✅ Features of QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The vacuum cleaner boasts a powerful 23 Kpa suction, which should effectively handle dirt, dust, and pet hair on multiple surfaces. This indicates a strong cleaning capability.

The 1.3L dustbin capacity is certainly generous, reducing the frequency of emptying during longer cleaning sessions.

With a 30-minute runtime, users can expect a decent amount of uninterrupted cleaning time before needing to recharge.

The inclusion of an LED headlight is a thoughtful addition, allowing for better visibility and cleaning in dark or poorly lit areas.

Having two speed modes offers some flexibility, enabling users to customize the suction power based on the specific cleaning task at hand.

The 6-in-1 handheld functionality significantly increases versatility, making it suitable for cleaning furniture, upholstery, stairs, and car interiors beyond just floors.

Finally, the upgraded filtration system is a key feature for allergy sufferers, as it captures dust and pet dander, helping to maintain cleaner air quality.

✅ What we like about QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

This product really shines in its lightweight design. Lifting it, carrying it up and down stairs, and maneuvering it in high places is a breeze. I also appreciate how easy it is to use. The functions are simple, assembly is straightforward, and cleaning is no hassle at all.

Its portability and ability to fit into small spaces are a major plus. You can easily use it in your car, under furniture, and other tight areas. For the price, it offers excellent value, packing in a good set of features.

The fact that it works well on various surfaces is another great aspect. It's effective on hardwood floors, carpets, sofas, and upholstery, making it a versatile cleaning tool. While opinions on suction power vary, some find it adequate for everyday cleaning and even pet hair.

The quiet operation and quick cleaning performance are definitely noteworthy. The two-speed settings provide versatility for different cleaning tasks. One review even mentioned a washable body, which would make cleaning the vacuum itself incredibly easy.

Customers generally express satisfaction with the product's overall quality. Finally, the seller is reported to have good customer support, readily offering replacements or refunds if the product is faulty.

✅ Key specs of QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Okay, here is a breakdown of the QikCln cordless vacuum cleaner based on its specifications:

The QikCln cordless vacuum boasts a powerful 23KPa suction and a 1.3L dust cup. It runs for 30 minutes on a single charge and features two suction modes. Its 5-stage filtration system includes a HEPA filter, and its 8-in-1 versatility makes it quite adaptable.

The package includes a charging dock with screws, a dusting brush, an adapter, a battery pack, a spare HEPA filter, the main motor, an LED roller brush, and a flexible tube. The vacuum is cordless, and designed for dry use only.

This stick vacuum comes in a vibrant purple color and has dimensions of 10"L x 7.48"W x 44"H. The battery is Lithium-Ion, and the noise level is 70 dB.

The vacuum is equipped with push-button controls and features a touch control method, fitting a modern style. It's designed for indoor use, and has two wheels. The item weighs 6.93 pounds.

The QikCln cordless vacuum is a product of China, with the model number QC-VC05-P. It requires one Lithium Ion battery, which is included. It is for House Cleaning, and has one piece.

The current customer rating stands at 4.1 out of 5 stars from 145 ratings. It ranks #222 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs. FABULETTA SV002 Cordless Stick Vacuum

QikCln and FABULETTA offer different strengths. Brand recognition is a wash as it's too subjective. Suction power slightly favors QikCln with its 23 Kpa rating. However, FABULETTA bounces back with a longer runtime of 47 minutes versus QikCln's 30 minutes and a larger dust cup capacity of 1.6 Liters against 1.3 Liters.

Filtration systems appear evenly matched with multi-stage HEPA filtration. QikCln emphasizes its 6-in-1 handheld versatility, which might be more explicit than FABULETTA's general "Multiple Attachments." Both vacuums feature an LED headlight. The QikCln is slightly lighter at 6.93 pounds compared to FABULETTA's 7.2 pounds, and boasts more compact dimensions.

FABULETTA pulls ahead with advertised special features, particularly the detachable battery and washable HEPA filter. Its user interface is also superior, featuring an LED screen providing battery, suction, and alert information. Customer reviews also lean slightly towards FABULETTA, with a 4.2 out of 5 stars versus QikCln's 4.1 out of 5.

✔ QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs. ZCAISH Z01-US2 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Let's break down these vacuum cleaners, the QikCln QC-VC05-P and the ZCAISH Z01-US2, feature by feature.

Brand-wise, it's a tie, as brand preference is subjective. However, when it comes to suction power, the ZCAISH dominates with 45 Kpa compared to QikCln's 23 Kpa. This is mirrored in the motor wattage, where ZCAISH boasts 500 Watts against QikCln's 150 Watts, suggesting a more powerful clean. The ZCAISH also wins on dust cup capacity (1.5L vs 1.3L) and runtime (60 mins vs 30 mins), the double runtime is a great advantage. The charging time is where the QikCln initially appears to have a shocking advantage, but it is actually an error.

Both vacuums feature a 5-Stage HEPA filtration system, resulting in a tie. However, the ZCAISH pulls ahead again with its special features, including an intelligent touch screen, a V-shape anti-tangle flexible floor brush, and even a fragrance feature.

Included components seem fairly even, resulting in another tie. However, the QikCln is lighter at 6.93 lbs compared to the ZCAISH's 9 lbs, making it potentially easier to maneuver. Customer reviews favor the ZCAISH, with a higher rating (4.4/5) based on a larger sample size (384 ratings) than the QikCln (4.1/5 with 145 ratings).

Versatility is a tie, as both are marketed with multiple functions. We have noise level information for QikCln at 70 dB, which is something to consider. Price information for each vacuum is not available, so we are unable to determine how budget factors into the overall determination.

✔ QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs. AFNOP Pure 16 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The AFNOP Pure 16 emerges as the superior vacuum in several key areas. Its suction power, measured at 45 Kpa, far surpasses the QikCln's 23 Kpa. The AFNOP also boasts a slightly larger dust cup capacity (1.5L vs. 1.3L) and a significantly longer runtime of 60 minutes compared to QikCln's 30 minutes. Its advanced filtration system and tangle-free brush head further solidify its lead. Additional advantages of the AFNOP Pure 16 include the convenient self-standing design, dual-screen display, higher wattage (550W vs 150W) and better customer rating.

The QikCln QC-VC05-P, however, does offer some advantages. It explicitly mentions a 6-in-1 handheld functionality while AFNOP only implies it. It is also the lighter of the two, weighing in at 6.93 pounds compared to AFNOP's 8 pounds, which could make it easier to maneuver for some users.

The quick 4 minute charging time, is a significant advantage over AFNOP's 4 hour charging time. Similarly, the noise level of 70 dB is known for the QikCln, whereas the AFNOP does not mention its Noise level.

Without price information, a full comparison is impossible, but based on the available data, the AFNOP Pure 16 appears to offer better performance and features.

✔ QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs. QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The QikCln QC-VC07 vacuum cleaner demonstrates a clear advantage in suction power, boasting 45 KPa in Max Mode compared to the QC-VC05-P's 23 KPa. Conversely, the QC-VC05-P holds a larger dust cup capacity at 1.3 Liters, reducing the frequency of emptying compared to the QC-VC07's 0.75 Liters. In terms of operational duration, the QC-VC07 offers a longer runtime of 50 minutes on Low Mode, outperforming the QC-VC05-P's 30 minutes. However, the QC-VC05-P compensates with a significantly shorter charging time of 4 minutes, in stark contrast to the QC-VC07's 4 hours.

The QC-VC07 boasts a more powerful motor, evidenced by its 450 Watts compared to the QC-VC05-P's 150 Watts. Both models share the same 5-Stage Fully-Sealed filtration system. The QC-VC07's inclusion of an anti-tangle brush, in addition to the LED Roller Brush, gives it an edge for pet owners.

Additionally, the QC-VC07 features an LED Touch Display, providing visual feedback and control not found on the QC-VC05-P. The QC-VC05-P is the lighter of the two at 6.93 pounds, potentially making it easier to maneuver than the QC-VC07's 8 pounds. However, the QC-VC05-P offers greater versatility with its 8-in-1 attachment system, while the QC-VC07 features a 2-in-1 Brush Tool and a long crevice nozzle.

The QC-VC05-P operates at a quieter noise level of 70 dB, compared to the QC-VC07's 75 dB. The QC-VC07 has more compact dimensions. The price comparison between the two models would sway the decision towards the lower priced one, providing that utility is similar.

✔ QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs. SunSare US-X9 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

The SunSare US-X9 consistently outperforms the QikCln QC-VC05-P across several key features. The SunSare boasts a significantly higher suction power of 45 Kpa compared to the QikCln's 23 Kpa. Its motor is also substantially more powerful at 550 Watts, while the QikCln operates at only 150 Watts. The SunSare's dust cup capacity is slightly larger at 1.5 Liters, allowing for less frequent emptying, compared to the QikCln's 1.3 Liters.

Runtime is another area where SunSare shines, offering 20-60 minutes of operation, whereas the QikCln is limited to 30 minutes. The SunSare also features a more advanced 7-Level High-Efficiency Filtration system, potentially benefiting allergy sufferers more than the QikCln's 5-Stage system.

The SunSare US-X9 has a notably shorter charging time of 4 minutes in comparison to the QikCln QC-VC05-P's 4 hours. Additionally, it operates at a quieter noise level of 62 dB, compared to the QikCln's 70 dB. The SunSare's self-standing design provides additional convenience. It also has more special features.

However, the QikCln QC-VC05-P is lighter, weighing 6.93 pounds compared to the SunSare's 8 pounds, which may make it easier to maneuver for some users. The QikCln is also described as a 6-in-1 handheld vacuum, suggesting a broader range of uses based on its versatility. Customer ratings favor the SunSare, with a higher score of 4.6/5 based on 188 ratings, indicating greater customer satisfaction compared to the QikCln's 4.1/5 rating from 145 reviews.

✔ QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs. PINICO PINICO-S7 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

When comparing the QikCln QC-VC05-P and the PINICO PINICO-S7 stick vacuums, the brands themselves don't present a clear winner, with both being reputable in the market.

However, digging deeper into performance metrics reveals a significant advantage for the PINICO. It boasts a much higher suction power (48 Kpa vs 23 Kpa) and wattage (550 Watts vs 150 Watts), indicating a more powerful motor. The PINICO also edges out the QikCln in dust cup capacity (1.5L vs 1.3L) and runtime (60 minutes vs 30 minutes). The charging time is advantageous for QikCln since PINICO has not specified their charging time.

The PINICO's filtration system is also more advanced, featuring a 6-stage system compared to the QikCln's 5-stage fully-sealed system. PINICO offers a more comprehensive set of special features, including an LED smart screen and a tangle-resistant brush, complemented by a longer runtime. The PINICO's LED headlight also has an additional green light feature to reveal hidden dirt.

Regarding included components, the PINICO scores points with an extra HEPA filter and a wall mount. It also offers more control with four power levels compared to the QikCln's two. Customer reviews also lean in favor of the PINICO, with a higher average rating (4.6 out of 5 stars vs 4.1) and a better Best Sellers Rank (#81 vs #222).

The QikCln has a slight edge in dimensions and weight, being a bit lighter (6.93 pounds vs 7 pounds) and having more compact dimensions. Ultimately, without knowing the price of either model, the PINICO appears to offer superior performance and features, while QikCln only has a slight advantage when it comes to charging time, dimensions and weight.

✔ QikCln QC-VC05-P Cordless Vacuum Cleaner vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The KCLASO V10 vacuum cleaner demonstrates superior suction power with 45 Kpa compared to the QikCln QC-VC05-P's 23 Kpa. However, the QikCln model boasts a significantly larger dust cup capacity of 1.3L, reducing the frequency of emptying compared to the KCLASO V10's 500ml capacity. The KCLASO V10 also provides a longer runtime of 45 minutes, while the QikCln offers 30 minutes, but the QikCln shows a very fast charging time of 4 minutes, while the KCLASO V10 shows a 5 hour charging time.

Both vacuum cleaners feature similar filtration systems, with the QikCln offering a "5-Stage Fully-Sealed Filtration" system and the KCLASO V10 featuring "5-Layer Filtration". The KCLASO V10 possesses a much more powerful motor at 550 Watts, compared to the QikCln's 150 Watts, further contributing to its stronger suction capabilities. The KCLASO V10 also offers special features such as the 90°Self-Standing Design + 180°Bendable Brush Head which is convenient for storing and also a touchscreen making it more practical.

While the QikCln operates at a slightly quieter noise level of 70 dB compared to the KCLASO V10's 75 dB, the KCLASO V10 is marginally lighter at 6.64 pounds compared to the QikCln's 6.93 pounds. Customer reviews also favor the KCLASO V10, with a higher rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars based on 331 ratings, suggesting greater customer satisfaction compared to the QikCln's 4.1 stars from 145 ratings. The KCLASO V10 also has a touchscreen feature, while the QikCln doesn't.

✅ Conclusion

The QikCln cordless vacuum presents a compelling option for those seeking a lightweight, versatile, and budget-friendly cleaning solution. Its strong suction, decent runtime, and multiple attachments make it suitable for various cleaning tasks around the house and even in the car. While suction power satisfaction may vary, the overall positive feedback on its ease of use, portability, and effectiveness on multiple surfaces is noteworthy. The inclusion of a HEPA filter and a washable body adds further value, and the good customer support reported provides peace of mind. Despite being a product of China and having a mixed customer rating, the QikCln stands out as a capable and convenient cleaning tool for everyday use.