The vacuum cleaner boasts a 450W highly efficient BLDC motor, promising robust performance across various surfaces. It claims powerful cleaning capabilities on hard floors, carpets, upholstery, curtains, and even stairs.
Runtime is a key consideration. With the inclusion of an extra battery and a charging station, the device offers a potential runtime of up to 120 minutes, but this figure is mode-dependent, with other runtimes stated at 20 minutes and 14 minutes in other modes.
The 1L dust cup is easy to remove, simplifying the emptying process. Fingertip controls allow for brush roll and suction adjustments based on floor type, and an LED UI displays the remaining battery power.
The Complete Seal System with HEPA and Cyclone Filtration aims to capture dust, dander, and allergens effectively. A motorized pet tool is included, targeting pet hair removal from furniture.
This stick vacuum truly shines in its portability. It's so lightweight that moving it around the house, even up and down stairs, is a breeze.
Maneuverability is another key strength. It transitions seamlessly between hardwood floors and rugs. The low profile also allows it to glide almost flat, making cleaning under beds and furniture remarkably easy.
The suction power is impressive. It effectively picks up debris and tackles pet hair with ease.
I appreciate the overall functionality. It performs well on hard floors, operates quietly, and the cordless design provides great convenience. The design of the dust cup and filter allows for quick and easy emptying and cleaning. The inclusion of attachments like the pet hair tool, crevice tool, and upholstery brush adds versatility.
The included wall mount is a thoughtful addition, providing convenient storage and accessibility. Customer service experiences, as reported by some users, seem to be positive, which is always a plus. The beater bar with a brush is superior for carpet cleaning compared to stick vacuums that use foam rollers.
The Eureka Lightweight Cordless Vacuum Cleaner is a stick and handheld vacuum designed for indoor use. It comes in red and boasts a 450W BLDC motor, delivering approximately 0.603 horsepower. The vacuum has a 1-liter capacity and operates cordless, powered by included lithium-ion batteries providing a runtime of up to 2 hours.
The vacuum features a HEPA filter and is equipped with LED headlights. The included components are: a motorized pet tool, an extra battery pack, a charging station, a crevice tool, a dusting brush and a wall mount. It has two speeds and power levels, controlled via touch, with a push button operation. The noise level is about 82dB.
This Eureka model is lightweight at 6.31 pounds and measures 10.9"L x 9.1"W x 45.7"H. It is suitable for hard floors, carpets, and stairs. The product model number is NEC582, with the ASIN B0B5R38RX9 and UPC 840296500118.
Customer reviews average 3.5 out of 5 stars based on 269 ratings. The vacuum comes with a 2-year warranty.
Alright, let's break down this Eureka NEC582 versus Shark IZ163H comparison. Price information is missing for both models, so we can't factor that into the overall winner.
In terms of pure power, the Eureka boasts a 450W BLDC motor, seemingly outperforming the Shark's 181W motor. This difference in wattage likely translates to stronger suction, giving the Eureka an edge there. The Eureka also offers a significantly longer runtime, up to 120 minutes with its extra battery, versus the Shark's 40 minutes. And the Eureka's dust cup capacity is much larger at 1 Liter compared to the Shark's approximately 0.32 Liters, meaning less frequent emptying. Finally, Eureka gets a win on included accessories for its extra battery pack and charging station.
However, the Shark pulls ahead with its brush roll technology. The PowerFins and self-cleaning feature are more effective and convenient. While both offer HEPA filtration with complete seals, I'm calling that a tie.
For pet owners, the Shark's self-cleaning brushroll is a huge plus for managing pet hair, so it wins that category. The Shark also provides better flexibility and storage thanks to its MultiFLEX wand. The Shark is also slightly quieter at 80 dB compared to the Eureka's 82 dB.
The Shark's lighter weight of 3.4 lbs compared to the Eureka's 6.31 lbs makes it easier to maneuver. The Shark also has a higher customer rating (4.2 out of 5 stars with many reviews) than the Eureka (3.5 out of 5 stars), suggesting higher overall satisfaction, along with a much longer warranty period of 5 years versus Eureka's 2 years.
The Eureka NEC582 and Eureka NEC370GR are both Eureka products, resulting in a tie for brand. However, the NEC370GR edges out with its special features including being cordless, compact, having a headlight, and HEPA filter compared to the NEC582's single HEPA feature. Both vacuums have HEPA filters, resulting in a tie for filter type.
The NEC582 includes more components like a motorized pet tool, extra battery pack, charging station, crevice tool, dusting brush, and wall mount compared to the NEC370GR's adaptor, dusting brush, and crevice tool. Both are cordless, leading to a tie.
The NEC582 has a larger dust cup capacity of 1 Liter compared to the NEC370GR's 0.6 Liters. Wattage is also higher in the NEC582 at 450 watts compared to the NEC370GR's 300 watts. Runtime favors the NEC582 significantly, boasting 120 minutes with an extra battery, compared to the NEC370GR's 40 minutes.
Both are recommended for indoor use. The NEC582 has a stick and handheld form factor making it more versatile, compared to the NEC370GR's stick only. Color is a tie as it's based on preference. Model names are different and therefore a tie.
Product dimensions are more practical on the NEC370GR. The NEC370GR is also quieter, measuring 80 dB compared to the NEC582's 82 dB. Both are from the same manufacturer and are one item each. Control type and method are the same, both use push buttons and touch. Both are portable and have the same number of handles.
The NEC370GR has more power levels, with 3 compared to the NEC582's 2. Series number, UPC, and item model number are not directly comparable. The NEC582 is lighter at 6.31 pounds compared to the NEC370GR's 8.16 pounds. The NEC582 also includes a spare battery.
The NEC370GR boasts higher customer reviews, 4.0 out of 5 stars with 8,120 ratings, compared to the NEC582's 3.5 stars with 269 ratings. The NEC370GR also has a better best seller rank. Specific instructions are more specific for the NEC582. Both have the same warranty and both require lithium-ion batteries.
The Eureka NEC582 boasts a more descriptive model name, emphasizing its powerful 450W BLDC motor, and indeed, its motor power is significantly higher than the NEC280TL's 250W. The NEC582 also wins in runtime, offering up to 120 minutes with an extra battery, compared to the NEC280TL's 40 minutes. It also holds the lead in dust cup capacity with 1 Liter versus 0.6 Liters and its HEPA filter trumps the NEC280TL's foam filter. Accessory-wise, the NEC582 provides a more comprehensive package, including a motorized pet tool and an extra battery pack.
The NEC280TL fights back with more power modes, offering three compared to the NEC582's two. It's also quieter, operating at 78 dB against the NEC582's 82 dB, and weighs less at 5.3 pounds versus 6.31 pounds, making it easier to maneuver.
The NEC280TL shines in customer reviews, scoring 4.2 out of 5 stars with significantly more ratings, 1,961, compared to the NEC582's 3.5 out of 5 stars with only 269 ratings. Its higher best seller rank (#16 vs #962) is further evidence of its popularity. The NEC280TL also highlights several key features, including its lightweight design, cordless operation, long runtime, headlight, and washable filter. It is presumed that the NEC280TL is less expensive, as models with less power and less accessories usually go for less.
The Eureka NEC582 boasts a more powerful motor at 450W compared to the BSNAW X8-Pro's 150W, suggesting stronger suction capabilities. However, the BSNAW X8-Pro explicitly states a suction power of 35Kpa, a specification missing for the Eureka, giving it the edge in suction.
In terms of runtime, the Eureka NEC582 advertises up to 120 minutes with an extra battery, although this varies significantly depending on the mode. The BSNAW X8-Pro offers a 40-minute runtime in standard mode. The Eureka potentially offers a longer total runtime, even though different modes will impact the final use-time.
The dust cup capacity is slightly larger on the BSNAW X8-Pro, at roughly 1 liter compared to the Eureka NEC582's stated 1 liter, implying less frequent emptying. The Eureka NEC582 is marginally lighter at 6.31 pounds versus the BSNAW X8-Pro's 6.93 pounds, making it potentially easier to maneuver.
The BSNAW X8-Pro incorporates a more comprehensive 6-layer filtration system, including HEPA, stainless steel, dual cyclone, and exhaust sponge filters, potentially capturing finer particles than the Eureka NEC582's HEPA and cyclone system. The Eureka NEC582 comes with a wider array of accessories including a motorized pet tool, extra battery pack, charging station, crevice tool, dusting brush, and wall mount, making it more versatile.
The BSNAW X8-Pro offers valuable features like LED lights on the brush head, a bendable head, and a self-standing design. The BSNAW X8-Pro also has a known battery charge time of 4 hours.
Customer ratings are significantly higher for the BSNAW X8-Pro, at 4.4 out of 5 stars (based on 56 ratings), compared to the Eureka NEC582's 3.5 out of 5 stars (based on 269 ratings), suggesting greater customer satisfaction, though with a smaller sample size. The BSNAW X8-Pro offers a longer warranty with a 3-year return/exchange service and 24/7 support.
The Eureka NEC582 is specifically mentioned as being suitable for pet owners and various types of carpets. The BSNAW X8-Pro is only suitable for low-pile carpets, limiting its versatility.
The KCLASO V10 edges out the EUREKA NEC582 in several key areas. With a 550W motor compared to EUREKA's 450W, the KCLASO suggests a stronger suction capability. The V10's 45Kpa suction power is explicitly stated, providing a concrete advantage where the EUREKA doesn't specify.
While the EUREKA offers a longer total runtime of up to 120 minutes with an extra battery (though only 20 minutes in standard mode), the KCLASO's 50-minute runtime is respectable. The EUREKA pulls ahead with its 1-liter dust cup capacity compared to the KCLASO's 500 ml, meaning less frequent emptying for the EUREKA.
The filtration systems are both HEPA and Cyclone-based, but the KCLASO boasts a 5-layer system, suggesting potentially superior filtration. The KCLASO is also the quieter of the two, operating at 75 dB versus the EUREKA's 82 dB. Conversely, the EUREKA is slightly lighter at 6.31 lbs compared to the KCLASO's 6.64 lbs, potentially improving maneuverability.
When it comes to special features, the KCLASO shines with its touchscreen, 90° self-standing design, and 180° bendable brush head, along with its 5-Stage Cyclone Filtration. The EUREKA includes a Motorized Pet Tool, Extra Battery, Charging Station, and LED UI Display.
Customer reviews heavily favor the KCLASO, with a 4.7 out of 5 stars from 331 ratings, significantly surpassing the EUREKA's 3.5 out of 5 stars from 269 ratings. The KCLASO also boasts a much better Best Seller Rank in the stick vacuum category, holding the #66 spot versus the EUREKA's #962. Price information was unavailable for both models.
Eureka edges out Ciogu in brand recognition, being a more established name in the vacuum cleaner market. However, Ciogu P2 gains an early advantage with a suction power of 33KPa, surpassing Eureka's wattage in effectiveness for cleaning. The Eureka NEC582 counters with a substantially longer runtime, thanks to its extra battery, offering up to 120 minutes of use. Both models share a 1-liter dust cup capacity and HEPA filters, resulting in a tie for these features.
The Eureka NEC582 pulls ahead again with a more comprehensive set of included components, including a motorized pet tool, extra battery, charging station, and various brushes. While both vacuums feature headlights, the Ciogu P2 boasts a touch screen LED display, offering a more modern and convenient user experience.
Maneuverability is a win for the Ciogu P2, which is significantly lighter at 4.5 lbs compared to the Eureka's 6.31 lbs. The Ciogu P2 also operates at a quieter noise level of 65 dB, a considerable difference from the Eureka's 82 dB. Customer reviews further favor the Ciogu P2, with an average rating of 4.8 out of 5 stars, compared to the Eureka's 3.5. The Ciogu P2 also shows better performance in sales, ranking higher in best seller lists.
Warranty coverage is a clear advantage for the Eureka NEC582, offering a 2-year warranty, while the Ciogu P2's warranty is not stated. The Eureka's 450W BLDC motor is generally more efficient and long-lasting than the Ciogu's 400W brushless motor. Finally, the Eureka NEC582 includes a specialized motorized pet tool, which the Ciogu P2 lacks.
The dsorupa SmartVac Pro edges out the Eureka NEC582 in motor power, boasting 550W compared to the Eureka's 450W, which generally translates to stronger suction. While the Eureka's suction power wasn't explicitly stated, the dsorupa's 45KPA further solidifies its advantage in this area. However, the Eureka shines in runtime, offering up to 120 minutes with its extra battery, versus the dsorupa's 60 minutes.
The dsorupa features a larger dust cup capacity at 1.5 liters, minimizing the frequency of emptying, compared to Eureka's 1 liter capacity. Additionally, the dsorupa operates at a quieter noise level of 68 dB, a considerable improvement over the Eureka's 82 dB. The Eureka, though, is lighter at 6.31 pounds, making it easier to handle than the dsorupa's 8 pounds.
A noteworthy advantage of the dsorupa is its ergonomic double handle design, promoting wrist support and simplifying cleaning under furniture. Its special features, including the double handle, adjustable extension tube, low noise operation, intelligent display, and anti-tangle brush, clearly outnumber the Eureka's LED headlights and extra battery.
Customer reviews reveal a significant difference in satisfaction, with the dsorupa scoring a 4.9 out of 5 stars (52 ratings) against the Eureka's 3.5 out of 5 stars (269 ratings). The dsorupa also holds a far superior Best Seller Rank (#89) compared to the Eureka (#962). Both vacuums offer a 2-year warranty.
Overall, the Eureka Lightweight Cordless Vacuum Cleaner NEC582 presents a compelling option for those seeking a versatile and portable cleaning solution. Its lightweight design and maneuverability make it a standout for everyday tasks and reaching difficult areas. The strong suction, coupled with specialized attachments like the motorized pet tool, address common cleaning challenges effectively. Despite the runtime variance depending on the mode, the inclusion of an extra battery and charging station extends its usability. However, potential buyers should consider the average customer review rating of 3.5 stars and the 82dB noise level, weighing these factors against the vacuum's strengths and the offered 2-year warranty.
Hi, I'm Nancy! Welcome to my blog, your go-to destination for all things vacuum cleaner! As a dedicated blogger, I'm passionate about helping you find the perfect vacuum cleaner to suit your lifestyle and cleaning needs. Whether you're tackling pet hair, deep cleaning carpets, or maintaining hardwood floors, I'll provide you with in-depth reviews, expert buying guides, and helpful tips to make your cleaning experience a breeze. Let's dive in and discover the best vacuum cleaner for you!
Explore these additional resources for more information.
© 2025 Flow. All rights reserved.