✅ Features of Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum

The Shark Stratos Cordless boasts Clean Sense IQ, utilizing an infrared sensor to detect hidden dirt and automatically boost power by up to 50% for enhanced dirt pickup compared to the Shark Stratos Cordless in ECO Mode. A visual indicator signals when floors are clean.

It also features HyperVelocity Plus, providing ultra-powerful cordless suction. The integrated Odor Neutralizer combats unpleasant odors from collected debris, leaving behind a fresh scent.

The DuoClean PowerFins HairPro system employs two brushrolls for deep carpet cleaning, effective hard floor engagement, and comprehensive pickup of dirt, debris, and hair. The Self-Cleaning Brushroll ensures powerful pet hair removal without hair wrap.

For ease of use, the Flexible Wand (MultiFLEX) bends to facilitate cleaning under furniture and folds for compact, freestanding storage. The LED Display provides real-time information on battery life, suction levels, and Clean Sense IQ status.

The vacuum offers up to 60 minutes of runtime in ECO mode when measured at the hand vacuum and includes a removable battery that can be charged anywhere. Finally, HEPA filtration and Anti-Allergen Complete Seal capture and trap over 99.9% of dust, allergens, and odors (based on ASTM F1977 of particles .3 microns and larger).

✅ What we like about Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum

The product boasts impressive functionality, effectively tackling various surfaces including hardwood and carpets. It excels at navigating under furniture and efficiently manages dog hair.

Its cleaning ability is another strong point. It cleans carpets thoroughly, picking up hair and dirt with ease, making it suitable for daily use. The rapid recharge time, easy-to-empty bin, and useful attachments further contribute to its appeal.

Ease of use is clearly a priority. The lightweight design and maneuverability make it a pleasure to operate. Clever attachments and simple maintenance routines add to the user-friendly experience. Assembly is also reported to be straightforward.

The suction power is generally considered effective. It grips rugs well and picks up debris both moving forward and backward. The automatic suction adjustment for different surfaces is a notable feature, although opinions on its consistency vary.

For some users, the lightweight nature of the product is a significant advantage, making cleaning less strenuous.

The overall build quality is perceived as sturdy and premium by some, adding to the feeling of a well-designed product.

The folding feature enhances its practicality by making storage a breeze.

A subset of users also appreciate the odor neutralizer, which leaves behind a pleasant, fresh scent.

Finally, the removable hand vac is a valued feature for reaching tight spots inaccessible to larger vacuums.

✅ Key specs of Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum

The Shark IZ862H DuoClean Hair Pro stick vacuum boasts several impressive features. It's cordless, offering up to 60 minutes of runtime, and includes an LED display for easy monitoring. Its anti-allergen capabilities, HEPA filter, and odor-neutralizing technology make it ideal for allergy sufferers. The bagless design and 0.72-quart capacity provide convenience.

This model comes with a duster crevice tool and anti-allergen brush, expanding its versatility. It's suitable for both carpet and hard floor cleaning. The controls are push-button and touch-based.

Powering the vacuum is a 309-watt motor, equivalent to 0.413 horsepower, drawing 12.26 Amps. The rechargeable Lithium-Ion battery takes approximately 210 minutes to fully charge. It does produce a noise level of 80 dB during operation.

Measuring 13.78"L x 10.24"W x 51.18"H and weighing 8.9 pounds, the Ash Purple vacuum is portable. Its cleaning path width is 10 inches.

The package includes three pieces, and the product has a 5-year limited warranty. The UPC is 622356588188 and the ASIN is B0B5JMNGNQ. The item model number is IZ862H, and it's part of the 862 series. It is intended for indoor use.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum vs. Shark IZ163H Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Shark IZ862H edges out the IZ163H with its Dirt Detection thanks to Clean Sense IQ, which automatically adjusts power based on detected dirt levels. Moreover, the IZ862H boasts "Ultra-powerful" suction, labeled as HyperVelocity Plus, suggesting a greater power than the IZ163H. It also offers Odor Neutralization, a feature absent in the IZ163H. The IZ862H also has DuoClean PowerFins HairPro brushroll tech which is generally a more effective pickup.

Furthermore, the IZ862H outlasts the IZ163H with a runtime of up to 60 minutes versus 40 minutes, and has a larger 0.72-quart dust cup compared to the IZ163H's 0.34-quart capacity. The IZ862H also has a higher wattage of 309 compared to 181 on the IZ163H.

However, the IZ163H boasts a significantly faster charging time of 40 minutes, while the IZ862H takes 210 minutes to fully charge. The IZ163H is also considerably lighter at 3.4 pounds compared to the IZ862H's 8.9 pounds.

Additionally, the IZ163H wins on maneuverability and features, equipped with a Flexible Wand, Removable Hand Vac, LED Headlights, and CleanTouch Dirt Ejector. While the IZ862H only has a Flexible Wand and LED Display.

Finally, the IZ163H has a slightly better customer rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars from nearly 10,000 ratings, against the IZ862H's 4.1 stars from just over 1,300 reviews, indicating higher overall customer satisfaction.

✔ Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum vs. Electrolux EHVS75S1AO Cordless Stick Vacuum

Both the Shark IZ862H and the Electrolux EHVS75S1AO are strong contenders, coming from well-known brands. Shark takes the lead in special features, boasting anti-allergen capabilities, a flexible design, a longer 60-minute runtime, odor neutralization, an LED display, and HEPA filtration, compared to Electrolux's portable, lightweight build with a headlight and washable filter. The HEPA filter in the Shark is a significant advantage for those concerned about allergens.

While Electrolux includes more components, Shark wins out in capacity with a 0.72-quart dustbin, more than double the Electrolux's 0.32-quart capacity. The Shark also offers a higher wattage of 309 watts, suggesting more powerful suction, and a longer runtime of 60 minutes versus Electrolux's 50 minutes. Charging time is slightly shorter for the Shark at 210 minutes compared to Electrolux's 270 minutes. Shark's versatility extends to both carpet and hard floor cleaning, while Electrolux is primarily recommended for indoor use.

Both vacuums are stick vacuums, and color preference is subjective, resulting in ties for form factor and color. Electrolux is smaller and significantly lighter, weighing 4.8 pounds compared to Shark's 8.9 pounds. Both models share the same noise level of 80 dB. The Shark provides a motor horsepower metric of 0.413, an objective indicator of power that Electrolux lacks. Customer reviews favor the Shark, with a higher rating and significantly more reviews. The Shark also demonstrates greater popularity based on its best-seller rank. If the price of both are the same, Shark is a better option.

✔ Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC490BL Cordless Stick Vacuum

Let's break down the Shark IZ862H and Eureka NEC490BL stick vacuums to see how they stack up. Both come from reputable brands in the vacuum cleaner world, leading to a tie in brand recognition. We can't compare price points without the actual numbers.

The Shark boasts more special features like anti-allergen capabilities, a flexible wand, odor neutralization, an LED display, and of course, a bagless design and HEPA filter. The Eureka sticks to cordless operation, a bag, a headlight, and HEPA filtration. Both vacuums are HEPA filtered and cordless. The Eureka fights back with included components like a charging dock and a vacuum bag.

Capacity is where the Eureka shines with its 2.5-liter bin compared to the Shark's 0.72 quarts, meaning fewer trips to the trash can. Power-wise, the Eureka edges out the Shark with 350 watts versus 309. For runtime, the Shark is at up to 60 minutes. The Eureka also offers a 60-minute runtime but it varies with other modes. The Shark takes a slightly shorter 210 minutes to charge, compared to Eureka's 240 minutes. The Eureka is recommended for slightly more floor types.

Maneuverability is a win for the Shark. Weighing in at 8.9 pounds versus the Eureka's 17.64 pounds, it's significantly lighter. The Shark also operates at a lower noise level of 80 dB.

Customer reviews favor the Eureka slightly. The Eureka has 4.2 out of 5 stars with 1,961 ratings compared to the Shark's 4.1 with 1,348. Sales figures also lean towards the Eureka. It is at #15 in stick vacuums, while Shark sits at #70.

The Eureka offers a self-emptying station, which is a huge plus for convenience. The Shark features a DuoClean PowerFins HairPro self-cleaning brushroll, while the Eureka has an anti-tangle nozzle. Lastly, the Shark has Clean Sense IQ (Dirt Detection) and a flexible wand, which is a good value. The Shark's motor has 0.413 horsepower.

✔ Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum vs. Farberware VC-D11B Stick Vacuum Cleaner

Shark's IZ862H edges out the Farberware VC-D11B overall, primarily due to its established brand reputation and a more comprehensive feature set. The inclusion of anti-allergen technology, a flexible design, odor neutralization, and a useful LED display gives it an advantage. The HEPA filter in the Shark model is also a crucial factor, offering superior allergen capture compared to the Farberware's cloth filter.

Both vacuums offer essential attachments, so it's a tie. The Farberware's charging dock provides a slight edge in convenience. Both being cordless units, that's a draw. The Farberware has a slightly larger dustbin capacity at 0.8 Liters compared to the Shark's 0.72 Quarts.

The Shark shines with its significantly longer runtime of 60 minutes, a definite plus for larger cleaning jobs. However, the charging time of 210 minutes for the Shark is notably long. Both vacuums are recommended for carpet and hard floor use, making that another tie. Also, both have a stick form factor. The Shark boasts a higher wattage, typically indicating more powerful performance.

The Farberware wins in physical dimensions and weight. Its more compact size and significantly lighter weight makes it easier to maneuver and store. I'm unable to compare the noise levels.

While the customer ratings are fairly close (4.1/5 for Shark vs 4.4/5 for Farberware), the Shark has significantly more ratings and higher score, making the Shark more trustable to the customer. The advanced features like Clean Sense IQ and DuoClean PowerFins HairPro on the Shark offer more advanced cleaning capabilities. Considering the assumption that the Farberware is priced lower, it's a win for Farberware.

✔ Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum vs. AZVKEA S17 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

Shark wins in brand recognition due to its established reputation for quality and innovation. It also has the edge with its Clean Sense IQ feature, which automatically adjusts suction based on dirt levels. When it comes to odor neutralization, Shark integrates this into the vacuuming process, which I believe is better than the AZVKEA's reliance on aromatherapy tablets. Shark's DuoClean PowerFins HairPro brushroll technology also seems more advanced and designed for hair pickup and tangle prevention. Its LED display provides more information, including battery level and Clean Sense IQ status. Also, Shark comes with a longer warranty.

However, AZVKEA boasts a stronger suction power (45KPa). Both offer flexibility and maneuverability. AZVKEA wins in filtration with a higher filtration rate and filters for smaller particles. Also, it has a significantly larger dustbin capacity, meaning less frequent emptying, a higher wattage, and it operates at a significantly quieter level. It is also lighter, making it easier to maneuver.

AZVKEA has a more comprehensive accessory set and higher customer ratings, suggesting greater satisfaction. The runtime is a draw. Price is a critical factor. If the AZVKEA is significantly cheaper, it could be a better overall value.

✔ Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Shark edges out dsorupa in brand recognition due to its established presence in the vacuum cleaner market. However, when it comes to suction power, dsorupa takes the lead with a clearly stated 45KPa and 550W motor, providing a quantifiable measure, in contrast to Shark's less specific "HyperVelocity Plus" claim.

Runtime favors dsorupa with up to 70 minutes on its lowest setting, slightly surpassing Shark's 60 minutes in Eco Mode. The dsorupa also boasts a much larger dust cup capacity (1.8 Liters) compared to Shark's 0.77 Liters, reducing the frequency of emptying.

While both offer HEPA filters, Shark's special features stand out with Clean Sense IQ, Odor Neutralizer Technology, and DuoClean PowerFins HairPro, offering advanced cleaning capabilities. On the other hand, dsorupa compensates with more included accessories, such as a wall mount and aromatherapy tablets.

Both vacuums share the same charging time of 210 minutes (3.5 hours). However, the dsorupa is lighter (8 pounds vs. 8.9 pounds for the Shark) and operates at a significantly lower noise level (64 dB vs. 80 dB). Customer reviews are higher for the dsorupa, and has a better best seller rank. Also dsorupa has higher wattage and motor horsepower.

Price should be considered when making a final decision. Also Shark has a 5 year warranty.

✔ Shark IZ862H Cordless Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

Shark, a reputable brand, faces off against dsorupa in this vacuum comparison. While Shark benefits from brand recognition, dsorupa takes an early lead with a specified suction power of 45KPA and a 550W motor compared to Shark's unspecified "ultra-powerful suction." However, Shark counters with its Clean Sense IQ dirt detection and odor neutralization technology, features absent in dsorupa.

The brushroll system is another key differentiator. Shark's DuoClean PowerFins HairPro with self-cleaning capabilities outperforms dsorupa's V-Shaped Anti-Tangle Brush. Runtime is a tie at up to 60 minutes, but Shark's charging time is faster at 210 minutes versus dsorupa's 270 minutes.

Dsorupa claws back with a larger dustbin capacity of 1.5 Liters, while Shark's holds only 0.72 Quarts. Both offer LED displays, making it a tie in that category. Filtration is a win for Shark, thanks to its HEPA filter and anti-allergen complete seal, a more comprehensive approach.

Dsorupa gains ground again, being lighter at 8 pounds compared to Shark's 8.9 pounds and significantly quieter at 68 dB versus Shark's 80 dB. The "double handle design" makes dsorupa a clear winner. Shark comes back with a longer 5 year warranty compared to dsorupa's 2 year protection plan.

Motor horsepower tilts the scale towards dsorupa, with a stronger 0.735 horsepower compared to Shark's 0.413 horsepower. Assuming similar pricing, customer reviews show dsorupa at 4.9/5 stars with 52 ratings, while Shark has 4.1/5 stars with 1,348 ratings. Though dsorupa's ratings are higher, the limited number of reviews should be considered.

✅ Conclusion

The Shark Stratos Cordless IZ862H DuoClean Hair Pro emerges as a strong contender in the cordless vacuum market. Its impressive suction, coupled with innovative features like Clean Sense IQ and the DuoClean PowerFins HairPro, delivers a thorough cleaning experience across various floor types. The convenience of cordless operation, extended runtime, and a flexible design further enhance its usability. While the noise level and battery charging time are factors to consider, the overall package, including its anti-allergen capabilities and user-friendly design, makes it a worthwhile investment for those seeking a powerful and versatile cleaning solution. The positive feedback regarding its maneuverability, ease of use, and effective pet hair removal solidifies its position as a well-rounded and practical choice for modern homes.