The standout feature of this vacuum is its 2-IN-1 Powered Lift-Away technology. This allows you to detach the pod and clean hard-to-reach areas with the powered brushroll still active. Advanced Swivel Steering contributes to excellent maneuverability, letting you navigate tight spaces and around furniture with ease.
Filtration is robust, featuring an Anti-Allergen Complete Seal with a HEPA filter. This system captures 99.9% of dust and allergens, making it ideal for allergy sufferers. The large 0.88-quart dust cup is easily removable for quick emptying. LED Headlights on the nozzle are a welcome addition, illuminating hidden debris and pet hair for a more thorough clean.
Multi-Surface Cleaning capability is enhanced by fingertip controls, allowing for seamless transitions between Hard Floor and Carpet modes. Its focus on pet owners is evident through the inclusion of a Self-cleaning Pet Power Brush, designed for removing pet hair and ground-in dirt from carpets and upholstery.
The included Upholstery Tool is suitable for cleaning curtains, lampshades, and other delicate surfaces. A Crevice Tool is also provided, enabling you to access corners, baseboards, and ceilings for a comprehensive cleaning experience.
The strong suction power is a major plus. It really gets the carpets and rugs clean, effectively removing dirt and pet hair. I appreciate the adjustable suction, which allows me to customize the cleaning power for different surfaces.
Ease of cleaning is another standout feature. The dust cup is simple to empty, and the filters are easy to access and clean, which makes maintenance a breeze.
It performs well on both hard floors and carpets, picking up dirt effectively. Plus, it's lightweight.
I found it lightweight and easy to maneuver, and switching between settings and attachments is simple. Cleaning is faster and less strenuous.
It offers good value for money, a reliable purchase and a good unit for the price.
Pet owners will appreciate how effectively it removes pet hair.
Its versatility is a definite advantage. I can use it in multiple rooms before needing to unplug it, and it performs well on different surfaces. The attachments are also great for various cleaning tasks.
The lift-away feature is incredibly useful for cleaning under furniture and in those hard-to-reach areas.
The bright LED lighting makes a noticeable difference, illuminating dark corners so I can see exactly what I'm cleaning.
The Shark NV752 is a corded, bagless upright vacuum cleaner with a HEPA filter, ideal for indoor use. It features a washable filter, a 0.88-quart capacity, and operates at 1150 watts with a noise level of 80 dB. It has a cleaning path width of 12 inches.
This model includes an upholstery tool, crevice tool, and power brush. The vacuum's design incorporates Powered Lift-Away technology. The unit weighs 15.4 pounds and measures 13.2"L x 11.9"W x 45"H.
It boasts a 6-foot hose length and a 1.54 horsepower motor. The Bordeaux-colored vacuum has a glossy finish and is equipped with four wheels and one handle.
It is recommended for cleaning carpet, hard floors, and upholstery. The vacuum is controlled via push button and touch methods. It comes with a 5-year limited warranty.
The Shark NV752 edges out the NV352 in technology with its 2-IN-1 Powered Lift-Away feature, which keeps the brushroll spinning in Lift-Away mode. This offers improved cleaning power in those difficult to reach areas. Both models are equipped with Anti-Allergen Complete Seal Technology (HEPA), making them equally suitable for allergy sufferers.
The NV352 scores wins with a larger dust cup capacity (1.1 Quarts vs 0.88 Quarts) for less frequent emptying and a lighter weight (12.5 pounds vs 15.4 pounds) for easier maneuverability. It also boasts a slightly more powerful motor with higher wattage (1200 watts vs 1150 watts), amperage (10 Amps vs 9.5 Amps), and horsepower (1.61 horsepower vs 1.54 horsepower). The NV352 also offers a longer hose (8 Feet vs 6 Feet) for extended reach.
The NV752 includes a power brush attachment designed for effectively removing pet hair. The NV752 uses fingertip controls, providing better control when switching between hard floor and carpet cleaning. It also features LED headlights to illuminate hidden dirt. The NV752 has slightly smaller width dimensions.
The NV752 holds a slightly higher customer rating (4.5 out of 5 stars vs 4.4 out of 5 stars). The NV352 is the better seller. Special features include the NV352 being portable.
When comparing the Shark NV752 and the Eureka NEU182A upright vacuums, several key differences emerge. The Shark generally wins on brand reputation and special features, particularly due to its HEPA filtration, which is superior to Eureka's foam filter. The Shark also includes a more useful set of components, including a power brush, which is great for pet owners.
While both vacuums are corded and upright, the Eureka boasts a significantly larger dust cup capacity (2.6 liters vs. Shark's 0.88 quarts), meaning less frequent emptying. However, the Shark counters with a more powerful motor (1150 watts vs. 960 watts) and a longer hose (6 feet vs. 4.9 feet). The Shark also supports more use cases with Carpet, Hard Floor, and Upholstery Cleaning whereas the Eureka is recommended for Hard Floor and Carpet.
Furthermore, the Shark edges out the Eureka in several performance-related metrics. It operates at a lower noise level (80 dB vs. 88 dB), has higher amperage (9.5 Amps vs. 3.6 Amps), and a more powerful motor (1.54 horsepower vs. 1.28 horsepower). A key advantage of the Shark is its Powered Lift-Away feature, which the Eureka lacks.
However, the Eureka has an advantage in weight, being significantly lighter at 10 pounds compared to the Shark's 15.4 pounds. While Shark has a higher user rating and higher rank, customer reviews are only slightly better (4.5 out of 5 stars vs 4.3) with a larger number of reviews provided for the Eureka. The Shark also has a longer warranty period, offering 5 years compared to Eureka's 2 years. A final comparison would need to incorporate price, which was not available.
Shark emerges as the superior brand, boasting a higher reputation in the vacuum market compared to Eureka. Shark's special features, including HEPA filtration and the Powered Lift-Away functionality, provide a distinct advantage, especially for allergy sufferers seeking versatile cleaning options. The HEPA filter further solidifies Shark's lead, as it traps finer particles and allergens more effectively than Eureka's foam filter.
The Shark NV752 includes an upholstery tool, crevice tool, and a specialized power brush for pet hair, adding significant value. While both are corded upright vacuums, Eureka pulls ahead with a larger dust cup capacity (1.7 Liters vs. 0.88 Quarts), requiring less frequent emptying. However, Shark quickly regains ground with its higher wattage (1150 vs. 720), indicating potentially stronger suction. The Shark's longer hose length (6 feet vs. 1.5 feet) provides greater reach. Furthermore, it's recommended for use on upholstery, unlike Eureka.
While both vacuums share the upright form factor, and their color preferences are subjective, the Shark wins with a more concise model name. The Eureka boasts more compact dimensions, but the difference might not be critical for many users. The Shark operates at a lower noise level (80 dB vs. 90 dB) and offers higher amperage (9.5 Amps vs. 6 Amps), pointing to a more powerful motor (1.54 horsepower vs 0.96 horsepower). In contrast, the Eureka is significantly lighter, weighing in at 7.7 pounds compared to the Shark's 15.4 pounds.
Despite the Eureka having more customer reviews, the Shark achieves a higher rating (4.5 vs 4.2 out of 5 stars). The Eureka holds a higher Best Seller Rank, indicating greater sales volume. Price-wise, without concrete numbers, the Eureka is assumed to be more budget-friendly, based on brand and features.
Let's break down the Shark NV752 and Kenmore DU2012 upright vacuums. Both are from well-known brands and are bagless, corded, and feature HEPA filtration, making them suitable for allergy sufferers. However, the Shark edges out with its washable filter.
The Kenmore comes with a more comprehensive set of included components, such as an extension wand and flexible hose. Regarding capacity, Kenmore's dust cup can hold approximately 2.1 quarts, significantly more than the Shark's 0.88 quarts.
The Shark NV752 packs a punch with 1150 watts compared to Kenmore's 200 watts, which suggests better suction. However, the Kenmore boasts a longer hose at 10 feet versus Shark's 6 feet. Both are designed for use on carpet, hard floors, and upholstery.
The Shark wins in product dimensions because it may be easier to store, plus the Shark may be a better fit for taller users. Furthermore, the Kenmore operates at a slightly quieter 75 dB compared to the Shark's 80 dB and has a slightly higher amperage of 10 compared to Shark's 9.5.
The Shark pulls ahead in horsepower (1.54), but Kenmore wins with its lighter weight (14 pounds vs. 15.4 pounds). Shark shines with a higher customer rating (4.5 stars) and a stronger best seller ranking than Kenmore. The Shark also has the convenient Powered Lift-Away feature.
The Shark NV752 edges out the HV343AMZ in several key areas. Its 2-IN-1 Powered Lift-Away technology offers superior versatility compared to the HV343AMZ's hand vacuum conversion, enabling floor-to-ceiling cleaning. The NV752's Anti-Allergen Complete Seal with HEPA filtration provides better allergen containment for allergy sufferers than the HV343AMZ's foam and felt filter. A larger dust cup capacity (0.88 quarts vs. 0.68 quarts) on the NV752 means less frequent emptying.
The NV752 further benefits from specialized pet hair features, including a self-cleaning pet power brush, which the HV343AMZ lacks. It also comes with a power brush as an included tool, expanding its cleaning capabilities. The higher wattage (1150 vs. 500) and amperage (9.5 vs. 3.6) of the NV752 suggest more powerful suction. A hose length of 6 feet adds to the extended reach when using attachments, a feature not available with the HV343AMZ. The NV752 also has a wider 12 inch cleaning path compared to the HV343AMZ. It also contains an additional piece (power brush).
Despite its advantages, the HV343AMZ has its own strengths. Both vacuums feature advanced swivel steering and LED headlights, offering similar maneuverability and visibility. Surface cleaning is more flexible on the HV343AMZ due to the bare floor setting. Its stick form factor and lighter weight (9.2 pounds vs. 15.4 pounds) make it easier to maneuver and carry, enhancing its portability. Its more compact dimensions and ability to convert to a hand vacuum also contribute to its enhanced portability.
While customer ratings slightly favor the NV752, the HV343AMZ has a better Best Seller Rank in the Home & Kitchen category, indicating higher sales volume and popularity. Finally, the HV343AMZ comes at a more affordable price.
The Shark NV752 edges out the Bissell 3197A in technology with its 2-in-1 Powered Lift-Away feature, offering superior cleaning versatility compared to Bissell's Scatter-Free Technology. However, both vacuums offer similar maneuverability thanks to their Swivel Steering.
For allergy sufferers, the Shark NV752 is the clear winner. Its Anti-Allergen Complete Seal and HEPA filter provide a much more effective barrier against allergens compared to the Bissell's Disk Filter, which doesn't mention HEPA filtration. The Bissell 3197A does shine in dust cup capacity, boasting a significantly larger 5.3-liter dust cup compared to the Shark's 0.88 quarts, allowing for extended cleaning sessions. The Shark NV752 comes with LED Headlights, improving visibility in dimly lit areas, a feature lacking in the Bissell.
The Shark NV752 offers more versatile surface cleaning and is better equipped for pet hair removal. Its multi-surface cleaning capabilities are more explicitly stated, and it includes a Self-Cleaning Pet Power Brush and upholstery tool, providing a comprehensive approach to pet hair. The Bissell compensates with an automatic cord rewind and longer power cord, which is a convenient feature.
The Shark NV752 is slightly lighter at 15.4 lbs compared to the Bissell's 16.5 lbs, contributing to ease of use. Additionally, the Shark has a lower noise level (80 dB) and a more powerful motor (1150 Watts, 9.5 Amps, 1.54 HP) versus the Bissell's (27 Watts, 3.7 Amps). The Shark NV752 also features a longer hose.
Further, the Shark NV752 utilizes a washable HEPA filter, saving on replacement costs. It comes with a 5-year limited warranty. The Shark NV752 is more affordable. The Bissell 3197A is more portable.
Let's analyze these two vacuum cleaners, the Shark NV752 and the Kenmore DU1275.
From a brand perspective, Shark edges out Kenmore due to its stronger reputation in the vacuum market. However, the Kenmore boasts a more extensive list of special features, including a Hair Eliminator brushroll, multiple height adjustments, and a larger 3L dust cup. On the other hand, Shark takes the lead with its HEPA filter, providing superior air quality compared to Kenmore's foam filter. Looking at included components, the Kenmore offers a slightly more versatile set of tools.
Both vacuums are corded and share the same 6-foot hose length. However, the Kenmore's significantly larger dust cup capacity is a major advantage, reducing the frequency of emptying. In terms of power, the Shark NV752 pulls ahead with a higher wattage (1150 vs 750) and amperage (9.5 vs 8), typically indicating stronger suction. The Shark is also recommended for more specific uses like carpets and upholstery, giving it some versatility.
While both are upright vacuums with similar noise levels, the Kenmore wins in terms of size and portability, featuring more compact product dimensions and is also portable. It also weighs less at 11 pounds compared to the Shark's 15.4 pounds.
Customer reviews favor the Shark, with a higher rating (4.5 stars versus 4.3) and a significantly larger number of reviews. The Shark also boasts a motor horsepower of 1.54. Finally, the Shark offers a longer warranty, providing 5 years of limited coverage compared to Kenmore's 1 year.
Shark's NV752 edges out the Eureka NEU801BL overall, largely due to its stronger brand reputation, higher wattage for more powerful suction, larger product dimensions, lower noise level, and superior customer reviews and best seller ranking. Shark also boasts a higher motor horsepower and a wider cleaning path, contributing to more efficient cleaning. Its "Powered Lift-Away" design adds versatility.
However, the Eureka NEU801BL shines in certain areas. Its anti-tangle technology is a plus for pet owners, and the inclusion of a motorized pet & stair tool, along with a dusting brush, makes it a well-rounded cleaning package. Eureka also offers a larger dust cup capacity, minimizing the need for frequent emptying, and is slightly lighter in weight. The presence of a headlight adds to its appeal.
Both vacuums share common features, including HEPA filtration, corded operation, and an upright form factor. They both include crevice tools, use touch control methods, and have one handle and four wheels.
In specific feature comparisons, Eureka wins in the areas of Special Features, Included Components, Capacity, and Recommended Uses. Shark leads in Brand Recognition/Reputation, Wattage, Product Dimensions, Noise Level, Manufacturer, and Style. Filter Type, Cordless?, Form Factor, Color, Controller Type, Control Method, Number of Handles, Number of Wheels, Indoor/Outdoor Usage, Batteries Required, and Country of Origin result in ties.
The Shark NV752 edges out the dsorupa V10 Ultra in brand recognition, due to Shark's established presence in the vacuum market. However, dsorupa takes the lead with its cordless design, offering greater freedom of movement compared to the corded Shark.
dsorupa boasts a more comprehensive feature set, including a long runtime, high suction, anti-tangle brush, aromatherapy, LED display, and quiet mode. Both vacuums utilize HEPA filters, ensuring excellent filtration for allergy sufferers, resulting in a tie in this category. However, dsorupa pulls ahead by including more accessories, such as a second HEPA filter, wall mount, and cleaner brush.
The dsorupa also boasts a larger dustbin capacity (1.8 Liters) than the Shark (0.88 Quarts), reducing the frequency of emptying. While the Shark NV752 has a higher wattage (1150 Watts) and horsepower (1.54 HP), implying a stronger motor, the dsorupa offers a runtime of 70 minutes thanks to its cordless design.
Furthermore, the dsorupa is recommended for a wider range of floor types, including hard floors, rugs, carpets, hardwood, tile, and bare floors. Its stick form factor makes it lighter and more versatile compared to the Shark's upright design. The color is subjective resulting in a tie. dsorupa's narrower dimensions (13"L x 8"W x 49"H) may also be preferable for storage and maneuverability, against the Shark's (13.2"L x 11.9"W x 45"H).
Customer reviews reveal a higher average rating for the dsorupa (4.9 out of 5 stars), albeit with a smaller sample size (455 ratings), against the Shark's (4.5 out of 5 stars from 16,929 ratings). The Shark NV752 holds a better best seller ranking within the Upright Vacuums category.
Finally, the dsorupa operates at a quieter noise level (64 dB) and provides higher suction power (45 KPa) making it the better choice. The dsorupa is also lighter, weighing in at 8 pounds compared to the Shark's 15.4 pounds.
The Shark NV752 and Dsorupa SmartVac Pro offer distinct advantages. The Shark, an upright model, typically provides stronger suction for carpets, while the Dsorupa stick vacuum boasts the freedom of cordless operation.
While the Shark's wattage isn't specified, the Dsorupa's 45KPA suction power (550 Watts) indicates robust performance, exceeding what's generally expected. The Dsorupa's cordless design allows up to 60 minutes of run time and features a larger 1.5-liter dust cup, requiring less frequent emptying. It's also significantly lighter at 8 lbs versus the Shark's 15.4 lbs.
Maneuverability also favors the Dsorupa, with its flexible anti-tangle brush and double handle design. However, for pet owners, the Shark's self-cleaning pet power brush and upholstery tool provide a clear advantage.
When it comes to filtration, the Shark's anti-allergen complete seal with HEPA gives it an edge in trapping allergens. The Dsorupa, on the other hand, operates at a quieter 68 dB compared to the Shark's 80 dB.
Feature-wise, the Dsorupa includes an upgraded brushless motor, double handle design, adjustable extension tube, low noise operation, and intelligent display, offering more modern conveniences.
Based on customer reviews, the Shark has 4.5 out of 5 stars from over 16,000 ratings, while Dsorupa has 4.9 out of 5 stars from 52 ratings. But the number of customer rating of the Shark indicates a more reliable feedback.
Finally, the Shark provides a 5-year limited warranty, surpassing the Dsorupa's 2-year protection plan.
The Shark NV752 emerges as a compelling option for homeowners seeking a versatile and powerful cleaning solution. Its standout features, such as the 2-IN-1 Powered Lift-Away technology and Anti-Allergen Complete Seal, cater to both convenience and health-conscious users. The strong suction, coupled with specialized tools like the Self-cleaning Pet Power Brush, makes it particularly appealing to pet owners. While corded, its maneuverability and multi-surface capabilities allow for whole-home cleaning. Ultimately, the NV752 provides substantial value, blending performance, ease of use, and specialized features into a reliable and effective cleaning appliance.
Hi, I'm Hannah! Welcome to my corner of the internet dedicated to helping you find the perfect vacuum cleaner for your home. As a passionate blogger and vacuum enthusiast, I've spent countless hours researching, testing, and reviewing a wide range of models. Whether you're tackling pet hair, deep cleaning carpets, or maintaining hardwood floors, I'm here to provide you with unbiased information, expert advice, and comprehensive buying guides. Let's find the vacuum that effortlessly transforms your cleaning routine!
Explore these additional resources for more information.
© 2025 Flow. All rights reserved.