✅ Features of Shark HS152AMZ Stick Vacuum

This corded stick vacuum boasts impressive cleaning power, effectively tackling deep carpet cleaning and excelling at pet hair removal across various surfaces. Its lightweight design is a definite plus, with the stick vacuum weighing under 10 lbs and the handheld portion coming in at under 3 lbs.

The design is well-considered, offering a "go-anywhere" capability thanks to its low-profile build for reaching under furniture. The tapered handheld vacuum is also a smart addition for cleaning tight spaces. LED headlights on the nozzle improve visibility, revealing hidden debris.

Maneuverability is enhanced by swivel steering, and the removable, easy-to-empty dust cup simplifies maintenance. It includes a Pet Crevice Tool, Pet Multi-Tool, and an Onboard Storage Clip.

The product comes with a 5-year limited warranty.

✅ What we like about Shark HS152AMZ Stick Vacuum

Customers consistently praise the vacuum's strong suction power, noting its ability to effectively pick up dirt, cat hair, and crumbs from various surfaces. This contributes significantly to its overall performance and cleaning ability.

Ease of use is another frequently highlighted positive aspect. Users find the vacuum lightweight, easy to assemble, and simple to convert to a handheld unit. The dustbin is also easy to empty.

The vacuum's performance is highly rated, with customers reporting that it cleans floors, carpets, and furniture effectively, particularly excelling at removing pet hair. This cleaning prowess, combined with its ease of maintenance and dust removal capabilities, earns high marks.

Many customers feel the vacuum offers excellent value for money, citing its reasonable price point in relation to its performance. The machine's maneuverability is also a plus, described as gliding smoothly and navigating around furniture and corners with ease.

The lightweight design is appreciated for making the vacuum easy to carry and maneuver, especially in comparison to heavier models. The corded design is a positive, as it eliminates the need to charge and ensures consistent power throughout the cleaning process. The attachments are also convenient to use because they are easy to attach and remove

The Zero Wrap Brushroll is a major plus, effectively preventing hair from wrapping around the brush and eliminating the need for frequent cleaning. Lastly, the long cord is a huge advantage, allowing users to clean large areas without frequently changing outlets.

✅ Key specs of Shark HS152AMZ Stick Vacuum

The Shark HS152AMZ Corded Stick Vacuum boasts several features, including a headlight and a lightweight design. It utilizes a foam and felt filter system and comes with the Duster Crevice Tool, Pet Multi-Tool, and an Onboard Storage Clip. Being corded, it offers consistent power without the need for battery charging. Its capacity is 0.35 quarts.

This vacuum operates at 5.7 watts and is recommended for use on carpet, hard floors, and hardwoods. It has a stick and handheld form factor. It comes in black and is named the Shark HS152AMZ Corded Stick Vacuum.

Dimensions are 10.39"L x 8.7"W x 45.48"H and it has a noise level of 80 dB. The controller type is push button with touch control. It features a bristle brushroll.

This is not a portable vacuum. It is equiped with one handle and one power level. There are four wheels for easy maneuvering. It is designed for indoor use. The vacuum weighs 7.76 pounds.

The product has a UPC of 622356583305 and an ASIN of B09B17CQ9Q with an item model number of HS152AMZ. Customer reviews average 4.4 out of 5 stars based on 5,440 ratings. The intended use of this vacuum is for carpets. The package contains 4 pieces. It comes with a 5-year limited warranty and does not require batteries.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark HS152AMZ Stick Vacuum vs. Shark HV343AMZ Stick Vacuum

The Shark HS152AMZ edges out the HV343AMZ in terms of weight, offering a lighter stick form at 7.76 lbs compared to the HV343AMZ's 9.2 lbs. This makes the HS152AMZ easier to maneuver and carry. Similarly, the HS152AMZ is also lighter in handheld form, clearly stating that the weight is less than 3 lbs, although HV343AMZ doesn't specify the weight.

However, the HV343AMZ boasts a larger dust cup capacity at 0.68 quarts, nearly double the HS152AMZ's 0.35 quarts, resulting in less frequent emptying. More notably, it features a self-cleaning brushroll designed to prevent hair wrap, a significant advantage over the HS152AMZ's standard bristle brushroll, especially for those with pets or long hair.

The HV343AMZ also demonstrates more power, with a wattage of 500 watts versus the HS152AMZ's 5.7 watts. Moreover, the HV343AMZ features portability via converts to handheld form, thus offering more cleaning options. Though, HS152AMZ offers a Pet Crevice Tool and Pet Multi-Tool while HV343AMZ has a Crevice Tool and Upholstery Tool

The HS152AMZ has smaller dimensions at 10.39"L x 8.7"W x 45.48"H, making it more convenient for storage and use in smaller spaces compared to the HV343AMZ's 13.4"L x 10.24"W x 47.3"H.

Looking at the broader market, the HV343AMZ holds a much higher best seller rank at #7 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms, while the HS152AMZ ranks at #536. This difference strongly indicates greater popularity.

Customer ratings are similar, with both models achieving 4.4/5 stars. However, the HV343AMZ has accumulated a significantly higher number of ratings (23,983 versus 5,440), giving its rating more statistical weight and credibility.

✔ Shark HS152AMZ Stick Vacuum vs. Electrolux EHVS75S1AO Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Electrolux EHVS75S1AO cordless design provides greater freedom of movement compared to the corded Shark HS152AMZ. Additionally, the Electrolux is significantly lighter in-hand, making it easier to maneuver, particularly for above-floor cleaning. While the Shark boasts "Powerful Pet Hair Pickup," implying strong suction, the Electrolux isn't explicit, though the higher wattage (250 vs 5.7) suggests potentially stronger suction in the Electrolux. The Electrolux also offers a 50-minute run time, a clear advantage over the Shark's corded operation.

While the Shark has a slightly larger dust cup capacity (0.35 quarts vs 0.3 liters), the Electrolux features a more advanced 5-step filtration system. The Electrolux also comes with more special features and tools and it has more speed/power levels for cleaning.

Both vacuums have a headlight, and a similar noise level of 80 dB. The Shark provides a longer 5-year limited warranty.

However, the Shark edges out the Electrolux in customer satisfaction, boasting a higher rating of 4.4 out of 5 stars with a significantly larger number of reviews (5,440) compared to the Electrolux's 3.9 out of 5 stars with only 124 ratings. Finally, The Electrolux is constructed with 43% recycled plastic, making it a more environmentally conscious choice.

✔ Shark HS152AMZ Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum

Shark emerges as the overall winner, primarily due to its stronger brand reputation in the vacuum cleaner market. While both vacuums are corded, Shark's stick and handheld form factor offers greater versatility compared to Eureka's handheld-only design. Although both use a push button touch controller and include only one item for indoor usage, Shark features carpet recommended uses, and specific instructions for carpet use, and includes Duster Crevice Tool, Pet Multi-Tool, Onboard Storage Clip, the Shark features a better filter type and customer reviews. Additionally, the Shark's specified noise level and slightly more compact dimensions are beneficial. Shark also offers a much more substantial 5-year limited warranty.

Eureka stands out with a larger dust cup capacity (1 Liter vs 0.35 Quarts), indicating less frequent emptying. Its powerful 500-watt motor vastly surpasses the Shark's 5.7 watts, suggesting more potent suction. Eureka has more Special Features and is also slightly lighter at 7.4 pounds compared to Shark's 7.76 pounds. The tangle-free brush roll feature is a definite convenience plus. Eureka's "portable" designation and better best-seller rank in stick vacuums are also noteworthy.

Ultimately, the choice depends on individual needs. If versatility, brand reliability, pet hair cleaning, and warranty are priorities, Shark is a solid choice. If strong suction, large capacity, portability, and tangle-free convenience are more important, Eureka is a viable alternative.

✔ Shark HS152AMZ Stick Vacuum vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The KCLASO V10 edges out the Shark HS152AMZ overall. Its cordless design grants superior freedom and maneuverability. The KCLASO is also lighter at 6.64 lbs compared to the Shark's 7.76 lbs, making it easier to carry around the house.

Suction power is another advantage for the KCLASO, boasting 45Kpa of "hurricane-force suction", offering a clearer picture of its capabilities. Its dust cup holds 500 ml, significantly larger than the Shark's 0.35 quarts (331 ml), translating to less frequent emptying. The KCLASO also uses a HEPA filter and cyclone system, providing superior filtration compared to the Shark's foam and felt filters.

In terms of runtime, the KCLASO's cordless nature gives it an edge, offering up to 50 minutes of cleaning time. Furthermore, the KCLASO comes packed with more modern features like a touchscreen, 5-stage filtration, a V-shaped brush, a self-standing design, and multiple suction modes. While both include a crevice tool, the Shark includes specific "pet" tools for pet owners, while the KCLASO includes a 2-in-1 brush tool which can be used for more than just pets.

The KCLASO V10 operates at a quieter 75 dB, compared to the Shark's 80 dB. The Shark HS152AMZ does offer a longer 5-year limited warranty which can be an important factor for some. Finally, the KCLASO's cordless design and flexible swivel head gives it a maneuverability advantage over the Shark's swivel steering.

✔ Shark HS152AMZ Stick Vacuum vs. Ciogu P2 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The Ciogu P2 consistently outperforms the Shark HS152AMZ in several key areas. Being cordless gives the Ciogu significant advantages over the Shark, offering unrestricted movement and convenience. This is further enhanced by its lighter weight of 4.5 lbs compared to the Shark's 7.76 lbs, making it easier to maneuver and carry during cleaning.

When it comes to performance, the Ciogu P2 specifies a suction power of 33Kpa in Max Mode, while the Shark's suction is only generally described as "Powerful". The Ciogu also boasts a substantial runtime of up to 45 minutes in Eco mode and 20 minutes in Max mode, exceeding the corded Shark which has no run time at all, this further proves its efficiency. Its dust cup capacity is much larger, 1 liter compared to the Shark's 0.35 quarts, which reduces the frequency of emptying. The Ciogu P2 also incorporates a more advanced HEPA filter, which traps more fine particles compared to the Shark's foam and felt filter. It also features a touch screen and LED display and maintains a noise level of 65 dB, which is quieter than the Shark's 80 dB.

The Shark HS152AMZ includes specialized pet tools like a pet crevice tool and multi-tool, making it a potentially better choice for pet owners. It also has a 5-year limited warranty, which offers greater peace of mind compared to the unstated warranty of Ciogu.

Customer ratings also favor the Ciogu P2, which has a 4.8 out of 5 stars rating with 269 ratings, against the Shark's 4.4 out of 5 stars with 5,440 ratings.

✅ Conclusion

In conclusion, the Shark HS152AMZ Corded Stick Vacuum emerges as a compelling option for users seeking a powerful, lightweight, and versatile cleaning solution. Its strong suction, particularly effective on pet hair, coupled with its maneuverability and easy-to-empty dust cup, make it a standout performer. The added convenience of features like the Zero Wrap Brushroll, LED headlights, and long cord further enhance its appeal. Given its performance and features relative to its price point, this vacuum offers excellent value, making it a worthwhile investment for maintaining a clean home.