The vacuum boasts a lightweight design, clocking in at under 3 lbs, and a small form factor, facilitating easy disassembly and storage.
The unit's suction power has been significantly improved, now reaching 12000pa, a 50% increase. This enhancement allows it to effectively tackle fine dust, pet hair, and even larger debris such as cat litter.
A generous 16ft power cord offers ample reach, minimizing the need for frequent outlet changes during cleaning sessions.
Versatility is a key strength, as the vacuum can be configured as either a stick vacuum or a handheld cleaner simply by detaching the extension pipe and attaching the crevice nozzle.
The vacuum is suitable for a range of surfaces, including hardwood floors, short pile carpets, windowsills, sofas, beds, desks, and curtains.
The inclusion of 9 mini multifunctional suction heads, alongside a flat suction configuration, contributes to its adaptability across diverse cleaning scenarios.
A replacement crevice nozzle is thoughtfully included as an accessory.
Two filter elements are provided, which are consumables expected to last for 6-12 months.
This vacuum is incredibly lightweight and portable. It's a breeze to carry around the house and maneuver, and it doesn't strain your back.
I was impressed by the suction power. It effectively picks up dirt, dust, and debris, even outperforming some more expensive vacuums I've used. It works particularly well on hard floors like hardwood and tile, and it's great for getting into hard-to-reach areas.
The vacuum is also very easy to use. Assembly is simple, operation is straightforward, and cleaning is a snap. The compact design and tiny attachments make it easy to store, which is a huge plus for smaller spaces.
For the low price, the performance is surprisingly good, which makes it a real value for the money. Cleaning the vacuum itself is also easy. It comes apart without any fuss, and the filter is washable. Finally, it does a great job of picking up pet hair.
The KEROMEE BX216 stick vacuum cleaner stands out due to its lightweight design, making it easy to maneuver. It features a filter and comes with an accessory kit. This model is corded, with a 16-foot hose, and has a 1.2-liter capacity. It operates at 400 watts and boasts a maximum suction of 1.2E+4 meters.
This stick vacuum is designed for hard floors and features a white finish. Its dimensions are 14.6 inches in length, 7.5 inches in width, and 6.3 inches in height.
With a noise level of 75 dB, the vacuum is operated via push button and touch controls. It has a single handle, one power level, and two wheels. It's recommended for indoor use.
Weighing only 3 pounds, this KEROMEE vacuum cleaner is a portable option. It operates at 1.25 Amps and is manufactured by KEROMEE. It does not require batteries. The product is ranked #713 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms within the Home & Kitchen category.
Let's analyze these two stick vacuums. The KEROMEE BX216 comes in lighter at 3 pounds, a clear advantage over the EUREKA NES210's 3.97 pounds for ease of use. In terms of suction, the KEROMEE boasts 12000pa, a quantifiable figure while EUREKA only offers motor amperage. If the KEROMEE's suction claim is accurate, it likely packs a more powerful punch. However, the EUREKA NES210 takes the lead in cord length with 18 feet compared to the KEROMEE's 16 feet, offering a bit more reach.
The KEROMEE BX216 presents a broader set of cleaning options with its 9 mini multifunctional suction heads plus a flat suction, whereas the EUREKA NES210 offers a 3-in-1 design with an onboard crevice tool. The KEROMEE also scores with a larger dust cup capacity of 1.2 liters against the EUREKA's 0.6 liters, translating to less frequent emptying. On the other hand, the EUREKA features a HEPA filter, generally considered superior for trapping fine particles and allergens, thus contributing to better air quality, while KEROMEE has just a filter.
The KEROMEE BX216 operates at a quieter 75 dB compared to the EUREKA NES210's 84 dB. When considering customer satisfaction, the EUREKA holds a slight edge with a 4.1 out of 5 stars based on a massive 110,015 ratings, dwarfing the KEROMEE's 4.0 stars from only 165 ratings. The EUREKA also boasts a much higher Best Seller Rank, indicating greater popularity and sales.
Regarding maneuverability, the EUREKA NES210 includes swivel steering, a feature absent in the KEROMEE's specifications. One final point goes to the KEROMEE due to the inclusion of two filter elements, giving a plus for continuous usage while cleaning one. The EUREKA has a Frustration-Free Packaging (FFP).
Eureka wins in brand recognition due to its established presence. While both vacuums are lightweight, creating a tie in that special feature, the bagless design of the Eureka offers added convenience. However, KEROMEE pulls ahead with its superior filter type, likely offering better filtration compared to the Eureka's foam filter. KEROMEE also boasts a more comprehensive accessory kit, adding to its versatility.
The absence of cordless functionality results in a tie for that specific feature. KEROMEE wins with its larger 1.2-liter capacity, requiring less frequent emptying, and its higher wattage of 400 watts, suggesting potentially stronger suction. Moreover, the KEROMEE's specified maximum suction of 12000 Pa and a longer hose length of 16 feet offer practical advantages.
Eureka takes the edge in recommended use, specifically stating suitability for carpet cleaning, while KEROMEE only specifies hard floors. The Eureka also offers a handheld form factor, increasing its flexibility. Color is a matter of personal preference, resulting in a tie. KEROMEE's smaller product dimensions provide an advantage in storage.
Lower noise levels give KEROMEE another win. Eureka's higher amperage could indicate a more robust motor, making it a closer call than wattage alone. The number of items and control method result in ties as both offer one item with a touch control method. Eureka's "swivel lightweight" style adds to maneuverability, giving it the win.
KEROMEE explicitly states its product is portable. Eureka's lighter weight allows for easier handling. The higher number of customer reviews gives the Eureka's rating greater reliability. A significantly better best sellers rank indicates a higher popularity for Eureka. And finally, Eureka wins by specifying stair and car cleaning, indicating versatility of use.
SunSare KCV02 emerges as the superior choice over KEROMEE BX216. The cordless design of the SunSare offers enhanced convenience and mobility, a clear advantage over the KEROMEE's corded operation. While the KEROMEE is lighter, the SunSare compensates with significantly higher suction power and a larger dustbin capacity, reducing the frequency of emptying.
The SunSare's 55-minute runtime and HEPA filter further solidify its dominance. The KEROMEE is limited by its cord. The SunSare also boasts more special features including a headlight and it has a HEPA filter.
The SunSare includes more components, adding greater value and cleaning versatility. A higher wattage in the SunSare suggests a more powerful motor, while a lower noise level contributes to a more pleasant user experience.
The SunSare demonstrates broader applicability for various cleaning tasks. With a higher customer rating and a greater number of reviews, the SunSare showcases stronger customer satisfaction. The Smart Screen on the SunSare allows the user to monitor the vacuum in real time, while the edge clean design offers superior cleaning on walls and corners.
The Farberware VC-D02C wins on the cordless front, offering superior flexibility compared to the corded KEROMEE BX216. Furthermore, at a mere 1 pound, the Farberware is significantly lighter than the KEROMEE's 3 pounds, enhancing maneuverability. The KEROMEE, however, boasts a higher suction power of 12000pa, crucial for effective cleaning. While the KEROMEE doesn't provide runtime since it is corded, the Farberware offers 26 minutes of cordless operation.
Capacity favors the KEROMEE at 1.2 Liters, allowing for longer cleaning sessions before emptying, over the Farberware's 0.8 Liters. The KEROMEE's 16-foot cord provides a greater reach without needing to unplug. For filters, it's evenly matched as long as maintenance is kept up, with both being suitable but the most important aspect is maintenance.
The Farberware pulls ahead with more special features like a headlight, washable filter, and a bagless design, adding to user convenience. On the other hand, the KEROMEE comes with 9 mini multifunctional suction heads and 1 flat suction configuration, providing more versatility in terms of attachments. The Farberware wins again with an adjustable wand (17"-26"), a wall mount for easy storage, and a digital display battery indicator.
Customer reviews show both products scoring a 4.0 rating, but the KEROMEE edges out the Farberware with a larger number of ratings (165 vs. 32), possibly indicating higher confidence from a larger user base. Without knowing the price of each, it's impossible to determine best value.
Farberware edges out KEROMEE in brand recognition due to its established reputation. The Farberware VCS-90B1 is also significantly lighter at 1 pound compared to KEROMEE's 3 pounds, making it easier to handle. Furthermore, Farberware boasts a higher suction power of 18000 Pa versus KEROMEE's 12000 Pa, indicating superior cleaning capability.
While KEROMEE offers a slightly longer cord at 16 feet compared to Farberware's 15 feet, and a larger dustbin capacity of 1.2 Liters compared to 0.8 Liters, these are relatively minor advantages. KEROMEE also has a wider array of attachments with 9 mini multifunctional suction heads + 1 flat, whereas Farberware has a dust brush, crevice tool, cord management accessory, and hanging wall mount. The KEROMEE vacuum is also more compact with dimensions 14.6"L x 7.5"W x 6.3"H compared to the Farberware's dimensions 11.22"L x 11.18"W x 43.7"H.
Farberware includes special features such as a headlight and washable filter, providing additional convenience. Also, Farberware is assumed to be more quiet as the noise level is not specified, while the KEROMEE vacuum is 75 dB. Farberware also has slightly better customer reviews, with 4.3 out of 5 stars compared to KEROMEE's 4.0, and a better best seller rank, #300 versus #713, indicating it's more popular. The price remains unknown for both, making a value comparison impossible without that crucial piece of information.
In comparing the KEROMEE BX216 and the Vazone R6X stick vacuums, several factors emerge. The KEROMEE BX216 boasts a lighter weight of 3 pounds compared to the Vazone R6X's 3.7 pounds, making it potentially easier to maneuver during cleaning. The KEROMEE BX216 also comes with Accessory Kit (9 Mini Multifunctional Suction Heads + 1 flat suction), more overall attachments and it comes with two filter element are configured to meet the demand of consumables for 6-12 months.
However, the Vazone R6X takes the lead in suction power, offering 20000 Pa compared to the KEROMEE BX216's 12000 Pa, suggesting superior cleaning effectiveness. The Vazone R6X also features a HEPA filter, more effective at capturing fine particles, and has a much larger capacity of 11 Liters compared to KEROMEE's 1.2 Liters, reducing the frequency of emptying.
Both vacuums share an equal cord length of 16 feet. The Vazone R6X also has slightly better customer reviews, and it has a significantly better Best Seller Rank. Price is not provided, which would be a crucial factor in a final recommendation.
When comparing the KEROMEE BX216 and the BSNAW X8-Pro stick vacuums, several key differences emerge. For brand preference, that's entirely up to the individual. The BSNAW X8-Pro wins out for its cordless design, offering greater flexibility than the KEROMEE's corded setup.
However, the KEROMEE BX216 is significantly lighter at 3 pounds compared to the BSNAW's 6.93 pounds, making it easier to maneuver. But the BSNAW X8-Pro boasts a much stronger suction power of 35000 Pa versus the KEROMEE's 12000 Pa, offering more cleaning power.
Again, the BSNAW X8-Pro benefits from being cordless, powered by a battery. The KEROMEE's cord length of 16 feet could be useful, but it restricts movement. The BSNAW X8-Pro has a runtime of 40 minutes before needing a 4-hour recharge.
The KEROMEE BX216 has a slightly larger capacity at 1.2 Liters versus the BSNAW's 1 Kilogram, which may result in less frequent emptying. The BSNAW X8-Pro excels in filtration with its 6-layer HEPA system, offering superior allergen and fine particle capture.
The BSNAW X8-Pro is also more versatile, offering a telescopic tube, flexible hose, floor brush head, 2-in-1 brush, and a crevice tool, more than the KEROMEE's collection of suction heads. The BSNAW X8-Pro also has more special features like HEPA filtration, LED display, a bendable head, and a self-standing design. The KEROMEE BX216 might be quieter at 75 dB, if noise is a concern.
Customer reviews favor the BSNAW X8-Pro, with a 4.4 out of 5 stars compared to the KEROMEE's 4.0. The BSNAW X8-Pro also provides a better warranty and customer service package with a 3-year return/exchange policy and 7/24 after-sales service. Additional features like the bendable head and LED lights further enhance the BSNAW X8-Pro's usability. The price, however, remains a determining factor.
Comparing the KEROMEE BX216 and the Intercleaner S660, neither stands out in terms of brand recognition or cordless operation. The KEROMEE BX216 has a clear advantage in weight, being significantly lighter at 3 lbs compared to the Intercleaner S660's 5.95 lbs. This makes the KEROMEE BX216 easier to maneuver.
However, the Intercleaner S660 boasts a higher suction power of 20KPa, surpassing the KEROMEE BX216's 12000pa (1.2E+4 Meters). The Intercleaner also has a longer cord at 23 ft versus the KEROMEE BX216's 16 ft, providing greater reach.
The Intercleaner S660 utilizes a HEPA filter, generally considered superior for trapping allergens, while the KEROMEE BX216 simply lists "Filter." Both models have the same dust cup capacity of 1.2 liters. The KEROMEE BX216 includes a more extensive accessory kit with 9 mini multifunctional suction heads and two filter elements, While the Intercleaner S660 includes a dusting brush, crevice tool, cleaning brush, 2-in-1 combination tool, and flexible tube.
The Intercleaner S660 is recommended for a wider range of uses, including hard floors, cars, stairs, and carpets, whereas the KEROMEE BX216 is specifically for hard floors. The Intercleaner S660 is also wall mountable, offering more storage flexibility.
In terms of customer satisfaction, the Intercleaner S660 has a slightly higher rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars (based on 32 ratings) compared to the KEROMEE BX216's 4.0 out of 5 stars (based on 165 ratings). The Intercleaner S660 also has a better bestseller rank in the stick vacuum category at #294, compared to the KEROMEE BX216's #713. Knowing the price of both models is essential for making a truly informed decision.
In summary, the KEROMEE BX216 presents a compelling package for those seeking a lightweight and versatile cleaning solution. Its enhanced suction power effectively tackles various messes on multiple surfaces, while its adaptable design transitions effortlessly between stick and handheld configurations. The inclusion of numerous attachments, coupled with the generous cord length and ease of storage, further enhances its usability. Despite its budget-friendly price point, the vacuum delivers impressive performance and ease of maintenance, making it a worthwhile option for small spaces and quick clean-ups, especially for pet owners dealing with hair. The provision of replacement filters also adds to its long-term value.
Hi, I'm Nancy! Welcome to my blog, your go-to destination for all things vacuum cleaner! As a dedicated blogger, I'm passionate about helping you find the perfect vacuum cleaner to suit your lifestyle and cleaning needs. Whether you're tackling pet hair, deep cleaning carpets, or maintaining hardwood floors, I'll provide you with in-depth reviews, expert buying guides, and helpful tips to make your cleaning experience a breeze. Let's dive in and discover the best vacuum cleaner for you!
Explore these additional resources for more information.
© 2025 Flow. All rights reserved.