✅ Features of Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum

The Shark Freestyle Cordless Vacuum offers cordless convenience, granting you the freedom to clean inside, outside, and even your car.

Its lightweight design, at only 7.5 lbs, makes it easily portable and versatile for various cleaning tasks.

The 2-speed brushroll is a notable feature, optimized for both carpets and hard floors, with premium pet hair pickup capabilities.

An XL dust cup with a 0.64-quart capacity allows for extended cleaning sessions without frequent emptying.

The precision charger doubles as a storage stand and fully charges the vacuum in 4 hours.

The package includes the Shark Freestyle Cordless Vacuum and the Precision Charger.

✅ What we like about Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum

This product shines in its functionality, proving effective on bare floors and great for those quick cleanups. The bonus? Some users are reporting impressive battery life.

When it comes to suction, this vacuum doesn't disappoint. It tackles hard floors and carpets with ease, effectively picking up dust and dirt.

Maneuverability is key, and this vacuum delivers. Its lightweight design makes it easy to move around and carry, adding to its overall portability.

Ease of use is another significant advantage. Customers appreciate its simple operation, convenient cordless design, and clear instructions. Plus, cleaning the dust cup is a breeze.

For quick pickups on both hard floors and carpets, this product performs admirably.

Finally, some find it offers excellent value, especially when purchased refurbished.

✅ Key specs of Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum

The Shark Navigator Freestyle Cordless Stick Vacuum boasts superior pick-up power, particularly on pet hair, and operates without a cord for enhanced convenience. It features a foam filter and comes with the vacuum itself and a charger.

Being cordless, this vacuum offers freedom of movement. Its capacity is listed as 75 pounds, a figure that likely refers to the weight it can support rather than the volume of debris it holds. It operates on 14 watts and provides a runtime of 2 hours after a 4-hour charging period.

Recommended for use on hard floors, in cars, on carpets, and throughout the home, its upright form factor and contemporary white and grey design fit seamlessly into various spaces. The model name is Shark Navigator Freestyle, with dimensions of 10.5"L x 9.6"W x 46"H.

Power comes from a 10.8V battery. Manufactured by Shark, the package contains two items. The vacuum is controlled via push button or app, and it offers two speeds, making it adaptable to different cleaning needs.

It's portable, featuring one handle and two wheels for ease of use. Designed for indoor use, the UPC is 723548662904 and its item weight is 7.5 pounds. The ASIN is B07QF185D6 and the model number is SV1106. It requires one lithium-ion battery, which is included.

Customer reviews average 4.1 out of 5 stars. It holds several ranks on Amazon, including #604 in Amazon Renewed and #76 in Upright Vacuum Cleaners. It is not discontinued by the manufacturer and is intended for both hard floor and carpet use.

The vacuum is certified frustration-free. It comes with a 90-day limited warranty and the battery type is 10.8V Battery Included. While listed as Made in USA, this detail might require verification.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Shark SV1106 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Both vacuums offer similar cordless convenience, brushroll speeds, dust cup capacities (0.64 quarts), and charging mechanisms with precision chargers and a 4-hour charging time, resulting in a tie for those features.

However, the first product stands out with its "Superior pick-up power on pet hair", a more specific benefit than the second product's "Portable, Lightweight, Bagless" description. Conversely, the second product features washable foam filters, a more convenient and cost-effective option than the first product's unspecified "Foam" filter.

In terms of power, the second product boasts a significantly higher wattage of 125 compared to the first's 14, suggesting more powerful suction. But the first product compensates with a much longer runtime of 2 hours compared to the second's 17 minutes.

The second product has 4.2 stars with 23,494 ratings, a slightly better average rating and a vastly larger number of ratings, suggesting broader satisfaction compared to the first product's 4.1 stars with 493 ratings. Despite this, the first product has a better Best Seller Rank in Home & Kitchen (#604 vs. #5,061), indicating more sales and popularity within that specific category. The first product is also made in the USA, which could be a preference for some.

The products both include the Shark Navigator Cordless Stick Vacuum & Charger, 10.8V Battery, Push Button controller type, App control method and similar contemporary styles resulting in a tie. The second product has Bluetooth, Infrared connectivity which is extra technology that the first product doesn't have. The second product requires no assembly which some consumers may prefer, in addition to having a better warranty coverage than the first one.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NES210 Stick Vacuum

The Shark SV1106 edges out the Eureka NES210 in cordless convenience, offering untethered freedom. However, the Eureka counters with a significantly lighter weight of 3.97 pounds compared to the Shark's 7.5 pounds, making it easier to handle, especially in handheld mode. Dust cup capacity slightly favors the Shark at 0.64 quarts, allowing for less frequent emptying compared to the Eureka's 0.6 liters.

While the Shark boasts a mere 14 watts, the Eureka unleashes a powerful 240 watts. The Shark, being cordless, delivers a commendable 2-hour runtime. Charging time is applicable only to the Shark, requiring 4 hours. The Eureka takes the lead with its HEPA filter, offering superior allergen capture compared to the Shark's foam filter. Swivel steering gives the Eureka an edge in maneuverability, allowing it to navigate around furniture with greater ease.

The Shark is recommended for a broader range of surfaces, including hard floors, cars, carpets, and homes. The Eureka, being a 3-in-1 vacuum (handheld, stick, and upright), provides greater versatility. Though price points are not explicitly provided, the Eureka could be the victor if budget is a primary concern. For homes with pets, the Shark's superior pet hair pickup gives it a significant advantage.

The Eureka's 18-foot power cord allows for extended reach without needing to change outlets. Both vacuums share an average customer rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars. However, the Eureka commands attention with a massive 110,015 ratings. Finally, the Eureka’s one-year limited warranty is a reassuring contrast to the Shark's limited 90-day warranty.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEU182A Upright Vacuum

The Shark SV1106 cordless vacuum edges out the Eureka NEU182A in some key areas. Cordless operation provides unmatched convenience and maneuverability. Its lighter weight (7.5 lbs vs 10 lbs) makes it easier to carry and use overhead. The Shark also claims superior pet hair pickup and has better dimensions to ensure it is easier to store. Finally, it seems to be the best seller vacuum.

However, the Eureka NEU182A counters with a significantly larger dust cup capacity (2.7 quarts vs 0.64 quarts), meaning less frequent emptying. It boasts a much higher wattage (960 watts vs 14 watts), suggesting greater suction power. This product also comes with a one year battery life, while the SHARK details a 2 hour runtime and 4 hours charging time.

Additionally, the Eureka includes a variety of helpful accessories like a crevice tool, dusting brush, and upholstery tool and has a longer warranty (2 years vs 90 days). Special features such as wheels, a washable filter, and a bagless design add to its appeal. It also receives higher customer review scores and a much larger number of reviews, indicating greater overall customer satisfaction. Also, the Eureka has some nice features like wheels, a washable filter, and a bagless design.

The Shark and Eureka both handle carpet and hard floors equally well and have push button controls. The Shark also excels with its unknown noise level, while the Eureka's noise level is 88 dB.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEU10AE5 Upright Vacuum Cleaner

The Shark SV1106 edges out the Eureka NEU10AE5 in the cordless category, providing users with greater freedom of movement and easier maneuverability due to its slightly lighter weight of 7.5 lbs compared to the Eureka's 7.7 lbs. The Shark's compact dimensions also make it easier to store. I will also say that it boasts a two hour runtime and a four hour charge time. However, the Eureka NEU10AE5 has a significantly larger dust cup capacity (1.7 Liters) for less frequent emptying. The Eureka also has a much higher power rating of 720 Watts indicating stronger suction, as well as being suitable for carpet, hard floor and upholstery. It also has more tools included for increased versatility.

The Shark SV1106 stands out for its pet hair pickup, which is likely superior to the Eureka.

The Eureka includes a washable foam filter, a feature that is more economical and environmentally friendly. Furthermore, a significantly higher volume of positive customer reviews (4.2 out of 5 stars from 31,635 ratings) also suggest a larger customer satisfaction.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Kenmore DU1275 Upright Vacuum

The Shark SV1106 wins on cordless convenience, offering more flexibility than the corded Kenmore DU1275. Its lighter weight (7.5 lbs vs 11 lbs) also contributes to easier maneuvering and carrying. The Shark also boasts a longer runtime of 2 hours versus the Kenmore, although, this is not applicable to the corded Kenmore DU1275. The noise level for the Shark is quieter than the Kenmore DU1275.

However, the Kenmore DU1275 takes the lead in several key areas. Its dust cup capacity is significantly larger at 3 Liters, reducing the frequency of emptying. The Hair Eliminator brushroll is also more useful than the "Superior Pet Hair Pickup" claim of the Shark. The Kenmore is also more suitable for the home versus the specific floor types of the Shark. It has higher wattage and includes a Pet HandiMate, Upholstery Tool, and 3-in-1 Combination Tool, providing more versatility for different cleaning tasks.

Maneuverability is improved with Kenmore's swivel steering, and the 4 height adjustment levels allow for optimized airflow. The Kenmore's longer 1-year warranty provides more peace of mind compared to the Shark's 90-day warranty. The Kenmore also has better customer satisfaction.

The final decision point is the price. If the Shark is significantly cheaper due to its potential renewed status, it might be a better value for budget-conscious consumers. The Kenmore wins in overall footprint and storage with smaller dimensions.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Kenmore DS1020 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Both the Shark SV1106 and Kenmore DS1020 are cordless and from well-known brands, making that aspect a tie. Weight is a factor, and the Kenmore edges out the Shark at 6.86 lbs versus 7.5 lbs, potentially making it easier to maneuver. Dust cup capacity is nearly identical, with the Shark having a very slight advantage at 0.64 quarts compared to the Kenmore's 0.6 liters.

However, runtime is a significant win for the Shark, boasting a 2-hour runtime compared to the Kenmore's 30 minutes in Eco Mode. The Shark also charges faster, taking 4 hours compared to the Kenmore's 5 hours. Both vacuums offer two speeds and claim to be effective at pet hair pickup, resulting in a tie.

Battery voltage is higher on the Kenmore at 16V compared to the Shark's 10.8V, which could mean better initial suction. The Kenmore also includes a combination dusting brush/crevice tool for added versatility, while the Shark only offers a charger/storage stand. Customer ratings favor the Kenmore slightly, with a 4.2 out of 5 stars from over 4,000 ratings, versus the Shark's 4.1 out of 5 stars from nearly 500 ratings, indicating greater satisfaction.

Comparing the wattage is tricky due to the different units provided. The Shark lists 14 watts, while the Kenmore lists 28.8 Watt-hours. Wattage indicates instantaneous power draw while Watt-hours indicate energy storage capacity. Looking at the Amazon Best Seller Rank, the Shark SV1106 does better than Kenmore DS1020. Both the models are portable, marking a tie.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NES520BL Stick Vacuum

The Shark SV1106 wins on the cordless front, offering users more freedom than the corded Eureka NES520BL. However, the Eureka takes the lead in weight, being lighter at 6.3 lbs compared to the Shark's 7.5 lbs, making it easier to maneuver. The Eureka also boasts a larger dust cup capacity, 1 Liter to the Shark's 0.64 quarts, meaning less frequent emptying.

When it comes to pet hair, the Shark pulls ahead, explicitly stating "Superior pick-up power". The Shark also wins when it comes to runtime as it is cordless. The Eureka on the other hand, requires no charging because it is corded.

The Shark appears more versatile with recommended uses including hard floor, car, carpet, and home, while the Eureka is only recommended for hard floors. The Eureka pulls ahead again because the "Accessory Kit" suggests a wider range of tools beyond just a charger. Plus, it includes headlights, which are absent on the Shark, improving visibility during cleaning.

Customer ratings also favor the Eureka, with a 4.4/5 compared to the Shark's 4.1/5. The Eureka also wins in wattage, with a much higher 500W compared to the Shark's 14W, suggesting more power. Both vacuums utilize a Foam filter, resulting in a tie in that category. Finally, the Shark, with dimensions of 10.5"L x 9.6"W x 46"H, might be easier to maneuver than the Eureka at 14.3"L x 5.1"W x 30.7"H, thanks to its smaller width and depth.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Prisvacs BW232 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Let's analyze the Shark SV1106 and Prisvacs BW232 cordless vacuums. Both emphasize cordless convenience, resulting in a tie for that feature. However, the Prisvacs BW232 takes the lead in weight, being significantly lighter at 4.4 lbs compared to the Shark's 7.5 lbs, making it easier to maneuver.

Suction power is another win for the Prisvacs, boasting a specific 25 Kpa rating, which offers more clarity than the Shark's implicit claim of "powerful." The Prisvacs also features a superior brushroll design with its V-shaped, anti-tangle brush and LED lights, making it especially suitable for pet owners and improving visibility in darker areas.

The Shark SV1106 bounces back with a larger dust cup capacity of 0.64 quarts compared to the Prisvacs' 0.37 quarts, allowing for longer cleaning sessions. It also boasts a significantly longer runtime of 2 hours against the Prisvacs' 35 minutes.

Conversely, the Prisvacs shines with a faster charging time of 2.5 hours compared to the Shark's 4 hours. Its HEPA filter is also generally considered superior for capturing fine particles and allergens. Moreover, the Prisvacs' self-standing design proves more practical for everyday use than the Shark's superior pick-up power on pet hair.

The Shark provides clearer information on battery voltage, at 10.8V. It also has significantly more customer reviews (493) compared to the Prisvacs (158), which could indicate more people have had experience with the product. The Shark's overall rating is also slightly better, at 4.1/5 compared to the Prisvacs' 4.0/5.

Finally, the Prisvacs showcases a higher wattage of 250 watts compared to the Shark's 14 watts, generally indicating a more powerful motor. The Prisvacs also provides specific information regarding its noise level, registering at 75 dB, while this information is unavailable for the Shark.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC285GR Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Shark SV1106 and Eureka NEC285GR both offer cordless convenience, resulting in a tie for this feature. However, the Eureka NEC285GR takes the lead in weight, being lighter at 5.3 lbs compared to the Shark's 7.5 lbs, making it easier to maneuver.

Brushroll speeds result in another tie. The Shark has a 2-Speed Brushroll optimized for both carpets and hard floors and provides premium pet hair pickup throughout the home while the Eureka RapidClean Pro cordless vacuum allows to effortlessly switch between three modes with fingertip control, while light beams illuminates hard-to-see dust and allows for better cleaning.

The Shark SV1106 edges out the Eureka in dust cup capacity with 0.64 quarts versus approximately 0.63 quarts, meaning less frequent emptying. When it comes to runtime, the Shark significantly outperforms the Eureka, offering 2 hours compared to the Eureka's 40 minutes.

The Eureka NEC285GR counters with a much higher wattage of 250 watts compared to the Shark's 14 watts, suggesting potentially stronger suction. Furthermore, the Eureka boasts a superior 5-stage filtration system compared to the Shark's foam filter, trapping finer particles. The Eureka NEC285GR also wins in additional features with LED Headlight, Easy Rest Feature, and Under Furniture cleaning over the Shark's Precision Charger/Storage Stand.

The Eureka NEC285GR gets another win in customer ratings. It boasts 4.2 out of 5 stars from 1,961 ratings, exceeding the Shark's 4.1 stars from 493 ratings, indicating broader satisfaction. While price is unavailable, making the comparison incomplete, the Shark SV1106 wins on specific use recommendations, catering to hard floors, cars, carpets, and homes, offering a greater range of surface options than the Eureka's hard floor, carpet and dual action specifictions.

✔ Shark SV1106 Upright Stick Vacuum vs. Vexilar V8PRO Cordless Stick Vacuum

Shark's SV1106 edges out Vexilar's V8PRO in brand recognition, holding a stronger position in the vacuum cleaner market. This is further complemented by the Shark's focus on pet hair pick-up, a specialized feature, along with a notably longer runtime of 2 hours compared to Vexilar's 35 minutes. Furthermore, Shark can hold slightly more, with a capacity of 0.64 quarts versus Vexilar's 500 milliliters. Finally, the Shark offers a warranty.

However, the Vexilar V8PRO presents several compelling advantages. Its HEPA filter surpasses the Shark's foam filter in capturing fine particles and allergens. The inclusion of an accessory kit adds versatility to the Vexilar. The Vexilar is slightly more powerful, at 15 watts compared to the Shark's 14 watts.

Regarding convenience, the Vexilar is smaller in dimensions, uses a superior Lithium-Ion battery, and operates at a quieter noise level of 70 dB. It is also negligibly lighter. Customer reviews favor the Vexilar, showcasing a rating of 4.3 out of 5 stars with a larger sample size of 704 ratings. While Shark holds a better Best Sellers Rank, the number of batteries is a huge advantage for Vexilar, as these can be switched out.

✅ Conclusion

The Shark Freestyle Cordless Vacuum presents a compelling option for those seeking a lightweight and versatile cleaning solution. Its cordless design, coupled with effective suction and a 2-speed brushroll, make it well-suited for quick cleanups on both hard floors and carpets. While the specifications list a somewhat ambiguous "75-pound capacity," the vacuum's actual performance, coupled with its impressive battery life reported by some users, makes it a practical choice for everyday use. The added convenience of the precision charger/storage stand and its maneuverability further solidify its appeal, especially for those prioritizing ease of use and portability in their cleaning tools.