✅ Features of QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The suction power is quite impressive, boasting a 450W high-speed brushless motor with three distinct power modes. The MAX mode delivers a notable 45KPa of suction.

The removable lithium-ion battery offers flexibility. Expect around 18 minutes of runtime on MAX suction, extending up to 50 minutes on the low power setting. The battery comprises 8 cells.

The LED touch display is a useful addition, providing real-time information on brush roll cleaning needs, battery level, and the current power mode.

The brush head features an anti-tangle roller brush, which is a welcome design choice. Its maneuverability is enhanced by 180° sideways swivel and 90° up and down swivel capabilities.

The 5-stage filtration system claims to capture a significant 99.98% of particles as small as 0.3 micrometers.

✅ What we like about QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum

This vacuum is impressively lightweight, making it easy to maneuver and perfect for quick cleanups. Its cordless design grants exceptional freedom of movement, allowing you to clean anywhere without the constraints of an outlet. You'll appreciate the good battery life, which easily handles cleaning an entire apartment or multiple rooms on a single charge.

The suction power is notable, especially on the high setting, effectively picking up dust and dirt. Emptying the dust cup is a breeze thanks to its convenient, one-button emptying system.

The inclusion of accessories like a 2-in-1 brush, crevice tool, and wall mount, along with an extra filter, adds significant value. The HEPA filter is a definite plus, effectively filtering out dust and allergens.

Maintaining the vacuum is simple, thanks to the removable and cleanable beater bar, which also comes with a handy tool for removing tangled hair. The powerful roller head practically pulls itself across the carpet, making cleaning effortless. Its quick charging time, only about 4 hours for a full charge, is a big advantage.

The build quality feels solid and should withstand several years of typical use. It's also quite versatile, performing well on mid-pile carpets, low-pile carpets, and hardwood/linoleum floors.

✅ Key specs of QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The QikCln QC-VC07 stick vacuum boasts a cordless design, powered by a lithium-ion battery for up to 45 minutes of runtime. It includes a HEPA filter for allergen capture. For included items there is a main motor, LED roller brush, flexible tube, battery pack, power adapter, 2-in-1 brush tool, long crevice nozzle, extra HEPA filter, wall mounted dock, and screws & anchors.

The vacuum has a 0.75-liter capacity and operates at 450 watts. Charging time is approximately 4 hours. It's designed for dry use only and features a stick form factor.

Sporting a green color, the QC-VC07 has product dimensions of 8"L x 6"W x 7"H and weighs 8 pounds. The noise level is rated at 75 dB.

Operation is controlled via touchpad, with three power levels to choose from. This model is suited for indoor use.

The product, model QC-VC07, is manufactured by QikCln in China. The vacuum runs on lithium-ion batteries, which are included. Customer reviews average 4.1 out of 5 stars based on 63 ratings.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. FABULETTA SV002 Cordless Stick Vacuum

QikCln and FABULETTA are evenly matched in terms of brand recognition, both boasting removable batteries, LED screens with touch controls, and a variety of included accessories.

However, QikCln seems to edge out in motor wattage, with 450W and 45KPa suction power compared to FABULETTA's 400W (KPa unlisted). QikCln also has a slightly longer maximum battery life on low mode (50 minutes vs 47 minutes) and a brush head with 180° rotation explicitly stated in the specifications.

FABULETTA, however, shines in filtration, claiming to capture 100% of 0.1um particles and 99% of <0.1um particles, surpassing QikCln's 99.98% of 0.3um filtration. FABULETTA also boasts a significantly larger dust cup capacity at 1.6 Liters compared to QikCln's 0.75 Liters. Furthermore, FABULETTA is lighter at 7.2 pounds versus QikCln's 8 pounds, making it potentially easier to maneuver.

QikCln has a specified noise level of 75 dB, which may be preferable as FABULETTA doesn't list this. QikCln wins on dimensions with 8"L x 6"W x 7"H compared to FABULETTA's 17.2"L x 10.5"W x 7.4"H.

FABULETTA has a slightly higher customer rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars with significantly more ratings (146) compared to QikCln's 4.1 out of 5 stars with (63) ratings.

Without pricing information, a definitive winner cannot be determined.

✔ QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. ZCAISH Z01-US2 Cordless Stick Vacuum

In comparing the QikCln QC-VC07 and the ZCAISH Z01-US2, it's a tight race, but ZCAISH edges ahead in several key areas. Brand preference is subjective, so we'll call that a tie. Both offer the same impressive 45 KPa of maximum suction power. However, the ZCAISH pulls ahead with a 550-watt motor compared to the QikCln's 450 watts, suggesting potentially more powerful performance.

Runtime is another win for the ZCAISH, boasting 60 minutes on minimum suction versus the QikCln's 50 minutes on low mode and only 18 minutes on max. The ZCAISH also has a specified 7 * 2500mAh battery, while the QikCln's battery details are vague. The ZCAISH features an intelligent touch screen with warnings and feedback, giving it an edge over the QikCln's standard LED display.

Both vacuums employ a 5-stage HEPA filtration system. The ZCAISH has a V-shaped anti-tangle brush roll, which is superior to the QikCln's standard anti-tangle design for larger particle pickup and tangle prevention. Furthermore, the ZCAISH's dust cup capacity is significantly larger at 1.5 liters compared to the QikCln's 0.75 liters, reducing the frequency of emptying.

The QikCln is lighter at 8 pounds versus the ZCAISH's 9 pounds. The QikCln is also smaller overall. However, the QikCln provides a noise level of 75 dB compared to the unspecified noise level of the ZCAISH.

Customer reviews favor the ZCAISH, with a higher rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars and significantly more reviews (384) compared to the QikCln's 4.1 stars (63 ratings). The ZCAISH also offers more special features. Both include a wall mount, but the ZCAISH includes an additional replacement filter. The ZCAISH also boasts a significantly better bestseller rank in both the Home & Kitchen and Stick Vacuums categories.

✔ QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Iirios Q5 Pro Cordless Vacuum

When comparing the QikCln QC-VC07 and the Iirios Q5 Pro stick vacuums, it's a close call in some areas. Brand preference is subjective, resulting in a tie. Suction power is also identical at 45 KPa, another tie. However, the Iirios Q5 Pro pulls ahead in several key specifications.

The Iirios Q5 Pro boasts a more powerful 550W motor compared to the QikCln's 450W. Its battery life is significantly longer, offering 70 minutes of runtime compared to the QikCln's 50 minutes on low mode and just 18 minutes on high. Battery capacity is also better in the Iirios Q5 Pro, with 8 x 2800mAh cells versus the QikCln's unspecified 8 cells.

The dust cup capacity on the Iirios Q5 Pro is also more than double that of the QikCln. The Iirios Q5 Pro offers a larger 1.6-liter capacity while the QikCln only offers 0.75 liters. It also has a superior 8-stage filtration system compared to the QikCln's 5-stage. The Iirios Q5 Pro features a V-shaped anti-tangle brush roll with a comb, whereas the QikCln just has an anti-tangle brush roll.

The Iirios Q5 Pro is significantly quieter, operating at 60 dB compared to the QikCln's 75 dB. It also features a higher-quality OLED display, whereas the QikCln has an LED touch display. Both vacuums offer convenient wall-mounted charging, resulting in another tie.

However, the QikCln QC-VC07 has the advantage in weight, coming in at 8 pounds compared to the Iirios Q5 Pro's 8.7 pounds. This is a significant win for the QikCln. The QikCln is also more compact in dimensions at 8"L x 6"W x 7"H compared to the Iirios Q5 Pro's 15"L x 8"W x 48"H.

Customer feedback heavily favors the Iirios Q5 Pro, with a 4.3-star rating from 859 reviews, compared to the QikCln's 4.1 stars from only 63 ratings. The Iirios Q5 Pro also has a much better Best Seller Rank in the stick vacuum category, ranking at #36 compared to the QikCln's #903. Lastly, the Iirios Q5 Pro offers slightly higher horsepower at 0.735 (550 Watts) compared to the QikCln's 450 Watts.

✔ QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. MBYULO EHBL-A001-V01-US-1 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The MBYULO EHBL-A001-V01-US-1 vacuum cleaner edges out the QikCln QC-VC07 in several key performance areas. The MBYULO boasts a more powerful motor at 600W compared to the QikCln's 450W, translating to a higher suction power of 55KPa versus 45KPa. This increased suction, coupled with a longer maximum battery life of 55 minutes (QikCln offers 50 minutes), gives the MBYULO an advantage in overall cleaning capability.

The MBYULO also presents a significantly larger dust cup capacity at 1.6 Liters, dwarfing the QikCln's 0.75 Liters. Additionally, its 11-level filtration system surpasses the QikCln's 5-stage system, suggesting a more comprehensive capture of dust and allergens. The MBYULO further impresses with an OLED color screen, providing a more user-friendly display than the QikCln's LED touch display.

Maneuverability is another win for MBYULO, thanks to its 270° rotatable brush head, offering greater flexibility than the QikCln's 180° design. Furthermore, at 5 pounds, the MBYULO is considerably lighter than the QikCln's 8 pounds, making it easier to handle. It also operates at a slightly quieter 72 dB compared to the QikCln's 75 dB. Also edge cleaning design is in MBYULO.

A notable point for the QikCln is its tangle-resistant brush, which addresses a common concern. However, accessories are comparably equipped between the two models.

Customer feedback further supports the MBYULO's superiority, with a higher rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars based on a larger sample size (402 ratings) compared to the QikCln's 4.1 out of 5 stars with only 63 ratings. Brand recognition is difficult to assess without more data.

✔ QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Nexahome BVC-V11 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

When comparing the QikCln QC-VC07 and the Nexahome BVC-V11 stick vacuums, the brands are a matter of personal preference. Both offer the same 45KPa of suction power, but Nexahome edges out QikCln with a 550W motor compared to 450W. While battery runtime is similar in Eco mode, QikCln offers slightly better performance in max mode. Both vacuums feature removable batteries and LED touch displays.

Nexahome's floor brush has an LED light and is suited for different floor types, giving it an advantage over QikCln's 180° rotatable brush. Additionally, Nexahome's 6-stage filtration system could remove finer particles compared to QikCln's 5-stage filtration. The Nexahome also boasts a larger 1.2-liter dustbin, reducing the need for frequent emptying. QikCln has a lower noise level at 75 dB. The QikCln is also lighter at 8 pounds, while the Nexahome is 9 pounds.

Nexahome's accessories are better than QikCln's and have a telescopic tube and a better brush. Nexahome's self-standing design makes it more convenient to store, while QikCln requires mounting. Customer reviews favor Nexahome with a 4.8 out of 5 stars compared to QikCln's 4.1. Nexahome also ranks higher in sales compared to QikCln. Finally, the Nexahome has an adjustable length.

✔ QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. BSNAW X8-Pro Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Let's analyze these two vacuum cleaners, the QikCln QC-VC07 and the BSNAW X8-Pro, based on the provided specifications. Brand preference is subjective, so we'll move on to performance. The QikCln boasts a higher suction power (45 KPa vs. 35 KPa) and motor wattage (450W vs. 150W), suggesting stronger cleaning capabilities. Its runtime is also slightly longer at 50 minutes (low mode) compared to BSNAW's 40 minutes (standard mode). Both vacuums use removable lithium-ion batteries with a 4-hour charging time. However, the BSNAW X8-Pro edges out the QikCln in a few key areas. Its filtration system is a 6-layer system, offering potentially superior air purification compared to QikCln's 5-stage HEPA filtration. The BSNAW is also lighter (6.93 pounds vs. 8 pounds) and has a slightly larger dust cup capacity (approximately 1 Liter vs. 0.75 Liters). The BSNAW is also made for hard floor and low-pile carpets, whilst the QikCln is implied to be for Dry Use Only.

While the QikCln features an LED touch display and an anti-tangle brush roll (a great feature for pet owners), the BSNAW excels in warranty and customer satisfaction. The BSNAW offers a 3-year return/exchange policy and 24/7 after-sales support, a significant advantage over QikCln's 24-hour online service team. The BSNAW also has a slightly higher customer rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars compared to QikCln's 4.1.

Both vacuum cleaners have similar flexibility. Both vacuum cleaners have the same number of power levels. Only the QikCln gives us info on the noise level of the vacuum cleaner.

✔ QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Comparing the QikCln QC-VC07 and the KCLASO V10 vacuum cleaners, the brands themselves are a matter of subjective preference. The KCLASO edges out the QikCln in motor power with 550W versus 450W, suggesting potentially stronger suction. However, both vacuums boast the same suction power of 45KPa.

The KCLASO appears to have a more robust battery setup, described as 6 x 2500mAh, whereas the QikCln has a removable 8-cell battery (implied size not given). This difference translates into a significant runtime advantage for the KCLASO, lasting around 50 minutes on max power compared to the QikCln's 18 minutes. The low-power runtime is the same for both at up to 50 minutes. The QikCln does charge faster, taking 4 hours compared to the KCLASO's 5 hours.

The KCLASO has the edge in display functionality, with its LED touchscreen providing alerts for filter or brush head issues. The brush head on the KCLASO with its V-shaped roller brush & comb and 180° Bendable Brush Head seems to be more innovative. In contrast, the QikCln has a slightly larger dust cup capacity at 0.75 liters versus the KCLASO's approximately 0.5 liters. The KCLASO also claims a lower noise level at under 75 dB, compared to the QikCln's 75 dB.

The KCLASO is also lighter, weighing 6.64 pounds against the QikCln's 8 pounds and boasts a self-standing design, which the QikCln lacks. Both vacuums come with comparable accessory sets. The KCLASO has a higher customer rating, 4.7 out of 5 with 331 ratings, compared to the QikCln's 4.1 out of 5 with 63 ratings. The QikCln is significantly more compact in dimensions than the KCLASO.

✔ QikCln QC-VC07 Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa SmartVac Pro Cordless Vacuum

In comparing the QikCln QC-VC07 and the dsorupa SmartVac Pro, several factors come into play. Brand preference is subjective, leading to a tie in that category. However, the dsorupa SmartVac Pro edges out the QikCln with a more powerful 550W motor compared to the QikCln's 450W, suggesting potentially stronger suction. Both share the same suction power at 45KPa and use Lithium-Ion batteries.

The dsorupa SmartVac Pro offers a longer runtime of 60 minutes versus the QikCln's 50 minutes. Conversely, the QikCln has a slightly faster charging time of 4 hours, compared to the dsorupa's 4.5 hours. The dsorupa SmartVac Pro boasts a larger dustbin capacity at 1.5 liters, double the QikCln's 0.75 liters, requiring less frequent emptying. While both vacuums feature anti-tangle brush designs and flexible rotation, resulting in a tie, they also both use smart LED displays and similar filtration systems.

The dsorupa SmartVac Pro has a lower noise level at 68 dB, making it quieter than the QikCln's 75 dB. Both vacuums weigh 8 pounds, leading to a tie in weight. The QikCln is more compact in dimensions, offering easier storage and handling. Both models provide three power levels.

A significant advantage for the dsorupa SmartVac Pro is its double handle design, which adds comfort during extended use. Customer reviews favor the dsorupa with a 4.9-star rating (from 52 ratings), compared to the QikCln's 4.1-star rating (from 63 ratings). The dsorupa SmartVac Pro also holds a much better best-sellers rank in the stick vacuum category at #89, in contrast to the QikCln's #903. Lastly, the dsorupa SmartVac Pro offers a more comprehensive warranty and support plan with a 2-year protection plan and 7*24 hours after-sales service. The price comparison is unavailable due to missing information.

✅ Conclusion

The QikCln QC-VC07 presents a compelling option for those seeking a lightweight and versatile cordless stick vacuum. Its strong suction, particularly in MAX mode, coupled with a decent runtime and helpful LED display, makes everyday cleaning tasks manageable. The anti-tangle brush head and included accessories enhance its usability. While the noise level is a factor to consider, the overall performance and user-friendly design, including easy dust cup emptying and maintenance, make it a solid contender in its category. The 4.1-star customer rating seems well-deserved, reflecting a generally positive user experience.