✅ Features of Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum

This vacuum cleaner aims to deliver the power and cleaning performance equivalent to a full-size vacuum, based on tests comparing it to the ZU630 model in Boost mode. Its removable battery provides up to 60 minutes of runtime when used as a hand vacuum in ECO mode.

The DuoClean PowerFins system is a key feature. A soft front roller helps pull in particles, while the PowerFins are designed to maintain constant contact with surfaces, aiming for more efficient pickup than the original DuoClean system. Moreover, the self-cleaning brushroll is a welcome addition, promising effective pet hair removal without annoying hair wrap issues.

The IQ Display offers real-time information about runtime and performance. MultiFLEX technology enhances flexibility, allowing for cleaning in difficult-to-reach areas, and offers a convenient freestanding storage solution. The vacuum can be converted into a hand vac for lighter cleaning tasks above the floor.

HEPA filtration is included to capture dust, dander, and allergens. LED headlights help to illuminate hidden debris. The removable dust cup features a CleanTouch Dirt Ejector for convenient emptying.

✅ What we like about Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum

This product really shines in its functionality. It works well on various floor types, although some users found it less effective in kitchens and bathrooms. The power is impressive, and the ease of use makes it a worthwhile purchase for the price.

The suction is a standout feature, effectively picking up small debris. The two suction types cater to both hard floors and carpets, and the lightweight design adds to its portability. A boost setting is also available for extra power.

Cleaning is made simple with the easy-to-empty dirt bin. It efficiently tackles pet hair and other debris, and its ability to vacuum under furniture without pivoting is a definite plus. Many users were impressed by its capacity to pick up even fine dust.

Ease of use is another key advantage. Assembly is straightforward, and the controls are clearly labeled. The lightweight design contributes to its user-friendliness, making cleaning less of a chore and even enjoyable for some. The included attachments further enhance its versatility.

Battery life seems sufficient for most users, lasting at least 30 minutes on the normal setting. The charge length is also adequate.

The lightweight design is a major benefit, making it easy to carry and maneuver. It doesn't strain the back and can easily reach under couches and side tables.

The anti-hair tangling feature is particularly effective at preventing hair from wrapping around the brush bar, saving time and effort. The pivot hinge is also appreciated for its ability to easily access those hard-to-reach areas under furniture.

The availability of replacement parts is a significant advantage, making repairs more cost-effective than replacing the entire unit if something breaks. The included warranty provides added peace of mind. Finally, the product is easy to store, which is a plus for those with limited space.

✅ Key specs of Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Shark Vertex Pro is a cordless stick vacuum designed for indoor use. It boasts a lightweight and foldable design with wheels for easy maneuverability. This model, the IZ662H, is finished in a black and red color scheme.

It's equipped with a foam filter and comes with several attachments, including an anti-allergen dusting brush, a crevice tool, and a pet multi-tool. Being cordless, it operates on a lithium-ion battery offering a runtime of approximately 60 minutes with a charging time of also 60 minutes.

It features a 1-quart capacity and consumes 309 watts of power, translating to about 0.413 horsepower. Recommended for use on carpet, hard floors, and tile floors, it has a cleaning path width of 10 inches.

The vacuum includes a push-button controller, touch control method and one power level, all located on a single handle. It is also portable.

The product measures 14.7"L x 10.24"W x 46.5"H and weighs 8.82 pounds. It requires one lithium-ion battery, which is included. The product's UPC is 622356574396 and its ASIN is B098RH3LTB. This model comes with a 5-year limited warranty.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Electrolux EHVS75S1AO Cordless Stick Vacuum

Shark IZ662H and Electrolux EHVS75S1AO were analyzed based on various features. Electrolux takes the lead in weight, being significantly lighter at 4.8 lbs compared to Shark's 8.82 lbs. This makes it easier to maneuver and carry. However, Shark boasts a longer runtime of 60 minutes versus Electrolux's 50 minutes, and a larger dust cup capacity of 1 quart compared to Electrolux's 0.3 liters.

In terms of power, Shark has a higher wattage of 309 Watts compared to Electrolux's 250 Watts. Charging time is also much faster with Shark, taking only 60 minutes compared to Electrolux's lengthy 4.5 hours. Both vacuums use a foam filter, but Shark's HEPA filtration system, specifically designed to capture dust, dander, and allergens, edges out Electrolux's 5-step system. Shark also has a versatile Foldable special feature that supports storage and cleaning.

The Shark's DuoClean PowerFins brushroll technology is designed for superior multi-surface cleaning, with the self-cleaning brushroll adding convenience. Electrolux offers more power levels/speeds, with 4 compared to Shark's single speed, offering more control to the user. Electrolux is quieter at 80 dB.

Customer ratings favor the Shark, with a 4.1 out of 5 stars from a large sample size of 6,265 ratings, compared to Electrolux's 3.9 out of 5 stars from 124 ratings. Electrolux incorporates 43% recycled plastic, making it more environmentally friendly. Shark provides a more comprehensive warranty with a 5-year limited coverage.

✔ Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. SMOTURE VAC01 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

In this comparison of the Shark IZ662H and the SMOTURE VAC01 cordless stick vacuums, several key differences emerge. Brand recognition favors Shark, a well-established name. However, when it comes to raw power, the SMOTURE boasts a clearly defined 45KPA suction, while the Shark makes claims of full-size vacuum power without specifics. Further supporting the SMOTURE's power argument is its higher wattage of 550W compared to the Shark's 309W.

Both vacuums offer a runtime of up to 60 minutes, resulting in a tie. However, the Shark takes a considerably shorter 60 minutes to charge, while the SMOTURE requires a lengthy 4 hours. The SMOTURE compensates with a larger capacity (1.5 Liters) compared to the Shark's 1 Quart. In terms of filtration, the SMOTURE's multi-layer system seems more advanced.

Special features are subjective. The Shark focuses on cleaning performance with DuoClean PowerFins and a self-cleaning brushroll, while the SMOTURE prioritizes convenience with a self-standing design and aromatherapy tablets. The SMOTURE also wins out in included components, offering a wider array of accessories.

Weight is another advantage for the SMOTURE, at a lighter 6 lbs versus the Shark's 8.82 lbs. Customer reviews also favor the SMOTURE, with a 4.7-star average compared to the Shark's 4.1. In contrast, the Shark offers a longer 5-year limited warranty, while the SMOTURE provides a 2-year protection plan.

Additional convenience features like the SMOTURE's self-standing design, lower noise level of 64 dB, adjustable suction levels, and wall mount option further tip the scales in its favor. The Shark however, is specifically designed for pet owners. The price is unavailable.

✔ Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Trucozie T350 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Shark wins on brand reputation, being a well-established name in the vacuum cleaner industry. Price is a tie because no price data was provided.

The Trucozie edges out the Shark in weight, being significantly lighter at 6 pounds compared to the Shark's 8.82 pounds. The Shark, however, boasts a longer runtime of up to 60 minutes versus the Trucozie's 45 minutes, and a much faster charging time.

Regarding capacity, the Shark's dust cup holds 1 quart (0.95 Liters), surpassing the Trucozie's 0.6 Liters. The Shark also has a higher wattage at 309 watts compared to Trucozie's 150 watts.

Filtration favors the Trucozie with its 5-stage metal and HEPA filtration system. The Shark takes the lead in brushroll technology with its DuoClean PowerFins, which are self-cleaning and effective on various floor types.

The Shark's IQ Display, offering real-time readouts, is superior to the Trucozie's LED display. However, the Trucozie scores higher in special features with its 8-in-1 multifunctionality and multiple suction modes, offering more versatility than the Shark's MultiFLEX technology.

The Trucozie includes more additional components, such as an extra HEPA filter and a wall hanger. The Shark provides a longer warranty of 5 years. Customer ratings are slightly higher for the Trucozie, with a 4.4 out of 5 stars rating compared to the Shark's 4.1.

Both vacuums are portable, resulting in a tie. The Trucozie offers three speeds, giving it an edge over the Shark. Both use lithium-ion batteries. The Trucozie's noise level is listed at 75 dB.

✔ Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. Eureka NEC490BL Cordless Stick Vacuum

When comparing the Shark IZ662H and the Eureka NEC490BL stick vacuums, several factors stand out. Brand preference is subjective. The Shark claims to have the performance of a full-size vacuum, testing it against similar products and giving it an edge in suction power. Eureka has a HEPA filter and headlight which are useful.

Regarding filtration, Eureka wins with its HEPA filter, superior for allergen removal. However, Shark's included "Pet Multi-Tool" is a big selling point for pet owners. Eureka takes the lead in capacity with a much larger 2.5-liter dustbin compared to Shark's 1 quart. Eureka also has a higher wattage motor.

Shark matches the maximum runtime of the Eureka, and is able to maintain suction levels. Shark wins with its faster charging time. Both vacuums are suitable for various floor types, and both are stick vacuums.

Eureka's self-empty station technology for hands-free cleaning. The Shark is more compact and significantly lighter, making it easier to maneuver.

Customer reviews slightly favor the Eureka, although the Shark has many more reviews. The Eureka also has a better best seller ranking.

The Shark offers a significantly longer warranty period. Other useful features include the Shark's LED headlights, while the Eureka features 5-layer Filtration. The price is essential to a final decision but is not provided.

✔ Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. AZVKEA S17 Cordless Stick Vacuum Cleaner

The AZVKEA S17 boasts superior suction power with a measured 45KPa, compared to the Shark IZ662H's vague claim of "Power of Full-Size." AZVKEA also wins in motor horsepower, packing 0.737 compared to Shark's 0.413. Runtime is a tie, as both offer up to 60 minutes, albeit in different power modes (ECO for Shark, Min for AZVKEA). However, the Shark IZ662H regains ground with its remarkably faster charging time of just 60 minutes, while the AZVKEA S17 requires a full 4 hours.

Brushroll design is a draw, with Shark's proven DuoClean PowerFins and Self-Cleaning design meeting AZVKEA's self-developed and upgraded V-Shaped Anti-Tangle brush. Filtration is where the AZVKEA S17 pulls ahead again, featuring an 8-stage cyclonic system with HEPA filtration, offering more thorough air purification. The AZVKEA S17's larger dust cup capacity of 1.6 liters also edges out the Shark's 0.95 liters, meaning less frequent emptying.

The AZVKEA S17's lighter weight, at 6.99 pounds versus the Shark's 8.82 pounds, makes it easier to maneuver. Special features are a matter of preference, as the Shark offers MultiFLEX and an IQ Display, while the AZVKEA has a Dual-Handheld design and aromatherapy tablet compatibility. However, AZVKEA wins out on included accessories, offering a more comprehensive set.

Customer ratings favor the AZVKEA S17 with a 4.6 out of 5 stars, compared to the Shark's 4.1, although the AZVKEA rating is based on fewer reviews. The Shark IZ662H redeems itself with its 5-year limited warranty, compared to AZVKEA's 7 x 24 service. Lastly, certain features are tied with LED headlights, leaning design and removable battery. Whether leaning design is better than Removable battery and CleanTouch Dirt Ejector is user preference.

✔ Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

Shark, a more established brand in the vacuum market, takes the lead in brand recognition. However, the dsorupa V10 Ultra boasts a stated suction power of 45 KPa, granting it an advantage over the Shark IZ662H, where the suction power is implied. The dsorupa also wins in wattage (550W vs 309W) and motor horsepower (0.74 HP vs 0.413 HP). Further extending its lead, the dsorupa offers a longer runtime of up to 70 minutes, compared to Shark's 60 minutes.

While the dsorupa excels in runtime, the Shark IZ662H offers a significantly faster charging time of 60 minutes. However, the dsorupa compensates with a larger dust cup capacity of 1.8 Liters, reducing the frequency of emptying. Its 8-stage filtration system may also prove more effective than the Shark's HEPA filter.

The Shark's DuoClean PowerFins brushroll has a self-cleaning capability, a great feature that could come in handy in homes with pets. That feature is missing in the dsorupa. However, the dsorupa's OLED display provides more information, including suction mode, remaining power, dust cup fullness, and filter clogging reminders. In terms of extra features, the aromatherapy tablet and ultra-quiet mode give the dsorupa an edge in user experience.

Weighing in slightly lighter at 8 lbs, the dsorupa is also more compact in dimensions. Customer reviews further favor the dsorupa with a 4.9 out of 5 stars rating, and a higher Best Seller Rank on Amazon (#26 vs #114). The Shark IZ662H is Foldable while the dsorupa is not. The Shark has 5 year limited warranty.

✔ Shark IZ662H Cordless Stick Vacuum vs. SMOTURE VAC02 Cordless Stick Vacuum

Shark wins in Brand Reputation due to its well-established name and recognition for quality in the vacuum cleaner industry, surpassing the lesser-known SMOTURE brand.

Regarding suction power, SMOTURE takes the lead with a specified 45Kpa, suggesting more powerful cleaning compared to the Shark's vague description. SMOTURE also edges out the Shark in Motor Power, boasting 550 Watts against the Shark's 309 Watts.

Runtime is a tie, as both vacuums offer up to 60 minutes. The SMOTURE also wins in Dust Cup Capacity, holding approximately 1.58 quarts versus the Shark's 1 quart.

The Shark's Special Features are generally more innovative and useful, particularly the DuoClean PowerFins and Self-Cleaning Brushroll. Filter Type is a tie, both provide HEPA filtration.

SMOTURE pulls ahead in Included Components, offering an extra filter, a wall-mounted charging dock, and an anti-tangle roller, which are valuable additions.

Form Factor is a tie, with both being stick vacuums. Regarding Weight, the Shark is more likely to be more reliable since the smoture item weight is incorrect.

Customer Reviews favor SMOTURE, with a 4.8-star rating (from 318 ratings) compared to the Shark's 4.1-star rating (from 6,265 ratings). The SMOTURE is more affordable.

The Shark wins with its Warranty, providing a 5-year limited warranty, while SMOTURE offers 24 months of protection.

✅ Conclusion

The Shark Vertex Pro IZ662H emerges as a compelling cordless stick vacuum, successfully blending power, convenience, and versatility. Its ability to mimic the performance of a full-sized vacuum, coupled with its impressive suction, ease of use, and thoughtful features like the DuoClean PowerFins and self-cleaning brushroll, make it a strong contender for those seeking a powerful and adaptable cleaning solution. The extended runtime, lightweight design, and convenient storage further solidify its appeal. While some users may find it less effective on certain kitchen or bathroom surfaces, the overall package offers a compelling value proposition, especially considering the included attachments, warranty, and availability of replacement parts.