✅ Features of Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum

The product is primarily designed for carpet cleaning, utilizing powerful suction to tackle dirt, debris, pet hair, and tough messes throughout the home. Its cleaning path width is 10.63 inches.

A key feature is the self-cleaning brushroll incorporating Dirt Engage technology, which ensures nonstop hair removal and efficient cleaning. The Dirt Engage Technology claims unbeatable performance on both carpets and bare floors, effectively removing deeply embedded debris.

The device offers a runtime of up to 40 minutes in standard mode, measured at the hand vacuum. Its removable battery can be conveniently charged either inside or outside the unit.

Notably, the product is explicitly NOT COMPATIBLE WITH LITHIUM ION BATTERY XBAT200. The filtration system includes Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology and a HEPA filter, designed to trap dust and allergens.

✅ What we like about Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum

Customers appreciate the overall functionality of this vacuum, noting its effectiveness on tile, hard floors, and carpets. The cordless design adds to its convenience.

The lightweight and portable nature of the vacuum makes it easy to use, carry, and maneuver, particularly on stairs.

Ease of use is another key strength. Users find it easy to handle, convert to handheld mode, empty the dust cup, and store. Its versatility across different floor types is also well-received.

While not universal, some users highlight the vacuum's effectiveness at picking up pet hair on rugs and hardwood. Furthermore, some customers have found that the design prevents hair from wrapping around the roller.

The HEPA filtration system also gets a nod for preventing the recirculation of fine particles, such as dust and salt, back into the air.

✅ Key specs of Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Shark IZ162H is a lightweight, cordless stick vacuum cleaner with a magenta finish. It boasts a HEPA filter, a brush roll, a crevice tool, a pet multi-tool, and a battery charger as included components. Being cordless, it offers freedom of movement, and the headlight illuminates dark corners.

This vacuum has a 0.1-gallon capacity and operates at 181 watts. It runs for up to 40 minutes on a single charge, with a charging time of 240 minutes. It's suitable for use on carpet, hard floors, and bare floors, offering both handheld and stick configurations.

The product dimensions are 10.24"L x 7.09"W x 46.1"H and it weighs 7.17 pounds. It operates at a noise level of 80 dB. The Shark IZ162H has a 10.63-inch cleaning path width and features two wheels for maneuverability.

This stick vacuum is designed for indoor use and has a number of two power levels. It uses a push-button controller with touch controls. It is powered by one included XSBT620 Lithium Ion battery. It requires assembly.

The Shark IZ162H comes with a 5-year limited warranty. Specific instructions recommend it for carpet use. The global trade identification number is 00622356560313 and the UPC is 622356560313. The ASIN is B07S98411P and the item model number is IZ162H.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. SMOTURE VAC01 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

Shark, a reputable brand in the vacuum cleaner market, wins in brand recognition. However, the SMOTURE VAC01 generally outperforms the Shark IZ162H in key performance areas.

The SMOTURE boasts a higher suction power of 45KPA compared to the Shark's unspecified but implied powerful suction. Furthermore, the SMOTURE has a more powerful motor at 550 Watts versus Shark's 181 Watts. The SMOTURE also offers a longer runtime of 60 minutes against the Shark's 40 minutes.

The SMOTURE has a substantially larger dustbin capacity at 1.5 Liters compared to the Shark's 0.38 Liters. In terms of filtration, SMOTURE features a multi-layer high-density filtration system, which seems more comprehensive than the Shark's HEPA filter. The SMOTURE is also lighter at 6 pounds versus Shark's 7.17 pounds, and quieter with a noise level of 64 dB against Shark's 80 dB.

The SMOTURE provides more versatility with 4 speeds/modes (ECO, STANDARD, BOOST, AUTO), including an auto mode, while the Shark has only 2. The SMOTURE's self-standing feature, wall mount, and touch screen control further enhance user convenience, features absent in the Shark.

The SMOTURE includes a more comprehensive set of accessories. Customer reviews favor the SMOTURE with a 4.7-star rating from 2,315 ratings, compared to the Shark's 4.3 stars from 1,983 ratings.

The Shark offers a longer warranty of 5 years limited compared to SMOTURE 2 year Warranty. Both perform well on carpet, making the instructions for use a tie.

✔ Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Trucozie T350 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Let's break down the Shark IZ162H and the Trucozie T350 vacuum cleaners. Starting with brand recognition, Shark definitely has the edge, being a well-established name in the vacuum cleaner market. However, the Trucozie compensates with a richer set of features including multiple suction modes, high-efficiency filtration, an LED display, and an 8-in-1 lightweight design with a stated 20-45 minute runtime.

When it comes to filtration, both vacuums utilize HEPA filters. The Trucozie goes a step further by including a metal filter, which can pre-filter larger debris and potentially extend the HEPA filter's lifespan. The Trucozie also comes with more included components – notably an extra HEPA filter and a wall hanger – making it a more complete package out of the box.

Both models are cordless and function as both stick and handheld vacuums. But the Trucozie has a considerably larger dustbin capacity at 0.6 Liters compared to the Shark's 0.1 Gallons (0.38 Liters). Although the Shark boasts a higher wattage at 181 watts compared to the Trucozie's 150, the Trucozie offers a slightly longer runtime of 45 minutes in energy-saving mode (runtime can vary based on the mode). The Shark, however, has a faster charging time of 4 hours compared to the Trucozie's 5 hours.

The Trucozie also is recommended for a broader range of cleaning tasks, including furniture, car interiors, and tile cleaning, while the Shark focuses on carpets and bare floors. The Trucozie's battery pack description suggests potentially better longevity and power, and it operates at a quieter noise level of 75 dB compared to the Shark's 80 dB. Moreover, the Trucozie features three speeds compared to the Shark's two and weighs less at 6 pounds versus the Shark's 7.17 pounds.

Customer reviews show the Trucozie with a slightly higher average rating and a better best seller rank in the Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms category. But the Shark counters with a significantly longer 5-year limited warranty, providing more peace of mind for potential buyers.

✔ Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. AZVKEA S17 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

Shark wins in brand recognition due to its established reputation. However, AZVKEA takes the lead in suction power, boasting a 550W motor and 45KPa max suction compared to the Shark's less defined "Powerful suction."

AZVKEA also offers a longer maximum runtime of up to 60 minutes in Min Mode, while Shark reaches up to 40 minutes in Standard mode. Both vacuums utilize Lithium-ion batteries and have a 4-hour charging time.

AZVKEA features an 8-stage cyclonic HEPA filter system, offering enhanced filtration compared to the Shark's standard HEPA filter. The AZVKEA also provides a significantly larger dustbin capacity of 1.6 liters (0.42 gallons) versus the Shark's 0.1 gallons.

In terms of weight, AZVKEA is slightly lighter at 6.99 pounds compared to Shark's 7.17 pounds, with the AZVKEA also achieving a much quieter operation at 64 dB compared to the Shark's 80 dB. AZVKEA offers a richer set of special features including an anti-tangle brush, dual-handheld design, and aromatherapy capabilities.

AZVKEA provides a broader range of included components. Customer reviews also favor AZVKEA, with an average rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars against Shark's 4.3. Shark edges out AZVKEA by providing a 5-year limited warranty. Typically, AZVKEA is offered at a lower price point. Finally, Shark takes the lead in assembly as there is less assembly needed.

✔ Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Shark faces off against dsorupa in this vacuum cleaner comparison. Right off the bat, Shark wins on brand recognition. It's a more established player in the vacuum market.

However, dsorupa quickly takes the lead in performance. It boasts 550W of suction power compared to Shark's 181W. dsorupa also specifies a suction power of 45KPa, offering a more quantifiable measure. Its runtime extends to 70 minutes, beating Shark's 40 minutes. Charging is also slightly faster for the dsorupa, clocking in at 210 minutes versus Shark's 240.

The dsorupa shines regarding capacity and filtration. Its dust cup holds a substantial 1.8 Liters, dwarfing Shark's 0.38 Liters. Plus, it uses an 8-stage filtration system with a HEPA filter, which appears more comprehensive than Shark's HEPA filter and anti-allergen seal. The V-shaped anti-tangle brush roll seems more versatile too.

dsorupa goes further with extra features like aromatherapy, an LED display, and a quiet mode. It has a better average customer rating of 4.9 stars, although it's based on fewer reviews (455) compared to Shark's 4.3 stars with 1,983 ratings.

The scale tips slightly in Shark's favor on weight, being a bit lighter at 7.17 pounds against dsorupa's 8 pounds. It's also likely that the Shark would be more affordable.

Overall, dsorupa emerges as the superior vacuum cleaner based on its superior suction power, longer runtime, bigger dust cup, better filter system and superior customer reviews.

✔ Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. PINICO PINICO-N5 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The PINICO vacuum clearly wins when it comes to suction power. It explicitly boasts 25000Pa, a quantifiable measure of its power, while the Shark only implies powerful suction. Both vacuums tie in terms of battery life, offering 40 minutes of runtime, and also charging time, which is 4 hours for both.

The PINICO has a significant advantage in dustbin capacity, holding 1500 grams compared to the Shark's approximate 379 grams. Its filtration system also seems superior, featuring a 6-stage system versus the Shark's anti-allergen seal and HEPA filter. However, both vacuums offer appealing brushroll features, with the Shark having a self-cleaning brushroll and the PINICO an anti-tangle design, resulting in a tie.

PINICO is the clear winner when considering special features. It offers a wider range, including a removable battery, faster charging, an anti hair tangle design and a swivel brush. The weight is also slightly in PINICO's favour, being marginally lighter at 7 pounds versus Shark's 7.17 pounds.

Customer ratings, however, indicate a slight advantage for the Shark, with a 4.3 out of 5 stars based on a much larger pool of reviews (1,983) compared to PINICO's 4.2 stars from only 85 reviews.

The Shark offers a longer warranty of 5 years, whereas the PINICO offers a 3-year warranty along with customer service. PINICO has a better best seller ranking in the stick vacuum category.

Without price information, it's impossible to provide a complete comparison, as this is a major factor in purchasing decision.

✔ Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The KCLASO V10 emerges as the preferable option overall, due to its performance characteristics, especially regarding price and value when considering its stronger performance. However, without specific pricing data for each product, this conclusion is based solely on the superior performance metrics of the KCLASO.

Regarding suction power, the KCLASO V10 has a clear advantage with its stated 45Kpa suction. Additionally, the KCLASO V10 offers a slightly longer runtime compared to the SHARK IZ162H.

Conversely, the SHARK IZ162H offers a faster charging time of 4 hours compared to the KCLASO V10's 5 hours.

The KCLASO V10 uses a 5-layer filtration system providing more comprehensive filtration. It also has a larger dust cup capacity. Furthermore, the KCLASO V10 is also lighter and quieter than the SHARK IZ162H.

Motor power is another area where the KCLASO V10 excels. In terms of brushroll design, the KCLASO's V-shaped roller brush and comb aims to reduce tangling.

The KCLASO V10 boasts a touchscreen interface, adding a level of control and information not found in the SHARK IZ162H. Also, the KCLASO V10 comes with a more extensive set of attachments.

The SHARK IZ162H offers a 5-year limited warranty while the KCLASO Warranty is not stated. Brand recognition is where the SHARK IZ162H wins as a well-known and trusted brand. The KCLASO V10 is more specific in how it can be used.

✔ Shark IZ162H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

When comparing the Shark IZ162H and the dsorupa SmartVac Pro, several key features stand out. The Shark benefits from being a well-established brand in the vacuum cleaner market. However, the dsorupa boasts a superior suction power, rated at 45KPA with a 550W motor, compared to the Shark's unspecified but described as "powerful" suction.

The dsorupa also offers a longer runtime of up to 60 minutes versus the Shark's 40 minutes. The dsorupa specifies its battery capacity as 7*2500mAh lithium-ion, also seemingly better than the Shark's unspecified battery. The Shark has faster charging time of 240 minutes versus the dsorupa 270 minutes. The dsorupa features a significantly larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 liters compared to the Shark's 0.38 liters.

The Shark is lighter, weighing 7.17 pounds versus the dsorupa's 8 pounds, making it slightly easier to maneuver. On the other hand, the dsorupa operates at a lower noise level of 68 dB compared to the Shark's 80 dB. While the Shark has a self-cleaning brushroll, the dsorupa has a flexible anti-tangle V-shaped roller brush with comb teeth and LED lights, providing more comprehensive cleaning features.

The dsorupa includes a smart LED display showing battery power, dust cup fullness, and fault alarms, a feature absent in the Shark. The Shark offers a longer warranty of 5 years compared to the dsorupa's 2-year protection plan. Finally, the dsorupa has double handle design for ergonomics and high customer reviews with 4.9 out of 5 stars (52 ratings) versus the Shark's 4.3 out of 5 stars (1,983 ratings).

✅ Conclusion

The Shark IZ162H cordless stick vacuum presents a compelling cleaning solution with its lightweight design, cordless convenience, and versatile performance across various floor types. Its Dirt Engage technology and self-cleaning brushroll stand out for effective hair removal and debris pickup, while the HEPA filtration system caters to allergy sufferers. While the 4-hour charging time is a drawback, the 40-minute runtime and included accessories provide ample cleaning power. Despite the incompatibility with the XBAT200 battery, the IZ162H, with its ease of use, portability, and 5-year warranty, is a worthy contender for those seeking a convenient and effective cleaning tool for carpets, hard floors, and beyond.