the KCLASO V10 comes out ahead with its 5-Stage Cyclone Filtration, 90°Self-Standing Design with 180°Bendable Brush Head and Intelligent Touchscreen. Both have useful attachments making this a tie.

Customer reviews lean towards the KCLASO V10, with a rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars compared to the SHARK's 4.3.

Smart features give KCLASO the edge as they have built the intelligent touchscreen directly into the device and there is no need for using a phone app. The KCLASO V10's 90°Self-Standing Design also offers better accessibility and convenience.

✔ Shark IZ140 Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

In a head-to-head comparison between the Shark IZ140 and the Dsorupa Smartvac Pro, the Dsorupa emerges as the overall winner. The Dsorupa clearly outshines the Shark when it comes to raw power, providing a suction power of 45KPA and motor power of 550W, whereas the Shark does not specify these values. Dsorupa also has a longer runtime of 60 minutes compared to Shark's 40 minutes. The Dsorupa wins again by specifying that it has a charging time of 4.5 hours, as the Shark does not specify a charging time.

The Shark wins in self-cleaning due to its "self-cleaning" brushroll, which suggests a more robust solution than the Dsorupa's roller brush and comb teeth. However, the Dsorupa bounces back by being more lightweight at 8 lbs compared to the Shark's 11.38 lbs, making it easier to maneuver. It also boasts a larger capacity of 1.5 Liters (approx. 3.3lbs) compared to the Shark's 1 lbs, meaning less frequent emptying. The Dsorupa is quieter, with a noise level of 68 dB versus the Shark's 80 dB. Its unique double handle design and intelligent display give it an edge in special features.

The Dsorupa is the clear winner for its HEPA filter, which is better for capturing allergens. It has higher customer ratings, with 4.9 out of 5 stars (52 ratings). Dsorupa also has a dust cup fullness indicator and a beneficial two-year warranty, which are absent from the Shark. The Dsorupa's 0° to 180° left and right and 0° to 90° up and down rotation give it greater maneuverability.

The price is not stated for either product, resulting in a tie in this category. Both have LED lights so it is a tie as well.

✅ Conclusion

The Shark IZ140 Rocket Pro cordless vacuum presents a compelling option for those seeking a lightweight and versatile cleaning solution. Its strengths lie in its cordless convenience, effective suction, and user-friendly design, particularly the self-cleaning brushroll and MultiFLEX wand. The praise for its performance on hardwood and tile floors, coupled with its ability to reach under furniture, highlights its adaptability. However, potential buyers should be mindful of the 40-minute runtime being measured at the hand vacuum level and the 80 dB noise level. Overall, the IZ140 offers a practical and efficient way to maintain a clean home, especially for pet owners and those with limited storage space.