✅ Features of Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Shark Freestyle Cordless Vacuum is a cordless vacuum cleaner. It weighs 7.5 lbs and operates at 10.8 volts with a wattage of 125 watts.

The noise level is 80 dB, and it features a 2-speed brushroll. It is compatible with both carpet and hard floors.

The dust cup has a capacity of 0.64 quart. Charging takes approximately 4 hours.

Included with the vacuum are the Shark Freestyle Cordless Vacuum itself and a precision charger. Other features include optimized performance for pet hair pickup, and the charger also functions as a storage block.

✅ What we like about Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum

This vacuum excels in functionality. It's convenient, lightweight, and offers decent pickup. The debris container is well-designed, and it's effective for daily use on bare floors and low-pile carpets, offering good value for the price.

The lightweight design is a definite plus, making it easy to carry up and down stairs. It eliminates the need to lug around a larger, heavier vacuum or deal with cumbersome cords.

Ease of cleaning is another highlight. The dust bin is simple to empty, and the dust catcher is easy to clean. It also maneuvers well in tight areas, such as under furniture. The overall ease of use is impressive, with its lightweight, cordless design being perfect for quick clean-up jobs. The charger is simple to use, and the brush roller can be easily removed with scissors for cleaning.

Being cordless is a huge advantage. The freedom to move around without dragging a power cord is very convenient. It's powered by a battery.

I've found it effective at picking up pet hair on hardwood floors, couches, and carpets. The swivel feature is also a nice addition.

The suction power receives mixed opinions. Some users have found it great for picking up pet food crumbs and fur, and it performs well on hard floors and thin carpets.

Similarly, battery life also receives mixed feedback. Some find it lasts a long time and that the battery charge base is convenient.

For taller individuals, the longer handle is a comfortable and appreciated feature.

✅ Key specs of Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Shark SV1106 Navigator Freestyle is a cordless stick vacuum designed for indoor use. It features a portable, lightweight, and bagless design, weighing in at 7.5 pounds. Its dimensions are 10.5"L x 9.6"W x 46"H. It's made with a white and grey color scheme. It is manufactured by Shark in China.

The vacuum has a 0.64-quart capacity and operates at 125 watts with 11.5 Amps. It includes washable foam filters, a precision charging base, and a 10.8V battery. The battery is included and lasts about 25 minutes on a full charge, with a charging time of around 4 hours. The cable length for charging is 46 inches.

This model is recommended for cleaning carpets, hard floors, and pet hair. It operates at a noise level of 80 dB. It has two power levels controlled by push buttons, and 2 speeds with a cleaning path width of 10 inches. The vacuum has one handle and connects via Bluetooth and Infrared, potentially implying app control.

The Global Trade Identification Number is 20622356533090. The product has an ASIN of B00C351GBC and is currently ranked #14 in Upright Vacuum Cleaners within the Home & Kitchen category. The vacuum requires batteries to operate and comes fully assembled. Shark provides a one-year limited warranty.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEU182A Upright Vacuum

When comparing the Shark SV1106 and the Eureka NEU182A, brand preference is subjective, resulting in a tie. The Shark wins on being cordless, offering more freedom. It's also lighter at 7.5 lbs compared to the Eureka's 10 lbs, making it easier to maneuver. However, the Eureka NEU182A excels in capacity with 2.6 Liters versus the Shark's 0.64 Quarts, meaning less frequent emptying. The Eureka also has a higher wattage at 960 watts compared to the Shark's 125 watts, which typically translates to more powerful suction. Due to its corded design, the Eureka also wins on runtime and charging time, as it requires no charging and provides unlimited cleaning time. While both are suitable for carpet and hard floors, the Shark has a slightly lower noise level at 80 dB compared to the Eureka's 88 dB. However, the Eureka has the edge in customer reviews with 4.3 stars from 58,910 ratings, against the Shark's 4.2 stars from 23,494 ratings. Unfortunately, the price for either product was not provided. The Eureka also offers more features, with wheels and a washable filter and provides more included components such as the crevice tool and dusting brush for versatile cleaning.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Bissell 3079 Stick Vacuum

When comparing the Shark SV1106 and the Bissell 3079, it's a close call. Brand preference is subjective, resulting in a tie. However, the Shark edges out the Bissell with its "Portable, Lightweight, Bagless" special feature, compared to Bissell's "Lightweight." Washable foam filters on the Shark are more economical and environmentally friendly than Bissell's cartridge filter.

The included components category ends in a tie, as the Shark's charging base doubles as storage, while the Bissell offers multiple tools. Both are cordless, resulting in another tie. Interestingly, the Shark has a larger capacity, .64 quarts (roughly 1.6 pounds) compared to Bissell's .768 pounds.

The Bissell wins in wattage with 150 watts versus Shark's 125 watts, which suggests potentially stronger suction. It also boasts a longer runtime of 25 minutes compared to the Shark's 17 minutes. The Shark, however, charges faster, taking 4 hours against Bissell's 4.5 hours. The Shark also has better and more versatile recommended uses, like carpet, hard floors, and pet hair versus Bissell's pet foundation.

The Bissell wins in form factor due to its more versatile stick and handheld design. This is more convenient for quick clean-ups. When assessing dimensions, the Bissell is more compact. Both have the same battery life and noise level, so we have a tie. The Shark is slightly lighter, weighing 7.5 pounds compared to Bissell's 7.75 pounds, making it easier to maneuver. The Shark also has two speeds, unlike the Bissell.

Shark edges out the Bissell in customer reviews, boasting significantly more ratings with the same average. Both have Lithium-Ion batteries, resulting in a tie. Finally, the Shark offers a one-year limited warranty, where Bissell has none.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEU10AE5 Upright Vacuum Cleaner

Let's break down this Shark SV1106 versus Eureka NEU10AE5 comparison. Both brands are reputable in the vacuum cleaner market, so we'll call that a tie. The Shark wins for being cordless, offering greater convenience, and also is slightly lighter at 7.5 lbs compared to the Eureka's 7.7 lbs.

However, the Eureka pulls ahead in several key areas. Its dust cup capacity is significantly larger, at 1.7 liters versus the Shark's 0.64 quarts. The Eureka also boasts a higher wattage of 720 watts, suggesting stronger suction, although other factors influence this as well.

Considering features, the Eureka includes a crevice tool, dusting brush, and replacement filter, providing greater versatility than the Shark. The Eureka also has slightly smaller footprint (length and width), could be easier to store and includes a 1.5 foot hose.

Customer reviews slightly favor the Eureka. Both vacuums have a rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars, however, the Eureka has a higher number of ratings, suggesting more owners have had positive experiences with the product. Furthermore, the Eureka holds a significantly higher Best Seller Rank, indicating greater popularity. The Shark's runtime and charging time, and battery life, are not applicable for the corded Eureka model. The noise level is slightly better on the shark, 80 dB versus 82dB. Both offer washable foam filters, a cost-effective feature. Without price information, it is impossible to compare that.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Bissell 3197A Upright Vacuum Cleaner

The Shark SV1106 edges out the Bissell 3197A in corded versus cordless operation, providing greater freedom and maneuverability with its cordless design. Its significantly lighter weight (7.5 lbs vs 16.5 lbs) also makes it easier to carry and use. Though both are bagless, The Shark unit is better for portability, light weight, and the bagless design itself. The Shark's washable foam filter also offers user preference.

However, the Bissell 3197A boasts a much larger dust cup capacity (5.3 Liters vs 0.64 Quarts), meaning less frequent emptying, which is a big win for large messes. The corded operation offers continuous power, a significant advantage over the Shark's limited runtime. Automatic cord rewind is also a very convenient storage feature, adding to the Bissell's ease of use.

The Shark potentially has more powerful suction, given its higher wattage (125 watts vs 27 watts), though other factors influence suction power. While it is stated that the Shark can do Carpet, Hard Floor and Pet Hair, The Bissell does Pet Hair pickup better in terms of explicit design.

The Bissell receives slightly higher customer satisfaction with a 4.5-star rating compared to the Shark's 4.2 stars. In terms of the description, the shark is the more versatile as the Bissell's description recommends it for "Pet Foundation" implying a charitable donation per purchase. The Shark takes the victory in best seller rating.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Bissell 3797V Cordless Stick Vacuum

When comparing the Shark SV1106 and Bissell 3797V cordless vacuums, both brands hold reputable positions in the vacuum cleaner market. As both vacuum cleaners are cordless, that leads to a tie on that matter.

The Bissell 3797V takes the lead in weight, at 5.9 lbs, making it more maneuverable compared to the Shark SV1106's 7.5 lbs. However, the Shark compensates with a larger dust cup capacity of 0.64 quarts, exceeding the Bissell's 0.3 liters (approximately 0.32 quarts), requiring less frequent emptying.

Bissell has a wattage of 300 while Shark only has 125. In terms of battery life, Bissell provides a longer runtime of 40 minutes and has a battery life of 40 minutes compared to Shark's 17 minutes and 25 minutes, respectively.

The Bissell 3797V proves more versatile with its recommended uses extending beyond carpet and hard floors to include rugs, furniture, cars, and tight spaces. Also, the Bissell has 3 power levels while Shark has 2. Shark has more special features.

Customer reviews favor the Bissell slightly, with a rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars based on a larger pool of 105,685 ratings, while the Shark SV1106 scores 4.2 out of 5 stars from 23,494 ratings. The Bissell 3797V also includes more components such as a deep cleaning fur brush, dusting brush, crevice tool, tool clip, charger, removable battery, and wall mount, enhancing its functionality.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Kenmore DS1020 Cordless Stick Vacuum

In a head-to-head comparison of the Shark SV1106 and the Kenmore DS1020 cordless vacuums, several factors come into play. Brand preference is a subjective element and both models are cordless, so they are both good in that regard. However, the Kenmore DS1020 edges out the Shark in weight, at 6.86 lbs compared to the Shark's 7.5 lbs, making it potentially more maneuverable.

The Shark SV1106 has a slightly larger dust cup capacity at 0.64 quarts versus the Kenmore's 0.63 quarts. However, the Kenmore DS1020 boasts a longer runtime of 30 minutes compared to the Shark's 17 minutes. The Shark, on the other hand, has a faster charging time of 4 hours, while the Kenmore takes 5 hours to fully charge.

Comparing wattage is tricky, as the Shark is listed at 125 watts, while the Kenmore is rated at 28.8 Watt-hours. It's difficult to directly compare these without knowing the voltage to calculate wattage for the Kenmore. The Kenmore DS1020 also operates at a lower noise level of 70 dB compared to the Shark's 80 dB.

The Shark features washable foam filters, a cost-effective advantage over the Kenmore's cloth filter. Dimensionality, the Kenmore DS1020 is slightly smaller, with dimensions of 10.04"L x 7.76"W x 43.43"H compared to the Shark's 10.5"L x 9.6"W x 46"H, which might make it easier to store.

Customer ratings are tied at 4.2/5 for both vacuums. But the Shark SV1106 has significantly more ratings (23,494) than the Kenmore (4,013), suggesting a wider base of user experience. Both models are lightweight and bagless, representing similar features.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. SMOTURE VAC01 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

The Smoture VAC01 emerges as the superior cordless stick vacuum over the Shark SV1106 based on a comprehensive comparison of their features and performance.

While both vacuums are cordless and share a 4-hour charging time, the Smoture boasts a lighter weight of 6 lbs compared to the Shark's 7.5 lbs, making it easier to maneuver during cleaning. Furthermore, the Smoture's dust cup capacity is significantly larger at 1.5 liters (approximately 1.58 quarts) compared to the Shark's 0.64 quarts, reducing the frequency of emptying.

The Smoture also demonstrates a more powerful suction capability with its 550 watts compared to the Shark's 125 watts. The runtime is considerably longer, offering 60 minutes of standard use (25-30 minutes in boost mode) compared to the Shark's reported 17 to 25 minutes.

Filtration is another area where the Smoture excels with its multi-layer high-density filtration system (HEPA washable) outperforming the Shark's washable foam filters. The Smoture offers four speeds/power levels compared to the Shark's two, providing greater flexibility for different cleaning tasks. Moreover, the Smoture operates at a significantly quieter noise level of 64 dB compared to the Shark's 80 dB.

Customer reviews also favor the Smoture, with an average rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars, compared to the Shark's 4.2. The Smoture holds a better seller rank at #6 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms, while the Shark holds #14 in Upright Vacuum Cleaners.

The Smoture also wins on the basis of special features. It includes features like a 550W Brushless Motor, 45KPA Suction, 60 Mins Runtime, Self-Standing, Rechargeable Wall Mount, Auto Suction Adjust, LED Touch Screen, Fragrant Filter, and Warranty. These features are not matched by the Shark, which is lightweight, portable, and bagless.

Finally, the Smoture comes with a more extensive set of included components. It includes an Extra HEPA Filter, Aromatherapy Tablets, Crevice Tool, Dusting Brush, Mini Cleaning Tool, Battery, Charger, Electric Floor Brush, Anti-tangle Roller, Wall-mounted Charging Dock, Adjustable Tube, Manual, and Warranty, which provides more versatility. Its adjustable tube is an added advantage.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. ZCAISH Z01-US2 Cordless Stick Vacuum

In comparing the Shark SV1106 and the ZCAISH Z01-US2 vacuum cleaners, the Shark wins in terms of brand recognition, being a more established name. However, the ZCAISH excels in special features, boasting an intelligent touch screen, long runtime, powerful battery, and efficient floor brush and filtration system. The ZCAISH also has a superior HEPA filter compared to the Shark's washable foam filters.

The ZCAISH includes more accessories than the Shark. Both are cordless and suitable for carpet, hard floors, and pet hair, and come in upright and stick form factors respectively, making it a tie in those categories. The ZCAISH has a substantially larger dust cup capacity.

The ZCAISH demonstrates higher wattage, contributing to a stronger motor and suction power. The ZCAISH offers a longer runtime on its minimum setting. Both have similar charging times. While Shark doesn't provide its suction power specification, the ZCAISH does, and it's impressive.

The Shark is slightly less bulky in product dimensions. The ZCAISH uses a Lithium-Ion battery, generally superior to other battery types. The Shark specifies its noise level, allowing for comparison. In weight, the Shark is lighter and easier to maneuver.

Shark boasts significantly more customer reviews with a slightly lower, but comparable rating. The Shark's higher best seller rank indicates higher sales and popularity. While the Shark specifies a battery life, ZCAISH doesn't provide any battery life specification. Finally, the ZCAISH specifies the motor horsepower, whereas the Shark does not.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC285GR Cordless Stick Vacuum

Both the Shark SV1106 and Eureka NEC285GR are established brands offering cordless vacuums, resulting in a tie in brand recognition and cordless functionality. However, the Eureka NEC285GR edges out the Shark SV1106 in several key areas.

The Eureka NEC285GR is significantly lighter at 5.3 lbs compared to the Shark's 7.5 lbs, making it easier to maneuver. While the Shark has a slightly larger dust cup capacity (0.64 Quarts vs 0.63 Quarts), the Eureka boasts a higher wattage (250 watts vs 125 watts), potentially indicating stronger suction power.

A significant advantage for the Eureka is its runtime of 40 minutes compared to the Shark's 17 minutes. Eureka also is expected to have a shorter charging time (Lithium-Ion technology), more speed settings (3 vs 2), and a slightly quieter operation (78 dB vs 80 dB). The Eureka also has extra features like the Headlight, a nice addition.

While both vacuums utilize similar washable foam filters, the Shark is recommended for a wider range of uses, including carpet, hard floors, and pet hair, versus the Eureka's focus on hard floors. On the other hand, the Shark has a higher customer rating (4.2 Stars, 23,494 ratings), indicating its popularity in the market.

The final decision may hinge on price, as it hasn't been specified in the initial assessment. The cost of each vacuum needs to be factored in when weighing these features. In addition, Eureka's special features, such as the upgraded brushless digital motor, 5-Stage Filtration System, Easy Rest Feature, and Under Furniture, are very appealing and give it a competitive edge over Shark's 2-Speed Brushroll and Precision Charging.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. AFNOP Pure 16 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Both the Shark SV1106 and AFNOP Pure 16 are cordless vacuums, offering convenience in movement. However, the Shark SV1106 is lighter, weighing 7.5 lbs compared to the AFNOP Pure 16's 8 lbs, making it more portable.

The AFNOP Pure 16 boasts a larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 Liters compared to the Shark SV1106's 0.64 Quarts (0.68 Liters). The AFNOP Pure 16 has a higher wattage of 550 watts compared to the Shark SV1106's 125 watts. The AFNOP Pure 16 provides a significantly longer runtime of 60 minutes, whereas the Shark SV1106 offers only 17 minutes (though some customers report 25 minutes). Both vacuums require 4 hours for a full charge.

The AFNOP Pure 16 uses a HEPA filter, generally more effective at capturing fine particles, while the Shark SV1106 utilizes washable foam filters. The AFNOP Pure 16 also has several advanced features like strong suction, a self-standing design, an efficient filtration system, and a V-shaped brush to prevent pet hair winding.

The AFNOP Pure 16 includes a dual-screen display that shows battery life, dust cup fullness, brush blockage, and suction mode. The Shark SV1106 has a noise level of 80 dB, the AFNOP Pure 16's noise level not specified. Customer ratings slightly favor the AFNOP Pure 16 with 4.5 out of 5 stars (406 ratings) compared to the Shark SV1106's 4.2 out of 5 stars (23,494 ratings). Price comparison is not possible, as the prices for both products were not provided.

✔ Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The Shark SV1106 edges out the dsorupa V10 Ultra in terms of weight, being slightly lighter at 7.5 pounds compared to 8 pounds. This makes the Shark potentially easier to maneuver. Both vacuums are cordless, leveling the playing field in terms of convenience.

However, the dsorupa V10 Ultra boasts a significantly larger dust cup capacity of 1.8 Liters compared to the Shark's 0.64 Quarts, reducing the frequency of emptying. Moreover, the dsorupa offers a much higher wattage of 550 watts, suggesting stronger suction capabilities compared to the Shark's 125 watts.

The dsorupa also demonstrates superior performance in runtime and charging time. It provides a runtime of 70 minutes, far exceeding the Shark's 17 minutes, and requires a shorter charging time of 3.5 hours compared to the Shark's 4 hours. Furthermore, the dsorupa utilizes a HEPA filter, which is more effective at capturing fine particles and allergens than the Shark's washable foam filters. The dsorupa operates at a lower noise level of 64 dB (in Ultra-Quiet Mode), making it more pleasant to use compared to the Shark's 80 dB.

The dsorupa V10 Ultra includes several special features. It has an anti-tangle brush design, aromatherapy capabilities, and an LED display. Customer reviews favor the dsorupa with a 4.9 out of 5 stars, compared to the Shark's 4.2. The dsorupa's recommended usage includes more floor types than the Shark.

✅ Conclusion

The Shark Freestyle Cordless Vacuum presents a compelling blend of convenience and functionality for everyday cleaning tasks. Its lightweight design and cordless operation make it ideal for quick cleanups and maneuvering in tight spaces. While suction power and battery life receive varied feedback, its effectiveness on hard floors, low-pile carpets, and for pet hair removal is generally well-regarded. The added features of a well-designed debris container, easy-to-clean components, and a charger that doubles as a storage block further enhance its appeal. Ultimately, the Shark Freestyle offers a practical and affordable solution for those seeking a lightweight, cordless vacuum for routine maintenance of their homes.