✅ Features of Bissell 3079 Stick Vacuum

This cordless, lightweight vacuum offers the convenience of up to 25 minutes of run time powered by a 14.4V Lithium-ion battery. Expect a charge time of 4.5 hours.

The unit boasts a two-way folding handle which allows for both compact storage and extended reach. It also includes an upholstery brush and a crevice tool for tackling various cleaning tasks.

A removable hand vac enhances versatility. The easy empty dirt bin and washable filter add to the user-friendliness.

Notably, every purchase supports the BISSELL Pet Foundation, aligning your cleaning efforts with a charitable cause.

✅ What we like about Bissell 3079 Stick Vacuum

The suction power of this product is a major plus. It effectively picks up a range of debris, including dried grass, cat litter, and pet hair, performing well on both carpets and hard floors.

Its lightweight design makes it easy to handle and maneuver, even when cleaning furniture. This also reduces strain during use, a significant advantage.

Cleaning is a breeze with this product. The dirt canister is easy to empty, and the attachments are simple to clean, making maintenance straightforward.

The vacuum is user-friendly. It is simple to set up and operate, and the attachments are simple to use. It's easily accessible for all users.

Functionality is also notable, especially for some users. It excels on carpets, area rugs, and hard floors. The power head's flexibility allows it to navigate around corners easily. Its versatility shines through its ability to function as both a stick vacuum and a handheld vacuum.

Battery life seems to be a positive aspect for some, holding a charge for a reasonable amount of time. Some users report being able to use it for multiple cleaning sessions on a single charge.

Finally, some users find it offers great value for money. It's considered affordable and a good deal for the price, especially given the detachable hand vac, which essentially provides two tools in one.

✅ Key specs of Bissell 3079 Stick Vacuum

The Bissell Featherweight Cordless XRT 14.4V Stick Vacuum (model 3079) is designed as a lightweight and portable cleaning solution. It boasts a cordless design for easy maneuverability, operating on a 150-watt motor powered by a lithium-ion battery. This stick vacuum offers a runtime of 25 minutes after a 4.5-hour charge.

The filter type is cartridge-based, and the package includes both an upholstery tool and a crevice tool for versatile cleaning. Bissell recommends it for cleaning pet messes, and its form factor is described as both stick and handheld. The vacuum is primarily intended for indoor use.

This model has a capacity listed at a seemingly large 768 pounds, likely a data entry error. It operates at a noise level of 80 dB and utilizes a hand control with a touch interface.

The dimensions of the vacuum are 6"L x 10"W x 44"H, and it weighs 7.75 pounds. It comes in color 3079.

Additional technical details include an amperage of 14.4 amps and a series number of 3079. The UPC is 011120259506. It requires lithium-ion batteries, which are included. It has a customer rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars based on over 7,500 ratings. Originates from China.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Bissell 3079 Stick Vacuum vs. Electrolux EHVS2510AW Stick Vacuum

Let's compare the Bissell 3079 and the Electrolux EHVS2510AW stick vacuums. Brand preference is subjective, so we won't declare a winner there. The price wasn't provided, so that's another N/A. Both vacuums are lightweight, making it a tie. They also both use cartridge filters, resulting in another tie.

The Electrolux pulls ahead with its included components: a 2-in-1 accessory, filter, and, crucially, a charging stand. Both are cordless, so that's a tie. The Bissell lists a capacity of "768 pounds" which seems to be inaccurate. I am assuming the "768 Pounds" is a data entry error and the Electrolux has a more practical capacity for a stick vacuum at 0.5 liters.

The Bissell has a wattage of 150 watts, which is potentially more powerful. The Electrolux has 37.8 Watt-hours. This is difficult to determine which is more powerful. The Electrolux, however, offers a runtime of 48 minutes, significantly longer than the Bissell's 25 minutes. The Electrolux also charges much faster, at 48 minutes compared to the Bissell's 4.5 hours. Furthermore, the Electrolux has a 60-inch cable for easier storage.

The Electrolux is recommended for both carpets and hard floors, making it more versatile than the Bissell, which is recommended for pet foundation. The Bissell can be used as stick or handheld. The second is only stick form factor. Both products are available in different colors so that is subjective.

The Electrolux is slightly shorter, smaller, and more compact at 5.6"L x 10.4"W x 42.7"H compared to the Bissell's 6"L x 10"W x 44"H. Both use lithium-ion batteries, making it a tie. However, the Electrolux is significantly quieter, with a noise level of 60 dB compared to the Bissell's 80 dB.

The Bissell has a higher amperage at 14.4 Amps compared to the Electrolux's 2.5 Amps, which could indicate a more powerful motor. Both have one item included. The controller type and control method are subjective. The styles are subjective. The connectivity technology is the same for both.

The Electrolux has two speeds. The other one has N/A. Both are portable and intended for indoor use, resulting in ties. The Electrolux is slightly lighter, weighing 7.5 pounds compared to the Bissell's 7.75 pounds. Customer reviews are slightly higher for the Electrolux (4.4 out of 5 stars) compared to the Bissell (4.2 out of 5 stars). The Bissell has a higher best-seller rank at #55, indicating better sales, while the Electrolux is at #81.

The Electrolux has a brushroll clean, making it easier to clean.

✔ Bissell 3079 Stick Vacuum vs. Electrolux EHVS35P2AT Stick Vacuum

Bissell takes the lead in brand recognition due to its stronger presence in the vacuum cleaner market. When it comes to purpose, it's a tie. The Bissell 3079 is designed for pet messes while the Electrolux EHVS35P2AT is for general carpet and hard floor cleaning, so they both cater to distinct needs. Both models are lightweight, offering convenience for users.

However, Electrolux pulls ahead with its longer runtime of 50 minutes compared to Bissell's 25 minutes. Charging time is equal as both vacuums require 4.5 hours for a full charge. Bissell compensates with a higher capacity for dust and dirt at 768 pounds, though this is potentially an error, as it's an unusually large number for a vacuum capacity.

Electrolux showcases superior power with a higher wattage of 700 watts, while Bissell offers only 150 watts. The Electrolux also features a foam filter, considered superior to Bissell's cartridge filter. The Bissell wins when it comes to included components due to it having an upholstery and crevice tool included, which are more versatile compared to the Electrolux's dusting brush. The Bissell and Electrolux both have a removable hand vac.

Electrolux stands out as being quieter, with a noise level of 70 dB compared to Bissell's 80 dB. Bissell leads in customer reviews, boasting a higher rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars from a large pool of 7,558 ratings, while Electrolux has 4.0 out of 5 stars from 336 ratings. In terms of best seller rank, Bissell is positioned higher at #55 in the stick vacuum category versus Electrolux at #220.

Electrolux is the winner when it comes to features. It offers axial cyclone technology, a 5-step filtration system, a motorized bristle nozzle, and brushroll clean technology, surpassing Bissell's two-way folding handle. Electrolux is also slightly lighter, weighing in at 6 pounds compared to Bissell's 7.75 pounds.

✔ Bissell 3079 Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VCS-90B1 Stick Vacuum

The Bissell 3079 edges out the Farberware VCS-90B1 due to its cordless design. Cordless offers a significant advantage in freedom and convenience. Furthermore, the 25-minute runtime of the Bissell is likely sufficient to cover the same area reachable by the Farberware's 15-foot cord.

However, the Farberware strikes back with significantly stronger suction, boasting an impressive 18,000 Pa generated by a 700W motor, dwarfing the Bissell's unspecified suction power (150W motor). The Farberware also wins on capacity, holding 0.8 Liters compared to the Bissell's 0.768 lbs. It's the clear winner in terms of weight, being only 1 lb compared to Bissell's 7.75 lbs, making it significantly easier to maneuver.

The Bissell wins in features, with its two-way folding handle, removable hand vac, and the laudable "Every Purchase Saves Pets" program. Both include essential attachments, leading to a tie.

In terms of customer rating, Bissell has a rating of 4.2 out of 5 (7,558 ratings) against Farberware's 4.3 out of 5 (32 ratings). While both are fairly similar, Bissell has more reviews, so their rating has more evidence. Storage is a tie, with the Bissell offering compact storage via a folding handle, and the Farberware providing a hanging wall mount. Finally, price cannot be compared because they were both N/A.

✔ Bissell 3079 Stick Vacuum vs. Nexahome BVC-V11 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Bissell wins in brand recognition due to its established presence in the vacuum cleaner market, while both products are cordless, resulting in a tie. Nexahome stands out with its impressive array of special features, including low noise, powerful suction, an LED touch display, and an anti-tangle motorized floor brush.

Nexahome also takes the lead in filter type with its HEPA filter, which is more effective for allergen capture, and offers more included components than the Bissell. The capacity listed for the Bissell (768 pounds) appears to be an error, making Nexahome's 1.2-liter capacity the more realistic and practical choice.

In terms of power, Nexahome's 550W brushless motor suggests greater wattage and superior performance. The Nexahome also boasts a longer runtime of 50 minutes in Eco mode, compared to the Bissell's 25 minutes. However, Bissell earns a point for specifying its charging time, which is not available for the Nexahome.

Nexahome proves more versatile with a broader range of recommended uses, while Bissell offers a more flexible stick and handheld form factor. Nexahome also wins in dimensions for its more compact size.

Moreover, Nexahome is specified as "low noise" so it wins in the noise level category. Bissell specifies the Amperage (14.4 Amps). Nexahome delivers longer battery life, as well as the Bissell being lighter. While the customer review sample size is smaller, the Nexahome has significantly better ratings. However, Bissell is currently the better seller in stick vacuums.

✅ Conclusion

The Bissell Featherweight Cordless XRT 14.4V Stick Vacuum (model 3079) presents a compelling option for those seeking a lightweight and versatile cleaning solution. Its cordless design, coupled with a reasonable runtime and strong suction, allows for effective cleaning of various surfaces, including carpets, hard floors, and upholstery. The inclusion of multiple attachments and a detachable hand vac further enhances its functionality. While the listed capacity appears to be an error, the positive user ratings and affordable price point suggest it offers good value, particularly for pet owners and those with smaller living spaces.