The vacuum boasts a detachable battery system with 8 batteries, providing up to 50 minutes of runtime. Easy battery replacement and charging is a plus.
Suction power is rated at 45Kpa, delivered by a brushless motor. The three wind speed settings allow for suction force adjustment based on cleaning needs.
A clogging reminder is a helpful feature, alerting users to potential blockages.
For pet owners, the vacuum includes a larger, anti-tangling floor brush specifically designed for pet hair. The strong grip should improve pet hair cleaning.
The XL dust cup is removable and incorporates a CleanTouch Dirt Ejector for hands-free disposal.
The 6-stage high-efficiency filtration system features E12-level filtration, designed to trap dust and prevent air re-dispersion.
Accessories include a 2-in-1 brush and crevice brush, providing versatility for cleaning different surfaces and tight spaces.
The vacuum comes with a 12-month protection plan and 24/7 customer service.
The functionality of this product is excellent. It works well and is a great value for the price. I found its performance to be good on various floor types including hardwood, low-pile carpet, and tile, with great pick-up.
I appreciate that it is lightweight and compact, making it easy to store and taking up minimal space.
The suction power is strong and adjustable, effectively picking up dirt and debris.
This vacuum is great for all household cleaning needs. The bright LED lights are helpful in spotting dust. It feels durable and is easy to empty and clean the filters.
Assembly was a breeze. It was easy to put together, and the instructions were clear.
Using the product is also straightforward. It picks up pet hair easily and is maneuverable with versatile settings. The mount is a helpful addition.
Considering the quality for the price, I think it is a good value for money.
The cordless feature adds convenience, especially for quick clean-ups.
Finally, the included attachments are useful.
The Trucozie T352 stick vacuum is a cordless model boasting a range of features for convenient cleaning. It has an 8-in-1 portable design, including a 180° rotatable brush head with LED headlights for illuminating dark areas. It is also designed to be self-standing and has an anti-tangling brush.
The vacuum features an LED display, a brushless motor for efficient power, and a one-click dust removal system for easy emptying. It's powered by 8 lithium-ion batteries, providing a runtime of 20-50 minutes, with 3 suction levels reaching up to 45Kpa. The filtration system employs a 6-stage E12-level high-efficiency process, utilizing metal, HEPA, and sponge filters.
Included components are a charger, wall hanger, adjustable extension tube, the 8-battery pack (8x2200mAh), a crevice tool, an LED big brush, and a 2-in-1 brush. The dustbin has a capacity of 0.7 liters and the vacuum uses 250 watts of power.
It's suitable for cleaning carpets, furniture, hard floors, and cars. The vacuum’s controls are push button type with touch method for controls with 3 power levels. It is designed for indoor use.
The vacuum measures 16.93"L x 12.6"W x 7.48"H and weighs 8.27 pounds. Other features include Wi-Fi connectivity, 1 handle, and a glossy finish. The model was manufactured in 2024 in China. Customer reviews show an average rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars. It is powered by Lithium-Ion batteries which is included.
When comparing the Trucozie T352 and SunSare X7A-US stick vacuums, several factors come into play. Brand recognition is neutral, with neither having a clear edge. Suction power is identical at 45Kpa, resulting in a tie.
However, SunSare demonstrates a clear advantage in several key areas. It boasts a longer runtime of 60 minutes compared to Trucozie's 50 minutes, has a significantly larger dust cup capacity (1.5 Liters vs. 0.7 Liters), and incorporates a more advanced 7-level filtration system.
The SunSare's 550-watt motor outpowers the Trucozie's 250-watt motor, and its color touchscreen offers a more user-friendly interface than Trucozie's LED display. Both vacuums feature anti-tangling brush designs, leading to a tie in that aspect.
Both vacuums include a good sets of attachments to get you started, and both have a self-standing design. SunSare operates at a lower noise level (≤ 62dB), which may be a crucial factor for some users.
Customer feedback strongly favors the SunSare X7A-US, with a higher rating (4.6 vs. 4.4) based on a significantly larger number of reviews. The SunSare also holds a better best seller rank.
While the SunSare X7A-US only comes with 1 battery, the Trucozie has 8 batteries, which may offer a longer lifespan in total, especially if the batteries can be replaced easily. Assuming that the prices of the two vacuums are similar, the SunSare X7A-US edges out in more categories.
When comparing the Trucozie T352 and the Fabuletta FSV006 Pro stick vacuums, it's a close call. Brand preference is subjective, so that's a tie, as is the model itself, providing no objective advantage to either.
Suction power is a clear win for the Trucozie at 45Kpa compared to Fabuletta's 38KPa. However, Fabuletta edges out Trucozie in motor power with 500W versus 250W, suggesting potentially a more powerful motor despite the lower suction rating. Runtime is slightly longer on the Fabuletta, clocking in at 55 minutes compared to the Trucozie's 50 minutes.
The battery situation is interesting. The Trucozie includes 8 batteries while the Fabuletta includes only 1, making it potentially useful for usage and extending the life of the vacuum. However, both have the same battery capacity. Trucozie also uses more filter types than the Fabuletta, which only contains HEPA filters.
Dust cup capacity favors the Fabuletta at 1 liter, meaning less frequent emptying compared to the Trucozie's 0.7 liters. The Fabuletta also has a significant advantage in weight, listed as 1.2 pounds versus the Trucozie's 8.27 pounds. However, note that the weight of the Fabuletta seems inaccurate and may be an error in the listing.
Both vacuums include a useful set of accessories, making that a tie as it depends on specific cleaning needs. The Trucozie boasts more special features, while the Fabuletta has a faster charging time of 4-5 hours. Customer ratings slightly favor the Trucozie, with 4.4 out of 5 stars from more reviews.
Finally, the price is an important factor, but since it's not provided for either model, it can't be considered in this comparison.
When comparing the Trucozie T352 and the Powerffy A17 cordless stick vacuums, both brands appear relatively unknown, resulting in a tie in brand recognition. The Trucozie boasts a slightly higher suction power at 45Kpa compared to the Powerffy's 40Kpa, giving it a slight edge in raw cleaning force. However, the Powerffy A17 features a more powerful 450W motor compared to the Trucozie's 250W, potentially offering more overall power, even though suction power figures are important in rating a vacuum cleaner.
The Powerffy A17 demonstrates a slightly longer runtime of 55 minutes versus the Trucozie's 50 minutes. Furthermore, the Powerffy's dust cup has a significantly larger capacity at 1.2 liters, reducing the frequency of emptying compared to the Trucozie's 0.7-liter capacity. In terms of filtration, Trucozie's 6-Stage E12 HEPA filter is more effective at capturing finer particles than the HEPA filter on the Powerffy.
Regarding brush design, the Powerffy A17 stands out with its Anti-Tangle Floor Brush featuring LED lights and soft/hard bristles, as well as 270 degree rotating brush. The Trucozie only provides an Anti-Tangling Larger Brush. The Powerffy also includes a richer set of accessories: a sofa brush, crevice brush, 2-in-1 brush, and spare filters, surpassing the Trucozie's 2-in-1 brush and crevice tool.
The Powerffy A17 features an LED touch screen, offering greater control and monitoring of suction levels compared to the Trucozie's standard LED display. While the Trucozie utilizes 8 detachable batteries, providing more convenient charging options, the Powerffy has 7 detachable batteries. Powerffy provides a 3-Year service, which is more than Trucozie's 12-month Protection Plan, offering significant peace of mind.
The Powerffy is significantly lighter at 5.9 pounds compared to the Trucozie's 8.27 pounds, making it easier to maneuver. Customer reviews indicate slightly higher satisfaction for the Powerffy, with a rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars from 349 ratings, while the Trucozie scores 4.4 out of 5 stars from 413 ratings. The Powerffy also offers five levels of suction power, offering more customized cleaning, as opposed to the Trucozie's Self Standing special feature.
In a head-to-head comparison of the Trucozie T352 and the ZCAISH Z01-US2 cordless vacuums, it's clear that both offer competitive features. The brands themselves are subjective, leading to a tie. Suction power is also equal at 45Kpa.
However, the ZCAISH edges out the Trucozie in motor wattage, boasting 550W compared to Trucozie's 250W. This suggests a potentially more powerful motor, despite the equal suction. The ZCAISH also provides a longer runtime of 60 minutes versus 50 minutes.
Conversely, the Trucozie's removable batteries give it an edge. The Trucozie also utilizes a 6-Stage E12 HEPA filtration system, offering more efficient filtration compared to the ZCAISH's 5-Stage HEPA filter. It presents itself with more special features.
Dust cup capacity favors the ZCAISH at 1.5 liters against the Trucozie's 0.7 liters. When it comes to included components, both come with a good range of accessories.
For intelligent features, the ZCAISH stands out with its intelligent touch screen offering Suction Levels, Battery, Dust Cup Full, Brush Roll Clogging Reminder, and a built-in aromatherapy tablet. The ZCAISH also has a V-Shape Anti-tangle Flexible Floor Brush.
The emptying mechanisms are comparable on both, designed for easy, mess-free operation. The ZCAISH has a more compact length and width. But, the Trucozie wins in weight at 8.27 pounds, making it easier to handle than the ZCAISH at 9 pounds.
If we are to assume the price points are close, it is a tie.
In a head-to-head comparison between the Trucozie T352 and the AFNOP Pure 16 vacuum cleaners, the brand category resulted in a tie due to varying brand preferences. Both vacuums offer identical suction power at 45Kpa, again resulting in a tie. However, the AFNOP Pure 16 takes the lead in runtime, offering a full 60 minutes compared to the Trucozie's 20-50 minutes, allowing for longer cleaning sessions.
The battery category goes to the Trucozie with its 8 x 2200mAh battery pack and detachable batteries for replacement and easy charging. The AFNOP Pure 16 offers a larger dust cup capacity at 1.5 Liters compared to Trucozie's 0.7 Liters, meaning less frequent emptying. Filtration is another tie, as both offer high-efficiency systems.
Both vacuums also offer effective brush head designs for handling pet hair, leading to another tie. The special features category is also a tie, with each vacuum boasting unique benefits appealing to different user preferences. However, the AFNOP Pure 16 boasts an intuitive dual-screen display.
The AFNOP Pure 16 also has a slight weight advantage at 8 pounds compared to the Trucozie's 8.27 pounds and has a higher wattage at 550 watts compared to the Trucozie's 250 watts. The Trucozie T352 stands out in the accessories category, including a charger, wall hanger, adjustable extension tube, 8x2200mAh battery pack, crevice tool, LED big brush, and 2-in-1 brush, providing a more comprehensive cleaning set.
Self-standing capability is a tie, as both models offer this convenience. Customer ratings favor the AFNOP Pure 16, with 4.5 out of 5 stars compared to the Trucozie's 4.4.
Alright, let's break down these two Trucozie stick vacuums. Model-wise, the T352 and T350 are distinct, designed for potentially different user needs.
The T352 boasts a stronger suction power at 45Kpa. Its runtime is also slightly longer, clocking in at 50 minutes compared to the T350's maximum of 45 minutes in energy-saving mode. Plus, the T352 has a larger dust cup capacity at 0.7 liters.
Filtration is also an area where the T352 edges out the T350, featuring a 6-stage E12-level high-efficiency system versus the T350's 5 stages. Similarly, the T352 has a more powerful battery, with 8 x 2200mAh cells, and a higher wattage rating of 250 watts. The T352 also features an anti-tangling larger brush, better for pet hair.
However, the T350 is lighter, weighing in at 6 pounds, making it potentially easier to maneuver. It includes two HEPA filters, offering a spare, and the battery is removable for storage. Interestingly, the T350 is the better seller and is ranked higher in its respective categories. The customer ratings also indicate a larger user base, although both models share an average rating of 4.4 stars. Finally, the T350 has more compact dimensions.
When comparing the Trucozie T352 and the JELLYPIG Pure 01 cordless vacuums, both brands appear relatively new to the market, resulting in a tie in brand recognition. Both models boast a suction power of 45Kpa, making it difficult to declare a winner based on this metric alone.
However, the JELLYPIG pulls ahead in runtime, offering a maximum of 60 minutes compared to the Trucozie's 50 minutes. Conversely, the Trucozie utilizes a detachable battery system with 8 batteries, a feature absent in the JELLYPIG that might extend the overall lifespan of the vacuum.
The JELLYPIG demonstrates an advantage with a significantly larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 liters versus the Trucozie's 0.7 liters, meaning less frequent emptying. Furthermore, the JELLYPIG incorporates a 7-layer double cyclone filtration system, which appears to be a more robust system compared to Trucozie's 6-Stage E12-Level High-Efficiency Filtration.
Both vacuums are designed with pet hair in mind, incorporating anti-tangle brush technology, and therefore, it's difficult to differentiate them on this basis. In terms of accessories, the JELLYPIG includes a 2-in-1 brush, Long Crevice Nozzle, and a Hair Cleaning Tool, giving it a slight edge over the Trucozie's 2-in-1 brush and crevice brush.
The Trucozie comes loaded with special features, including an 8-in-1 portable design, 180° rotatable brush and LED headlights, self-standing capability, LED display, one-click dust removal, and multiple suction levels. The JELLYPIG focuses more on simplicity with features like bagless design and aromatherapy tablets. In terms of wattage, the JELLYPIG has a higher wattage of 450 watts compared to Trucozie's 250 watts.
The JELLYPIG is the lighter of the two at 6 pounds, versus the Trucozie's 8.27 pounds, contributing to its ease of use. Moreover, the JELLYPIG operates at a noise level of 65 dB, while the noise level of Trucozie hasn't been specified. Finally, the JELLYPIG receives slightly higher customer ratings, with 4.6 out of 5 stars from 476 ratings, compared to the Trucozie's 4.4 out of 5 stars from 413 ratings.
The Trucozie T352 boasts a higher suction power of 45Kpa compared to the INSETech S62's 30Kpa, which generally makes it more effective at picking up dirt and debris. It also offers a slightly longer runtime of 50 minutes versus 45 minutes for the INSETech. For filtration, the Trucozie T352 has a 6-stage E12-Level filtration system, implying superior particle filtering capabilities when compared to the INSETech S62's 5-stage system.
The INSETech S62 has a more powerful motor at 300W compared to the Trucozie T352's 250W. The INSETech S62 also features a larger dust cup capacity of 1.2 Liters, reducing the frequency of emptying.
The INSETech S62 stands out due to its lighter weight of 5.9 pounds, making it easier to handle than the Trucozie T352 at 8.27 pounds. Additionally, it operates at a quieter 65 dB noise level. The INSETech also has a better battery with 8 x 2500mAh cells for longer life.
In terms of versatility, the INSETech S62 offers a more comprehensive set of attachments including a flexible hose, mini pet hair brush, long crevice tool, 2-in-1 brush, retractable metal tube, motorized brush, and specialized rollers. Furthermore, the INSETech S62 comes with special features like two rollers (carpet and hard floor), is ultra-quiet, offers a wall mount, and is self-standing. The Trucozie has detachable batteries, Anti-Tangling, LED Display, Brushless Motor, One-click Dust Removal, and Self-Standing.
Customer ratings favor the INSETech S62 with a 4.7 out of 5, although based on fewer reviews compared to the Trucozie T352's 4.4 out of 5 rating. The INSETech S62 provides a longer warranty period of 2 years, offering greater peace of mind compared to the Trucozie T352's 12-month protection plan.
In a head-to-head comparison of the Trucozie T352 and the dsorupa V10 Ultra vacuum cleaners, both brands start on equal footing as brand preference is subjective. The suction power is also identical at 45Kpa.
However, the dsorupa V10 Ultra quickly gains an advantage with a 550W motor, significantly surpassing the Trucozie's 250W. This advantage extends to runtime, where the dsorupa boasts 70 minutes compared to the Trucozie's 50. The dsorupa also wins in battery capacity (20,000mAh vs 17,600mAh) and dust cup capacity (1.8 Liters vs 0.7 Liters).
The dsorupa V10 Ultra continues to excel in filtration with an 8-stage system, improved from Trucozie's 6 stages. Furthermore, the dsorupa utilizes a V-Shaped Anti-Tangle Soft and Hard Brush, providing more versatile cleaning options.
The integrated OLED display on the dsorupa offers more information than the Trucozie's LED display. The dsorupa is also marginally lighter.
In terms of extras, the dsorupa package includes a telescopic tube and aromatherapy tablets, adding value beyond basic cleaning. The dsorupa's special features, such as Wall-Mounted Charging, Aromatherapy, and Quiet Mode, are notably more compelling.
Customer reviews reflect a preference for the dsorupa, with a higher rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars compared to the Trucozie's 4.4. The Trucozie wins in price with its bestseller rank indicating that it is likely the lower priced option.
The Trucozie T352 and KCLAsO V10 vacuums exhibit equal suction power at 45Kpa. However, the KCLASO V10 boasts a significantly more powerful motor at 550 Watts compared to the Trucozie's 250 Watts, suggesting a potentially better performance and longer lifespan for the KCLASO. On the other hand, the Trucozie T352 edges out the KCLASO in runtime, offering 50 minutes of maximum runtime compared to the KCLASO's 45 minutes.
The Trucozie's 6-stage E12-Level filtration system is deemed superior to the KCLASO's 5-Layer Cyclone Filtration with HEPA, potentially trapping more dust. Moreover, the Trucozie's dust cup capacity is also larger at 0.7 liters compared to the KCLASO's 0.5 liters, meaning fewer trips to empty the dust cup during cleaning. The Trucozie also packs 8 batteries, which translates to a potential longer lifespan.
The KCLASO V10 takes the lead in noise reduction by specifying a noise level of under 75dB. The KCLASO V10 also is designed with a V-shaped roller brush and comb design for anti-tangling, proving it more effective for pet hair. KCLASO V10's features don't stop here, as it has an intelligent touchscreen interface, more user-friendly than the Trucozie's simple LED display. Moreover, the KCLASO V10 is lighter, weighing 6.64 pounds compared to the Trucozie's 8.27 pounds.
The special features and accessories are a tie between both vacuums. The KCLASO also has a higher customer rating with 4.7/5 from 331 ratings, and has better sales ranking than the Trucozie.
When comparing the Trucozie T352 and the dsorupa SmartVac Pro, several key differences emerge. Both vacuums tie in brand and model subjectivity and possess the same suction power of 45 KPa. However, dsorupa edges ahead with a more powerful 550W motor compared to Trucozie's 250W, suggesting potentially better performance.
The dsorupa also boasts a longer maximum runtime of 60 minutes versus Trucozie's 50 minutes. Both vacuums utilize lithium-ion batteries, but the dsorupa's battery system seems more efficient, contributing to the extended runtime. A significant advantage for the dsorupa is its larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 liters, compared to Trucozie's 0.7 liters, reducing the frequency of emptying. The filtration systems are challenging to compare due to lack of standardized testing data, resulting in a tie.
While Trucozie lists more special features, the dsorupa's included components appear more diverse and tailored, particularly with the inclusion of both inlet and outlet HEPA filters and a hair cleaning tool. The dsorupa also operates at a lower noise level (≤ 68 dB) than the unspecified noise level of the Trucozie. Its dual handle design is another advantage, potentially reducing wrist strain.
The Trucozie has smaller, wider dimensions, which could be advantageous in certain situations. However, the dsorupa is slightly lighter, potentially improving maneuverability. Customer reviews favor the dsorupa with a higher rating, although based on a smaller sample size. The dsorupa also offers a longer warranty period and is the newer model year.
Overall, the Trucozie T352 stick vacuum presents a compelling option for those seeking a versatile and affordable cordless cleaning solution. Its strong suction, multiple attachments, and lightweight design make it well-suited for a variety of household tasks, especially for pet owners. The ease of assembly, use, and maintenance further enhance its appeal, while the included protection plan and customer service offer added peace of mind. Despite being manufactured in China, the positive customer reviews and impressive feature set indicate a product that delivers considerable value for its price point.
Hi, I'm Hannah! Welcome to my corner of the internet dedicated to helping you find the perfect vacuum cleaner for your home. As a passionate blogger and vacuum enthusiast, I've spent countless hours researching, testing, and reviewing a wide range of models. Whether you're tackling pet hair, deep cleaning carpets, or maintaining hardwood floors, I'm here to provide you with unbiased information, expert advice, and comprehensive buying guides. Let's find the vacuum that effortlessly transforms your cleaning routine!
Explore these additional resources for more information.
© 2025 Flow. All rights reserved.