✅ Features of Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum

This cordless vacuum cleaner offers whole-home deep cleaning and conveniently converts to a handheld unit for tackling cars, stairs, and upholstery. Boasting 60% more power than previous models, it provides ample suction for various cleaning tasks. The runtime extends up to 60 minutes, supplemented by Auto, Eco, and Boost power modes to optimize performance. Auto mode balances power and runtime, Eco prioritizes extended use, and Boost delivers intensive cleaning.

An integrated LCD screen displays the current power mode, alerts, and remaining runtime. The Motorbar cleaner head effectively deep cleans all floor types while actively detangling hair. For focused cleaning, the hair screw tool with its anti-tangle conical brush bar excels at removing long hair and pet hair from multiple surfaces.

The unit includes four Dyson-engineered accessories designed for high, low, and all-around cleaning needs. Its advanced whole-machine filtration system traps 99.99% of particles as small as 0.3 microns, ensuring cleaner expelled air. Constructed from strong, durable, and lightweight materials, the vacuum promises longevity.

The product is backed by a 2-year warranty and lifetime Dyson support. The MyDyson app provides personalized guides, maintenance tips, and support resources.

✅ What we like about Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum

This vacuum boasts powerful suction, effectively cleaning various surfaces like tile, rugs, hardwood, and even sand. It excels at picking up dust, dirt, and pet hair that other vacuums might miss, making it suitable for kitchen floors and stairs.

The lightweight design is a significant advantage. It's portable, easy to maneuver, and quicker to use compared to bulky traditional vacuums. This contributes to its ease of use, making it convenient for quick cleanups on windowsills, bookshelves, and in the kitchen. Assembly and disassembly are straightforward, further enhancing its user-friendliness.

Functionality is another strong point, with versatility across different surfaces and helpful attachments. It's easy to keep clean, effective for pet hair removal, and some models even feature a self-cleaning brush head.

From a value perspective, many find it worth the investment, considering it a great product that delivers performance at a competitive price point, especially compared to predecessors. The battery life also contributes to its value, with users reporting sufficient run time to complete cleaning tasks. The battery display and multiple power options are well-received features.

Finally, the design incorporates practical elements, such as a wall mount for discreet storage and an easy-to-empty canister. The "Motorbar cleaning head" is designed to prevent hair tangles. The quiet operation and large capacity tank are also noteworthy features. While the handle's ergonomics might be a concern for some, the overall design is generally appreciated.

✅ Key specs of Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum

The Dyson V11 Origin cordless vacuum boasts several appealing features. It's lightweight and bagless, promising up to 60 minutes of run time. It is a versatile option for whole-home deep cleaning. The HEPA filter caters to users concerned about allergens.

Inside the box, you'll find the Dyson V11 Cordless Vacuum itself, along with a wand, docking station, charger, mini soft dusting brush, crevice tool, hair screw tool, motorbar cleaner head, and a lithium-ion battery.

Cordless operation adds to its convenience, and the 0.2-gallon capacity seems adequate for regular use. The advertised runtime is approximately 1 hour. This vacuum tackles multiple surfaces like carpet, hard floor, tile, hardwood, and rugs.

The handheld form factor and nickel/blue color give it a sleek look. Weighing just 6.6 pounds, the V11 Origin is easy to maneuver. The noise level is approximately 70 dB.

This model operates using a push button and touch control method. It has one handle for easy handling. It is designed for indoor use.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. Dreame R10 Pro Cordless Vacuum

Dyson wins on brand reputation, being a well-established name known for quality and innovation in vacuum cleaners. However, the Dreame R10 Pro potentially edges out the Dyson in suction power, boasting 150 AW compared to Dyson's vague "60% more power." Dreame also takes the lead in runtime, offering up to 65 minutes versus Dyson's 60 minutes.

Both vacuums utilize lithium-ion batteries, resulting in a tie there. Dreame gains another point for floor illumination with LED lights on the cleaner head, a feature absent in the Dyson. Both have brush head designs that manage hair entanglement.

Filtration is comparable, with both claiming high rates of fine particle capture. Dreame pulls ahead with a wider array of accessories and a larger dustbin capacity (0.6 liters vs. 0.2 gallons). It also operates at a lower noise level (65 dB vs. 70 dB).

The Dyson is significantly lighter (6.6 pounds vs. 9.25 pounds), giving it an advantage in maneuverability. Customer reviews heavily favor the Dyson, with a 4.5-star rating based on a large number of reviews, dwarfing Dreame's 3.8-star rating from a smaller pool.

Pricing is unavailable for both, preventing a comparison. Dyson's warranty and lifetime support are superior. Special features are a tie, with Dyson's auto mode/LCD screen appealing to some, while Dreame's LED lights are advantageous in dark areas.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. SMOTURE VAC01 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

Dyson, with its strong brand recognition, goes head-to-head with the SMOTURE VAC01. While Dyson wins on brand reputation, SMOTURE edges ahead in suction power, explicitly stating 45KPA compared to Dyson's implied high suction. Both offer a runtime of up to 60 minutes and utilize a lithium-ion battery, resulting in a tie in those categories.

However, SMOTURE pulls ahead with a larger 1.5-liter capacity dustbin, offering more convenience than Dyson's 0.2 gallons. SMOTURE is also slightly lighter at 6 pounds compared to Dyson's 6.6 pounds. Dyson makes a comeback with its HEPA filter, claiming to capture 99.99% of particles as small as 0.3 microns, while SMOTURE offers a multi-layer filtration system.

SMOTURE distinguishes itself with unique features like self-standing capability, a rechargeable wall mount, and even a fragrant filter layer for aromatherapy. It also packs in a broader range of accessories compared to Dyson. Furthermore, SMOTURE operates at a quieter 64 dB compared to Dyson's 70 dB.

Warranty and support are comparable, with both offering a 2-year protection plan. SMOTURE shines with a higher customer rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars based on significantly more reviews than Dyson. While pricing isn't directly available, SMOTURE is likely the more budget-friendly option due to its newer brand status.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. ZCAISH Z01-US2 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Dyson takes the lead in brand reputation due to its established history of quality and innovation in the vacuum cleaner market, overshadowing the lesser-known ZCAISH. However, when it comes to suction power, ZCAISH edges ahead with a definitive 45KPa / 550W specification, while Dyson's claim of "60% more power" lacks context. Both vacuums offer a runtime of up to 60 minutes.

Delving into battery details, the ZCAISH provides more specifics with its 7 * 2500mAh Lithium-Ion battery, giving it an advantage. Furthermore, the ZCAISH boasts a significantly larger dust cup capacity of 1.5 Liters compared to Dyson's 0.2 Gallons (0.76 Liters), reducing the frequency of emptying.

In terms of filtration, both vacuums employ HEPA systems, but ZCAISH's 5-layer system captures smaller particles down to 0.1 micron, surpassing Dyson's 0.3-micron filtration. Feature-wise, the decision is a tie, as Dyson offers an LCD screen, Auto Mode, convertibility to handheld, and a hair screw tool, while ZCAISH counters with an Intelligent Touch Screen, V-Shape Anti-tangle Floor Brush, and fragrance option – catering to different user preferences.

Dyson's lighter weight of 6.6 pounds provides better maneuverability and portability, while ZCAISH compensates with a more extensive accessory package, including a Short Brush Head, Long Crevice Nozzle, Hair Cleaning Tool, Charging Wall Mount Plate, and two Replaceable HEPA filters.

Dyson's 2-year warranty and lifetime support inspire confidence, while ZCAISH's warranty remains unspecified. Dyson also wins out on noise level as it is confirmed to be 70dB.

Dyson's slightly higher customer reviews, with 4.5 stars from 859 ratings compared to ZCAISH's 4.4 stars from 384 ratings, indicates greater customer satisfaction. With the pricing of both products being unknown, it is a tie.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. Iirios Q5 Pro Cordless Vacuum

When comparing the Dyson 481771-01 (V11 Origin) and the IIRIOS Q5 Pro cordless vacuum cleaners, several factors come into play. Dyson wins on brand recognition, due to their long history and reputation for innovation, particularly in vacuum technology. However, Iirios surpasses Dyson in suction power, providing a clear specification while Dyson only makes a relative claim.

Iirios also boasts a longer run time and a higher battery capacity, enabling extended cleaning sessions. Furthermore, the Iirios Q5 Pro holds a substantially larger dust cup, reducing the need for frequent emptying. Both vacuums claim equivalent high-level filtration.

Dyson takes the lead in weight, offering a lighter design that enhances maneuverability. Noise is another point of difference, with Iirios advertising a lower noise level.

In terms of special features and display, Iirios offers a more extensive range, including an OLED display that is more user-friendly for elderly people. However, it is important to note that both prices vary based on sales and retailers.

Customer ratings also indicate a slight edge for Dyson, while Dyson provides a stated warranty and lifetime support. The Iirios has an anti-tangle brushes with soft and hard bristles and LED lights to see dust.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. AFNOP Pure 16 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Dyson edges out AFNOP primarily due to its strong brand reputation, built on innovation and quality. While both vacuums boast a HEPA filter and relatively similar runtime of up to 60 minutes, Dyson’s established brand provides consumer confidence. The features category is a tie since it's subjective and depends on what the user prioritizes.

The AFNOP Pure 16 takes the lead in suction power, claiming an impressive 45000Pa, surpassing Dyson's relative "60% more power" claim without a clear baseline. Battery capacity and dustbin capacity are areas where AFNOP also outperforms Dyson, with a clearly stated 7 * 2500mAh battery and a larger 1.5-liter dustbin, respectively.

Dyson counters with a lighter weight of 6.6 pounds, potentially making it more user-friendly for extended use, and a stated noise level of 70 dB, allowing for comparison with other vacuums. The AFNOP fails to specify its noise level. Dyson's 2-year warranty and lifetime Dyson support offer significant peace of mind.

Customer reviews favor Dyson, with a 4.5-star rating from 859 ratings compared to AFNOP's 4.5-star rating from 406 ratings. However, the price comparison is unavailable because it wasn't stated in the comparison.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC490BL Cordless Stick Vacuum

Dyson's 481771-01 (V11 Origin) generally outperforms the Eureka NEC490BL (Stylus Elite) in several key areas. Dyson's brand reputation precedes it, known for superior engineering and reliability. The Dyson potentially boasts stronger suction, though direct comparison is difficult. The Dyson also offers specifically described cleaning modes. It's significantly lighter, enhancing maneuverability and portability. Dyson's advanced filtration system traps smaller particles, making it better for allergy sufferers. The attachments are more specialized for targeted cleaning, particularly pet hair, and the LCD screen provides useful information. Dyson also offers a clear 2-year warranty. Finally, Dyson has better customer reviews.

However, the Eureka NEC490BL has its advantages. It features a much larger dustbin capacity, meaning less frequent emptying. The self-emptying station is a significant convenience. The Eureka is likely more affordable.

Both vacuums offer up to 60 minutes of runtime and are suitable for all floor types.

Without knowing the test specifics of "60% more power" for the Dyson vs. the 350W BLDC motor for the Eureka, it is difficult to directly compare. It also makes comparing the noise levels difficult.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. Honeywell VC10 Aeromax Cordless Stick Vacuum

Dyson takes the lead in brand recognition due to its strong reputation for quality vacuum cleaners. Although the exact pricing wasn't available, Honeywell likely offers a more budget-friendly option. When it comes to power, the Dyson V11 Origin boasts "60% More Power," suggesting a superior suction capability despite the lack of direct comparison. It also offers a slightly longer runtime of up to 60 minutes compared to the Honeywell's 55 minutes.

However, Honeywell scores a point by specifying a 5-hour battery recharge time, a detail missing for the Dyson. The Honeywell VC10 Aeromax is also the lighter option at 5.5 pounds versus the Dyson's 6.6 pounds, making it potentially easier to maneuver.

The Dyson V11 Origin pulls ahead again with a larger 0.2-gallon capacity dustbin, meaning less frequent emptying. It also operates at a quieter 70 dB compared to the Honeywell's 80 dB.

But, the Honeywell excels in the included accessories department, offering 12 versus Dyson's 4. This provides greater versatility for various cleaning tasks. Additionally, the Honeywell lists compatibility with a broader range of floor types, including specialized surfaces like Marble, Laminate, and Vinyl. The Dyson comes equipped with a HEPA Filter, generally considered superior for trapping small particles compared to the Honeywell's Foam and Disk filter setup.

Customer reviews further support the Dyson, with a higher 4.5 out of 5-star rating based on a substantial 859 ratings, while the Honeywell receives a 4.3 rating from only 26 reviews. In terms of special features, both vacuums offer distinct advantages. The Dyson's LCD screen is a convenient addition, while the Honeywell's LED lights and tangle-resistant roller provide practical benefits. The two vacuum cleaners are tied on this feature. Finally, Dyson provides a 2-year warranty and lifetime support, giving it an advantage over the Honeywell, where warranty and support details were not provided.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. MBYULO EHBL-A001-V01-US-1 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Dyson, a reputable brand known for quality, loses out to MBYULO in motor power and suction, with MBYULO boasting a 600W motor and up to 55KPa suction. Dyson edges out MBYULO slightly in runtime (up to 60 minutes vs. 55).

Battery technology favors MBYULO with its removable battery, offering flexibility and extended life. Dustbin capacity is a clear win for MBYULO at 1.6 Liters compared to Dyson's 0.76 Liters, meaning less frequent emptying.

Filtration also goes to MBYULO with its 11-level system, which includes extended H13 Hepa cartridge, stainless steel cartridge and outlet Hepa cartridge. The display is a tie, as Dyson shows runtime to the second, while MBYULO alerts to clogs. Cleaner head features are also a tie, as each offers unique benefits.

Attachments favor Dyson and its engineered accessories. MBYULO's rechargeable wall mount is better than Dyson's docking station for storage. Dyson operates slightly quieter (70 dB vs. 72 dB).

MBYULO is lighter at 5 pounds compared to Dyson's 6.6 pounds. Warranty goes to Dyson with its 2-year coverage and lifetime support. Special features are won by MBYULO, with its premium motor, extra long life battery, and edge clean design offering temperature, overcharge, and short-circuit protection. Finally, MBYULO wins on price, typically being the lower-cost option.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Dyson edges out KCLASO in brand recognition, thanks to its established reputation for quality and innovation. However, when it comes to suction power, KCLASO boasts a quantifiable 45Kpa suction with a 550W motor, making it the winner in this category. Dyson wins in runtime with up to 60 minutes compared to KCLASO's 45 minutes. Both offer three power modes.

Dyson's LCD screen provides more detailed information, including maintenance alerts and precise remaining runtime, giving it the edge in the display category. Filtration is important and KCLASO claims to capture smaller particles (0.1 microns vs 0.3 microns)

The cleaner head features are a tie, as both are designed to handle hair, just with different mechanisms. Similarly, included accessories are comparable, so both tie here. Dyson's dust cup capacity is larger at 0.2 gallons versus KCLASO's 500 ml. The Dyson is also slightly quieter at 70 dB compared to KCLASO's 75 dB. Weight is practically identical.

KCLASO stands out with its self-standing design and bendable brush head, offering unique convenience, making it the winner for special features. Customer reviews are slightly higher for KCLASO, with an average of 4.7 out of 5 stars compared to Dyson's 4.5. Price information was not available, so that aspect could not be judged.

✔ Dyson 481771-01 Cordless Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

Dyson edges out dsorupa in brand reputation, leveraging its long-standing image of innovation and quality in the vacuum cleaner market. However, when it comes to suction power, dsorupa takes the lead with its explicitly stated 45KPA and 550W brushless motor, offering a more quantifiable measure compared to Dyson's implied high power. Both vacuums offer a runtime of up to 60 minutes, resulting in a tie.

dsorupa further demonstrates an advantage by detailing its battery capacity as 7*2500mAh, while Dyson leaves this information unspecified. Conversely, Dyson wins in charging time, as information on Dyson's charging time is unavailable. dsorupa details a charging time of 4.5 hours.

Dustbin capacity favors dsorupa with its significantly larger 1.5-liter capacity compared to Dyson's 0.2 gallons (0.76 liters), reducing the frequency of emptying. Dyson wins in weight, with its lighter 6.6-pound design, making it easier to maneuver compared to dsorupa's 8 pounds. dsorupa has slightly quieter operation at 68 dB compared to Dyson's 70 dB.

In terms of filter systems, both vacuums tie, each claiming to capture 99.9% of dust particles. dsorupa's Smart Display and Double Handle Design give it an edge over Dyson's LCD screen, Motorbar cleaner head, and handheld convertibility. dsorupa further gains an advantage with its greater number of included accessories.

The two products tie in warranty/support, both offering a 2-year protection plan. The price for both products needs to be researched, which is a crucial factor for many consumers. Customer reviews reveal dsorupa with a slightly higher average rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars (based on 52 ratings) compared to Dyson's 4.5 out of 5 stars (based on 859 ratings); but it is important to note the much smaller sample size of the dsorupa. The addition of the double handle design for wrist health helps give dsorupa the win here, while both products offer three power levels.

✅ Conclusion

The Dyson V11 Origin presents a compelling cordless cleaning solution. Its powerful suction, coupled with a lightweight design and versatile attachments, makes it an effective tool for tackling a range of surfaces and cleaning tasks. The extended runtime and intelligent power modes offer a balance between performance and convenience. Features like the LCD screen, Motorbar cleaner head, and whole-machine filtration enhance its user experience and overall value. While the handle's ergonomics may warrant consideration, the V11 Origin's practical design elements, combined with its performance and Dyson's support, position it as a worthwhile investment for those seeking a powerful and convenient cleaning solution.