✅ Features of Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Dyson V7 boasts cordless operation, offering freedom of movement and ease of use during cleaning tasks. Its run time extends up to 30 minutes with non-motorized tools, though this reduces to 6 minutes when utilizing the MAX power mode. The vacuum's lightweight design contributes to its versatility and suitability for general home cleaning.

The instant release trigger is a notable feature, conserving battery life by activating power only during active cleaning. Initial charging requires a minimum of 3.5 hours.

The Direct Drive Cleaner Head utilizes stiff nylon bristles to effectively agitate and remove embedded dirt from carpets. Power comes from the Dyson digital motor V7, specifically engineered for both hard floors and carpets. The brush bar delivers 75% more power compared to the previous V6 model.

Hygiene is addressed through a fully-sealed filtration system that captures a high percentage (99.97%) of fine particles, down to 0.3 microns. Moreover, emptying the bin is a hands-free process. The bin volume is 0.14 gallons.

✅ What we like about Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Customers generally appreciate the vacuum's functionality, noting its strong performance across various floor types like hardwood, tile, and vinyl. The included attachments are also well-received for dusting purposes, contributing to overall satisfaction with its cleaning capabilities.

Ease of cleaning is another significant advantage, with users highlighting its lightweight design and ease of use for daily tasks. The effortless process of emptying the dust container and changing filters further enhances the user experience.

The vacuum's suction power receives positive feedback, especially for smaller clean-ups. Users feel the performance justifies the cost, particularly when operating at maximum suction. The lightweight and cordless design is also a major selling point, providing portability and ease of emptying.

The vacuum is convenient and provides a quick solution for everyday messes, and is easy to assemble and disassemble.

Many customers specifically praise its effectiveness in picking up pet hair, including cat fur, dog hair, and even hay. The cordless design is a game changer for many users, eliminating the hassle of dealing with a cord.

The battery life is generally sufficient for regular use, especially when operating on the standard setting. Finally, the durability of the plastic construction is noted as a positive aspect of the product's overall quality.

✅ Key specs of Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Dyson V7 Animal (Iron) is a cordless stick vacuum designed for indoor use, perfect for homes with hard floors and carpets. It features a pre/post motor filter system and comes with a cleaner head, mini motorized tool, combination tool, and crevice tool to tackle various cleaning needs.

This model boasts a 0.5-liter capacity and operates at 52.69 Watt-hours, offering a runtime of 30 minutes on a full charge. The charging time is approximately 210 minutes. The vacuum's compact design, measuring 8.2"L x 9.8"W x 49"H, and lightweight construction at 5.58 pounds makes it easy to maneuver and store. It's also portable, featuring one handle for easy carrying.

The Dyson V7 Animal operates on a lithium-ion battery, which is included. It has a noise level of 80 dB and amperage of 27 Amps. Control is managed via push button touch method. The cleaning path width is 9.84 inches, and the style is tailored for homes with animals. The product is part of the Series Number 7.

It is not discontinued and requires assembly. Batteries are required and are included; battery type is Lithium-Ion. The volume is 5.28 Fluid Ounces.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Shark IZ163H Cordless Stick Vacuum

Let's compare the Dyson 419666-01 (V7 Animal) and the Shark IZ163H stick vacuums. Both brands are reputable, however, Shark pulls ahead with its diverse features like the self-cleaning brushroll. In terms of filtration, the Shark's HEPA filter is preferable for trapping allergens. While both vacuums include useful tools, the Dyson's combination tool may offer slightly more versatility. Both are cordless, which is a key advantage for stick vacuums.

The Dyson has a larger dustbin capacity at 0.5 liters compared to the Shark's 0.34 quarts, meaning less frequent emptying. While it may seem like Shark has greater wattage at 181 Watts versus Dyson's 52.69 Watt-hours, we need to convert these to the same units to make an accurate suction power comparison. The Shark offers a longer runtime of 40 minutes compared to Dyson's 30 minutes, and a significantly shorter charging time of 40 minutes versus 210 minutes for the Dyson.

The Shark is specifically recommended for pet owners while the Dyson is recommended for hard floors, carpet, and home. Both have a similar handheld stick form factor. Dimensions-wise, the Shark is more compact, especially in width. Both use Lithium-Ion batteries and have the same noise level of 80 dB. The Shark also edges out the Dyson in battery life, and notably weighs less at 3.4 pounds compared to the Dyson's 5.58 pounds, making it easier to maneuver. Both vacuums use a push button for control and are equally portable and designed for indoor use.

Customer reviews give the Dyson a slightly higher rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars, but the Shark is a best seller at #10 among stick vacuums. The Shark is also better suited to handling pet hair and specific cleaning needs associated with pets, while Dyson's specific instructions list is limited to hard floors.

Generally, the Shark is the less expensive option, providing great value for its price. Overall, the Shark IZ163H appears to be the winner due to its superior features, longer runtime, faster charging time, lighter weight, and suitability for pet owners, especially when considering the cost.

✔ Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Bissell 3797V Cordless Stick Vacuum

Let's compare the Dyson 419666-01 (V7 Animal) and the BISSELL 3797V (CleanView XR Pet) cordless stick vacuums to determine the better option for pet owners. Price is a key factor, and while specific figures aren't provided, Dyson is likely the more expensive option, giving Bissell an initial edge for budget-conscious buyers. Both vacuums are cordless, so there is a tie there.

The Bissell boasts a longer runtime of 40 minutes compared to Dyson's 30. However, the Dyson compensates with a larger dustbin capacity of 0.5 liters versus Bissell's 0.3 liters, reducing the frequency of emptying. In terms of power, the Bissell has a significantly higher wattage at 300 Watts compared to the Dyson's 52.69 Watt-hours, potentially indicating stronger suction, though this isn't always a direct correlation. The Dyson is slightly lighter at 5.58 pounds compared to the Bissell's 5.9 pounds.

When it comes to filtration, the Dyson's pre/post motor filter type is generally superior to Bissell's foam filter, offering better particle capture. Both include a good assortment of included components like a cleaner head, mini motorized tool, combination tool, crevice tool (Dyson), deep cleaning fur brush, dusting brush, tool clip, charger, removable battery, and wall mount (Bissell). This category comes down to the user's preferences. The Dyson has a considerably longer charging time of 210 minutes compared to Bissell, which isn't specified.

Unfortunately, noise levels aren't provided for the Bissell, so we can't compare that aspect. Both vacuums receive similar customer ratings, with 4.3 out of 5 stars. The Bissell, however, holds a much higher best seller rank (#1) compared to the Dyson (#38). Both vacuums are designed with animal hair in mind. Special features such as powerful suction and hygienic bin emptying for Dyson, and more powerful motor and removable battery for Bissell are also user-preference based.

✔ Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Electrolux EHVS75S1AO Cordless Stick Vacuum

Let's break down this comparison between the Dyson 419666-01 (V7 Animal) and the Electrolux EHVS75S1AO (Ultimate700).

Electrolux wins on special features, offering portability, lightweight design, a headlight, bagless operation, and a washable filter, compared to the Dyson's single "cordless" feature. However, Dyson edges out Electrolux with its more effective pre/post motor filter system, while Electrolux only has a foam filter. Included components is another win for Dyson, as it offers a mini motorized tool ideal for pet hair and upholstery. Although both are cordless, Dyson boasts a larger dustbin capacity at 0.5 Liters versus Electrolux's 0.3 Liters. On the other hand, Electrolux takes the lead in wattage (250W vs 52.69 Watt-hours) and runtime (50 minutes vs 30 minutes).

Regarding charging, the Dyson charges faster at 210 minutes compared to Electrolux's 270 minutes. Dyson is also specifically recommended for hard floors, carpets, and home use. Both vacuums have a stick form factor, utilize lithium-ion batteries, have a noise level of 80 dB, and have portable features. Both also have one item, a push button, and touch control methods.

Electrolux has the edge with its 4 speeds and 4 power levels and lighter weight at 4.8 pounds compared to the Dyson's 5.58 pounds. Dyson's customer reviews are better, averaging 4.3 out of 5 stars from 3,443 ratings, whereas Electrolux has a 3.9 rating from 124 reviews. Dyson also enjoys a significantly better best seller rank in the Home & Kitchen category. Dyson has a cleaning path width of 9.84 inches.

✔ Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC370GR Cordless Stick Vacuum

Both the Dyson 419666-01 and the Eureka NEC370GR are cordless, offering users freedom of movement. However, the Dyson is significantly lighter at 5.58 lbs compared to the Eureka's 8.16 lbs, making it easier to maneuver. The Eureka has a longer runtime of 40 minutes versus the Dyson's 30 minutes, and a slightly larger dustbin capacity of 0.6 Liters compared to Dyson's 0.5 Liters. Eureka also has a higher wattage of 300 Watts compared to Dyson's 52.69 Watt-hours, suggesting stronger suction.

The Eureka utilizes a HEPA filter, which is superior for trapping fine particles and allergens compared to Dyson's pre/post motor filter. The Eureka also boasts more special features, including being compact and featuring a headlight. Dyson has a charging time of 210 minutes (3.5 hours) which is specified, while the charging time for Eureka is not specified.

Both vacuums have similar cleaner heads, making this feature a tie because the best head depends on flooring. Both share the same noise level of 80 dB. The Dyson has a higher customer rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars (based on 3,443 ratings) compared to the Eureka's 4.0 out of 5 stars (based on 8,120 ratings).

The Dyson also has a better bestseller rank at #38 in the stick vacuum category, while the Eureka ranks at #63. Dyson's product dimensions make it easier to store. Finally, the Dyson includes a valuable Mini Motorised Tool as an attachment, and Eureka lacks this.

✔ Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Iirios Q5 Pro Cordless Vacuum

Dyson edges out Iirios in the brand category due to its established reputation for quality and innovation. However, without price information, a direct comparison is impossible, so there's no winner. Both models are cordless, resulting in a tie.

The Iirios Q5 PRO boasts a higher suction power at 45 KPa, giving it the edge. Its wattage is also significantly higher at 550 Watts, indicating a more powerful motor. The Iirios also offers a substantially longer runtime of up to 70 minutes compared to the Dyson V7 Animal. The Dyson charges slightly faster at 210 minutes versus the Iirios' 270 minutes.

The Iirios has a larger dustbin capacity of 1.6 Liters, reducing the frequency of emptying. The Iirios features a slightly superior 8-Stage Filtration system, capturing 99.99% of tiny dust particles. Furthermore, the Iirios operates at a quieter 60 dB.

The Dyson is lighter at 5.58 pounds, making it easier to handle. Its smaller dimensions also contribute to easier storage and maneuverability. The Iirios' V-shaped Anti-Tangle Roller Brush is a useful advantage for pet owners and those with long hair. The Iirios also includes a Smart OLED Interactive Display.

The Iirios comes with more accessories. Both models have similar customer review scores of 4.3 out of 5 stars, but the Dyson has significantly more ratings. The Iirios lists a greater number of special features, including powerful suction, advanced noise reduction, long battery life, wall-mounted charging, an enlarged dust cup, and multiple cleaning heads.

✔ Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Trucozie T350 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Dyson edges out Trucozie in brand recognition and reputation, leveraging its established presence in the vacuum cleaner industry. Dyson also wins out in weight and charging time.

However, Trucozie takes the lead in several key areas. It boasts a larger dustbin capacity and a longer runtime in energy-saving mode. Furthermore, Trucozie's filtration system claims to capture smaller particles, and it offers a wider array of special features and included accessories.

In terms of user experience, Trucozie is perceived to be slightly quieter and has garnered a marginally higher average customer rating. Trucozie also has a higher wattage suggesting a potentially more powerful suction. Finally, it is also described as more versatile than the first product.

✔ Dyson 419666-01 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

Dyson wins on brand recognition, being a well-established name. However, dsorupa pulls ahead with suction power, explicitly stating 45KPA and a 550W motor, offering more clarity than Dyson's vague description.

dsorupa dominates in runtime and bin capacity, offering up to 60 minutes and a 1.5-liter bin, respectively. Dyson claws back a win in weight, being significantly lighter at 5.58 pounds for easier maneuverability, as well as shorter charging time.

dsorupa scores again with a lower noise level (68 dB), a more extensive set of special features like its unique double handle and smart display, and a superior HEPA filter. It also boasts a more comprehensive set of included components, like a wall mount and specialized tools.

The dsorupa is easier to store due to it's smaller width. Customer reviews favor the dsorupa (4.9/5) although the sample size is smaller. Both are cordless. Dsorupa is better at pet hair and better protection plan.

✅ Conclusion

The Dyson V7 Animal stands out as a versatile and convenient cordless stick vacuum, particularly well-suited for homes with pets and a mix of hard floors and carpets. Its lightweight design and array of attachments make it an effective tool for both quick clean-ups and more thorough cleaning sessions. While the battery life in MAX mode is limited, the standard runtime and instant release trigger offer sufficient power and efficiency for most everyday tasks. The positive user feedback on suction power, ease of use, and pet hair removal, coupled with the hygienic filtration system and hands-free bin emptying, suggest a product that delivers on its promises of performance and convenience.