✅ Features of Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum

This cleaning device boasts a 3-in-1 design, functioning as a stick vacuum, handheld vacuum, and crevice tool. It's quite lightweight at just 4 pounds and incorporates swivel steering to improve maneuverability.

The capture nozzle is a great addition for tackling larger debris. In terms of surface cleaning, it's effective on various surfaces, successfully removing surface dirt and dust.

Powering the unit is a 2 amp motor. It also features a washable filtration system, which is a plus. The power cord extends to 18 feet, offering a decent reach.

The vacuum is equipped with an extra-large dust cup. The cleaning path width measures 9.44 inches, allowing for efficient coverage.

Finally, the product arrives in Frustration-Free Packaging (FFP) that is environmentally safer.

✅ What we like about Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum

This product really shines in how well it cleans. I've found it to be effective on small areas, consistently delivering the best cleaning results and wiping away even single particles of dust. It gets the job done.

The lightweight design is a huge plus. It's easy to carry, maneuver, and handle, making it ideal for quick clean-ups. Plus, the slim design is great for limited storage.

Considering the price, it offers great value. It's durable and powerful enough for simple jobs and daily spot cleaning, especially when you compare it to more expensive cordless models.

Ease of cleaning is another strong point. I appreciate being able to easily clean sections of the house without constantly unplugging it, thanks to the long cord. The dust cup is easy to empty, and the washable filter is a convenient feature.

The compact size is perfect for small spaces like apartments or dorms. It's great for reaching tight spots, and the swivel steering really helps with corners. Storing it is also a breeze.

It's also just plain easy to use. The product is simple and functional.

The suction power is impressive. It picks up dirt, pet hair, and fine dust effectively, and the versatility as a handheld vacuum makes it useful for stairs, regular vacuuming, and even the car.

This vacuum is perfect if you have pets, it effortlessly handles pet hair, dirt, and debris on carpets, tiles, and hardwood floors.

The 3-in-1 design adds to its versatility, especially for cleaning stairs and furniture. It works well as a handheld vacuum, for stairs, and for regular cleaning.

✅ Key specs of Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum

The Eureka Corded Stick Vacuum Cleaner boasts several notable features. It's designed to be lightweight with swivel steering, making it easy to maneuver around furniture and tight spaces. The inclusion of a washable HEPA filter is a plus for allergy sufferers, and it comes with a nozzle and a HEPA filter as included components. It is not cordless and has a 0.6-liter capacity.

This vacuum operates at 240 watts and has an 18-foot hose, providing a decent reach. It's recommended for use on bare floors, hardwood, and tile. The vacuum has a handheld, stick, and upright form factor.

The vacuum's color is Blaze Black and its model name is Corded Stick Vacuum Cleaner for Home Pet Hair. It has product dimensions of 9.8"L x 5.6"W x 44"H. The noise level is 84 dB. It operates at 2 Amps. It is manufactured by Midea and comes as a single item.

The vacuum has a push button controller and a touch control method. Its style is swivel lightweight and it is portable. It has 4 wheels and intended for indoor use. Its Global Trade Identification Number is 00839724016383 and UPC is 839724016383.

The item weighs 3.97 pounds and the ASIN is B075P7J8BB. It is made in China and the item model number is NES210. The vacuum currently holds a 4.1 out of 5 stars rating based on 110,015 customer reviews. It's ranked #353 in Home & Kitchen and #3 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms. It is not discontinued by the manufacturer.

Specific instructions for use include hard floors. The volume it holds is 550 Milliliters. It is certified frustration-free. No assembly is required and it comes with a one-year limited warranty. No batteries are required.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum vs. Bissell 2033 Stick Vacuum

Bissell edges out Eureka due to its stronger brand recognition in the vacuum cleaner market. While both are corded models, Eureka takes the special features category with swivel steering, known for improving maneuverability. The filter type also favors Eureka, as its HEPA filter is typically more effective than a disk filter for capturing fine particles and allergens.

Bissell compensates by offering a slightly larger dust cup capacity (0.67 Liters vs. 0.6 Liters) leading to less frequent emptying. The wattage tilts towards Bissell as well (2033 watts vs. 240 watts), suggesting potentially stronger suction although this isn't always guaranteed. While Eureka counters with a longer hose at 18 feet, giving greater reach.

The versatility of recommended uses gives Bissell another win, targeting hard floors, carpets, and upholstery. Eureka however provides more form factor options, including handheld and upright configurations, increasing flexibility. Noise levels are lower for the Bissell at 80 dB, making it preferable.

Bissell continues to pull ahead in amperage with 17 Amps compared to Eureka's 2 Amps, which may influence suction power. Bissell is also lighter, weighing 2.6 pounds versus Eureka's 3.97 pounds, offering better portability. Customer reviews and sales performance further bolster Bissell's appeal, with a slightly higher average rating and better Best Sellers Rank. Bissell again shows up with its use and application by listing more types of floors they are rated for.

Eureka gains a slight advantage by requiring no assembly, offering convenience. The warranty is the same for both products at 1 year. Assuming the price point is similar, the final decision hinges on individual needs, where Bissell comes out slightly ahead.

✔ Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEU10AE4 Upright Vacuum

When comparing the Eureka NES210 and the Eureka NEU10AE4, the NEU10AE4 emerges as the winner if you're looking for a dedicated upright vacuum cleaner. The NES210, with its stick/handheld/upright hybrid design, offers more versatility but the NEU10AE4 is specifically designed as a traditional upright.

The NES210 boasts a significantly lighter weight at only 3.97 lbs compared to the NEU10AE4's 7.7 lbs, making it easier to carry and maneuver, particularly in handheld mode. However, the NEU10AE4 wins in capacity, offering a 1.7-liter dust cup compared to the NES210's 0.6 liters, meaning less frequent emptying. The NES210 pulls ahead again with an 18-foot cord, offering greater reach than the NEU10AE4's short 1.5-foot hose.

The NEU10AE4 packs more power, with a 720-watt motor compared to the NES210's 240 watts, which generally translates to stronger suction. The NES210 redeems itself with a HEPA filter, considered superior for allergen trapping, while the NEU10AE4 uses a foam filter.

While both vacuums are lightweight and feature washable filters, the NEU10AE4 comes with a more comprehensive set of included components, such as a dusting brush, crevice tool, and replacement filter. The NES210 operates at a lower noise level of 84 dB compared to the NEU10AE4's 90 dB. The NEU10AE4 features a wider cleaning path of 10.5 inches compared to the NES210's 9.44 inches. Customer ratings slightly favor the NEU10AE4, with an average of 4.2 out of 5 stars compared to the NES210's 4.1. If you are looking for a traditional upright vacuum, the NEU10AE4 is the better choice.

✔ Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum vs. Shark HV343AMZ Stick Vacuum

When comparing the Eureka NES210 and the Shark HV343AMZ stick vacuums, Shark emerges as the overall winner. Shark boasts a more established brand reputation, generally known for higher-quality vacuums. The Shark's self-cleaning brushroll stands out as a significant convenience feature. While the Eureka uses a HEPA filter, generally superior for allergen removal, the Shark includes more useful attachments such as an upholstery tool and a crevice tool.

The Shark also edges out the Eureka in terms of dust cup capacity (0.68 quarts vs. 0.63 quarts) and wattage (500 watts vs. 240 watts), suggesting more powerful suction. Furthermore, Shark's recommended uses are broader, encompassing both carpet and hard floors. The Shark has a more specific name that's more search-friendly, and it boasts slightly quieter operation (80 dB vs. 84 dB) and higher amperage (3.6 Amps vs. 2 Amps), again pointing to greater power. Customer reviews also favor the Shark, with an average rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars compared to Eureka's 4.1. Finally, Shark offers a much longer warranty period of 5 years, compared to Eureka's one-year limited warranty.

However, the Eureka has its strengths. It has a longer power cord, is more versatile in form factor, offering handheld, stick, and upright configurations, and is more compact overall. The Eureka is significantly lighter (3.97 pounds vs. 9.2 pounds) and is currently a more popular seller. Other categories such as being cordless or not, color, number of items, controller type, control method, portable and number of wheels had the same results for both products.

✔ Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC370GR Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Eureka NEC370GR cordless stick vacuum edges out the NES210 corded model overall, primarily due to its cordless design which offers superior flexibility and convenience. While the NES210 boasts a significantly lighter weight (3.97 lbs vs 8.16 lbs) for easier handling, the NEC370GR compensates with a more powerful 300-watt motor compared to the NES210's 240 watts. The cordless NEC370GR also offers up to 40 minutes of runtime, eliminating the constraints of a cord.

Both vacuums utilize HEPA filters and share the same 0.6-liter dustbin capacity. However, the NES210's 18-foot cord provides a longer reach than the cordless NEC370GR.

In terms of features, the NEC370GR comes out ahead with features like a headlight and is compact in design. It also includes more versatile attachments such as a dusting brush and crevice tool. Although the NES210 received slightly better customer reviews (4.1 stars with a massive 110,015 ratings), indicating broader satisfaction, the NEC370GR operates at a slightly lower noise level (80 dB vs 84 dB). Maneuverability is comparable, with both models featuring swivel steering or similar rotating brush head features. The NEC370GR also offers a longer 2-year manufacturer warranty, providing better peace of mind compared to the NES210's one-year limited warranty.

✔ Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum

Let's break down these two Eureka vacuums. Assuming similar pricing, the NES210 likely wins on price. However, the NES520BL boasts more advanced features like a tangle-free brush roll, a plus for pet owners or those with long hair. While the NES520BL promotes "spotless cleaning," it is subjective.

The NES210 edges out with its HEPA filter, which is better for those with allergies, versus the NES520BL's foam filter. But the NES520BL has an accessory kit with a crevice tool and dusting brush, giving it more cleaning versatility. Both are corded, so no difference there.

The NES520BL's larger dust cup (1 Liter vs 0.6 Liters) means less frequent emptying, and its higher wattage (500 Watts vs 240 Watts) suggests stronger suction. The NES210 has a longer power cord (18 Feet), offering greater cleaning range.

For recommended use, the NES210 works on bare floors, hardwood, and tile, while the NES520BL is specifically for hard floors. The NES210 also offers a more versatile form factor as it is a handheld, stick, and upright, whereas the NES520BL is handheld only.

The NES520BL also has more manageable dimensions (14.3"L x 5.1"W x 30.7"H) compared to the NES210 (9.8"L x 5.6"W x 44"H), meaning easier storage. While the NES210 weighs a significantly lighter 3.97 pounds compared to the NES520BL's 7.4 pounds, which affects maneuverability.

Customer reviews favor the NES520BL with a 4.4 out of 5 stars (with 234 ratings), while the NES210 has 4.1 out of 5 stars (with a much larger 110,015 ratings). The NES210 is a best seller (ranked #3) compared to the NES520BL (ranked #73). Neither require assembly, and the NES210 has four wheels, potentially aiding in maneuvering. The NES210 has a noise level of 84dB.

✔ Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC285GR Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Eureka NEC285GR cordless vacuum emerges as the winner in several key categories. It offers the freedom of cordless operation, boasts a more powerful 250W brushless digital motor, and provides a 40-minute runtime. The NEC285GR also incorporates a 5-stage filtration system for improved dust and dirt removal and operates at a quieter 78 dB noise level. Its versatility extends to carpet cleaning, and it comes with helpful features such as a headlight and an easy rest feature. The customer rating is slightly higher, and it includes more tools like an adapter, dusting brush, wall mount, and crevice tool.

However, the Eureka NES210 shines in specific areas. Its HEPA filter provides superior allergen capture, and its lighter weight (3.97 pounds) makes it easier to handle. The price is expected to be lower, making it a budget-friendly option.

Both vacuums share the same dust cup capacity of 0.6 liters and are considered portable. The Eureka NES210 features swivel steering while the Eureka NEC285GR features a headlight. These both add to the cleaning process, however are good in separate instances.

✔ Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum vs. Farberware VCS-90B1 Stick Vacuum

When comparing the Eureka NES210 and the Farberware VCS-90B1, the brand is a tie as preference is subjective. However, Farberware edges ahead in special features, boasting a headlight and bagless design, while Eureka offers swivel steering and a washable filter. Filtration-wise, Eureka's HEPA filter is a winner, generally superior to Farberware's cloth filter.

Looking at included components, Farberware takes the lead with a dusting brush and crevice tool for versatile cleaning. Both vacuums are corded, resulting in a tie. Farberware has a larger dustbin capacity at 0.8 liters compared to Eureka's 0.6 liters, meaning less frequent emptying.

Wattage is specified for the Eureka (240 watts) while not for the Farberware. Farberware takes the lead with a specified suction power of 18,000 PA. Eureka's cord length is longer at 18 feet compared to Farberware's 15 feet.

Farberware is recommended for more floor types including hard floors, carpets and rugs, while Eureka is best for bare floors, hardwood and tile. Eureka offers a more versatile form factor with handheld, stick, and upright options, whereas Farberware is solely a stick vacuum. Color is again subjective and results in a tie. Product dimensions are similar.

The Eureka is less noisy, coming in at 84 dB. Amperage is specified for Eureka at 2 Amps while not for the Farberware. Farberware is significantly lighter at 1 pound, whereas Eureka weighs 3.97 pounds.

Eureka scores better in customer reviews, with 4.1 stars from over 110,015 ratings, versus Farberware's 4.3 stars from only 32 ratings. Eureka also boasts a much better best seller rank, at #353 compared to Farberware's #168,228. Farberware is equipped with a lighted motor brush and a hanging wall mount.

✔ Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum vs. Ciogu P6-C17K-H08A Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Eureka and Ciogu vacuums were put head-to-head, examining key features to determine the better option. While Eureka benefits from a more established brand presence, Ciogu takes the lead with its cordless design, offering significant convenience. Both vacuums utilize HEPA filters for allergen control, resulting in a tie in that aspect. However, the cordless nature of the Ciogu provides enhanced freedom and maneuverability.

Capacity is another area where Ciogu excels, boasting a larger 1-liter dust cup compared to Eureka's 0.6 liters, translating to less frequent emptying. In terms of power, the Ciogu delivers 400 watts compared to Eureka's 240 watts, potentially indicating stronger suction. This is further supported by the Ciogu's 45-minute runtime on Eco mode and 20 minutes on Max, showcasing a definitive measure of usage on a single charge, where Eureka lacked due to it being corded. While both are suitable for hard floors, the Ciogu broadens its usability by including carpet cleaning capabilities.

In form factor, Eureka offers a greater degree of flexibility with its handheld, stick, and upright configurations compared to the Ciogu's solely stick design. Product dimensions offer a slight edge to Eureka for its more compact design. The most notable difference between the two is noise levels, the Ciogu operates significantly quieter at 65 dB compared to Eureka's 84 dB. Eureka edges out Ciogu in amperage and item weight, useful for those seeking lighter weight and for circuit load understanding.

Looking at customer reviews, Eureka has a vast number of ratings (110,015) with a 4.1-star average, while the Ciogu has a 4.5-star average based on significantly fewer ratings (173). Eureka dominates in best sellers rank (#3) versus Ciogu's #199 indicating stronger popularity and sales volume. The Ciogu incorporates modern features like an LED brush head and touch screen control, which Eureka lacks.

Considering value and the assumption that Eureka would be lower in price, it is still difficult to ignore Ciogu. Overall, the Ciogu emerges as the superior choice due to its cordless convenience, higher suction power, quieter operation, LED brush head, and touch screen control.

✅ Conclusion

The Eureka Corded Stick Vacuum Cleaner proves to be a surprisingly capable and versatile cleaning tool. Its 3-in-1 design offers adaptable cleaning solutions, and its lightweight maneuverability makes quick clean-ups a breeze, especially in smaller spaces. While it may not replace a heavy-duty vacuum for large areas, its powerful suction, easy maintenance, and effectiveness on various surfaces, particularly for pet hair, makes it an excellent value for the price. This vacuum is a solid choice for those seeking a convenient and efficient solution for everyday cleaning needs.