✅ Features of Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner

BISSELL is clearly the brand behind this product. A key selling point is that every purchase contributes to the BISSELL Pet Foundation, making it a purchase with a feel-good element for animal lovers.

The runtime is a respectable 50 minutes, providing ample time for thorough cleaning sessions.

This product is designed with pet owners in mind, indicating features catered towards handling pet-related messes. While not explicitly stated, it appears intended for all types of pets and primarily for general cleaning tasks.

✅ What we like about Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner

Customers consistently praise the product's ease of use, noting its convenience for quick cleanups, touch-ups, and daily chores. The lightweight design is also a major plus, making it easy to maneuver around, especially in bedrooms. The cordless design is a key selling point, providing freedom of movement and greater convenience.

The pivoting head is another highly appreciated feature, allowing users to easily navigate around obstacles and clean under furniture. The inclusion of an LED headlight illuminates dirt and debris that might otherwise be missed. Additionally, the pet hair attachment proves effective for cleaning couches and upholstery covered in pet hair.

Multiple attachments add to the product's versatility, enabling users to tackle various cleaning tasks and reach small corners and crevices. Multiple suction modes provide further flexibility for different cleaning needs. The docking station/caddy is also considered a valuable feature, as it stores attachments and ensures the vacuum is always charging when docked.

Finally, some customers report positive experiences with Bissell customer service when resolving issues, suggesting a generally helpful support system.

✅ Key specs of Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner

The Bissell ICONpet Turbo Edge is a bagless, cordless handheld vacuum designed for pet owners. It features a foam filter and comes with a brush attachment. It operates at 700 watts and offers a runtime of 50 minutes with a charging time of 50 minutes. The recommended use is for pet-related messes. The product dimensions are 11"L x 7.75"W x 44.25"H and it weighs 8 pounds.

It runs on a Lithium-Ion battery and produces a noise level of 82 dB. The battery life is listed as 5E+1 minutes.

The vacuum includes one item, controlled by push buttons and touch controls. It features one handle and is part of the 317 series. It is designed for indoor use. The product has a UPC of 011120262056 and an ASIN of B09M9219TZ. The model number is 3177A and it requires 1 Lithium Ion battery (included).

Customer ratings average 3.7 out of 5 stars based on 573 ratings. As of this writing, it ranks #489,948 in Home & Kitchen and #188 in Upright Vacuum Cleaners. It first became available on February 3, 2022.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. Electrolux EHVS2510AW Stick Vacuum

Electrolux emerges as the superior choice due to its broader strengths in appliance quality and features. While Bissell is known for pet-focused cleaning, Electrolux boasts a wider, more positive brand reputation. Electrolux's "Flexible Cleaning" and lightweight design are more versatile than Bissell's bagless design focused on pet welfare contributions.

Electrolux wins in filtration with its cartridge filter, which is typically more effective and longer-lasting than Bissell's foam filter. It also comes with more included components. While both are cordless, Electrolux has a 0.5 Liter capacity, where Bissell has no specified capacity.

While Bissell edges out Electrolux in wattage (700W vs 37.8W) and runtime (50 minutes vs 48 minutes), Electrolux compensates with faster charging time (48 minutes vs 50 minutes) and a 60-inch cable length. Electrolux is more versatile, suited for both carpets and hard floors, compared to Bissell's pet-focused use.

The Electrolux stick form factor is more versatile for floor cleaning than the Bissell's handheld design. The Satin White color of the Electrolux is also more universally appealing. Electrolux is also more compact.

Electrolux shows a noise level of 60dB compared to Bissell's 82dB. Electrolux also comes with 2.5 Amps where the Bissell comes with N/A.

Electrolux also has superior customer reviews (4.4 stars with 1,742 ratings) compared to Bissell (3.7 stars with 573 ratings) and a significantly better sales rank. Electrolux also comes with 2 speeds compared to N/A. Electrolux also comes with a maximum recommended load of 6 pounds.

Electrolux includes a 2-year manufacturer warranty. The Bissell requires parts to assemble, which the Electrolux does not.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. Electrolux EHVS35P2AT Stick Vacuum

Electrolux takes the lead initially due to its reputation as a more premium brand in the vacuum cleaner market, edging out Bissell. While both models are bagless, Electrolux's lightweight design is deemed a more desirable feature, given the prevalence of bagless vacuums already.

The filter type and included components are a tie, as both vacuums use foam filters and come with some form of brush attachment. Cordless functionality is also equal. However, Electrolux gains an advantage by having a specified capacity of 0.3 liters, while Bissell does not provide this information. Wattage and runtime are identical at 700 watts and 50 minutes, respectively.

Bissell claws back a win in charging time, with a significantly faster 50-minute charge compared to Electrolux's 4.5 hours. But Electrolux pulls ahead again with more versatile recommended uses, covering both carpets and hard floors versus Bissell's focus on pet foundation. The stick form factor of the Electrolux is also preferable for general floor cleaning.

Aesthetic considerations such as color and the inherent vagueness of model names result in a tie. However, Electrolux secures another win with slightly smaller dimensions. Battery type and battery life are identical, as both use Lithium-Ion batteries and offer a 50-minute runtime. The fact that both come as a single unit, use push button controls, and have a touch control method result in ties.

Style and portability also come down to user preference, resulting in ties. Electrolux further distinguishes itself with a significantly quieter operation at 70 dB compared to Bissell's 82 dB. Both vacuums have one handle, are intended for indoor use, but the lighter weight of the Electrolux makes it easier to maneuver.

Customer reviews favor Electrolux, with a 4.0/5 rating (from 336 ratings) over Bissell's 3.7/5 (from 573 ratings). Electrolux also demonstrates superior market performance with a much higher best seller rank. Finally, the presence of BRUSHROLL CLEAN TECHNOLOGY on the Electrolux model makes hair removal easier.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. Eureka NEC370GR Cordless Stick Vacuum

Eureka emerges as the winner when brand recognition is considered. Eureka is better known than Bissell. Both vacuums are cordless, resulting in a tie.

However, Bissell gains ground with a slightly lighter weight of 8 pounds compared to Eureka's 8.16 pounds. Bissell also boasts a longer runtime of 50 minutes versus Eureka's 40 minutes. Furthermore, Bissell features a higher wattage of 700 watts, which typically suggests greater suction power, although not a certainty.

Eureka pulls ahead with its HEPA filter, generally considered superior for allergen and fine particle trapping compared to Bissell's foam filter. Eureka also specifies a capacity of 0.6 liters, whereas Bissell's capacity remains unspecified. Eureka operates at a slightly quieter 80 dB compared to Bissell's 82 dB.

Eureka's dimensions of 11.9"L x 4.33"W x 8.58"H also make it easier to store than Bissell's 11"L x 7.75"W x 44.25"H. Eureka demonstrates stronger customer satisfaction with a 4.0 out of 5 stars rating from 8,120 ratings, compared to Bissell's 3.7 out of 5 stars from 573 ratings.

Eureka's best seller rank of #17,929 in Home & Kitchen significantly outperforms Bissell's #489,948, indicating higher sales volume and popularity. Eureka's stick form factor is also preferred over Bissell's handheld design due to its greater versatility.

Finally, Eureka includes more accessories (Adaptor, Dusting Brush, Crevice Tool) than Bissell (Brush). Eureka also offers more special features like Cordless, Compact, Headlight, and HEPA.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. FABULETTA FSV006 Pro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Bissell wins on brand recognition due to its established presence in the vacuum cleaner market. However, FABULETTA takes the lead in suction power with a specified 38,000Pa compared to Bissell's unspecified rating, albeit a higher wattage.

FABULETTA offers a slightly longer runtime of 55 minutes in Eco mode, while Bissell charges faster at 50 minutes. FABULETTA boasts a superior HEPA filter compared to Bissell's foam filter.

FABULETTA's lightweight design (1.2 pounds vs. Bissell's 8 pounds) contributes to easier handling. The stick form factor of the FABULETTA is more versatile than Bissell's handheld design. Bissell's higher wattage of 700 watts could potentially translate to more power, though the FABULETTA has better suction.

Bissell is quieter at 82 dB, FABULETTA provides a greater range of accessories and attachments and also has a higher customer ratings. FABULETTA is a best seller than Bissell and offers a wider array of attachments and accessories for different cleaning tasks. FABULETTA's recommended use has more versatility and meets more household needs than Bissell's recommended use.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. SMOTURE VAC01 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

Bissell edges out SMOTURE in brand reputation due to its long-standing presence and established trust within the vacuum cleaner industry. However, when it comes to suction power, SMOTURE takes the lead with a clearly stated 45KPA, even with a lower wattage motor.

SMOTURE also boasts a longer runtime of 60 minutes compared to Bissell's 50 minutes. Conversely, Bissell offers a significantly faster charging time of only 50 minutes.

SMOTURE wins in terms of special features, packing in auto-adjust suction, a self-standing design, an LED touch screen, and even a fragrant filter. Its multi-layer high-density filtration system is also superior to Bissell's foam filter.

The SMOTURE provides much more in box accessories including extra HEPA and sponge filters, aromatherapy tablets, various tools, wall mount, adjustable tube. The SMOTURE stick form factor and lighter weight of 6 pounds is better than Bissell's 8 pound handheld.

SMOTURE operates at a much quieter noise level of 64 dB, compared to Bissell's 82 dB. Customer reviews also favor SMOTURE, with a higher rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars from over 2,300 ratings.

SMOTURE holds a much better Best Seller Rank in the Upright/Stick category, achieving #6 compared to Bissell's #188. Price wasn't available to compare.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. SMOTURE VC80 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Bissell wins on brand reputation due to its established presence in the vacuum cleaner industry. However, SMOTURE boasts more special features, including a HEPA filter, a more powerful motor, higher suction, multiple suction levels, auto-adjust, a longer runtime, an OLED display, a self-standing design, a wall mount, and an LED light. Speaking of filters, SMOTURE uses a HEPA filter which captures finer particles and allergens compared to Bissell's foam filter.

Cordless convenience is a tie between both models. Bissell has a higher wattage at 700 watts compared to SMOTURE's 450 watts, which generally indicates a more powerful motor. SMOTURE provides a slightly longer runtime of 55 minutes compared to Bissell's 50 minutes. However, Bissell charges faster than SMOTURE.

SMOTURE is more versatile in its recommended use spanning carpet, hard floor, tile floor, hardwood, and rug. Also, SMOTURE's stick form factor is more versatile for floor and above-floor cleaning. SMOTURE also includes a smart OLED display that shows all the neccessary information. SMOTURE also has a larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 liters, requiring less frequent emptying.

SMOTURE's lighter weight makes it easier to maneuver and has better customer reviews, suggesting greater customer satisfaction. SMOTURE also has a better sales rank. Finally, SMOTURE has a better warranty and support.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. AFNOP AceVac 11 Cordless Vacuum

Bissell takes the lead in brand recognition, thanks to its established reputation in the vacuum cleaner industry, a stark contrast to AFNOP. Furthermore, if your purpose revolves around supporting a pet-focused product and cause, the Bissell is the better choice. The suction power is not explicitly stated in Bissell, but the AFNOP boasts a strong 45000Pa (45KPa). Motor wattage provides insight on cleaning power, giving Bissell an edge with 700W.

Runtime is a crucial aspect and the AFNOP lasts longer at 60 minutes. The Bissell charges in a quicker 50 minutes.

The AFNOP features a HEPA filter, making it the victor here in terms of filter type. A larger dust cup capacity of 1.6 Liters allows the AFNOP to extend time between emptying.

Looking at features, the AFNOP goes above and beyond. Its extensive feature set is a huge win for this product. When it comes to noise, the AFNOP wins again with a lower 78 dB.

Customer reviews provide a good indication of satisfaction. AFNOP is the clear victor. Furthermore, the form factor plays a part in cleaning convenience and the stick design of the AFNOP is better than a handheld option. Although marginal, the Bissell is slightly lighter.

Price is always a consideration and here it comes down to personal preference. Extra Features like the 8-Layer Filtration System on the AFNOP push this into the lead once again.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. AFNOP Pure 16 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Let's analyze the Bissell 3177A ICONpet Turbo Edge against the AFNOP Pure 16 vacuum.

Brand reputation favors Bissell, a well-known and established name in the vacuum cleaner market. However, AFNOP pulls ahead in suction power with a stated 45000Pa, where the Bissell's suction is not specified. AFNOP also offers a longer runtime of 60 minutes compared to Bissell's 50 minutes. The charging time tells a different story. Bissell charges in only 50 minutes, a stark contrast to AFNOP's 4-hour charging period.

When we look at filtration, AFNOP utilizes a HEPA filter, generally considered superior to Bissell's foam filter for allergen removal. Dust cup capacity is another win for AFNOP, boasting a 1.5-liter capacity. Both vacuums weigh the same at 8 pounds.

Bissell has a higher wattage at 700 watts compared to AFNOP's 550 watts, which could translate to more brush agitation power. However, the noise level tilts towards AFNOP, as Bissell is specified to run at a loud 82 dB, while AFNOP's noise level is unknown.

AFNOP gains ground again with its dual-screen display, providing users with fault codes and battery life information. Bissell lacks this feature. In the area of special features, AFNOP again has more to offer. The Bissell has a slogan "Every Purchase Saves Pets." AFNOP has more special features like self-standing design, one-click dust removal and V-shaped brush. AFNOP has a self-standing design, while Bissell does not. Finally, customer ratings favor AFNOP with 4.5 out of 5 stars versus Bissell's 3.7 out of 5 stars.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. Eureka NEC490BL Cordless Stick Vacuum

Let's break down this vacuum comparison between the Bissell 3177A (ICONpet Turbo Edge) and the Eureka NEC490BL. Both are cordless and portable, utilizing Lithium-Ion batteries. Brand preference is a tie as it's subjective. The Bissell has a higher wattage at 700 compared to Eureka's 350, charges faster at 50 minutes versus 4 hours, and its dimensions are more compact (11" x 7.75" x 44.25") compared to the Eureka (13.19" x 11.22" x 49.6"). The Bissell is also significantly lighter at 8 pounds versus Eureka's 17.64 pounds. The noise level is listed for the Bissell as 82 dB, while Eureka's isn't specified. Battery life is listed for the Bissell as 50 minutes, but is not listed for the Eureka.

The Eureka offers more special features including being cordless, having a bag, a headlight, and a HEPA filter. Eureka's HEPA filter is also considered superior to the Bissell's foam filter. Eureka also has more included components, such as a vacuum bag, accessory kit, charging dock, and crevice tool, compared to the Bissell's brush. While both are cordless, Eureka's runtime is potentially longer, at 15/40/60 minutes depending on the mode.

The Eureka can be used on more floor types, including bare floor, hard floor, carpet, rug, and tile floor, whereas the Bissell is specifically recommended for pet foundations. The Eureka's stick form factor provides more versatility for floor cleaning compared to the Bissell's handheld design. Eureka also has a listed dustbin capacity of 2.5 liters, while the Bissell's capacity is not listed.

Looking at customer reception, the Eureka has a higher rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars from a larger pool of 1,961 ratings, compared to Bissell's 3.7 out of 5 stars from 573 ratings. The Eureka also has a much better best-seller rank in the Home & Kitchen category, ranked at #3,466 compared to Bissell's #489,948. The Eureka's automatic dust emptying is much more convenient than Bissell's manual emptying.

✔ Bissell 3177A Upright Vacuum Cleaner vs. MBYULO EHBL-A001-V01-US-1 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Bissell, a well-known brand in the vacuum cleaner industry, edges out MBYULO in brand recognition. Both vacuums cater to pet owners effectively, making it a tie in that category. The choice between bagless (Bissell) and cordless (MBYULO) depends on individual preferences.

However, MBYULO's HEPA filter surpasses Bissell's foam filter in air quality due to its superior fine particle and allergen capture. MBYULO also provides a more comprehensive set of attachments and accessories. MBYULO has bigger dust cup capacity. Higher wattage generally indicates potentially stronger suction, Bissell has the edge with 700 watts while MBYULO only has 500 watts.

MBYULO boasts a slightly longer runtime of 55 minutes compared to Bissell's 50 minutes. MBYULO is recommended for carpet and hard floor.

MBYULO's stick form factor is more convenient for floor cleaning than Bissell's handheld design. MBYULO features more compact dimensions, and the noise level is also lower. The battery life is slightly higher for MBYULO.

MBYULO receives better customer reviews (4.5 out of 5 stars) compared to Bissell (3.7 out of 5 stars), and its Best Seller Rank is significantly better.

MBYULO is better because it has an OLED Screen and Bissell does not. MBYULO also has a flexible head, and a better filtration system.

✅ Conclusion

The Bissell ICONpet Turbo Edge presents a compelling option for pet owners seeking a lightweight and cordless solution for quick cleanups. Its generous runtime, combined with practical features like the pivoting head, LED headlight, and specialized pet hair attachment, addresses common pet-related cleaning challenges. While the average customer rating suggests room for improvement, the positive experiences with Bissell's customer service and the convenience of the docking station further enhance the overall appeal. Ultimately, its ease of use and contribution to the BISSELL Pet Foundation make it a worthwhile consideration for those prioritizing convenience and supporting animal welfare, provided its limitations relative to heavier-duty vacuums are understood.