The vacuum boasts a Turbo Brush, effective on carpets and other surfaces with its strong suction (up to 200AW). The multi-cyclonic air filtration system optimizes airflow and traps fine particles.
The Mini Motorized Tool is specifically designed for removing pet hair and fine particles from furniture, rugs, and other surfaces.
Maneuverability appears to be a key focus with its lightweight 6-pound design. The 180-degree swivel head further enhances its reach under furniture and in tight spots.
The digital display offers helpful real-time information, including power level, brush type, and alerts for airflow issues, clogs, and missing filter.
The removable battery provides flexibility in charging and offers up to 60 minutes of vacuuming time per charge. Flexible charging allows for wall-mounting, closet storage, or stand-alone use.
Finally, the Long Reach Crevice Tool is included for accessing tight corners, crevices, and other difficult-to-reach areas.
The suction power is impressive. This lightweight and cordless vacuum delivers excellent suction on various surfaces, including tile, hardwood, rugs, and carpets. It's strong, reliable, and offers great convenience.
This vacuum works well on both hardwood floors and carpets. The inclusion of a pet hair tool is a definite plus. Its lightweight design and cordless operation make it ideal for busy households. Plus, emptying the dust bin is a breeze.
Ease of cleaning is another highlight. It's easy to clean and empty, effectively picks up pet hair and dust, and is well-suited for smaller spaces. The dust bin is simple to remove, and the battery life is sufficient for most cleaning tasks.
The lightweight design makes it incredibly easy to maneuver. It performs admirably on hardwood floors with pet fur, boasts smooth wheels, and features a straightforward dustbin emptying process.
It's user-friendly with intuitive controls, and attaching or detaching different heads is simple.
For some, it offers excellent value for money. It operates reasonably quietly, offers longer battery life, and comes with multiple attachments for various surfaces. It's also a more affordable option compared to some of its competitors.
A particularly clever design feature is the notch that catches on the edge of flat surfaces.
The battery is removable and can be charged separately in the charger. There are also lights to indicate the vacuuming power being used.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet is a portable and lightweight bagless stick vacuum. It has a disk filter and includes a dusting brush. This cordless vacuum has a capacity of 0.8 liters and a runtime of 1 hour.
The charging time is 120 minutes. It's recommended for hard floors, carpets, and area rugs. It comes in a teal silver color and is a 2022 style model.
The product dimensions are 9.8"L x 8.5"W x 44.5"H. It uses a lithium-ion battery that provides 60 minutes of battery life. The vacuum has a push button controller and a touch control method.
Connectivity is cordless and it has 4 power levels and 3 wheels. It's designed for indoor use and weighs 10.53 pounds.
The item model number is VS20T7512N7/AA. It requires 1 lithium-ion battery, which is included. It can be used on carpet and stairs. It has received customer ratings of 4.3 out of 5 stars.
When comparing the Samsung VS20T7512N7/AA and the Praovado C11 cordless stick vacuums, several factors come into play. Samsung wins on brand recognition due to its established reputation in home appliances. While suction power is difficult to directly compare (Air Watts vs. Pascals), the Samsung's 200AW likely translates to more effective usable suction. The Praovado shines with its significantly lighter weight (3.3 pounds vs. 10.53 pounds), making it easier to maneuver.
The Praovado also boasts a larger dustbin capacity (1.8 Liters vs. 0.8 Liters), reducing the frequency of emptying. Runtime is a tie, with both offering 60 minutes. However, Samsung has the edge in charging time, taking only 120 minutes compared to the Praovado's 270 minutes.
For filtration, the Praovado wins due to its HEPA filter, generally considered more effective at capturing fine particles. The Praovado also includes a richer feature set, including a touch screen, multiple modes, an upgraded floor brush, and advanced filtering. Samsung is more compact dimensions at 9.8"L x 8.5"W x 44.5"H compared to Praovado at 7"L x 7"W x 47"H.
The Praovado appears to be quieter, operating at 58 dB, although the noise level of the Samsung is not specified. Customer ratings are tied at 4.3 out of 5 stars, but the Samsung has a vastly greater number of reviews (2,709 vs. 27), lending more credibility to its rating.
The Praovado is likely the better value, assuming it's priced lower than the Samsung, especially if its performance is comparable.
In a head-to-head comparison between the Samsung VS20T7512N7/AA and the Smoture VAC01 cordless stick vacuums, several key differences emerge. Samsung takes the lead in brand recognition, leveraging its established reputation in the electronics market. However, Smoture appears to have a higher suction power.
Both vacuums boast a runtime of up to 60 minutes, resulting in a tie in this category. However, Samsung recovers quickly with its faster charging time of just 2 hours, compared to Smoture's 4 hours.
The Smoture VAC01 gains ground with its larger dustbin capacity of 1.5 liters, nearly double that of the Samsung's 0.8 liters. The Smoture is also significantly lighter, weighing in at 6 pounds compared to the Samsung's 10.53 pounds.
The Smoture features an LED touch screen, providing more advanced controls than the Samsung's basic digital display. Smoture's additional features, like self-standing capability and its fragrant filter design, add to its appeal.
The Smoture VAC01 comes with a comprehensive accessory package, including an extra HEPA filter, aromatherapy tablets, and an adjustable tube. A rechargeable wall mount adds to the Smoture's convenience. The higher customer rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars further supports the Smoture's overall value. Without specific pricing information, it is difficult to select a winner on this aspect.
Samsung, a reputable brand, goes head-to-head with ZCAISH. ZCAISH edges out Samsung in suction power, boasting 45 kPa, potentially higher than Samsung's 200 AW (Air Watts), but further conversion is needed for a direct comparison. ZCAISH also reveals its motor power at 550W, which is more information than Samsung.
The ZCAISH vacuum shines in dust cup capacity, offering a larger 1.5-liter capacity compared to Samsung's 0.8 liters. Both vacuums offer a runtime of 60 minutes, resulting in a tie. However, Samsung takes the lead in charging time, completing a full charge in 120 minutes, while ZCAISH requires 240 minutes.
ZCAISH offers a lighter weight of 9 pounds versus Samsung's 10.53 pounds, promoting easier handling. The ZCAISH has special features such as an Intelligent Touch Screen, 60Mins Runtime, 7x 2500mAh battery, V-shape floor brush, High efficiency filtration system, and Fragrance. This is in comparison to Samsung's Turbo Brush, Mini Motorized Tool, Digital Display, Removable Battery, Flexible Charging, and Long Reach Crevice Tool.
ZCAISH stands out with its 5-layer HEPA filtration system, generally superior to Samsung's disk filtration for allergen capture. The ZCAISH also provides a better included accessories, such as a Short Brush Head, Long Crevice Nozzle, Hair Cleaning Tool, Charging Wall Mount Plate, and 2 Replaceable HEPA filters. The ZCAISH has better maneuverability with its brush head having more swivel options.
The price comparison is dependent on current retail pricing. Customer ratings slightly favor ZCAISH with 4.4 out of 5 stars, based on 384 ratings, compared to Samsung's 4.3 out of 5 stars from 2,709 ratings. Finally, the ZCAISH also offers smart features like an Intelligent Touch Screen, dust cup full of dust reminder, and brush roll clogging reminder, whereas the Samsung only offers a digital display with notifications.
The Iirios Q5 Pro edges out the Samsung Jet 75 Pet in several key areas. Its 45KPa suction, powered by a 550W motor, indicates more robust cleaning power compared to the Samsung, which lacks a specified suction power in AW.
Runtime is another advantage for the Iirios, offering 70 minutes versus the Samsung's 60 minutes. However, the Samsung counters with a significantly faster 2-hour charging time, while the Iirios takes 4.5 hours to fully charge.
The Iirios Q5 Pro is also lighter at 8.7 pounds compared to the Samsung's 10.53 pounds, making it easier to handle. Its larger 1.6-liter dust cup requires less frequent emptying than the Samsung's 0.8-liter capacity.
Filtration is superior in the Iirios Q5 Pro, boasting an 8-stage system versus the Samsung's unspecified multicyclonic filtration. The Iirios Q5 Pro also features a smarter OLED interactive display offering more comprehensive information. The Iirios Q5 Pro is also quieter, specified at less than 60 dB.
The Iirios Q5 Pro's V-shaped anti-tangle roller brush with LED lights is also a better design compared to the Samsung's turbo brush. Further, the Iirios uses 8 lithium-ion batteries, in comparison to the Samsung which uses only 1, which can improve battery life and longevity. The Iirios also comes packed with more special features.
Price comparison is impossible without data, which heavily influences the overall value proposition.
Samsung goes up against AFNOP, let's see how they compare. Samsung benefits from being a more established brand. However, AFNOP appears to have a considerable edge in suction power, boasting 45000Pa, which likely translates to significantly more AW than the Samsung.
When it comes to special features, AFNOP brings more to the table. While Samsung offers a Turbo Brush and Mini Motorized Tool, AFNOP distinguishes itself with a self-standing design, dual-screen display, and tangle-free brush. A HEPA filter gives the AFNOP a clear advantage in filtration, surpassing Samsung's disk filter. AFNOP also includes a more comprehensive set of accessories and provides replacement HEPA filters. Both models are cordless and offer an hour of runtime.
The capacity of AFNOP's dustbin is almost double that of the Samsung. On the other hand, Samsung charges in half the time (2 hours vs 4 hours). Both are stick vacuums. AFNOP weighs less making it more maneuverable. AFNOP boasts a dual-screen display, likely more informative than Samsung's single digital display.
Customer reviews lean slightly in favor of AFNOP, and it also holds a much better bestseller ranking. The self-standing design of the AFNOP is a major convenience factor. Furthermore, AFNOP products are typically priced lower. The AFNOP also has a wattage rating of 550 watts.
The Samsung VS20T7512N7/AA edges out the Eureka NEC490BL in suction power, boasting up to 200AW compared to the Eureka's unspecified Air Wattage despite its 350W BLDC motor. The Samsung is also significantly lighter at 10.53 pounds versus the Eureka's 17.64 pounds, enhancing maneuverability. While both vacuums offer runtime of up to 60 minutes, the Samsung charges much faster at 120 minutes compared to the Eureka's 240 minutes. A digital display is present on the Samsung showing power level, brush type, and alerts. This adds to the customer satisfaction for the Samsung, which has a 4.3 out of 5 stars rating and more reviews than the Eureka. The design allows for lightweight and 180 degree swivel head to manoeuvre more effortlessly.
However, the Eureka NEC490BL takes the lead in capacity, offering a much larger 2.5-liter dustbin compared to the Samsung's 0.8 liters. The Eureka also features a HEPA filter, superior for allergen capture compared to the Samsung's disk filter. The Eureka's special features, including a self-empty station, and included components like the vacuum bag, accessory kit, charging dock, and crevice tool, provides user with value added experience.
Both vacuums have features tailored for pet hair removal and achieve 60 min run time. The final decision depends on price consideration which is unknown.
SAMSUNG is the better brand due to its established reputation in electronics. However, the dsorupa V10 Ultra appears to have stronger suction power, indicated by its 45 KPa rating compared to SAMSUNG's 200 AW (it is worth noting 10 AW equals about 1 KPa).
The dsorupa also offers a slightly longer runtime of 1 hour and 10 minutes versus SAMSUNG's 1 hour. The SAMSUNG takes the cake for charging time, only needing 2 hours for a full charge, whereas the dsorupa requires 3.5 hours.
The dsorupa has a much larger dustbin capacity, at 1.8 Liters, compared to SAMSUNG's 0.8 Liters. The dsorupa is also lighter, weighing in at 8 pounds, versus SAMSUNG's 10.53 pounds.
The dsorupa features a better display with its OLED, as OLED is usually known to have better contrast and viewing angles. It also boasts a superior 8-stage filtration system with a HEPA filter compared to SAMSUNG's disk filter, which means it will trap fine particles and allergens much better.
The dsorupa's V-shaped anti-tangle soft and hard brush is more versatile than the SAMSUNG's Turbo Brush + Mini Motorized Tool. The dsorupa also wins in the special features category with its aromatherapy tablet and wall-mounted charging, beating SAMSUNG's removable battery and flexible charging.
Customer reviews favor the dsorupa with a 4.9 out of 5 stars, while the SAMSUNG has a 4.3, however, the dsorupa has much fewer ratings overall. Finally, the dsorupa has a much better Best Sellers Rank, at #26 in the stick vacuum category, while SAMSUNG is at #380.
The Samsung Jet 75 Pet distinguishes itself through its impressive suction power, lightweight design, and user-friendly features. Its maneuverability, coupled with a suite of specialized tools like the Turbo Brush and Mini Motorized Tool, makes it a versatile cleaning solution for various surfaces and messes, including pet hair. The digital display provides useful real-time information, enhancing the overall user experience. While offering a competitive price point, the Jet 75 Pet doesn't compromise on performance or convenience, making it a compelling option for those seeking a cordless stick vacuum. The removable battery and flexible charging options further add to its appeal, solidifying its position as a well-rounded cleaning device.
Hi, I'm Hannah! Welcome to my corner of the internet dedicated to helping you find the perfect vacuum cleaner for your home. As a passionate blogger and vacuum enthusiast, I've spent countless hours researching, testing, and reviewing a wide range of models. Whether you're tackling pet hair, deep cleaning carpets, or maintaining hardwood floors, I'm here to provide you with unbiased information, expert advice, and comprehensive buying guides. Let's find the vacuum that effortlessly transforms your cleaning routine!
Explore these additional resources for more information.
© 2025 Flow. All rights reserved.