✅ Features of Shark HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum

PowerFins provide continuous cleaning contact, digging deep into carpets and directly engaging hard floors. The No Hair Wrap feature picks up more hair compared to Shark bristle brushrolls, preventing hair from wrapping around the brush.

The vacuum boasts an ultra-lightweight design, with powerful suction packed into a hand vacuum that weighs less than 3 lbs. A self-cleaning brushroll is included for effective pet hair pickup without hair wrap issues.

The unit includes a removable dust cup for convenient emptying. LED headlights on the nozzle illuminate hidden debris and pet hair, while a low-profile design allows for easy cleaning under furniture.

Advanced Swivel Steering enables excellent maneuverability. A precision handheld vacuum features a tapered design for cleaning tight spaces.

The product comes with several included accessories: the HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum, a Crevice Tool, an Upholstery Tool, a Pet Power Brush, and an Onboard Storage Clip.

✅ What we like about Shark HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum

The suction power of this vacuum is a major plus. It tackles dust, dirt, cobwebs, and general debris with ease on surfaces ranging from shelves and walls to carpets and floors. Many users appreciate it for quick clean-ups.

Ease of use is another highlight. It's reportedly easy to maneuver, particularly beneficial for those with back problems. The hand-held unit is convenient, and emptying the canister is a simple process.

Pet owners will be pleased to know that this vacuum effectively removes cat and dog hair from carpets and other surfaces.

The lightweight design is a common point of praise, making it easy to carry around the house and up and down stairs.

The vacuum's functionality receives mixed reviews, with some finding it works well on both floors and stairs. The self-cleaning brush roll is also effective at cleaning both rugs and bare floors well.

For the corded model, the long cord is a valuable feature, allowing for extended cleaning without the constant need to find a new outlet. And some believe it offers good value, given the price.

Finally, several users appreciate the dirt cup design, specifically the dual-section feature. This helps separate smaller particles from larger items like Legos or coins, making it easy to retrieve accidentally vacuumed-up objects.

✅ Key specs of Shark HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum

The Shark UltraLight Pet Pro Corded Stick Vacuum, in a striking Comet Red, boasts several special features including PowerFins, a Self-Cleaning Brushroll, LED Headlights, and a Low-Profile Design. Filtration is handled by a Foam and Felt filter system. Inside the box you will find an Upholstery Tool, Pet Power Brush, Onboard Storage Clip, and a Crevice Tool which will assist you in your cleaning tasks.

This is not a cordless vacuum. It has a capacity of 0.35 Quarts and a wattage of 6.8E+2. The hose length is 0.76 Feet, and it is recommended for carpet cleaning. The form factor is a Stick vacuum.

It has dimensions of 10.24"L x 8.46"W x 48.43"H and produces a noise level of 80 dB. The controller type is a Push Button, and the control method is Touch. The vacuum has a motor horsepower of 0.91 and operates with one Power Level. The Series Number is 6, and it's intended for Indoor usage.

With a cleaning path width of 8.58 Inches, this vacuum is portable and has a UPC of 622356569842. It weighs 8.05 pounds and has an ASIN of B08R118GZM and the item model number is HZ602. The style is PowerFins & Self-Cleaning Brushroll. It comes with 5 pieces and requires no assembly. It has 4.2 out of 5 stars with 827 ratings.

This vacuum holds a spot at #298,831 in Home & Kitchen and #423 in Stick Vacuums & Electric Brooms. Lastly, it comes with a 5-year limited warranty and does not require batteries.

✅ Comparison to similar models

✔ Shark HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. Shark HV343AMZ Stick Vacuum

Alright, let's break down the Shark HZ602 UltraLight Pet Pro Corded Stick Vacuum versus the Shark HV343AMZ Rocket Corded Stick Vacuum.

First, both vacuums feature self-cleaning brushrolls, so neither wins out in terms of hair wrap prevention. The HZ602 is lighter, weighing in at 8.05 lbs compared to the HV343AMZ's 9.2 lbs, making it easier to maneuver.

However, the HV343AMZ boasts a larger dust cup capacity at 0.68 quarts, surpassing the HZ602's 0.35 quarts, meaning less frequent emptying. The HZ602 packs more of a punch with 680 watts compared to the HV343AMZ's 500 watts, which could translate to stronger suction.

In terms of included components, the HZ602 comes with a crevice tool, upholstery tool, pet power brush, and an onboard storage clip, offering more accessories than the HV343AMZ, which only includes a crevice tool and upholstery tool. The HV343AMZ is slightly more compact with dimensions of 13.4" x 10.24" x 47.3" against the HZ602's 10.24" x 8.46" x 48.43", due to a lower profile.

The HV343AMZ is clearly the better seller, ranked at #1,087 in Home & Kitchen compared to the HZ602's #298,831. Customer reviews also favor the HV343AMZ, with a 4.4-star rating from a massive 23,983 ratings, dwarfing the HZ602's 4.2-star rating from 827 ratings, suggesting greater customer satisfaction.

Finally, the HV343AMZ offers broader usability, recommended for carpet, hard floors, and bare floors, while the HZ602 is specifically recommended for carpet. The features are fairly comparable; both have LED headlights and a low-profile design. The HZ602 has PowerFins, while the HV343AMZ offers the added convenience of converting to a hand vacuum.

✔ Shark HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. Trucozie T350 Cordless Stick Vacuum

The Trucozie T350 clearly outperforms the Shark HZ602 in several key areas. Its cordless design offers unmatched freedom, and its lighter weight enhances maneuverability during cleaning. Furthermore, the Trucozie boasts a larger dust cup capacity, allowing for extended cleaning sessions without frequent emptying. The runtime of up to 45 minutes of Trucozie compared to the corded Shark is a significant advantage.

The Trucozie also comes out on top in filtration and special features. The HEPA filter provides superior air purification compared to the Shark's foam and felt filters. The Trucozie has various modes and a LED Display. And the array of included accessories makes it a more versatile cleaning tool.

While the Shark HZ602 has a higher wattage, potentially indicating stronger suction, the Trucozie T350 compensates with a quieter operation and equal proficiency in pet hair pickup, thanks to its V-Shape De-Tangle Floor Brush. Customer ratings also slightly favor the Trucozie.

The choice depends on individual priorities, it's important to note that the Shark HZ602 does excel with its powerful 680W while the Trucozie only offers 150W. But the Trucozie is the better option when it comes to user experience, convenience, and comprehensive cleaning capabilities. The dimensions comparison is very subjective as it will vary person to person.

✔ Shark HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. JELLYPIG Pure 01 Cordless Vacuum

The JELLYPIG Pure 01 edges out the SHARK HZ602 as the superior vacuum. The cordless design offers unparalleled freedom compared to the corded SHARK. Further solidifying its lead, the JELLYPIG boasts a significantly higher suction power at 45Kpa. Run time isn't an issue for the corded SHARK, but the JELLYPIG's 60-minute Eco Mode offers considerable cleaning time.

Both vacuums address hair tangling with their respective brushroll technologies, resulting in a tie. However, the JELLYPIG takes a definitive lead with its much larger 1.5-liter dust cup, reducing the frequency of emptying. The JELLYPIG's 7-layer filtration system, complete with a HEPA filter, surpasses the SHARK's foam and felt filtration for superior air purification. The JELLYPIG is also the lighter vacuum at 6 pounds, making it easier to maneuver. With a noise level of 65 dB compared to the SHARK's 80 dB, the JELLYPIG is also quieter.

Special features are subjective, leading to a tie. The SHARK offers LED headlights and a low-profile design, while the JELLYPIG includes an aromatherapy tablet. The JELLYPIG excels in its included accessories, offering a more comprehensive range of specialized tools.

The SHARK wins in the wattage category at 680W, potentially indicating a more powerful motor than the JELLYPIG's 450W. Pricing is unknown, leading to a tie in that area. Customer satisfaction leans toward the JELLYPIG, with a rating of 4.6 out of 5 stars versus the SHARK's 4.2. The SHARK compensates by offering a 5-year limited warranty, while the JELLYPIG's warranty is unspecified. Both vacuums are portable, resulting in a tie.

✔ Shark HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. dsorupa V10 Ultra Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The Dsorupa V10 Ultra edges out the Shark HZ602 primarily due to its cordless design, offering superior freedom of movement compared to the corded Shark. While the Shark boasts a higher wattage (680W) suggesting potentially stronger suction compared to Dsorupa's 550W, the overall package of the Dsorupa appears more compelling.

The Dsorupa's 70-minute runtime on its minimum setting provides ample cleaning time, something a corded vacuum inherently doesn't need to address. Furthermore, its 1.8-liter dust cup dwarfs the Shark's meager 0.35 quarts, meaning less frequent emptying.

Although both vacuums are similarly weighted (8.05 lbs for Shark vs 8 lbs for Dsorupa), the Dsorupa wins in filtration with a HEPA filter, which is far more effective at trapping fine particles and allergens than the Shark's foam and felt filter.

Dsorupa's features are more numerous, including 45KPA powerful suction, anti-tangle brush, built-in aromatherapy tablet, LED display, quiet mode, and an 8-layer filter system. The Shark counters with PowerFins, a self-cleaning brushroll, LED headlights, and a low-profile design. Both provide unique maneuverability.

Customer satisfaction appears higher for the Dsorupa, with a 4.9-star rating (from 455 reviews) compared to the Shark's 4.2 stars (from 827 ratings). And Dsorupa also operates at a quieter 64dB, versus the louder 80dB of Shark.

✔ Shark HZ602 Corded Stick Vacuum vs. KCLASO V10 Cordless Vacuum Cleaner

The KCLASO V10 edges out the SHARK HZ602 due to its cordless design, providing greater freedom and convenience during cleaning. While the suction power of the SHARK is not explicitly stated, the KCLASO V10 boasts an impressive 45 KPa, a clear advantage. The KCLASO V10 is also lighter, weighing in at 6.64 pounds compared to the SHARK's 8.05 pounds, making it easier to maneuver for extended periods.

The KCLASO V10's dust cup capacity of 500 ml surpasses the SHARK's 0.35 quarts (approximately 331 ml), reducing the frequency of emptying. Furthermore, the KCLASO V10 utilizes a HEPA filter system with stainless steel and sponge filters, generally considered superior for trapping fine particles and allergens compared to the SHARK's foam and felt filter. The KCLASO V10 offers a more compelling array of features including a self-standing design, bendable brush head, and a 50-minute runtime.

With a runtime of up to 50 minutes, the KCLASO V10 provides more cleaning coverage than the corded SHARK HZ602. The KCLASO V10 also operates at a lower noise level of 75 dB compared to the SHARK's 80 dB, contributing to a more comfortable cleaning experience. The KCLASO V10 offers slightly more attachments for versatile cleaning tasks. Customer reviews also favor the KCLASO V10, with an average rating of 4.7 out of 5 stars compared to the SHARK's 4.2.

Maneuverability appears to be better on the KCLASO V10, offering flexible swivel head (180° sideways, 90° up/down). Although the SHARK HZ602 has a stronger motor at 680 Watts versus the KCLASO V10's 550 Watts, the KCLASO reports a strong 45Kpa suction, so in reality it may be stronger.

✅ Conclusion

The Shark UltraLight Pet Pro HZ602, in its Comet Red finish, presents a compelling option for those seeking a lightweight and maneuverable cleaning solution. Its strong suction and specialized PowerFins technology excel at removing dirt, debris, and pet hair from various surfaces. The self-cleaning brushroll is a particularly valuable asset, preventing hair wrap and simplifying maintenance. While corded, the long cord offers ample reach for extended cleaning sessions. The included attachments further enhance its versatility, making it suitable for detailed cleaning tasks. The dual-section dust cup design is a thoughtful touch that separates larger objects. Despite its robust performance, the vacuum's noise level may be a consideration for some users. Overall, the HZ602 is a solid choice for those prioritizing convenience, power, and effective pet hair removal in a lightweight, corded stick vacuum. Its solid ratings and 5-year limited warranty further enhance its appeal.