✅ Features of KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum

This cordless vacuum cleaner boasts impressive floor compatibility, adept at cleaning hard floors, tile, wooden floors, low carpets, and rugs. An extended tube enhances its reach, making it suitable for cleaning curtains and ceilings.

The filtration system is a highlight, employing a 5-stage HEPA system that captures 99.7% of fine dust particles as small as 0.13 microns. Its lightweight design, less than 7 lbs, and included wall mount, ensure convenient storage and charging.

With a maximum suction power of 18000Pa, it effectively tackles crumbs, debris, pet hair, and dirt. The vacuum provides a run time of up to 45 minutes.

The versatility of this cleaner shines with its 6-in-1 design, readily converting to handheld, stairs, and car vacuum configurations. LED lights incorporated into the brush head assist in detecting dust in dimly lit areas.

Customers can rely on a 1-year quality and technical support/warranty, as well as 7*24h customer service. The package includes a cordless vacuum cleaner, extended tube, HEPA filter, LED head brush, crevice nozzle, hair brush, storage and charger, and a user manual.

✅ What we like about KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum

The lightweight design of this product is a major plus, making it easy to maneuver and use. This is further enhanced by its excellent maneuverability, allowing it to easily navigate around and under furniture, and reach tight spots that are often difficult to clean.

The price is also very attractive, making it an affordable option considering its overall functionality.

It performs well on hardwood and tile floors, effectively picking up dust and debris. The suction power is adequate for these hard surfaces.

The long battery life is impressive; a single charge is sufficient to vacuum an entire house multiple times before needing a recharge.

The quiet operation is a pleasant surprise. It runs much quieter than I anticipated.

The bright light is a standout feature, proving to be more useful than expected for identifying debris on the floor.

Finally, the assembly is incredibly simple. It took less than a minute to put together.

✅ Key specs of KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum

The KEROMEE BW750 is a cordless stick and handheld vacuum designed for indoor use, primarily on hard floors. It boasts a HEPA filter, a brush attachment, and is powered by a 150-watt-hour lithium-ion battery. A fully charged battery provides about 45 minutes of runtime.

This vacuum is compact and relatively lightweight, weighing in at 7 pounds. The charging time for a full battery replenishment is approximately 1.5 hours. The vacuum offers one power level and is controlled using push buttons with a touch control method.

The product dimensions are 17.72 inches in length, 13.8 inches in width, and 7.88 inches in height. The KEROMEE BW750 requires one lithium-ion battery, which is included.

Currently, the customer ratings for this model average 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 20 ratings. It holds a best-seller rank of #1,216,832 in Home & Kitchen and #1,113 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum vs. Prisvacs BW232 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The Prisvacs BW232 emerges as the stronger contender. Its brand is more established in this comparison. More importantly, it boasts a significantly higher suction power of 25000Pa compared to KEROMEE's 18000Pa, suggesting superior cleaning capabilities.

While KEROMEE offers a longer runtime (45 minutes versus 35) and faster charging (1.5 hours versus 2.5), Prisvacs compensates with a much lighter weight (4.4 lbs versus 7 lbs), enhancing maneuverability and ease of use.

Prisvacs packs a more feature-rich design, including an ultra-lightweight build, a motorized floor brush with LED lights, detachable batteries, multiple suction modes, a quick-empty dustbin, a self-standing design, a washable filter, a V-shaped anti-tangle floor brush, a black aluminum tube design, suitability for multiple scenarios, a multi-layer filtration system, low noise, and suitability for hardwood floor & low pile carpet. KEROMEE's feature set is comparatively limited.

The specified dust bin capacity (0.35 Liters) for Prisvacs allows consumers to get a sense of the dust bin capacity. The anti-tangle V-shaped floor brush and the self-standing feature add practicality.

Customer reviews overwhelmingly favor Prisvacs, with a 4.0/5 rating from 158 reviews, dwarfing KEROMEE's 3.4/5 rating from only 20 reviews. The Best Sellers Rank further reinforces Prisvacs' superior market performance.

Assuming similar pricing, Prisvacs provides a greater overall value with its enhanced features and performance. Even at a slightly higher price point, the investment in Prisvacs appears justified.

✔ KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum vs. SUXIANGVAC A27P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Let's analyze these two vacuum cleaners, the KEROMEE BW750 and the SUXIANGVAC A27P, feature by feature.

Starting with the brand, SUXIANGVAC appears to be the more established choice due to its wider usage and presumed stronger brand recognition. Pricing is unavailable for both models, making it impossible to compare in that regard.

SUXIANGVAC dominates in power, boasting 30000Pa of suction compared to KEROMEE's 18000Pa. This is further supported by its more powerful 350-watt motor, dwarfing the KEROMEE's 150-watt motor. The SUXIANGVAC's 6-layer filtration system with cyclone technology seems superior to KEROMEE's 5-stage HEPA filter, claiming a higher filtration efficiency.

KEROMEE offers a slightly longer runtime of 45 minutes versus SUXIANGVAC's 40 minutes. However, SUXIANGVAC compensates with a larger 1.5-liter dust cup, requiring less frequent emptying. Its also more lightweight which makes it more manageable.

The SUXIANGVAC also has a broader range of potentially more practical features including a LED display, more useful green LED light, V-shaped brush, removable battery and low noise. KEROMEE only has extended tube and LED lights.

Looking at customer feedback, the SUXIANGVAC excels with a 4.4-star rating based on 155 reviews, signaling greater customer satisfaction compared to KEROMEE's 3.4 stars from only 20 ratings. The SUXIANGVAC also offers a longer warranty period (2 years versus 1 year) and claims to provide lifetime customer service which is better than KEROMEE's 7/24 customer service.

The SUXIANGVAC also has a V-shaped anti-tangle floor brush, 270° rotation, and green LED light compared to the LED head brush of KEROMEE.

✔ KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum vs. FABULETTA FSV006 Pro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Let's break down this vacuum comparison, focusing on the key differences between the KEROMEE BW750 and the FABULETTA FSV006 Pro. Brand preference is subjective, and without pricing information, we can't make a call on value.

The FABULETTA clearly wins in suction power, boasting 38,000Pa compared to the KEROMEE's 18,000Pa. It also offers a slightly longer runtime of 55 minutes versus 45. The KEROMEE does charge faster, taking only 1.5 hours compared to the FABULETTA's 4 hours.

A significant advantage for the FABULETTA is its weight; at 1.2 lbs, it's much lighter than the KEROMEE's 7 lbs. Both use HEPA filters, but the FABULETTA has more special features, including variable suction modes and a self-standing design. It also includes a more comprehensive set of attachments.

The FABULETTA has a 500W motor, while the KEROMEE is rated at 150 Watt-hours. This higher wattage likely contributes to its superior suction. Customer reviews also favor the FABULETTA, with a 4.3-star rating from 290 reviews, compared to the KEROMEE's 3.4 stars from only 20 ratings. Finally, the FABULETTA is slightly more compact and offers three power levels compared to the KEROMEE's single level, providing greater cleaning flexibility.

✔ KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum vs. BSNAW X8-Pro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

In a head-to-head comparison of the KEROMEE BW750 and the BSNAW X8-Pro vacuum cleaners, BSNAW edges out KEROMEE in several key areas. While both are relatively unknown brands, BSNAW boasts significantly more customer reviews, suggesting greater customer confidence.

KEROMEE highlights cordless operation, compact design, and HEPA filtration as special features. Both vacuums use HEPA filters. However, BSNAW shines with a notably stronger suction power of 35000Pa compared to KEROMEE's implied 18000Pa. Although KEROMEE offers a slightly longer runtime of 45 minutes versus BSNAW's 40, KEROMEE charges much faster at 1.5 hours compared to BSNAW's 4 hours.

BSNAW is recommended for a wider range of surfaces, including beds, floors, cars, and importantly, pet hair. KEROMEE's form factor includes both stick and handheld options. BSNAW is slightly lighter. BSNAW claims a more comprehensive 6-layer filtration system compared to KEROMEE's 5-stage HEPA, potentially improving air purification.

A distinct advantage for BSNAW is its LED power display, providing at-a-glance battery information. BSNAW also includes more accessories in its 8-in-1 set compared to KEROMEE's 6-in-1. Furthermore, the BSNAW's bendable head is invaluable for reaching difficult spots.

Customer sentiment leans heavily towards BSNAW, with a higher average rating and more reviews. BSNAW also offers a superior warranty and support package, featuring a 3-year return and exchange service. Without price information, a direct comparison is impossible. Finally, KEROMEE doesn't specify that you should avoid using it on long-pile carpet, whereas BSNAW explicitly mentions that it can stall or overheat on long-pile carpets.

✔ KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum vs. Powaert N7S1101 Cordless Vacuum

The KEROMEE BW750 and Powaert N7S1101 vacuums are comparable in brand, cordless operation, color, model name, and battery type, resulting in ties in these categories. Dimensions are also tied because there is no indication of which set of dimensions are more optimal; however, the KEROMEE's dimensions are more compact. Price is also tied because it's not available for either product.

Powaert has an edge in several special features, including its high-efficiency filtration, rechargeable battery, versatile cleaning capabilities, powerful suction, and 6-in-1 lightweight design, making it ideal for hardwood floors and low-pile carpet. Its filter is also reusable and washable, which is generally more convenient and cost-effective. Furthermore, Powaert provides significantly more included components, such as an extra filter and different roller types. Powaert also specifies a dustbin capacity of 1 liter and provides more recommended uses and form factors. Noise level is also listed for the Powaert. Powaert also has two power levels compared to Keromee's one.

KEROMEE BW750 wins in terms of runtime, offering 45 minutes compared to Powaert's 30 minutes. The lighter weight of 7 pounds compared to Powaert's 7.85 pounds also favors KEROMEE.

Customer reviews are higher for Powaert. This is also confirmed by its better best-sellers rank.

✔ KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum vs. BSNAW XL-613M Cordless Vacuum

The BSNAW XL-613M edges out the KEROMEE BW750 in several key areas. Notably, the BSNAW boasts a significantly higher suction power at 45 KPa compared to the KEROMEE's 18000Pa. This makes the BSNAW a more effective choice for demanding cleaning tasks. The BSNAW is also slightly lighter, weighing in at 6.82 lbs versus the KEROMEE's 7 lbs, which could improve maneuverability.

While both vacuums feature 5-Stage HEPA filtration, the BSNAW mentions a stainless steel and sponge filter in addition to the HEPA filter. The BSNAW is more versatile, advertised as an 8-in-1 cleaner compared to the KEROMEE's 6-in-1 functionality, and explicitly mentions low noise operation. The BSNAW also includes a telescopic tube, enhancing its adaptability for users of varying heights. BSNAW reviews are significantly better. Dust cup capacity is higher for the BSNAW.

The KEROMEE BW750 has the upper hand in runtime, offering a consistent 45 minutes without needing to be set to an "eco mode." It also has a specified rapid charging time of 1.5 hours, a detail not provided for the BSNAW.

Without knowing the prices of either unit, a definitive determination of price/value is impossible.

✔ KEROMEE BW750 Cordless Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

The dsorupa SmartVac Pro clearly outperforms the KEROMEE BW750 in several key areas. Dsorupa boasts a significantly stronger suction power of 45KPa (45000Pa) compared to KEROMEE's 18000Pa. Its motor is also far more powerful, rated at 550 Watts versus KEROMEE's 150 Watts. The dsorupa also offers a longer runtime of 60 minutes, beating KEROMEE's 45 minutes.

KEROMEE, however, has a faster charging time of 1.5 hours, which is preferable to dsorupa's 4.5 hours. But this advantage is offset by dsorupa's larger 1.5-liter dust cup, allowing for less frequent emptying. It is also lighter, weighing 7 pounds compared to 8 pounds.

Dsorupa also appears to have superior features, including a double handle design, adjustable extension tube, low noise operation, and an intelligent display, compared to KEROMEE's extended tube and LED lights. Both vacuums utilize HEPA filters. Dsorupa also has multiple power levels compared to the single power level of the Keromee. Dsorupa also comes with a stated noise level.

The dsorupa vacuum has significantly better customer reviews, with a rating of 4.9/5 from a larger pool of 52 ratings, while KEROMEE has a 3.4/5 rating based on only 20 reviews. Dsorupa also has a far better best seller rank, suggesting higher sales volume and popularity, is double handled, and comes with a longer warranty. Without available pricing, a final determination of value cannot be made, but based on features and performance, dsorupa is ahead.

✅ Conclusion

The KEROMEE BW750 offers a compelling combination of features for its price point. While its performance on hard floors and maneuverability are strong points, potential buyers should consider the average customer rating and the relatively low power level if they have extensive carpeting or heavy-duty cleaning needs. The lightweight design, long battery life, and convenient features like the bright LED light and easy assembly add significant value for everyday cleaning tasks. It's a solid option for those prioritizing convenience and affordability for primarily hard floor surfaces.