✅ Features of Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum

The tangle-free brush roll is a definite plus. It prevents hair and debris from tangling, which should translate to less maintenance and consistent cleaning power. The 500W suction sounds promising, particularly for those with carpets where deep cleaning is essential.

Weighing in at only 6.3 lbs, this vacuum is lightweight and should be easy to maneuver, especially with the advanced swivel steering. The compact storage base is another practical feature, ideal for those with limited storage space.

The 3-in-1 versatility is a real selling point. The included crevice tool, 2-in-1 dusting brush, and extension pole expand the cleaning possibilities beyond just floors. And who can complain about LED headlights? They definitely help spot hidden dust and debris.

The claim of superior performance, stability, and durability needs to be tested over time, but on paper, the features are compelling.

✅ What we like about Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum

The lightweight design is a major plus, making it easy to carry and maneuver, even for younger users. Its functionality is impressive, effectively cleaning a variety of surfaces from tile to hardwood and carpets, including area rugs, mats, and tackling pet hair. The rotating power head contributes significantly to this versatility.

The powerful suction is a standout feature, effortlessly lifting dirt, dust, and pet hair, and even managing heavier items like coins. This suction power translates to excellent cleaning efficiency, with easy dust disposal and washable components like the dust cup and filters. It is very convenient for everyday cleaning.

Ease of use is another highlight. Assembly is straightforward, maneuvering around furniture is simple, and tight spaces are easily accessible. The manual is well-written and easy to understand. The compact size is appreciated for its easy storage. Its slim profile ensures it doesn't take up much space.

The dirt collection is effective, picking up debris from various surfaces including under beds. Removing and replacing the dust cup is also an easy task. The build quality feels sturdy, durable, and reliable, also providing a stable base for storage.

The corded design provides consistent power, eliminating battery life concerns. The long cord is a definite advantage, reaching multiple rooms without needing to switch outlets. Overall, the value for money is excellent, considering the features and performance it offers for its price.

✅ Key specs of Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum

The Eureka Corded Stick Vacuum Cleaner, model NES520BL, is a portable and lightweight cleaning solution designed for indoor use. Its key features include spotless cleaning, a bagless design, and a washable foam filter.

The vacuum boasts a 1-liter capacity and operates at 500 watts. It is recommended for hard floors and comes with an accessory kit for versatile cleaning.

Its dimensions are 14.3 inches in length, 5.1 inches in width, and 30.7 inches in height. The unit weighs 7.4 pounds and is controlled via push button touch controls.

The vacuum has a modern or compact style with a single handle and one power level. It has received positive customer reviews, with an average rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars from 234 ratings.

It is currently ranked #73 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms and #18,586 in Home & Kitchen. The UPC is 840296510063 and the ASIN is B0D268C4YY. It does not require batteries and is manufactured in Vietnam.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NES215A Stick Vacuum

Let's break down these two Eureka stick vacuums, the NES520BL and the NES215A, feature by feature to determine a clear winner.

When it comes to price, the NES215A likely takes the lead, based on its superior Bestseller Rank. Generally, a better rank correlates with a lower price point. The NES520BL boasts a tangle-free brush roll, a definite advantage for pet owners or anyone tired of removing tangled hair. Suction power is another win for the NES520BL, with a 500W motor compared to the NES215A's 240W, promising more effective dirt removal.

The NES215A, however, counters with its lighter weight of just 4 lbs versus the NES520BL's 7.4 lbs. This makes it significantly easier to maneuver and carry around the house. For storage, the NES520BL has a compact base, which is a point in its favor. The NES520BL also shines in versatility, including a crevice tool, 2-in-1 dusting brush, and a 2.2ft pole; that is more than the NES215A's single crevice tool. Furthermore, LED headlights and a larger 1-liter capacity give the NES520BL an edge. The NES215A has a capacity of 0.55 Liters.

Maneuverability appears to be equal. Both units have swivel steering. The NES520BL comes up on top again as the noise level is not specified, indicating it is likely quieter than the NES215A's 84 dB. Customer reviews also marginally favor the NES520BL at 4.4 stars, despite the NES215A having a significantly higher number of ratings, with 4.1 stars. On the other hand, the NES215A boasts a far superior Bestseller Rank, indicating much higher sales and popularity. Lastly, both vacuums utilize foam filters.

✔ Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum vs. Shark HV343AMZ Stick Vacuum

The Eureka NES520BL and Shark HV343AMZ both feature tangle-free brushroll technology and boast 500W of suction power, making them equal in these aspects. Both also include headlights and advanced swivel steering for maneuverability.

However, the Eureka takes the lead in weight, weighing in at 6.3 lbs compared to the Shark's 9.2 lbs. Eureka also highlights its compact base storage feature, a detail absent for the Shark. Additionally, the Eureka offers a slightly more versatile set of attachments including a crevice tool, 2-in-1 dusting brush, and crucially, an extension pole. Capacity wise, the Eureka also wins out, with a 1 Liter dust cup compared to the Shark's 0.64 Liters. Furthermore, I assume that the Eureka is quieter as there is no noise level given for the model. Eureka is also easier to use as it's lighter than the Shark model.

The Shark counters with a handheld conversion feature, making it more versatile in certain cleaning situations. It also features a foam and felt filter, which may provide better filtration compared to the Eureka's foam filter. The Shark also pulls ahead in customer reviews, boasting significantly more ratings (23,983) with a 4.4-star average, indicating greater popularity and reliability compared to the Eureka's 234 ratings with the same average star ranking. This is further supported by its much better bestseller rank overall and within the stick vacuum category. Finally, the Shark offers a 5-year limited warranty, while the Eureka's warranty is unspecified.

Considering all factors, the Shark HV343AMZ emerges as the overall winner. It wins more categories overall and especially excels in popularity (customer review count and bestseller rank) and versatility (handheld conversion).

✔ Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC285GR Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Eureka NEC285GR emerges as the superior choice due to its cordless design, providing greater freedom and maneuverability compared to the corded NES520BL. While the NES520BL boasts a higher suction power at 500W versus the NEC285GR's 250W, the NEC285GR compensates with a runtime of 40 minutes.

The NEC285GR also excels in portability, weighing only 5.3 lbs against the NES520BL's 7.4 lbs. However, the NES520BL offers a larger dustbin capacity of 1 liter, reducing the frequency of emptying, while the NEC285GR has a 0.6 liter capacity.

Filtration is another key area where the NEC285GR shines, featuring a 5-stage filtration system that captures more dust and allergens compared to the NES520BL's foam filter. Furthermore, the NEC285GR offers more versatile features like 3 power modes and an Easy Rest Feature. The NEC285GR includes a wider range of accessories such as adaptor, dusting brush, wall mount and crevice tool and the NES520BL comes with a crevice tool and a 2-in-1 dusting brush.

Despite the NES520BL having a slightly higher customer rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars compared to the NEC285GR's 4.2, the NEC285GR demonstrates stronger sales with a lower bestsellers rank (#3,296 vs #18,586). Without pricing information, a price comparison remains impossible. The NEC285GR is easier to store due to its wall mount feature.

✔ Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VCS-90B1 Stick Vacuum

When comparing the Eureka NES520BL and the Farberware VCS-90B1, several key differences emerge. One notable advantage of the Eureka is its tangle-free brush roll, which the Farberware lacks. However, the Farberware boasts a more powerful suction, with a 700W motor compared to Eureka's 500W.

Weight is also a significant factor. The Farberware is considerably lighter at 1 pound, versus the Eureka's 7.4 pounds, making it potentially easier to maneuver. Conversely, the Eureka offers a larger dustbin capacity of 1 liter, exceeding the Farberware's 0.8 liters.

Regarding cord length, the Farberware specifies a 15-foot cord, while the Eureka does not. This could be important, and gives the Farberware another point. Accessory-wise, Eureka gets another point, including a crevice tool, 2-in-1 dusting brush, and a 2.2ft pole, while the Farberware comes with a dust brush, nozzle, cord management accessory, and a hanging wall mount. Both models feature headlights and are considered multi-purpose.

Customer reviews favor the Eureka, with a rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars based on 234 ratings, compared to the Farberware's 4.3 out of 5 stars with only 32 ratings. As for dimensions, the Eureka is generally more compact at 14.3"L x 5.1"W x 30.7"H, though shorter than the Farberware at 11.22"L x 11.18"W x 43.7"H. The storage options are different, with the Eureka offering a compact base and the Farberware a hanging wall mount, making this a matter of personal preference.

✔ Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum vs. Intercleaner S660 Stick Vacuum

The Eureka NES520BL appears to be the more popular choice, based on its significantly higher bestseller ranking and a larger number of customer reviews compared to the Intercleaner S660. This suggests that consumers generally find it to be a better value. A major plus for the Eureka is its tangle-free brushroll, a very valuable feature for those dealing with pet hair or other fibers.

However, the Intercleaner strikes back with superior suction power, boasting 20KPa compared to Eureka's implied "great suction," which lacks a specific measurement. The Intercleaner is also significantly lighter, making it easier to maneuver and carry, especially up stairs.

The Intercleaner also edges out the Eureka in dust cup capacity, offering 1.2 liters versus Eureka's 1 liter, meaning less frequent trips to the trash. In addition, it provides a specified cord length of 23 feet.

Filtration is another area where the Intercleaner excels, using a HEPA filter, which is much better for capturing fine particles and allergens than Eureka's foam filter. The Intercleaner is also more versatile. It comes with accessories such as a cleaning brush, a 2-in-1 combination tool, and a flexible tube. This makes it a more comprehensive cleaning solution.

Finally, the Intercleaner offers more flexible storage options, with both wall mount and stand-alone designs. Both vacuums do feature LED headlights.

✔ Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum vs. Ciogu P2 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The CIOGU P2 wins in the corded/cordless category, offering greater freedom and convenience due to its cordless design. While the EUREKA NES520BL boasts a 500W power rating (albeit not a direct suction measurement), hinting at stronger potential, especially on carpets. However, the CIOGU P2 wins in weight. Coming in at only 4.5 pounds, the lighter CIOGU P2 offers easier maneuverability and portability.

The CIOGU P2 also wins in filter. The CIOGU P2's HEPA filter is superior for trapping smaller particles and allergens. Moreover, the CIOGU P2 wins the runtime category. It offers up to 45 minutes of runtime in Eco Mode and 20 minutes in Max Mode, thanks to its cordless design. Both vacuums share a 1-liter capacity, ending in a tie.

The CIOGU P2 is the winner with special features due to its inclusion of LED Headlights and a Touch Screen & LED Display for enhanced control. The CIOGU P2 wins in the accessories. With multiple brush heads and telescopic links offering six configurations, it claims to be more versatile.

The EUREKA NES520BL wins in storage because of the compact storage base. Finally, the CIOGU P2 has better customer reviews, winning it the final category with a 4.8 average rating (269 ratings) compared to the EUREKA NES520BL's 4.4 rating (234 ratings). Price determination is unavailable.

✅ Conclusion

The Eureka NES520BL corded stick vacuum presents a compelling package for those seeking a lightweight and versatile cleaning solution. Its tangle-free brush roll, strong suction, and maneuverable design contribute to efficient cleaning across various surfaces. While the long-term durability remains to be seen, the initial impressions suggest a well-built and reliable machine. The inclusion of multiple attachments, the ease of use, and the consistent power provided by the corded design further enhance its appeal. For the price, the Eureka NES520BL offers excellent value and is a worthy contender in the stick vacuum market.